I find it strange because I’m a man of limited means right now, but I seem to be supporting many nonprofits.  I think it’s a manufactured condition for those lower in the industrial earth, kings, castles, and kingdoms hierarchy to give their heart energy and their resources to nonprofits to solve problems on earth.   However, with the We-Me Explorers Cycle, we should be able to prioritize those who should invest more energy and resources toward solving these problems on Earth.   I’m not just talking about donating to nonprofits; I am referring to a rational approach to distributing energy and resources to those who need them on Earth.   

I’ve observed a curious paradox in my own experience: despite operating with relatively constrained personal resources, I consistently find myself deeply engaged in supporting numerous philanthropic organizations. This has led me to reflect on what appears to be a systemic dynamic—a prevailing expectation for individuals, particularly those at the foundational levels of societal structures, to dedicate their invaluable emotional energy and tangible assets towards resolving significant global challenges. It often feels as though this responsibility is disproportionately borne, potentially diverting essential contributions from spheres where greater leverage might exist.

My conviction, informed by what I envision as the We-Me Explorers Cycle, champions a fundamental shift in this paradigm. Rather than exclusively relying on individual altruism, we should be establishing a comprehensive framework that systematically identifies and incentivizes entities and areas be they institutions, corporations, or individuals of substantial means—who are best positioned to invest significant energy and resources into sustainable solutions. This should be done with eco-geo relative prioritization.

This initiative transcends the traditional encouragement of charitable donations. It advocates for a truly rational and equitable strategy for distributing the collective energy and wealth of our planet. We require a sophisticated methodology to ensure that those with the greatest capacity to effect large-scale change are indeed contributing their fair share, thereby optimizing our collective impact on pressing global issues.