We have a choice in our world, either to follow obscure Omerta. Silence is violence functioning, or being infinitely aware in a be-aware concept, in a sort of way.  Being aware is kind of like courtesy.  It is a loving, caring, sharing, giving, forgiving, and genuinely kind condition that strives to bring about conditions of comfort, joy, love, hope, faith, unity, equity, justice, and sustainable, striving happiness.   Being aware of infinite awareness has to do with the potential to share information, data, and cumulative knowledge so that we can create wisdom for each of us and all of us, everyone, everything, everywhere on earth.   Being aware allows you to learn, explore, discover, and experience everything about planet Earth, as much as you want to know and do.  For example, for each coordinate, there are many coincident data layers associated with it.  Each of these data layers or rasters can be used to describe all the associated characteristics at the coordinate or location you indicate. It helps ascertain what, where, when, and how something needs to be done. These coordinates help you learn everything you want to know about a specific location, as well as broader regions.  The idea is to spawn a concept called Earth Unidiversity, Earth research, explorer cycle, or we-me cycle, with a location-enabled integrated device. This helps keep things in context with everything else on Earth including where help is needed.   It has a Collection of learning and exploration points on Earth so we can navigate to them.    It is a new way to look at universities and other schools.   It turns education into a research exploration for everyone.   Instead of reading countless books, you can foster the continuance and propagation of your education vacation through exploratory research of everything on earth.  This turns life into a vacation-like research exploration while we contribute our energy towards the needs of our planet.   In fact, one way to assess the needs of our planet is to conduct research and exploration, and to log coordinates with brief descriptions.   This kind of concept immediately shares your data collection with everyone else, making them immediately aware of the point you’re trying to make.   Passing along data points as coordinates helps us learn, explore, discover, and experience all that is on planet Earth then it helps you imagine the future.   At the same time, coincidentally, it helps you be aware of things that you didn’t know already.   All of this helps you learn about your local communities, regions, Eco, regions, and planet Earth.   This is especially true when you integrate the functionality with the integrated device or any computer.   Overall, this concept is about each of us, all of us, everyone, everything, everywhere on earth, as a cycle.   It helps us live as one on planet Earth. At the same time, we celebrate our unique contributions to diversity.  So, to reiterate, it allows us to pay attention to our collective commons on earth while also allowing us to focus on our uniquely diverse life’s path, life’s purposes, life’s work, and life’s journey.  The great thing about this is that all our efforts and energy are logged, so they become monuments forever.  They can be shared with people who have similar life paths or with family members who want to understand what you did in your lifetime for future generations.   You could select similar areas your ancestors visited to understand changes that occurred over time or ecological succession.   In other words, it’s kind of like a game and a problem-solving vacation at the same time, where you contribute your lives, energy, and work to meet our planet’s needs and solve its problems, while learning and exploring as much as you can.   Sometimes they compare it to Hansel and Gretel, where you pick up various pieces of knowledge along a path that you plan out ahead of time.   Learning through research exploration is a way to learn about creativity, creation, the needs of our world, and evolution.   Overall, this helps each of us understand the context of our lives and their contributions to ourselves and to everyone and everything everywhere on earth. It also helps us understand energy allocation as well like a superorganism that want to understand and track itself in time..  In many ways, this concept replaces old-world functioning and tedious micro-management.   This broader concept is about living life to the fullest, understanding the past, the present, and the future, and understanding everyone, everything, and everywhere on earth as a cycle with each of us.   Nobody does it better than each of us and all of us together.  World without end…

We stand at a pivotal juncture, faced with a choice: to persist in disconnected observation or to embrace a transformative state of collective awareness including what needs to be done. This is more than a mere concept; it is an active principle of engagement, one that embodies courtesy, compassion, generosity, forgiveness, and genuine kindness. It is the very foundation upon which we can build conditions of comfort, joy, love, hope, faith, unity, equity, justice, and sustainable well-being for all.

At its core, this boundless awareness flourishes from the powerful potential to openly share information, diverse data, and cumulative knowledge. By doing so, we collaboratively cultivate profound wisdom that benefits every individual, forging a truly interconnected global community. Imagine a world where understanding our planet, from its most intricate details to its grandest ecological systems, is not only accessible but actively co-created and continuously enriched by each one of us. It holds the key to understand which areas need contributions and collaborations.

This vision culminates in a groundbreaking framework I call “Earth Unidiversity” – or the “Earth Research Explorer Cycle,” which we often refer to as the “we-me cycle.”(We the people of planet earth and every other level too.) This paradigm redefines education and planetary stewardship. Envision an integrated system, powered by location-enabled devices, that dynamically contextualizes every piece of information. For any given coordinate on Earth, a wealth of associated data layers – whether environmental, cultural, historical, or ecological – are immediately accessible and profoundly interconnected. These data layers transform passive observation into an active journey of discovery, allowing us to delve into the specific characteristics of any location, from a local landmark to an entire eco-region.

