Those who put people in categories like criminals seem to be overlooking themselves in the analysis.\u00a0 In essence, labeling someone as detrimental as a “criminal” kills them in some way, shape, or form.\u00a0 We need to get to people first before they have a chance at being labeled something so negative.\u00a0 Why don’t we get to the so-called criminals before they can get impacted by the law?\u00a0 It is strange.\u00a0 It seems to me that we ought to eliminate the word criminal.\u00a0 Instead, we can have a scientific index assessment that involves the totality of one’s functioning, including one’s well-intentioned contributions toward improving our world.\u00a0 It becomes more about inspiration incentives instead of waiting to be labeled something.\u00a0 The word criminal is political and is often out of context with one’s totality.\u00a0 In essence, simply labeling someone a criminal is criminal if we stick with arcane concepts of crime and punishment.\u00a0 They dropped the ball on getting someone the help they needed in the first place.\u00a0 It represents a cycle of violence that starts with confinement, loneliness, isolation, and destructive influences of others.\u00a0 A more relevant assessment of what we used to call “criminal” would be a cumulative assessment of all the detrimentally impacting behaviors towards other people and our cumulative environment.\u00a0 It makes sense for everyone to function in our world, contributing what they can towards loving, caring, and helping one another rather than trying to find people to label criminals.\u00a0 Criminality is a war against the people without understanding the cumulative circumstances it took to get a person in a suffering survival zone in the first place.\u00a0 Criminality is big business and supports a huge chunk of the traditional economy.\u00a0 Thus, it is resistant to change.\u00a0 Labeling people criminals is part of this archaic infrastructure bound and determined to find fault with natural spiritual miracles.\u00a0 It makes God cry.\u00a0 Remember that we were small children and are still relatively young.\u00a0 Labeling someone a criminal means that the rest of us did not do our job of loving, caring, sharing, giving, forgiving, and genuine kindness striving in the first place.\u00a0 Some were not nurtured enough.\u00a0 It does not make sense to label people criminals at all.\u00a0 In essence, it is like a war crime when people are labeled prisoners of war, but instead of war, they are victims of an out-of-context economy and traditional functioning.\u00a0 Our priorities are all screwed up.\u00a0 We need to put everyone, everything, everywhere on the relative priority list.\u00a0 However, I wonder if we should look at a more rational context assessment and then put things in a ratio form of prioritization, a more acceptable form of assessment.\u00a0 Furthermore, traditionally, this concept does not make sense because the data is not normalized relative to anything else.<\/p>\n
This type of traditional out-of-context analysis has been going on for a long time, and the detrimental impacts are enormous.\u00a0 This only leads to the furtherance of self-promulgating, out-of-context political violence from those who “know not what they do.” I believe Jesus said the exact quote.\u00a0 It is true; they know not what they do.\u00a0 I am trying to tell them what they do and have been trying to figure out our problems for a long time.\u00a0 Let us now work together with a foundation of love, compassion, care, forgiveness, nature concepts, sharing, giving, simplicity, living, genuine kindness, striving, and learning in context to all that is highly relevant.\u00a0 At the same time, we can spread the holistic inclusion project and inspirational inclusion incentives.\u00a0 We must transform to this perspective.\u00a0 I do not see another way.\u00a0 Otherwise, we are trying to create “criminals”.\u00a0 Creating “criminals” unknowingly serves no other purpose than to increase more fortunate people’s ultra-competitive edge over those less fortunate.\u00a0 This allows the creation of enslaved people while those that may be more “criminal” are labeled slave labor so others can profit more from a money perspective.\u00a0 Labeling people may significantly benefit the economy because of this slave labor and takings.\u00a0 Maybe it makes the more fortunate look better, feel better, or get more privileges and benefits in our world.<\/p>\n
Consequently, anybody labeled criminal indicates our current systems and processes are inadequate.\u00a0 Criminal means that we have not done what is necessary to prevent this concept in the first place.\u00a0 The problem was not solved promptly or contained in the first place.\u00a0 It is an indicator that our relative priorities are in the wrong place.\u00a0 Furthermore, every criminal is an out-of-context concept and a problem that was not prevented or solved when it should have been.\u00a0 This is often because people are too concerned about making money, achieving success in the current definition, ultra-competing for a hierarchical position in society, and functioning in complacent organizations.\u00a0 These organizations also use a set of rules and procedures to get people in trouble at work and limit their fitness success.<\/p>\n
Furthermore, many hierarchical people may suffer in their positions and lack time or concern to look beyond their functioning.\u00a0 I have also written that many people are in such a state of survival and living cycle that they sometimes gain satisfaction from others’ extreme suffering because it makes them feel better about their situation.\u00a0 It is the same concept I have noticed with police blotter cultures.\u00a0 The further we deviate from God, nature, humanity, and simplicity, the more stressed everyone gets.\u00a0 The more complex and frustrating work piles up on everyone’s desks, and they work for the sake of work and drop all context.\u00a0 This extreme reductionist approach to societal functioning creates a downward spiral feedback loop, reverberating throughout our reactive complexity society, creating transference to those most susceptible to perturbation and risk.\u00a0 Is everyone too busy to care?<\/p>\n
Does this create a pollution feedback loop?<\/p>\n
From a traditional perspective, are we all relative “criminals” really?\u00a0 Let us get rid of the word reactionary justice because it is the most negative concept ever created.\u00a0 It represents a positive feedback pollution loop.\u00a0 Please understand me; I believe people who exhibit these behaviors need help, and it is not their fault.\u00a0 But they need real help as well from everyone, everything, everywhere on Earth too.\u00a0 We ought to be compassionate in such a way that provides them with the care needed and chances of reintegration into a higher, relatively accessible, contributing life.\u00a0 We must research and try and learn as much as we can from them to better find ways to minimize the chance that people get into these pollution manufacturing positions in the future.\u00a0 The real reason is that we need everyone on Earth to contribute what they can in terms of energy so we can live on this planet in a sustainable, striving way.<\/p>\n
In summary, we must holistically include everyone on Earth with inspirational incentives and inclusion.\u00a0 People need to learn to become holistic, holy, or both.\u00a0 We must strive to be loving, caring, sharing, giving, forgiving, and genuine kindness, striving to bring around conditions of comfort, joy, love, hope, faith, and sustainable striving for happiness.\u00a0 World without end\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Those who put people in categories like criminals seem to be overlooking themselves in the analysis.\u00a0 In essence, labeling someone as detrimental as a “criminal” kills them in some way, shape, or form.\u00a0 We need to get to people first before they have a chance at being labeled something so negative.\u00a0 Why don’t we get … Continue reading Criminals<\/span>