I am getting tired of all the reactionary reductionistic research in our world that tries to pinpoint the exact cause of illness, especially cancer. From my observations, patterns, and hypotheses, it appears to be from multiple sources. In particular endocrine, disruptors and chemicals that mimic hormones may be a significant contributor. However, I believe that all anthropocentric anthropogenic chemicals and pollution are contributing to illness, especially cancer on our planet. Exhaust from the burning of fossil fuels may be a contributor as well. I also believe that medication and things that people are given like drugs contribute to cancer too. Pollution is all about manufacturing stress in the body and stressors from all the pollution on earth, including laws, rules, regulations policies, and some procedures create stress hormones out of balance with nature. So my hypothesis, this time has to do with cumulative totality pollution exclusion of natural healthy conditions. Therefore, the natural earth ethic of natural earth striving, may be the desired future condition in the short term and the long-term. Natural earth striving is about living and functioning close to nature in the way God intended. It is about trying to do the best you can, considering all of the societal compulsions and pollution we have developed. It is about re-incorporating nature into everything that we do. Biodiversity and nature itself is a kind of buffer against pollution. It ecologically balances and attacks pollution when we have an ecosystem prepared to do such a thing. It is the same kind of concept as the rainforest absorbing the CO2 on our planet. The more we have natural conditions and organisms in ecosystems that can buffer and attack pollution of all sorts, the better off that we will be. I know this answer is not a specific cause of cancer, but it’s the ubiquitous cumulative totality of everything that is against nature and natural healthy living that causes pollution and thus cancer. For example, It is best to strive to use organic methods when growing food instead of using pesticides and herbicides.

Traditional unenlightened democracy is about being able to say anything you want to say.   However, it is my opinion that we need to be enlightened about what we say.    Otherwise, the collective masses can send us down the wrong trail because of popularity reasons.  We need more of a university research, explorer cycle, where it is about, continuous learning, holistic rational decision making, and continuous adaptive driving towards desired future condition   It is about living, learning, exploring, discovering, experiencing, and investing in our planet and our people.   We need to get absolutely everyone involved so that they can contribute what they’re meant to contribute and anything else they might like to contribute to our planet and people.   As we continually adaptively, strive towards desired future condition, we need relative proximal mentors for all of us on earth as we strive to be enlightened in a holistic way with both similarities foundation and unique diversity pyramid.   The similarity foundation is more universal and the pyramid is more uniquely diverse relative to a persons interests, passions, purposes and chosen enlightenment.   Striving towards holistic, beauty and stability on earth is worthwhile goal and involves holistic, inspirational incentives, and inspiration places.  Eventually, the whole surface of the Earth will transition to a natural, spiritual holistic well motivated positive energy experience for everyone on earth   As we strive to keep things and homeostatic balance or dynamic equilibrium, we keep things in stability so we don’t have to worry about tipping points and extreme oscillations.   I believe we have a lot to learn from everyone on earth getting involved in everything on earth relatively considered by their interest, passions, purposes, and pursuits.   Voting should be about relative weighting voting about what you’re interested in or what you know about the most and on a similarity level too.   In some situations, people may override the existing system if they have something worthwhile to contribute outside of their area of expertise.    This is the ultimate way to have checks and balances in our world.  There is nothing like having  enhanced and enlightened masses from continuous life long learning and exploration.   This concept enlightens people by igniting their passions to understand who we are and our context of the world around us.  In fact, this concept finds us together as a similarity condition that we all are interested in on earth.   Everything on earth is related to everything else one way or another and we need to adapt and strive towards desired future conditions as we learn as much as we can about those changes that occur over time.  Some things may stay the same, and some things may transition to something much different when we are enlightened about what God wanted in our world   However, I think I’m enlightened enough to say that God wanted us to take care of creation and everyone/everything on earth   Nobody does it better than each of us and all of us together. World without end….