Earth Unidiversity transforms learning into a continuous, invigorating expedition. Rather than relying solely on abstract academic endeavors, it champions an experiential research model where education becomes an active, hands-on engagement with the world itself. Life evolves into a vacation-like exploration, where every observation, every collected data point, serves a dual purpose: enriching personal understanding and contributing directly to our shared global knowledge base. This method profoundly cultivates innate curiosity, fosters creativity, and deepens our connection to the fundamental processes of creation and evolution. It also integrates with actual contributions and collaborations in our world as well so that we accomplish a great deal.

Crucially, this system empowers us to collectively assess and proactively address the urgent needs of our planet. By logging precise coordinates with descriptive observations – be it the sighting of a new species, an emerging environmental concern, or the discovery of a historical artifact – our individual contributions are immediately shared, creating a dynamic, real-time tapestry of global insights. This transparent data exchange ensures that what one discovers, all can learn from, facilitating the rapid dissemination of vital information essential for problem-solving, conservation efforts, and sustainable development. It enables us to become acutely aware of phenomena and interconnections that might otherwise remain unseen.

The “we-me cycle” masterfully harmonizes individual purpose with collective impact. It celebrates our uniquely diverse life paths, purposes, work, and journeys, while simultaneously ensuring these myriad contributions coalesce into a magnificent, unified understanding. Every effort, every allocation of energy within this system, becomes a lasting ‘monument’ – a digital legacy. These contributions can be shared with those who walk similar paths or with future generations eager to understand the accomplishments of their ancestors, allowing them to revisit locations and bear witness to ecological succession or societal changes across time. It creates a living, evolving archive of human endeavor and planetary transformation.

This conceptual framework represents a profound departure from outdated, often tedious, and fragmented systems. It advocates for a life lived to its fullest potential, deeply rooted in understanding the past, actively engaging with the present, and consciously shaping the future. It fosters a cyclical understanding of existence, where every individual is an indispensable part of the grand, interconnected tapestry of ‘everyone, everything, everywhere on Earth.’ We firmly believe that collective wisdom, collaboratively built and continuously refined, holds the key to nurturing a thriving world without end, powered by the combined ingenuity and spirit of us all.

Going back to what a mentor and professor (John Donnelly, UVM) taught me in my environmental problem-solving class in 1998:   Understanding the true “nature of the problem” is key to solving problems on Earth. Sometimes it takes a long time to arrive at the true nature of the problem. Based on my life, I have strived to understand the true nature of the problem. In conclusion, I have outlined the hypothesized problem definition on Earth, but I haven’t received any responses. For the sake of a prompt, holistic transition, I hypothesize that the overall planetary problem is industrial earth, kings, castles, and kingdoms (almost all financially prioritized revolution at the expense of everyone on Earth. These fortified structures/functioning or bubbles, public and private), or parallel trains maintain the status quo, (controlling people) employing methods such as the extraction-exclusion-exchange cycle, which affects all well-motivated, positive-energy people on earth. It appears as if the status quo establishment will do absolutely anything to survive.

The Industrial Earth Kings’ castles, and extraction, exchange exclusion kingdoms’ philosophy, over 1,000 years, has killed more than 1 billion people (Google) especially because of the financial prioritization revolution over nature and natural healthy living.   This is because of war alone. I can’t imagine how many other deaths occurred because of their practices.   For example, I believe industrial earth Kings, castles, and kingdoms, greed, and strict one-dimensional financial prioritization is the source for all war, crime, violence, terrorism, and all the preventable suffering, directly or indirectly, on earth. This is because they started to prioritize business financials instead of joy which caused significant survival zone suffering in the lower hierarchies. Even the creators were put into survival zone suffering. I believe it’s about time for us to transition beyond the concept of an industrial Earth, kings, castles, and kingdoms, towards a more holistic, well-motivated, positive-energy, and sustainable way of living on Earth.  One aspect of the Unidiversity research explorer cycle is the foundation. The foundation includes loving, caring, sharing, and giving, for giving to bring about conditions of comfort, joy, love, Hope, faith, unity, equity, justice, and sustainable striving for happiness.   I also believe in the concept of courtesy as described by Thomas Wells in the early 1800s.   With these fundamental values, we can transition to a world of joy and pleasant experiences.   I believe that is what God wanted on our planet, instead of this world of war, violence, terrorism, abductions, and fighting.  Furthermore, I don’t believe God likes all the preventable suffering that exists in this world, as a result of industrial earth, kings, castles, and kingdoms’ approaches to living on earth.    With the unidiversity research explorer cycle, we all get involved in holistic, well motivated, positive, energy contributions and collaborations on Earth.   There is more similarity in functioning at times when we need to take care of our commons, and more unique contributions as life purposes pass for your own contributions.   You can mix and match as needed.   There is so much to talk about regarding the Earth Unidiversity Research Explorer Cycle, but it requires all of us to get involved.  Nobody does it better than each of us and all of us together.  World without end…

