It does not make sense to have liberal or conservative. It is a ridiculous concept. It is even more foolish to put a wall around these concepts and stay in each respective proverbial country of liberal or conservative. Since I went to university to learn, I do not understand these well enough to comment on each one because I try to be me (which is who I am as a person.) Conservatism and liberalism, to me, are a dynamic continuum instead of a controversial bubble war concept. Not that it is anyone’s business, but I tend to see the world as dynamic and ever-changing. Laws and policies are primarily static and tend to stagnate progress and detrimentally impact severely. This is because they are often out of context or insufficient to capture the essence of all it means to be human in our world of nature, God, and spirituality. I favor educational learning. As a person who works with nature, it did not take long to realize that forests and laws are incompatible because what is best for the law is not the best for the forest and nature itself. The same is true for our Earth as well. All human influence and organizational boundaries do not unite but fragment and isolate us, causing complexity and confusion over simplicity and closer to nature functioning with planning. This planning must integrate humanity with nature sustainably, holistically, and ecologically. We must learn from nature and mimic its functioning, where it contributes to helping strive toward those sustainable goals.

On the other hand, we must strive to keep enlightening ourselves with the foundational fundamentals learned from our educational learning. We should internalize the beneficial, enlightening teachings from God, spirituality, and any other beneficial contributions from philosophy, Buddhism, or anything else that helps bring harmony to our world. We could even relatively weigh and prioritize each concept by assigning a relative importance index and relative societal acceptance index, which is a great way to prioritize learning. (The same thing should be done on the internet with all potential classes someone might take). The liberal, conservative concept is weird because people are individuals. They are the sum total of all that is learned in their life. These days, too often, people know how to be liberal or conservative, which is an itinerant acceptance ploy to get power or status rather than solve problems. Maybe it says something about the majority of our functioning. Words that mean dynamic processes rather than static are more adaptively beneficial for our world. If you want to call it something other than “all that you have learned,” why not call it the liberal-conservative liberalism continuum? I would instead call it adaptive learning, adaptive rationalization, adaptive prioritizing, adaptive allocation of educational learning, adaptive problem solving, adaptive planning, or adaptive ecogeosytematics. Adaptive Ecogeosytematics is probably a tremendous dynamic summary word.

Law is status quo staticness.  It is a static way to look at a dynamic functioning planet Earth.  Law is too cumbersome for anyone to understand in its entirety.   However, it was developed when we did not have holistic technologies, and holistic science thus is archaic in transitioning toward a more desired future condition.  Don’t get me wrong.  I think lawyers and people who work in the field of law are tremendously valuable in a different, more holistic prescriptive advice and holistic arbitration context.  We must transition from this reactionary reductionistic perspective as soon as possible.

Reactionary justice is the continuation of violence. I would rather see it transform into a Holistic Environmental Justice Health and Safety. It is a concept that is genuinely more holistic and sustainable striving. It also eliminates the emotional hardening that goes along with challenging and demanding jobs when they consistently see people at their worst all the time. This seems to be a feedback loop that may sometimes result in more emotionless and violent behavior. The holistic concept is also more advantageous in terms of health for those in that Ecological Niche Organization because you feel good about the beneficial impact you have in terms of helping people who need help every day. Likewise, the holistic concept creates practical harmony and striving behavior in communities, which increases comfort and trust. Thus, improved communication can occur when someone needs help.

