I have a question about solar panels in their existing form.\u00a0 It seems that if solar panels continue to gain popularity, it would significantly increase the albedo effect and the loss of snow and ice worldwide as more black absorbing albedo effect increases.\u00a0 We seem to have already created blacktop and black roofs worldwide.\u00a0 However, it may be a relative benefit to having solar panels because of less pollution from power generation in traditional fossil fuel consumption.\u00a0 Maybe we must assess, problem-solve, and plan a more well-planned perspective.\u00a0 Maybe it is about assessing trade-offs relatively.\u00a0 It seems we ecogeorationalize a prioritization plan to incentivize solar panels more in certain areas and less in others.\u00a0 We could make solar panels with less albedo effect and simultaneously strive to eliminate fossil fuel combustion.\u00a0 Energy generation and conservation ought to be an integrative concept.\u00a0 They ought to be related to the area’s characteristics, suitability, and potential while at the same time trying to reduce pollution in all forms as much as possible.\u00a0 Maybe if we were more thoughtful about energy, we would reduce our consumption.\u00a0 Imagine if we all worked with the Eco-Geo We-Me integrated device and brainstormed with everyone who wanted to contribute.\u00a0 However, once we have everyone’s ideas, I can imagine a world where energy production is more of an integrative concept using as many ideas as possible.\u00a0 We could generate energy while we have locomotion and trains.\u00a0 It is just like the car concept.\u00a0 We should be able to generate power while a train moves across the terrain with natural momentum.\u00a0 We could have wave generation where it makes sense, the wind where it makes sense, and solar where it makes sense.\u00a0 Maybe biomass where it makes sense and trains wherever possible.\u00a0 It ought to be planned out in an ecogeorational way.\u00a0 No other way is close to a rational or a real solution.\u00a0 We could devote everybody to solving this problem; it would only be part of the overall effort to solve the problem.\u00a0 I see contributions from everyone as a public scoping or contribution to problem-solving inclusion ideas.\u00a0 However, most problem-solving will be accomplished in this integrative, all-inclusive way with those with more to offer regarding integrated ecogeorelative problem-solving ability.\u00a0 However, some great ideas come from regular people; therefore, we must all have the opportunity to contribute.\u00a0 So, it is both.\u00a0 It is an evenness spatial equal opportunity to contribute because we all have the potential to come up with great ideas.\u00a0 It is also the ecogeorational relative weighting regarding cumulative knowledge, expertise, and interdisciplinary way.\u00a0 Many decisions are made from data; thus, the data are critical because interdisciplinary experts begin the rational decision process with data, which is often spatial.\u00a0 In sum, we are all in this together, and we should be relatively incentivized and encouraged to collaborate and contribute what we can to help one another, everyone, everything, everywhere on Earth as much as we can.\u00a0 It makes sense that everyone is the same, but at the same time, everybody is different.\u00a0 The different part is an accumulation of characteristics that is up to each person relative to their interests, purpose, life’s path, aspirations, and who they are as individuals.\u00a0 No matter what you choose for your life’s path, it is best to do what you can in terms of helping one another with the cumulativeness of who you are as an individual.\u00a0 Every niche organization is made up of every role on this planet.\u00a0 More weight should be put on everyone to do what they can, relative to their cumulativeness at whatever place or time you are in your life.\u00a0 The rest is up to you.\u00a0 Your cumulativeness should be ever increasing.\u00a0 Otherwise, you are stagnant and somewhat static.\u00a0 If you ever feel this way, you need help from mentors, counselors, inspirational people, education, health care, spirituality, and anyone else who will talk to you.\u00a0 The ECVI Ecological Contribution Value Index inspires people to be genuinely holistic and sustainable, striving while we live on planet Earth.\u00a0 Some people can help more or some less, but differently.\u00a0 The ECVI is an ecogeorational way to look at a more important indicator because we should focus on EVCI instead of just how much money, power, or coolness a person has.\u00a0 The EEC (Ecological Equilibrium Compensation) incentive is about striving for equality in terms of a dynamic equilibrium and homeostasis survivability for everyone, everything, everywhere.\u00a0 The amount of EEC depends on how much you help with everyone, everything, everywhere.\u00a0 The ECVI and EVPI (Ecological Values Potential Index) are about your potential and roles and your various sustainable striving behaviors in context with your chosen roles, regardless of whether they are genuine holistic public, genuine holistic private, or genuine holistic research knowledge.\u00a0 However, it is more rational to have EVCI be an inspirational incentive for everyone so that everyone strives to do what they can relative to their interests and life’s path if it is in context with the bigger picture.\u00a0 We should have several conferences on the EEC, EVPI, and EVCI.\u00a0 Here are some ideas on EEC.\u00a0 EEC should be related to the amount one helps (or it could be an ENO) with the public good.\u00a0 It should relate to involvement in planned research and public scoping efforts.\u00a0 It should relate to the energy, value, benefit, or help you do on the ground to help.\u00a0 I imagine several roles or opportunities to help will be available on a point-based, ever-changing opportunity to help map (Part of the ecogeo scheduler).\u00a0 Any of these public benefiting roles will contribute to one’s EEC.\u00a0 Likewise, EVCI will be the cumulative totality you have to offer in several areas relative to your role in context with your environment and humanity.\u00a0 These can be chosen, combined, or integrated in any way.\u00a0 The closer you function to a sustainable striving nature, the closer you are to genuine holistic striving, your experience and education, continuous learning, creativity; role contribution, role collaboration, your knowledge\/knowledge contribution index, holistic in context sustainable striving technology contribution, sustainable string investment index, closer to education\/mentoring, ENOs EVCI, ideas you contribute, the index of EEC public good you contribute, genuine kindness, holistic problem solving, and prevention ability.\u00a0 Furthermore, there is a Wow index to inspire people that add integrative beauty or creativity to the world, a difficult role or organization index, your sustainable striving investment index (products you buy index and organizations you invest in index), travel cost index relative to cumulative benefit including your fossil fuel consumption\/pollution index related to cumulative benefit.\u00a0 All you need to do is turn the potential into a holistic positive energy contribution.<\/p>\n
As far as solar panels are concerned, it would be best to lessen the albedo effect, and one way to do this may be to use the color of sand ( I found this in the Sahara desert), as it is more of a natural color for solar panels.\u00a0 Having more sand-colored roofs and limestone or gravel roads would make sense.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
I have a question about solar panels in their existing form.\u00a0 It seems that if solar panels continue to gain popularity, it would significantly increase the albedo effect and the loss of snow and ice worldwide as more black absorbing albedo effect increases.\u00a0 We seem to have already created blacktop and black roofs worldwide.\u00a0 However, … Continue reading SOLAR PANELS AND ENERGY AND BRAIN ENERGY EVCI EEC EVPI INDICES<\/span>