For millennia, human civilization has often been structured around paradigms of centralized power, conquest, and resource extraction, leaving a devastating legacy of conflict and suffering. The historical dominance of systems built on control and exploitation—what I refer to as the “Industrial Earth”  king, castles, and kingdoms paradigm, characterized by entrenched hierarchies and territorial conflicts—has resulted in an unimaginable human toll. This path has consistently led to widespread preventable misery, including war, crime, violence, and terrorism, falling far short of our collective potential for peace and prosperity. Overall it is meant to keep our planet functioning in dynamic equilibrium striving and homeostasis like condition.

The time has come for a fundamental paradigm shift beyond current condition business financial prioritization. We must consciously transition beyond these outdated models towards a holistic, regenerative, and profoundly ethical way of living. My ongoing work and vision revolve around fostering a civilization rooted in positive energy, sustainable striving, and genuine human flourishing, prosperity, and peace for the purposes of everyone, everything, everywhere. This isn’t merely an ideal, but an urgent imperative for our shared future.

Central to this transformation is what I term the ‘Unidiversity Research Explorer Cycle.’ This framework is designed to empower every individual to contribute meaningfully to a shared global endeavor. It’s a dynamic journey of collective inquiry, collaborative discovery, and compassionate action, where we actively research, explore, and implement solutions for a better world—solutions that respect both necessary planetary boundaries and human dignity.

At its very core, this cycle is built upon foundational human values: unconditional love, compassionate care, generous sharing, proactive giving, and profound forgiveness. These aren’t merely abstract ideals; they are the practical cornerstones for cultivating environments of comfort, joy, hope, unwavering faith, genuine unity, true equity, justice, and enduring, sustainable happiness. This also encompasses a deep commitment to what I perceive as ‘courtesy’—a recognition of the inherent dignity and value of every being, fostering mutual respect and ethical conduct in all interactions, much like the principles espoused by thoughtful minds through history.

Within the Unidiversity Research Explorer Cycle, there’s a dynamic interplay between our shared responsibilities and our individual callings. We engage in collaborative efforts to nurture our global commons, ensuring well-being for all, while simultaneously embracing and developing our unique talents and passions to contribute distinctively to life’s grand tapestry. This flexible approach allows individuals to seamlessly blend collective action with personal purpose, responding to evolving needs and desires in a spirit of harmonious co-creation.

We stand at a pivotal moment, poised to move beyond a world marred by conflict, violence, and preventable suffering. I firmly believe this transition aligns with humanity’s highest aspirations for peace, holistic sustainability, prosperity, justice, and a world free from unnecessary hardship—a future that reflects our deepest potential. This grand endeavor requires the engagement of every single one of us, for it is only through our combined effort, diverse perspectives, and collective brilliance that we can truly manifest this better world, not just for ourselves, but for all generations to come. The future will be filled with exploration, discovery, living, learning, loving, and experiencing all there is to experience on Earth from local to at times global.   The time to transition is now. I love you.

With conviction and hope,

Richard Thomas Simmons

It appears that industry, Kings, castles, and kingdoms are using the collective idea of law-enforcement clashes as a tool to distract and divert, as well as to uphold the status quo.   It appears that when the proverbial hits the fan, the focus is always on the people at the bottom.   However, lately, you will notice the highlighting of people at the top for malfeasance and misbehavior. This may be the indicator that my overall hypothesis has been proven.

The manufacturing of crime at the bottom and at the top on a broad-scale societal level is occurring.   I even have a hypothesis that crime is caused by industrial earth, kings, castles, and kingdoms’ approach to life on earth, either directly or indirectly.   It also seems like a distraction and diversion to focus so much on Immigration and Customs Enforcement.   Law enforcement has long focused on the masses and people at the bottom of the hierarchy because that is where the negative fissionary energy occurs.   My hypothesis is different.   The industrial Earth Kings’ approach to life on Earth causes much overt crime and malfeasance because it focuses primarily on business finances and not natural healthy living and nature perspectives; The establishment also indirectly fuels crime by creating survival zone suffering conditions.   I think industrial Earth Kings, castles, and kingdoms recognized that we were starting to focus on the manufacturing of crime, directly or indirectly.   For that reason, they needed to point the picture at the billionaires who were misbehaving.  In other words, I think it’s all manufactured.   However, one thing I’m not sure about is Trump.   Although his perception is different, it sure seems like he’s in a downward spiral.   Has this condition been manufactured as well?   More than ever, industrial earth, Kings, castles, and kingdoms need to distract and divert attention from what is going on in our world today.   It may even go back to Carew Castle, the tidal mill, or 1000 years ago. Another hypothesis is that it goes back to the birth of universities on earth.   Maybe it’s the idea of both hypotheses being considered relatively.  Did the takings extraction-exclusion cycle begin with these two major historical events?   