Facts are information taken out of context.   We must all work together to solve our problems and transition to more desired future conditions.   Many are overwhelmed by the dependence on minutiae and facts.  We must look at things like cycles and systems.   Everything is connected to everything else.  We must look at this world as a cycle of us to all of us, everyone, everything, everywhere, and all our communities.  Our health is inextricably linked to our planet’s health and all its systems.   All depends on all of us together and on the health of each of us, everyone, everything, everywhere on Earth, including our planet’s ecosystem services and life-support systems.   If we all were Natural Earth striving and contributing like Earth research explorers to collect the minutiae and to identify patterns, we would be better off.   We must relatively prioritize our needs, and we must help locally and globally.  Otherwise, we will continue to be overwhelmed by facts and information taken out of context

I believe we ought not have traditional, capitalism, traditional socialism, and traditional democracy. Instead, we need to adapt and transition to a holistic way of doing things that combines the best parts of every way of doing things not limited to our current concepts of systems. However, the real solution is combining everything known and eventually it is what it is. In fact, we can have a similarity condition of a park like existence on planet Earth, taking into consideration, environmental values, and humanity values. In fact, it should be all about natural earth striving on the similarity level. It is obvious we can still have leases and ownerships at the unique diversity level after the needs of our world are satisfied. Therefore, it is the concept of combining and having both situations at once. I initially called this holistic adaptive capitalism and pure democracy, but it’s just a way to describe based on already defined methods to help people understand better. It really is a condition where we use an earth research explorer cycle, and university coupled with GIS as a holistic adaptive learning tool for everyone everything everywhere on earth. This way people will be able to interact and contribute, as well as collaborate towards striving to desire future conditions. Determining which sites to restore on planet Earth may involve environmental impact assessment. However, observations, patterns, hypotheses, ideas, and creativity may help this concept out immensely when people notice changes in their environment. It is not only the natural environment, it is the social environment as well. I believe we can have both a holistic natural earth striving world, and a holistic capitalism adaptive for where we can be a natural earth striving at the same time as developing our Earth. I have already seen gardens on rooftops and vegetation covering buildings. This seems to be a very desirable method to replace nature when we develop our world. For urban areas, I believe in community Gardens and urban forestry striving to be like a park like experience. This kind of concept gives us multiple benefits, including physical and mental health. People that are closer to nature and society are the ones that determine what kind of changes can occur in the landscape. The ones that know how to prescribe natural earth, striving recommendations to developers will be very desirable. I have also thought of the idea of solar panel roofing so that we ought to replace roofs with energy generation. It does not make sense to put solar panels in productive agricultural fields or pasture. I believe the forest ought to be managed in its entirety and people can apply to treat certain areas and manage certain areas with ownerships and leases as well. However, it should be about ecological methods wherever possible. This is because these methods are closest to natural earths striving methods. Therefore, there will be a management plan for every square meter and miles (planned over vast regions) on planet Earth first and then leases and private ownership can occur as long as it is in context with the similarity condition or prescribed condition. I believe it all will be the goal to maximize park like green space so that it can be used by humans in most situations. However, there should be nature reserves as well. The overall goal to maximize green space on planet Earth and minimize deforestation and desertification areas. Prescriptions and treatments will taken to consideration, desired habitat for all different species, natural ecological communities and communities including humans. Agricultural land should be more of a nature concept prioritization. Before we can have agriculture, we must have natural prescriptions for nature considerations. This will be planned by experts as well, including people who are interested in getting involved. I have often thought that native American Indians may be involved in the environment and natural resources on our planet because of their close affiliation and their connection with nature. Anyway, in the future, the university research explorer cycle is about everyone, everything, everywhere on earth. Everyone will be involved with people scoping pure democracy. Those that learned the most about agricultural areas and nature will be the ones involved with that sort of thing. On a similarity level, the goal is to plan everything out on planet Earth, and from a unique diversity level allowed development, agriculture, forestry to continue in a holistic way with natural earth striving holistic prescriptive advice and practices. Tropical forest ought to be left alone and managed in an ecological way. The concept of university research explorer cycle allows everyone to get involved in nature. It allows exploration, learning, discovering, and experiencing all there is to experience on planet Earth. Like academia, it allows people to pick and choose what they’re interested in and what they learn about. There are similarity roles, which are more like university research explorers roles. And then there are unique diversity, unique life, path, unique, life, purpose, and your own desire contributions. Therefore, it’s kind of like balancing life between the commons and your own unique diversity life’s contributions. One can choose whatever percentage allocation they choose in each category. When you’re young, you may want to choose more similarity, university, research explorers, roles, and working with the commons instead of a unique university contribution. It may change when you get older and then change back again when you are elderly. This concept is about everyone working together, collaborating and contributing to everyone, everything, everywhere on earth, most often by communities. In the university people will be trained to observe, innovate, create, understand patterns, and contribute their ideas towards continuous adaptive improvement on planet Earth. The great thing is that everyone is involved in continuously learning more and more all the time about what it is to live on planet Earth overall, the main desire will be switched to living, learning, loving, exploring, discovering, experiencing all there is to experience on planet Earth where the contribution is mostly through your own communities and regions. Overall, the energy allocation index is the desired future condition minus the current condition. Therefore, this is an indicator whether outside investment is needed to restore certain areas or to adapt to changing conditions. While allocating energy locally, people can invest globally to help with other areas on earth. Eventually, it may be your desire to visit these regions that you’re invested in our planet to see how you impacted our world. Nobody does it better than each of us and all of us together the world without end….