People are reluctant to ask for help in a reactionary justice or trouble-seeking paradigm. It seems like reactionary justice seeks not to end the cycle of violence but instead creates more in terms of detrimental impacts. Using reactionary justice instead of rational problem-solving approaches and helping people in a more genuine holistic way indicates that we are focused on the wrong resolutions of problems and merely temporarily postponing the inevitable continuation of the problem and, thus, further violence. Rational problem-solving is more humane, compassionate, and consistent with our foundational fundamentals instead of more shortsighted business-as-usual approaches. Combining this concept with the Help Project and Holistic Inclusive Blobification Project can prevent people from ever needing any reactionary justice. All human problems are often very involved and complicated and often involve people’s entire lives, which no reactionary justice person can get their arms around in totality. It is best to have love, care, compassion, and empathy for the circumstances many have endured, as many have suffered dearly in significant cumulative impact. This sometimes leads to post-traumatic stress disorder or other forms of mental illness or behavioral competition mechanisms as well as survival mechanisms. I believe too many people are waiting for something to happen instead of being genuine, holistic, loving, caring, and compassionate people. While transforming to a natural, holistic, sustainable, striving planet Earth, we must only use minimal violence when we have exhausted every other means of problem resolution, like when a person has a gun to someone’s head, for example. Over time, I suspect our need for this reactionary justice will be minimized towards the baseline. The paradigm should shift beyond laws and more inadequate life path resolution, which is reactionary violence. It does not consider the extremely high relative importance of every human being on this planet. Everyone needs the absolute most help in terms of care, inclusion, help, and genuine ecological rehabilitation and restoration so they can have more comfort, joy, love, hope, and sustainable striving happiness just like everyone else. The reactionary justice concept is out of context ignorance.

I wonder if we can map this phenomenon and show a correlation between reactionary justice needed and sustainable striving community cohesiveness functioning. I suspect that inclusiveness is the most crucial concept. Reactionary justice impacts a person’s connectedness and inclusion, where most people build self-esteem and need to belong, which are essential for human health and foundational fundamental functioning. As people are impacted (sometimes by opportunistic ultra-competitiveness), people lose connectedness over time and become more vulnerable to perturbations, survival stressors, and lack of opportunities in society. When all the cumulative survival stressors and absence of the ability to support yourself happen, you become vulnerable to illicit opportunistic organizations that often have no compassion at all for anything. (Because they are products of the same processes). Once this happens, people become more hardened and begin a downward spiral feedback loop, which often includes excessive self-medication to feel better, which can be another downward spiral feedback loop. Social interactions are sought with anyone with similar lives, and the struggle continues without inclusion and inadequate means of survival. This creates more compulsion to enter riskier ventures to survive, which sometimes turns criminal or violent. When this happens, the risk of traditional reactionary justice occurs. If arrested, the cycle begins again. If not, survival living conditions occur where people start sleeping anywhere they can and often end up with people in dire straits themselves, contributing to more detrimental influence and the overall downward spiral feedback loop. When this happens, the less violent become homeless, and the more violent live in survival conditions with survival stress until they are pushed beyond their inflection point.

Any time kids are killed or there is a mass shooting, it is a keystone indicator of extreme societal decline.  Most traditional investigations are out of context with the resolution, both temporally and spatially, of the closer-to-reality problems.  Many investigations are erroneous because they lack connectivity to a more thoroughly researched problem scope and definition.  Energy spent on these investigations is often wasted unless connected to some broader, genuine, holistic research.  The goal should be genuine holistic problem-solving, not getting people in trouble or fighting.  Getting people in trouble is like out-of-context reactionary justice violence, which contributes little to ending the cycle of violence.  I have even wondered if investigations themselves and the criminal justice system are being used to create confusion and transference other resolutions.  I have also asked if killings are a way to say, “I told you so someone was going to get hurt,” and a transference occurs, leaving the investigative baggage with the death and the real problems away to reap more havoc elsewhere.  Many times, crimes and horrific violence of intensive media attention may be distractions for some other issues going on in either the region or area.  When I think of kids getting killed, it is an indicator of severe problems in the region or location or a distraction, intimidation, controlling, sick, violent person.  I wonder if something was being investigated in the area, and   “s–t hits the fan” or something.  I also wonder about pedophilia and its relationship with certain drugs or other societal phenomena.  I also wonder about some sick transference game of massive proportions to transfer the attention to killings while control and transference stay with a concentric ring bubble.  In legal cases, investigations often die when someone gets hurt, and the higher the magnitude of the killings, the greater the shock factor and transference ceases or ends with pocketing the money instead of finishing an investigation.  I believe there are itinerant mental illnesses created in people inherently, and they have some repetitive voices in their heads from “killerish” sources that cause them to do what they do.  I believe that extreme control mechanisms of a human being create patterns of a downward spiral of mental illness until the person no longer knows closer to the reality of what is going on.  A person may not be in their state of mind or, combined with the detrimentally impacted mental state, causes them to do what they would not ordinarily do if they were not anthropocentrically controlled.  These situations, combined with desperation survival zone behaviors and mental illness, cause an integrated meltdown of a human being, causing them to directly or indirectly hurt children.  Sometimes, the proximity to solving the problem is a matter of looking at the proximity of any controlling phenomenon or person they may be interested in blaming for coincidental characteristics of some previously illegally obtained surveillance meant to harm.  It may be a way to bring intensive investigation into the area for purposes of causing transference to another or endless distraction and diversionary investigations.