Our current societal architecture, often characterized by its hierarchical and extractive nature—reminiscent of feudalistic structures and industrial paradigms—appears to rely heavily on law enforcement to uphold its prevailing status quo. The same is true for the use of the military. This observation prompts a critical examination of whether the very concept of crime is, to a significant extent, a manufactured construct within these established systems.

It strikes me that a substantial portion of what we label as criminal activity may not be an inherent flaw of individuals but rather a direct or indirect consequence of these deeply entrenched societal models. My working hypothesis posits that such systems, through their inherent inequalities and mechanisms of resource appropriation, inadvertently foster what could be termed “survival zone suffering” among the broader populace. This suffering, born from systemic deprivation and limited opportunity, then manifests in behaviors that are subsequently criminalized, effectively positioning those at the lower echelons of society as the primary source of disorder. For an extended period, law enforcement efforts have disproportionately targeted these marginalized groups, solidifying the perception that they, rather than systemic failures, are the fundamental problem. This in addition to reductionistic fine scale laws for penalization purposes seem to give endless tools to law and law enforcement. We should transition to holistic loving, caring, sharing, giving, forgiving, and genuine kind striving to bring about conditions of comfort, joy, love, hope, unity, equity, faith, justice and sustainable striving happiness in a preventative way so we minimize persecutory violence.

It appears that the prevailing power structures have an ever-increasing need to manipulate public attention and redirect it away from their foundational imperatives and accumulating systemic pressures. This phenomenon might trace its origins back significantly further than commonly assumed. Perhaps its roots lie in the very inception of centralized power structures, potentially as far back as the Carew Castle or the rise of institutionalized knowledge in the earliest universities. Could these historical junctures mark the genesis of what I perceive as the “takings, extraction, exchange, and exclusion cycle”—a continuous historical process of wealth concentration, financial prioritization resource monopolization, and the systematic marginalization of vast segments of humanity? It is critical to research and explore whether these pivotal historical developments initiated the enduring patterns of inequality and the subsequent need for coercive enforcement that characterize our world today.

I find it strange because I’m a man of limited means right now, but I seem to be supporting many nonprofits.  I think it’s a manufactured condition for those lower in the industrial earth, kings, castles, and kingdoms hierarchy to give their heart energy and their resources to nonprofits to solve problems on earth. Where does the investment go and which areas are helped by donations or investments?  Why not have those that are polluters invest or pay more? It depends on the value energy and benefits created by the investments as well. People want to invest where there are great benefits or dividends to be earned based on natural value added to planet Earth homeostasis or dynamic equilibrium as we strive for sustainable striving happiness. With the We-Me Explorers Cycle, we should be able to prioritize those who should invest more energy and resources toward solving these problems on Earth. With GIS, “the where” question is answered.  I’m not just talking about just donating to nonprofits; I am referring to a rational approach to distributing energy and resources to those areas as well as who need them on Earth.   This is about naturally and spatially relative prioritizing help project investment to area on Earth that need the help the most prioritizing the major problems on Earth. Creating opportunities for investment on Earth is key to solving problems on Earth. Eco geo relative prioritization helps us prioritize the needs and where investment is needed.

My conviction, informed by what I envision as the We-Me Explorers Cycle, champions a fundamental shift in this paradigm. Rather than exclusively relying on individual altruism, we should be establishing a comprehensive framework that systematically identifies and incentivizes entities and areas be they institutions, corporations, or individuals of substantial means—who are best positioned to invest significant energy and resources into sustainable solutions. This should be done with eco-geo relative prioritization. It also should be done by free choice investment of the masses.

This initiative transcends the traditional encouragement of charitable donations. It advocates for a truly rational and equitable strategy for distributing the collective energy and investment wealth of our planet in a more nature centric way. We require a sophisticated methodology like area based investment and the help project which combines all significant needs on earth together to ensure that those with the greatest capacity to effect large-scale change are indeed contributing their fair share, thereby optimizing our collective impact on pressing global issues.

Dear Colleague,

Another way to address Earth’s problems and understand the planet’s current state is to map all events and headlines.   These can be used to understand changes over time. Subsequently, we can map these changes over time and arrive at the problem definition, which, in my hypothesis, likely refers to the industrial earth concept of kings, castles, and kingdoms especially greed as well as irrational financial prioritization above all else..   In fact, looking back in history, one has to wonder about the crew castle and the tidal mill, and why they were replaced in 1801 with a new version.   Was the old tidal mill a sign of a more natural approach to energy generation?   Was it the beginnings of a more natural, creative industrial revolution, one created by people with a greater connection to nature?  Although the mill was initially used to grind corn, it appears to have been the spark that led to the concept of Hydroelectric tidal power.   These days, there is an incredible amount of adaptive creativity involving tidal power.  Could the Carew Castle tidal mill be an early example of an extraction-exclusion exchange?   Did financial logic-oriented manufacturing logic replace only the early creative industrial revolution?  Did the king back then take Wales for Dominance and control?   Were the owners of the castle, the tidal mill, assassinated?   

