I find it strange because I’m a man of limited means right now, but I seem to be supporting many nonprofits.  I think it’s a manufactured condition for those lower in the industrial earth, kings, castles, and kingdoms hierarchy to give their heart energy and their resources to nonprofits to solve problems on earth. Where does the investment go and which areas are helped by donations or investments?  Why not have those that are polluters invest or pay more? It depends on the value energy and benefits created by the investments as well. People want to invest where there are great benefits or dividends to be earned based on natural value added to planet Earth homeostasis or dynamic equilibrium as we strive for sustainable striving happiness. With the We-Me Explorers Cycle, we should be able to prioritize those who should invest more energy and resources toward solving these problems on Earth. With GIS, “the where” question is answered.  I’m not just talking about just donating to nonprofits; I am referring to a rational approach to distributing energy and resources to those areas as well as who need them on Earth.   This is about naturally and spatially relative prioritizing help project investment to area on Earth that need the help the most prioritizing the major problems on Earth. Creating opportunities for investment on Earth is key to solving problems on Earth. Eco geo relative prioritization helps us prioritize the needs and where investment is needed.

My conviction, informed by what I envision as the We-Me Explorers Cycle, champions a fundamental shift in this paradigm. Rather than exclusively relying on individual altruism, we should be establishing a comprehensive framework that systematically identifies and incentivizes entities and areas be they institutions, corporations, or individuals of substantial means—who are best positioned to invest significant energy and resources into sustainable solutions. This should be done with eco-geo relative prioritization. It also should be done by free choice investment of the masses.

This initiative transcends the traditional encouragement of charitable donations. It advocates for a truly rational and equitable strategy for distributing the collective energy and investment wealth of our planet in a more nature centric way. We require a sophisticated methodology like area based investment and the help project which combines all significant needs on earth together to ensure that those with the greatest capacity to effect large-scale change are indeed contributing their fair share, thereby optimizing our collective impact on pressing global issues.