Regardless of the fundamental reasons these tragedies happen, they must stop, but our society as a whole must ecogeorelatively prioritize our societal problems as well.  Solving the killings and tragedies solves the indicator only, not the microcosmic expansion to broader levels.  I think switching priorities from reactionary reductionism to holistic preventative might be a great place to start.

I believe it is our choice to stay in an era that is significantly reliant on medicine primarily and intensive reactionary procedures in the absence of a significant focus on genuine holistic health. I believe the preferred alternative ought to be to transform to a more preventative, integrated, holistic health perspective that includes important prioritization on natural Earth striving behaviors, focus on ecological health, preventable holistic health of the individual, holistic epidemiology, nutrition, fitness, strength and conditioning, and quality of life. The last resort ought to be medical intervention with medications. We ought to strive to minimize side effects or use medications closer to natural substances and perform more minimally invasive techniques if possible. As I have suggested in previous papers, maybe we ought to turn hospitals into integrated, holistic community health that considers the needs of the region rather than just traditional standard structure and functioning. Each should be planned to meet the integrated, holistic needs of the area. At the same time, we should have regional specialty hospitals for those remnants of our “way things are world” illnesses until they are holistically eradicated over time. Hopefully, this will happen sooner than later. A higher focus should be on ESH and prioritization of human health and environmental ecogeosystematic health mitigation and prevention. We ought to use holistic diagnostic methods that create indicators of potential risk.  EMS capability at increased density (preferably doctors or close to doctors at a little broader density) ought to be an essential skill for as many people as possible with the aptitude and ability to learn such basic skills.

I believe we ought to have a location-based connectivity system where not only people know where our health people are at all times to respond to essential life-threatening situations and emergencies. We ought to incentivize people to live and hang out in certain places relative to need and ecogeorelative prioritization. This depends on characteristics, population, special events with high numbers of people, or higher-risk events like skiing. All healthcare people ought to ski for free anywhere, and everywhere they would like in a well-planned way. Likewise, skiing lessons ought to be provided for free for everyone. The same goes for any other higher-risk event, sport, or area where increased need or risk may occur. Incentives to have more EMS, Paramedics, and health care experts, including Doctors in rural areas, especially those further away from trauma hospitals, is a must. It’s our choice.

It seems to me a teaching degree is a weird concept.  Instead, we ought to allow teachers to learn anything they want to know about, preferably something of higher relative importance and relevance to the needs of our children and our world.  It would be interesting to see if we can determine the origin of a weird concept called a teaching degree.  I wonder if some itinerant groups created a teaching degree or something because it seems as if the focus on teaching distracts us from doing the most critical role, inspiring children with fundamental knowledge about more substance.  This substance is often found in contexts related to passionate interests in something important, significant, and relevant rather than focusing on a weird skill concept that should come naturally to those inspired by learning.  This is something real instead of some itinerant job-seeking degree.  It might be one of the biggest problems in education today.  Is it any wonder why we have education issues?  It almost seems like a plot against sustainable striving for holistic progress.  Was it a top-down decision by a decision maker?  Is it an indicator that those in leadership positions were deciding on something they know little about?  Is it an ultra-competitive top-down diversion for the acquisition of political power to dominate someone or something?  I wonder if it was a political lobby to minimize someone’s relative importance by creating masses with similar interests to one another for over-topping?  It warrants further research as it might be about a behind-the-scenes political war of massive proportions.