I wanted to share some evolving thoughts on an unconventional approach to analyzing the complex challenges currently facing our planet. My hypothesis suggests that many of our contemporary global issues can be traced back to fundamental shifts in human interaction with our environment and each other, which I term the “industrial earth concept.” By meticulously charting pivotal historical events – akin to mapping significant headlines across millennia – we can uncover the underlying patterns and transitions that have shaped our present condition. This methodology allows us to not only identify problem definitions but also to understand the deep-seated ideological frameworks that govern our societal structures, echoing ancient power dynamics often symbolized by “kings, castles, and kingdoms.”

Consider, for instance, the fascinating case of the Carew Castle tidal mill. Its reconstruction in 1801 prompts a deeper inquiry into the prevailing technological philosophies of the era. Was the original tidal mill a testament to a more integrated, nature-centric approach to harnessing energy, perhaps indicative of an nascent industrial revolution driven by individuals deeply connected to their natural surroundings? While initially purposed for grinding corn, its design inherently embodied principles of hydroelectric tidal power, a concept that continues to inspire significant adaptive creativity in our modern age. This raises crucial questions about the trajectory of early industrialization.

Could the Carew Castle tidal mill represent an early iteration of a “natural creative industrial revolution” that prioritized sustainable resource utilization? If so, why might such a path have been seemingly supplanted by a purely financial or manufactured logic which impact people in the heart lower down in the hierarchies? Was there a deliberate redirection of innovation, driven by emerging economic paradigms or even political imperatives? One might ponder the broader historical context, such as the strategic annexation of territories like Wales by the king, and whether such actions were intertwined with the control of resources and suppression of alternative technological developments. The historical record invites us to explore whether the proprietors of such pioneering, nature-aligned technologies faced pressures or interventions that led to their eventual obsolescence or re-engineering, steering us towards a less harmonized, more extractive industrial model. Did the focus become business financial prioritization mainly forgetting about the holistic well motivated positive energy people and the natural environment?

Sincerely,

Richard Thomas Simmons

The concept of liberty is a strange concept to me.   It appears there’s an obscure definition that higher-ups in the industrialized world, Kings, and the hierarchies of castles and kingdoms used when considering life on earth.  It is a strange concept to me because I believe we all should have a high degree of relative freedom, without anyone else telling us when we can be free. In many ways, liberty is a reactionary, reductionist concept of anthropocentric rights.  I’m not in favor of any government or organization telling me when I can be free, in industrial earth, kings, castles, and kingdoms.    Precisely, I believe liberty as a term has been used to indicate that there’s some controlling domination over you.   However, we should have a high degree of relative natural freedom.  By relative, I mean that we all have responsibilities on earth to our people, our planet, our families, our communities, and our purposes in life.    However, I prefer the term “high relative natural freedom” to mean choosing what we want to do in life as we strive towards heaven.

 Knowing what I know, it appears that liberty was created in a time of war, slavery, kings, castles, and kingdoms financial and power revolution, when it was about granting permission and telling people when they could be free.  Likewise, it is an extreme reactionary kind of reductionism, whereas high relative natural freedom is an expansive, all-inclusive kind of concept.   When you have a diverse number of offerings or opportunities, you experience joy.   Liberty is a concept that tells you when to work and when to be free.   The concept of natural rights is something that I believe in. I do not believe in the same kind of application of rights in the financial extreme Industrial Earth as in the kings, castles, and kingdoms approach, for example, through constitutions.  I believe in generalizing and naturalizing rights so that they are natural consequences and conditions of living on Earth.   I agree with the concept that high relative freedom, natural rights are universal and fundamental, inherent to all individuals, and not created by any government, legal system, or corporation. For example, I agree with almost everything the Declaration of Independence says, except for the concept of liberty.   I want to change the word liberty to high relative freedom.   For example, liberty was created to support a system with numerous laws, rules, regulations, policies, and procedures. In contrast, the high relative freedom I envision requires greater agreement on values.  For example, in the We-Me explorer cycle’s similarity foundation, we all strive to live, learn, love, discover, experience, invest, and explore as we live on Earth.  Likewise, we need to be loving, caring, sharing, giving, forgiving, and genuinely kind, striving to bring them the conditions of comfort, joy, love, hope, unity, equity, faith, justice, and sustainable, striving happiness.   This foundation replaces all laws, rules, regulations, policies, and many procedures, giving us a high degree of relative freedom to live the way we want.   The concept of natural rights has long existed and has been discussed by many people.   I am more in favor of natural rights and greater relative freedom than of liberty.   Nobody does it better than each of us and all of us together. World without end….