The concept of our founding, including the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, was considered an experiment. If it were considered an experiment, we might want to transition to something more adaptive and creative, involving a university research explorer cycle and Spatial technology. Recently, we have realized that we’re probably at the end of an era, as evidenced by current functioning, and we need a new cyclical, more scientific way of doing things, as often seen in nature. It’s not a bad thing that the ideal of the US government system was considered an experiment (all other systems too), because it’s kind of like science, where we learn a tremendous amount from our failures. It took a long time to understand that we’ve adapted beyond the feasibility of using the present government structure and function as the way forward. I think we can take bits and pieces of it and expand it into a concept called a holistic focused university research explorer cycle, everywhere on earth, (with God) as a similarity condition. As a similarity condition all of everybody contributes in sort of a people scoping pure democracy. Needed government functions would be retained as we transition. However, in the future, everyone will be involved, sort of like the concept of pure democracy. The university will help educate the masses by having them learn, explore, create, observe, experience, and discover, as well as provide a more holistic approach to solving problems in the future. It will involve prioritizing health, including and accepting everyone on earth, and transitioning towards a desired future condition with inspirational incentives. We can still have the concept of politicians, but it should be about them concerning themselves with gut feel determination after a rational decision-making or problem-solving process. I think much should be taken from the Declaration of Independence, as rights should be natural and not spelled out as they were in the Constitution. The constitution was created by reactionary reductionism. Law was an interesting concept; however, what they didn’t realize is that reactive, adaptive planning would cause many people who know the most about government and law to use everything including the law and everything but the law to get what they need and want accomplished, driven by greed and a king-like functioning. We need more holistic endeavors that prioritize preventive approaches to living on Earth. The university research explorer cycle is an idea that involves a cycle between each of us and all of us, everyone, everything, everywhere on earth. It is holistic, inclusive, accepting, and adaptive. With a strong focus on communities on earth, Nobody does it better than each of us and all of us together. World without end…

Direct investment is about allocating your investment interest and amount to a geographic area, which can be represented as polygons or pixels. I’ve already seen an example of someone who is using pixels or rosters. When investing, you can invest in one location, multiple locations, or all the locations associated with your investment interest. It’s a matter of selecting areas you want to invest in, or the pixels or rasters you would like to invest in. It may be better to convert polygons to rasters and divide the number of rasters per polygon to get the amount invested per area. This way would be easier for multiple layers at the end, since there will be certain overlapping help or investment areas on the map. With this method, we can create a Z coordinate to indicate where the mountain ranges will be, so we can climb them and solve the problem. There will be areas of significant elevation and areas that are just like hills to climb. It is hoped that the lower elevations will be addressed by more local expeditions rather than large coordinated efforts to climb high peaks. Remember, these elevations and mountain ranges can be summarized by whatever geographic area is necessary for the problem-solving endeavor. You can look at it as planet Earth, or as North America, or as a geographic region within the continent. Investing in your own community may be the most important, because if everyone did the same, we could aggregate it at the Earth scale. That is the interesting thing about environmental problem-solving: the geographic areas are variable depending on the problem to be solved. Therefore, the problem to be solved may indeed be multidimensional, whereas the smaller geographic areas contribute to the whole planet. It may be somewhat easier to look at the planet as smaller areas rather than the entire planet. However, in terms of the earth, homeostasis, dynamic stability, or dynamic equilibrium striving, we can see how we’re doing on planet Earth by examining the mountain ranges that exist at the time.  I look forward to communicating this idea with experts to understand the best recommended practices.

The area-based Help project and investment concept is a pure democracy like concept intended to apply to everyone, everything, everywhere on earth.  It is supposed to be about planting trees areas, hunger areas restoration needed areas, clean water needed, stream restoration needed, invasive species areas that need to be cleaned up, sources of air pollution, sea level rise areas, ocean acidification areas, degraded soil areas,  desertification areas, cultural restoration areas,  over fishing areas, social injustice areas, environmental injustice areas, biodiversity loss areas, climate change disruption area, poverty areas, refugee areas, future pandemic, potential areas, pollution areas, healthcare needed areas, mental healthcare needed areas, disability areas, children in need of help areas, corruption areas, health care needed areas, crime areas, environmental technology investment areas, companies, organizations, and preventable suffering areas etc. 