I believe we ought to go back to the foundational disciplines so that teachers can live a life of living, learning, and loving as they strive towards their desired discipline of interests that ignite their passions in life instead of putting them in some perceptively subservientized means discipline that is sort of a dead end more limiting position.  When teachers can choose their real discipline of interest, they are continuously inspired to learn more in life and are able to transition to other niche organizations or advanced teaching roles in higher-level schools.  A teaching degree as it is creates the appearance of a dead-end job.  I believe it causes more depression, boredom, irrelevancy to a broader discipline, more isolation, and impacts the cumulative health of teachers negatively.  We need our teachers to be as healthy, inspired, and passionate as possible to be the most inspirational and influential while carrying out one of the most critical roles on Earth.  A traditional discipline would help with their self-esteem and confidence.  It will provide connectivity and context with broader inclusive academic disciplines, which are extremely valuable for general acceptance of the more big-picture functioning.  A discipline that inspires continuous learning creates endlessly sustainable striving healthiness and happiness in life.  The passion derived from this concept passes along as sustainable seeking for beneficial energy through inspirational energy and enthusiasm to our kids.  Our kids are our future.

We should transition charity giving to more of a cumulative charity prioritization and allocation responsibility group. We ought to have all donated funds offered to a concept like a Real Angel Sustainable Striving Prioritization and allocation group connected to the top of the spectrum triangle research assessment ecogeorational allocation help project for determining EEC. Otherwise, we ought to have various predetermined categories of needed allocation. People can select the category to allocate their energy to feel good about contributing to a specific area that means a lot to them. The area can be a geographic area or a sector to be allocated later by those that can ecogeoallocate at the top of the spectrum triangle or those connected to the top. Once we have given potential energy in those needed areas around Planet Earth, it is relatively weighted in an ecogeorelative way, whatever way is deemed most appropriate given the proximity and the highest relative help needed depending on the relative importance, urgency need, and relative significance or any other indicator considered necessary. Some areas I might suggest that we ought to allocate toward humanitarian survival need and preventable suffering first, critical ecogeorelative ecogeosystematic environmental problems, stopping and preventing violence of all forms, Area Decisions Assessment Planning and Tracking, Help project mountaineering and peace corp ecological restoration, inclusion allocation and getting people on life’s path so they can contribute the most of what they have to offer, spectrum triangle ecological niche roles for everyone and public scoping, integrated environmental technology prioritization, incentives for education and helping kids and parents, ecogeorational conversion to Ecological Niche Organizations and Ecological Niche Roles in an ecogeosystematic and ecogeorelative context system, striving to help everyone get to comfort survival level, sustainable striving investment energy ecogeoallocation systems, EEC, and energy, value, and benefits creation in a continuous web and chain value adding way, inspiring genuine kind competition, inspirational spectrum milestones, stopping quid pro quo, inspiration and incentives for EVII, EVCI, EEC milestones, rail trails and nature trails, tiki copa cabanas mansions, resorts, natural areas, islands, sailboats, bed and breakfasts, restaurants. Culinary food science and nutrition expansion, photography courses, and anything else determined to add tremendous value to our planet, people, natural environment, communities, future (kids), and all associated contributing characteristics thereof.

All the world’s militaries ought to be converted to an Ecological Restoration Corps or a well-planned and prioritized Peace Corps-like concept.  I believe women can do anything they want to do in life.  However, It would help women more if they take advantage of their natural attributes like natural propensity toward love, caring, education, nature, and nurturing—compassion and helping one another rather than fighting in combat.  The same goes for many men.  It seems to me that we spend a lot trying to convert people to a more propensity towards being prepared to fight with violence (all types) rather than to contribute toward solving problems in a well-planned holistic way.  It goes against the principle of nature that we should expend the least energy while getting the most energy in return.  Conversion of our natural tendencies toward a more extreme anthropocentric and anthropogenic environment leads to more of the same.  It expends tremendous energy, converting our inherent nature to something less natural.  I believe those beneficially impacting characteristics inherent in our nature are closer to the most integrated concepts of God, love, and nature.  Focusing on anything that expends energy on efforts that yield more detrimental impacts than it creates makes no sense.  We must expend energy in the most holistic and rational ways as it is what we need the most today as we transition to an era where we focus more on planning and Interdisciplinary ecosystems.  The qualities naturally inherent in women and many men are what we need most, but being themselves is better than trying to conform or convert them to a “way things are world.” The military excels at training and preparing people and organizations, but it would be great if they helped change the context.  World without end…