I am writing to share a perspective on a concept central to human existence: freedom. While ‘liberty’ is widely embraced, I find myself wrestling with its traditional interpretation, and I believe a more nuanced understanding is imperative.

My unease stems from the historical baggage associated with ‘liberty.’ It often seems to define freedom as something granted or withheld by external authorities—be it historical monarchies, industrial powers, or governmental structures. This perspective inadvertently suggests a controlling dynamic, where individuals are ‘permitted’ to be free, rather than inherently possessing that state. The term ‘liberty,’ in this context, has historically emerged from reactive efforts to define rights against an oppressive backdrop of kings, castles, and industrial hierarchies. It can feel like a restrictive concept, one that delineates when and how one is allowed to operate, rather than empowering boundless potential.

Instead, I advocate for ‘high relative natural freedom.’ This concept posits that genuine freedom is an intrinsic state, not a conditional grant. The term ‘relative’ is crucial here, as it acknowledges our inherent interconnectedness and responsibilities—to our families, communities, our planet, and our individual life’s purpose. It speaks to the expansive ability to self-determine one’s path, aligning with one’s highest aspirations and spiritual journey. This is a proactive, all-encompassing ideal that empowers individuals to thrive, explore, and find joy within a framework of shared values and abundant opportunities.

I wholeheartedly embrace the principle of natural rights—universal, fundamental entitlements inherent to every individual, independent of any governmental or legal decree.as we strive for natural healthy living, natural earth striving, natural spirituality striving and natural humanity striving. I find myself in strong agreement with the spirit of the Declaration of Independence in its assertion of these intrinsic rights. However, my divergence occurs with its embrace of ‘liberty’ as the ultimate expression of this freedom. I believe natural rights should be seen as the inherent consequences of our existence, a foundational truth for living on Earth, rather than codified permissions within systems that previously dictated our freedom.

My preference is to replace ‘liberty’ with ‘high relative natural freedom’ in our discourse. This isn’t merely a semantic shift; it signifies a fundamental paradigm change. ‘Liberty,’ as historically applied, often necessitates an extensive framework of laws, regulations, and policies to delineate its boundaries. ‘High relative natural freedom,’ conversely, flourishes within a framework built not on prescriptive rules, but on a collective agreement of values.

Consider, for instance, the ‘Similarity Foundation,’ as conceptualized within the ‘We-Me Explorer Cycle.’ This foundation champions core tenets: living, learning, loving, and exploring our existence on Earth. It emphasizes active cultivation of love, care, sharing, giving, forgiveness, and genuine kindness. These shared principles form the bedrock upon which we can cultivate an environment brimming with comfort, joy, love, hope, unity, equity, faith, and sustainable happiness. This value-driven approach, I believe, inherently fosters ‘high relative natural freedom,’ allowing individuals to navigate their lives authentically, without the restrictive burdens of excessive legislation.

The enduring concept of natural rights serves as a powerful testament to our intrinsic worth. My aspiration is to see these rights realized through the lens of ‘high relative natural freedom’—a vision of collective flourishing grounded in shared purpose and mutual respect, rather than a limited, externally defined ‘liberty.’ It is in our combined efforts, as individuals and as a global community, that we truly manifest a world without end, guided by an expansive and inherent sense of freedom.

Richard Thomas Simmons

Dear Everyone, ,

Making mistakes in the perfect world of industrial earth, Kings castles and kingdoms is a way to keep them above the rest of us.  If you write, every mistake that you make in your grammar and writing can be reviewed, so that you won’t get credit for your writing and creativity.    In other words, making a mistake is a justification that you need a supervisor or a manager over you.   Therefore, this is another way to increase the use of planet Earth. King’s castles and kingdoms: extraction, exchange, exclusion, and the taking cycle. This is a serious matter: those who intersect or intercept your contributions on earth may be taking them because they’re not perfect. Instead of contacting you for clarification, for example, they leave you hanging.   Thus, what I’ve indicated here is the concept of the exchange prioritization.  Creativity, ideas, and energy are shared and exchanged through this type of methodology.   Most of the time, people are left in a survival zone, suffering, lonely, and isolated in their cubicles or houses.   Moreover, I’ve tried to illustrate this concept before as a rotating hierarchical structure around a pivot point.   It appears that the extraction causes an exchange with other hierarchies and organizations.  Therefore, this is one of the primary justifications for my hypothesis about Industrial Earth, Kings, castles, and kingdoms, confined, compartmentalized, hierarchical structures that take and give to others all the time.   The We-Me Explorers are holistically inclusive of everyone on earth.  Therefore, it’s sort of like human resources for planet Earth.   In other words, if you have a problem, it will be prevented before it even materializes.   In fact, I see the cycle as preventing most problems on earth, so that we never have human resources problems. To me, human resources is like natural resources. We are all natural contributors to our planet, not employees of industrial earth, kings, castles, and kingdoms.   The cycle allows us to transition to a more holistic, adaptive approach, striving towards the desired future condition.   Nobody does it better than each of us and all of us together. World without end….