The area-based (GIS) help project is supposed to be from people scoping pure democracy data, where people and experts identify areas in need of help.  In addition, information about environmental technology and companies or organizations will be provided. People also invest in people and organizations that can help provide for areas in need.  People themselves may also directly invest in areas in need of help, both in a charitable way and in an investment sort of way, so they receive dividends and returns on investment based on how well the help project is progressing.   In my opinion, most people would rather invest in these areas than donate, but either way, ecological equilibrium compensation from corporate profits will also support these efforts.  The great thing about this investment kind of concept is that you can invest in the entirety of planet Earth when it comes to climate change or ocean acidification, for example, or invest in particular coral reefs.   One may invest in specific areas of the world with hunger or poverty, or select all of them at once.   I believe people will likely invest in specific areas because they can see overall progress and track results on a computer or an integrated device.   This people-scoping, pure democracy kind of concept helps everyone contribute to solving the major problems on earth.   It identifies sources and sinks to solve the problem, enabling compensation for ecological equilibrium.   This is where we take from the sources on earth and give to the sinks, which are the problems on earth. The hope is to solve the problem by compensating for ecological imbalance through corporate profits (ecological equilibrium compensation) or through direct investment by organizations, so that people will invest in organizations and companies that contribute most to the help project. It is kind of like holistic transitioning (Unidiversity Research Explorers Cycle). A combination of both methods is probably preferable.  Overall, the needs assessed on our planet are captured through people, scoping, pure democracy methods, GIS, and remote sensing methods.  The overall idea is to put all the problems on Earth in front of you on an Earth map, so you can zoom into areas you may want to invest in or that interest you in terms of your desire to help.  In addition, it helps with problem-solving because people can add comments and questions, especially yes-or-no questions about specific areas, to work together.  It is also used as a learning, exploration,  and discovery tool to understand associations through areas of concern.   It is a source of tremendous knowledge, so we can ask questions about these areas as we put them in perspective with the surrounding areas.  Therefore, the maps provide context that allows people to make pure democracy people-scoping observations.   The overall concept allows for planning, tracking, and assessment of investment decisions and helps areas.   In summary, the problems on earth are represented as mountains that can be climbed.

In fact, when you look at the entire planet, you can understand the concept of homeostasis, dynamic equilibrium, and stability on Earth, as well as in certain areas on Earth.   The lower the mountain ranges get, the less volatile, such that the oscillations are minimized.   Eventually, it is hoped that things will be balanced so that there are no more “mountains” on planet Earth.   Then we will have a natural, Earth-Striving planet, where the detrimental impact of pollution, etc., is minimized. However, the concept of climate change will take a long time to address.   Nobody does it better than each of us and all of us together.   World without end…

Pure democracy principles like people scoping is a way to protest current functioning. In a way it’s a way to have everyone contribute to everything relatively speaking on earth.  Assessing people’s opinions about various matters could be accomplished by geographic coordinates through pure democracy and people scoping. This is especially true when we use yes or no answers to a specific questions and polls.  Eventually, we’ll be able to have a census of everybody in earth when we have something of earth scale to problem solve. In fact, multidimensional and multicriteria problems solving starts with people, scoping and pure democracy. Everyone has their own knowledge and relevancy to certain problems on earth therefore, they will be able to contribute relatively speaking in a weight sort of way sometimes and other times may contribute equally among the masses. This is the concept of Eco Geo relative voting that I had a long time ago. With people scoping, pure democracy we have no need for gerrymandering or districts because each person has the same way and different ways at the same time. It is actually dynamic aggregation and can be an aggregated anyway we so choose. The ideas of districts is kind of a strange one when we consider that there are different Eco regions that are more similar than different. This way we were able to aggregate areas that are over a vast amount area or regions. Wouldn’t it be great to have everyone be a representative of our world and our continent as well as our local region? We can still have political representatives to assess gut feel at the end of a rational decision-making process. (environmental problem-solving 1998. ) This method encourages learning, exploration, discovery, and experiencing on earth. In order to contribute more to our world then you have to know more about our world and our people. It is really strange the way things occur these days with popular elections and electoral college results. If we want to have leaders that are elected then I suggest Eco Geo relative voting where on one hand it’s about similarities and on the other hand it’s about differences. I said previously, sometimes you will contribute more to a vote than other times, depending on the subject area involved. If the question is about bridge building and if you are an engineer, you probably have more to contribute on the bridge building process however, from an everybody perspective, visual quality is one of those ideas where everyone can contribute because it doesn’t require extra expertise as does the engineering. It would be great to ask people questions where everyone can be involved and use their knowledge to get contribution weight towards solving problems. These pure democracy, people coping perspectives contribute towards solving all the major problems on earth.