I have an idea about bringing everyone together on planet Earth regarding spirituality, religion, nature principles, foundational fundamentals, prioritized classes, living, learning, and loving. It seems that the close to 7 billion people on planet Earth are similar and different simultaneously. What if we had a broader context where we focused on our unifying collective humanity regarding foundation principles that almost all religions have in common? We must integrate these concepts with nurturing principles learned from nature. These principles include love, care, compassion, nurturing, nature, helping one another, and others that are learned in religion, philosophy, nature nurturing, and other inspirational messages from nature and spirituality. At the same time, we are all different, leaving us the freedom and flexibility to study the finer points and various interpretations in the Bible (as long as they are genuine holistic interpretations), spirituality, nature writing, or any other writings or messages that have a positive benefiting genuine holistic sustainable striving concept to learn that would benefit all of humanity. Likewise, our differences give us the ability to learn whatever it is each of us wants to learn, which allows for a diversity of ideas that contribute to research ideas that allow us to learn. This way, we could all get an inspirational message on Sunday or whenever that we all should share as our core foundational principles as a human family. On the other hand, we can learn about differences by choosing a specific religion and/or spirituality as well as other educational enlightenment that may contribute in a highly relevant way at the same time. This satisfies both our commonality and our individuality at the same time. We can celebrate and work together on our similarities and continually learn from our differences. What do you think?

