It appears that industry, Kings, castles, and kingdoms are using the collective idea of law-enforcement clashes as a tool to distract and divert, as well as to uphold the status quo. It appears that when the proverbial hits the fan, the focus is always on the people at the bottom. However, lately, you will notice the highlighting of people at the top for malfeasance and misbehavior. This may be the indicator that my overall hypothesis has been proven.
The manufacturing of crime at the bottom and at the top on a broad-scale societal level is occurring. I even have a hypothesis that crime is caused by industrial earth, kings, castles, and kingdoms’ approach to life on earth, either directly or indirectly. It also seems like a distraction and diversion to focus so much on Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Law enforcement has long focused on the masses and people at the bottom of the hierarchy because that is where the negative fissionary energy occurs. My hypothesis is different. The industrial Earth Kings’ approach to life on Earth causes much overt crime and malfeasance because it focuses primarily on business finances and not natural healthy living and nature perspectives; The establishment also indirectly fuels crime by creating survival zone suffering conditions. I think industrial Earth Kings, castles, and kingdoms recognized that we were starting to focus on the manufacturing of crime, directly or indirectly. For that reason, they needed to point the picture at the billionaires who were misbehaving. In other words, I think it’s all manufactured. However, one thing I’m not sure about is Trump. Although his perception is different, it sure seems like he’s in a downward spiral. Has this condition been manufactured as well? More than ever, industrial earth, Kings, castles, and kingdoms need to distract and divert attention from what is going on in our world today. It may even go back to Carew Castle, the tidal mill, or 1000 years ago. Another hypothesis is that it goes back to the birth of universities on earth. Maybe it’s the idea of both hypotheses being considered relatively. Did the takings extraction-exclusion cycle begin with these two major historical events?
Our current societal architecture, often characterized by its hierarchical and extractive nature—reminiscent of feudalistic structures and industrial paradigms—appears to rely heavily on law enforcement to uphold its prevailing status quo. The same is true for the use of the military. This observation prompts a critical examination of whether the very concept of crime is, to a significant extent, a manufactured construct within these established systems.
It strikes me that a substantial portion of what we label as criminal activity may not be an inherent flaw of individuals but rather a direct or indirect consequence of these deeply entrenched societal models. My working hypothesis posits that such systems, through their inherent inequalities and mechanisms of resource appropriation, inadvertently foster what could be termed “survival zone suffering” among the broader populace. This suffering, born from systemic deprivation and limited opportunity, then manifests in behaviors that are subsequently criminalized, effectively positioning those at the lower echelons of society as the primary source of disorder. For an extended period, law enforcement efforts have disproportionately targeted these marginalized groups, solidifying the perception that they, rather than systemic failures, are the fundamental problem. This in addition to reductionistic fine scale laws for penalization purposes seem to give endless tools to law and law enforcement. We should transition to holistic loving, caring, sharing, giving, forgiving, and genuine kind striving to bring about conditions of comfort, joy, love, hope, unity, equity, faith, justice and sustainable striving happiness in a preventative way so we minimize persecutory violence.
It appears that the prevailing power structures have an ever-increasing need to manipulate public attention and redirect it away from their foundational imperatives and accumulating systemic pressures. This phenomenon might trace its origins back significantly further than commonly assumed. Perhaps its roots lie in the very inception of centralized power structures, potentially as far back as the Carew Castle or the rise of institutionalized knowledge in the earliest universities. Could these historical junctures mark the genesis of what I perceive as the “takings, extraction, exchange, and exclusion cycle”—a continuous historical process of wealth concentration, financial prioritization resource monopolization, and the systematic marginalization of vast segments of humanity? It is critical to research and explore whether these pivotal historical developments initiated the enduring patterns of inequality and the subsequent need for coercive enforcement that characterize our world today.