I wanted to share some thoughts on the underlying mechanics of our current global systems and introduce a transformative vision for our collective future. It strikes me that within many established hierarchical paradigms, the concept of a “mistake” is often weaponized. Rather than being seen as an opportunity for growth or learning, individual errors, whether in grammar, output, or judgment, can be strategically leveraged to justify increased oversight, diminish personal credit, and ultimately reinforce a power dynamic where supervision is deemed perpetually necessary. This subtle yet pervasive mechanism often strips individuals of their autonomy and the full recognition of their creative contributions.   Even a typo or misplacement of a comma can get you into extreme trouble because of the extraction exchange exclusion cycle.

My observations suggest that this isn’t merely about individual management styles; it’s indicative of a systemic process I refer to as the “extraction-exchange paradigm.” In this framework, valuable contributions, innovative ideas, and personal energy are often siphoned off and redistributed within the existing power structures, frequently without the original contributor’s full understanding or fair compensation. Instead of engaging in clarifying dialogue when ambiguities arise, the system often leaves individuals in a state of uncertainty, their efforts potentially appropriated or devalued. This dynamic, which I have previously conceptualized as a “rotating hierarchical structure,” actively facilitates the transfer of value and influence between various organizations and established hierarchies.

Consequently, this systemic methodology frequently leaves individuals feeling marginalized, isolated, and struggling in what I term the “survival zone.” Their innate creativity and potential are often stifled, leading to widespread disillusionment and a sense of being disconnected from the broader purpose of their efforts. This forms the bedrock of my ongoing hypothesis regarding “Industrial Earth, Kings, Castles, and Kingdoms” – a metaphor for the confined, compartmentalized, and often self-serving hierarchical structures that perpetually dictate the ebb and flow of resources and opportunities.

It is precisely to counteract these limitations and foster a genuinely inclusive future that I advocate for “The We-Me Explorers.” This initiative represents a radical departure from conventional models, striving for a holistically inclusive global community where every individual is recognized as an indispensable contributor. We envision “The We-Me Explorers” as a proactive, planet-wide human resource framework – not in the corporate sense of managing personnel, but in the profound understanding that human potential is our most vital natural resource.

Our objective is to preemptively address and mitigate global challenges before they escalate, ensuring that human-centric problems become a relic of the past. Just as we cherish natural ecosystems, we must equally value and nurture the inherent contributions of every person on Earth. We are not merely employees or cogs in an “Industrial Earth” machine; we are sentient, creative agents vital to our planet’s well-being.

Through this transformative cycle, we aspire to transition towards a truly adaptive and holistic reality – a future meticulously designed to achieve our collective highest potential. No single entity, nor isolated individual, can achieve this monumental shift alone; it demands the synergistic power of each of us, working in concert, for a world without end.

With thoughtful consideration,

Richard Thomas Simmons

Building files on people as a practice of industrial earth, Kings, castles, and kingdoms, as well as investigations on earth.  If you’re put on a performance improvement plan or put under investigation, the rest of your life is about proving that you deserved it.   It’s a practice that King’s castles and kingdoms, Earth’s hierarchical structures, employ because they can never be proved wrong.   In other words, they must be known as perfect.   The same is true if you were fired or laid off.   The rest of your experiences are very challenging because all the organizations you’re part of, or investigations into them, are trying to prove that you are the problem.    It is hard to imagine how many people have been impacted by this kind of behavior.   Imagine all the people suffering with investigations and performance reviews, a downward spiral.    These behaviors are indicative of industrial Earth, Kings, castles, and kingdom systems, and of their perception that they are under attack all the time.   People in lower hierarchies are at greater risk than those in higher hierarchies.  Another hypothesisis that if your family ancestry has contributed significantly to our world, you are an infinite threat to the status quo, industrial earth, Kings, castles, and kingdoms’ approach to living on earth.  Moreover, if you’re part of a particular religion or spiritual group, you can be perceived as a threat as well.   The reason for this is that you’re striving to say that you’re holy, when industrial earth, kings, castles, and kingdoms want you to be low on the hierarchy?  