Navigating or trails to nature sites on planet Earth where we can view natural beauty, and wildlife is also a way to balance, learn, explore, and achieve harmony. I have often said it’s better than counseling. I have had ideas to integrate it with counseling so that people can be healed by the power of nature. If we consider each person a geographic coordinate on planet Earth, kind of like the concept of pure democracy, nature points can be seen as a way to balance oneself. These points can also be a location where someone could take a photograph or paint a picture, or meditate. I had the nature striving photo project way back in the early 2000s. I gave a bunch of cameras to Foresters and Foresters captured ecological values and nature values with their photographs during a summer project. It was one of the steppingstone ideas that I had prior to the integrated device idea. After that, I noticed that Google Earth and Google maps started to incorporate nature photos as well. I learned about adding photographs to Maps when I learned it from ESRI. Life gets even better when you integrate something fun with dynamic nature, for example skiing or ice-skating. I am, however, a little disappointed with the fact that we have an overwhelming amount of nature pictures that it doesn’t encourage people to go out into nature because they sit behind their computer instead. However, I hope the nature photos with geographic coordinates encourage people to get more immersed into nature and natural beauty. Nature points can be integrated with humanity, points, spirituality points in places where we have natural healthy living. Point locations where you can fish and have a high degree of success of catching or observing something is a great idea as well. In fact, with pure democracy principles, people can use people scoping to report their catch and observations to fishery and wildlife biologists.

Ecological equilibrium compensation may be the way that we balance sources and sinks in our world. If, for example, food is needed in Somalia and elsewhere, ecological equilibrium can be compensated for by corporate profits worldwide. It can also be obtained from the ice cream people eat around the world. Need is understood through the concept of needs assessment, a process that occurs through people scoping. With the integrated device, people are constantly assessing their needs and reporting them to the university. Investment need is also calculated the same way through people scoping. People determine where the needs are on planet Earth. Therefore, both the sources and the sinks are determined through people scoping. The overall goal is to balance the sources in the sinks to move towards homeostasis striving, dynamic equilibrium striving, and stability on Earth and at every other scale. The most important is the Earth’s concept and communities (natural and humanity), because they are more of a holistic scale then the other levels. Ecological equilibrium compensation is a way to balance the needs of our world, including rare earth minerals.  Countries or geographic areas that use rare earth minerals holistically would be given priority over those that use them in detrimental ways. Coral reef damage and ocean acidification on Earth can be offset by fossil fuel production and battery use. Therefore, ecological equilibrium compensation would come from fossil fuel production, profits, and battery profits. However, I’m not sure about the treatment of coral reefs, but it would definitely support research to help them. We could balance Earth’s oceans by introducing limestone. Ecological equilibrium compensation can be obtained from any boundary structure on a map or any raster pixel by area-based investment. Everyone on earth will be able to invest in anything, anywhere on earth. Need will be ascertained by people scoping the needs assessment of sources and sinks. The overall goal is to strive for dynamic equilibrium, stability, and a homeostatic existence on Earth. The main source is corporate profits. Much can be done to prioritize those corporations that are needed on planet earth, relatively, and those that are more about replicating existing products, so that we can prioritize which to take more profits from. For example, there are 10,000 types of flashlights on planet Earth, so we can seek more ecological equilibrium compensation from those companies, since there are so many types and they are not needed. This would cause them to raise prices and improve their offerings. The whole point of goods and services is to be durable, sustainable, and needed in our world. Also so called externalities on planet Earth, will be balanced in this way, striving towards homeostasis, dynamic equilibrium, and stability. This concept solves most of the major problems on Earth and helps us continuously focus and adapt to changing conditions. This concept is also consistent with the earth, values, and earth ethics associated with natural earth striving, natural humanity striving, natural healthy, living striving, and natural spirituality striving.