In industrialized societies, Kings, castles, and kingdoms often use religion to judge people as if they are playing God.   In other words, they use it to stratify their hierarchy.    However, I’m concerned that religion gives them a reason to judge in an absolutist sort of way instead of a relative sort of way.  This is a way to maintain the status quo, including their use of sin as ammunition factories and assembly lines.   If you’re a part of a religion, you have to act that way all the time.   Industrial Earth, Kings, castles, and kingdoms use this concept to prevent any uprising.   It keeps certain people in lower positions and advances those favored by the industrial Earth Kings, castles, and kingdoms.    The concept of sin is used most often in the hierarchy because unreconciled sin is treated as a policy violation.   Moreover, it can be used to address the extraction, exchange, and exclusion cycles, as sin is used to justify the takings.   As far as I know, God did not intend religion to be used in this way, as it creates a downward spiral feedback loop of suffering.   This kind of preventable suffering manifests itself in unemployment and homelessness at times.  

In the future, I see this world as a holistic, inclusive, inspirational, and accepting world.   Everyone deserves the chance to live a relatively free life, experiencing all they want on this planet.   Traditional industrial-era approaches to human resources, Kings, castles, and kingdoms are detrimental, impacting our people and our planet.   Therefore, we must transition to a more desirable future in which everyone has a chance.   Other than the 10 Commandments, the only thing a priest ever told me about sin was that carnal knowledge was a sin, and even a thought could be a sin.   Therefore, Industrial Earth, Kings Castle, and kingdoms and their hierarchical structures try to prove that you’re a sinner and don’t deserve anything other than hard labor and suffering.   It is another way to start the extraction-exclusion exchange cycle on Earth.   I am interested in transitioning to the We-Me Explorers’ Cycle, which helps everyone on their trail to heaven.  Nobody does it better than each of us and all of us together. World without end…..

I wish to share some critical reflections on the enduring, often unseen, mechanisms that underpin many of our societal structures. It appears that the pervasive hierarchical systems, which I refer to as “Industrial Earth, Kings, castles, and kingdoms,” operate under an implicit principle: their own inherent infallibility.

Consider the common institutional practices of placing individuals on performance improvement plans or initiating investigations. These are frequently presented as corrective measures, yet their practical effect can be deeply insidious. They often compel the individual to spend the remainder of their professional (and sometimes personal) life in a struggle to justify their very existence within the system, to prove they “deserved” the scrutiny. The system, by contrast, rarely needs to justify itself; it assumes a posture of unassailable perfection. Similarly, the aftermath of a termination or layoff can be profoundly isolating, as subsequent opportunities and interactions often frame the individual as the inherent “problem,” rather than questioning the systemic forces at play.

The human cost of these entrenched dynamics is immeasurable. We must contemplate the vast numbers of people who have been caught in this downward spiral of judgment and suspicion, enduring significant suffering and distress, which can tragically manifest as unemployment or even homelessness. These behaviors are symptomatic of a deeper insecurity within traditional power structures, which frequently perceive themselves as perpetually under threat. Consequently, individuals positioned at the lower echelons of these hierarchies bear a disproportionate share of the risk and burden.

Furthermore, it appears that any form of identity or affiliation that challenges the established order can be deemed a threat. Whether an individual’s ancestry carries a legacy of profound global contributions, or their spiritual convictions diverge from mainstream norms, they risk being perceived as an “infinite threat to the status quo.” This is particularly evident in the manipulation of religion. Spiritual paths, intended for profound personal growth and ethical guidance, are frequently co-opted and instrumentalized by these hierarchical systems. They are transformed into tools for judgment, stratification, and social control, effectively preventing any genuine form of uprising or collective empowerment. The concept of “sin,” in particular, is perverted from a spiritual concept of reconciliation into a harsh policy violation, a justification for exclusion and the perpetuation of an “extraction, exchange, exclusion” cycle that benefits only the entrenched powers. This tragically distorts the very essence of spiritual teaching, which I believe was never intended to foster suffering or hierarchical oppression.

We stand at a crucial juncture, compelled to envision and build a future that transcends these regressive paradigms. My aspiration is for a world founded on holistic inclusivity, driven by inspirational incentives, and underpinned by radical acceptance especially after counseling, reconciliation, conversations with Jesus, and confessions. A world where every individual is afforded the inherent right to a life of profound freedom and the opportunity to fully explore their potential on this planet. The antiquated, often detrimental, “human resources” approaches of these old systems are actively harming both our people and our planet.

It is imperative that we transition away from the current “extraction, exchange, exclusion” cycle towards a collaborative paradigm—a “We-Me Explorers Cycle.” This new model would focus on collective upliftment, where individual journeys of self-discovery and growth (“Me”) are supported by a powerful, empathetic community (“We” as in We the people). It recognizes that true progress is achieved not through extreme competition and control, but through mutual aid and shared aspiration. There is no limit to what we can achieve when we unite, recognizing that each of us is an indispensable part of the collective journey toward a more enlightened existence, fostering a world without end.