People need connectivity, inclusion, and opportunities to mingle with people that could inspire them to get on a particular life’s path.  In the past, people with less mentoring and less parenting wondered what to do.  Our past freedom society was more like freedom because we let people with great potential slip through the cracks.  This availed these people to opportunists who preyed upon their desperate need for a job doing anything that would support them.  In this era, there were a lot of opportunities to get distracted.  Many, I noticed, were starting to drink, smoke, and do drugs and pay less attention to the higher relative importance of finding ways to get inspired to get on the path of their dreams.  Some itinerant distracting and corrupting force may have been meant to knock people off their potential life’s path.  Life is about balance, but it is more like a relative balance at various stages of one’s life.  High school should be about having fun, socializing, becoming socialized, and learning.  It should not be about classifying people according to characteristics or criteria.  We should inspire kids to have holistic fun, but the higher relative importance should be keeping kids on genuinely holistic and well-balanced learning and exploring paths.  We should have a team of caring and loving people who look out for kids (and integrated internet communities) who may be struggling during this period, as it is vital.  Too often, I have wondered whether struggling kids can rise out of the temptation to have fun only and put academics and exploring last.  This sets them up for a more slavish type experience, often when they make low wages and get low benefits, as those who could potentially advocate for them are preoccupied with supremacist categorizations of them.  Likewise, some resort to dealing drugs because opportunists have sought out people for various reasons to do such things.  The same goes for one-dimensional extreme anthropocentric bottom-line money-making potential opportunities.  Sometimes, beautiful women were selected primarily for their good looks and put on an intentional trail instead of choosing a more balanced, genuine, holistic trail.  Some women genuinely want to be in certain holistic professions.  Still, it seems to me that in the past, it was only an attempt to have some control over beautiful women to make money directly or indirectly.  I believe women themselves are born more genuinely holistic because of their natural characteristics and qualities given to them by Nature and God.  This is why so many women are in some of the highest EVCI roles like health, teaching, parenting, holistic counseling, and positions that love and care about people, kids, families, communities, society, and many nature and environment positions.  However, I believe that many have been controlled and domineered by wolf opportunists sometimes instead of loving and caring for more nature-centric people.  I may be wrong sometimes, and maybe things have changed (I wonder why things have changed interestingly).  I want to ensure that everyone can do whatever they want in life as long as their functioning is genuinely holistic.  Still, it must be in context with genuine holistic, sustainable striving advice, which is often the integration of well-meaning mentoring from genuine holistic people.  Did people intentionally cause others to get on certain life paths so their lives could be controlled and maximum profit extracted from them?  I have wondered if some of the large wealth centers on Earth have been created by taking advantage of people in this way or if it is also a distraction.  I believe it is all part of the big picture.  I will do whatever is necessary to help people get out of their servitude roles and connect them with genuine people who genuinely care about them as individuals above all.  We must stop the itinerant controversy creation involving drugs and sex as well.  It has become a complacency behind-the-scenes functioning that appears to be enjoyed by all behind the scenes because nobody ever speaks out about it.  They might be ill and may need urgent help.  Likewise, we must get rid of the extreme anthropocentric destruction of people because of the itinerant controversy created about love and sex.  It appears to me that those who have guided us on sex in the past have lacked the necessary foundational enlightenment from a more compassionate, nature-centric love approach.We must stop the ultra-capitalistic mobbish and oversized destruction of people that involves the most brutal and inhumane behaviors.  People who do such things are experts at destroying people’s inner core spirit and will to live.  These behaviors are in the category of what Jesus said: “They know not what they do.”  Dragging people’s sanctuaries out into the public streets for itinerant reasons to destroy a person, a relationship, a community, or whatever else is one of the destructive, inhumane behaviors that serves no constructive, genuine, holistic, and sustainable striving purpose whatsoever.  Often, these tools of war and extreme violence are dormant until the need for ammunition arises, a profiteering motive occurs, or the potential loss of something occurs, like someone who blows the whistle on the most destructive force ever in the history of humanity free out of context mobbish omerta perception based capitalism.  I must learn more about whether this destructive force started in illicit mobbish organizations as a tool for subversion, then became a corporate tool, and then a government tool.  Either way, this trichotomous functioning and structure have worked quite well for a long time as both a peanut under the walnut shell game or an OK corral pointing the 45 at one another.  The one thing these people did not know (or did they) was that their behaviors not only contributed to killing people, but they also contributed to people living in isolated, lonely, empty, and very impoverished conditions where they have suffered immensely in their survival zones.  It is not all their fault, as many were doing what they were told.  However, now would be a great time for people to become educated and enlightened before we all can hurt one another again.  Those who have hurt the most know who they are and ought to get help for their illness and lack of holistic learning.  In the future, I would like to have a planet based on a foundation of love, caring, compassion, and naturecentricsm balanced with holistic anthropocentric.  Without guidance, mentoring, foundational education, compassion, love and care, and genuine inclusion, we will continue to put more kids at risk of either being itinerantly over or forced into servitude and lives of suffering.  We must let those extreme opportunists take advantage of our youth while those least knowledgeable about the nature of things do their jobs and do what they are told by persecuting and contributing to detrimental impacts on individuals, families, communities, and, eventually, our natural environment.  They know not what they do.  ( At least I hope they do not know what they do as it is better than knowing what they do).  Either way, I am letting them know so they can help transition to a genuine holistic perspective.  I often wonder about the multiplier effects associated with all of these behaviors, especially when an individual is thoroughly over-topped and suffering in extreme suffering survival zones.  Imagine how many people have violent tendencies because of the various contributing characteristics and attempts at stopping the pain within.  These experiences and totality result in a cumulative significant impact on individuals, which multiplies in a downward spiral feedback loop in our society.  I have often wondered how much detrimental impacts could be considered catalysts to adding to multiplying detrimental impacts and downward spiral feedback loops.  These mechanisms in society become like a complexity and chaos creation force that continually adds more and more to an already out-of-control cumulatively and significantly impacted populace.  Let’s go on functioning holistically.  The reactive complexity and continuous controversy creation cycles contribute more and more to the problems.  At the same time, the narrow perspectives and functioning of those with power and authority do their jobs at a different pace out of context with the magnitude and resolution of the closer-to-reality appropriately defined problems.  In the past, the real opportunistic people who take advantage of our extreme context, reactionary complexity, and controversy-creation world have learned that they can exponentially maximize their profit by inflicting detrimental influences and servitude functioning as well as overtopping behaviors.  At the same time, they use the rigid, structured, extreme, traditional, slow-paced system to their advantage.  They profiteer in extremely ultra-competitive ways and let others do the dirty work of wasting people’s lives away or eradicating them.  In a more planned approach with genuine holistic and sustainable striving methods, we can eliminate the detrimental functioning and deleterious structures to get every individual to self-assess themselves to understand their current position on the spectrum.  Then, we can transition once they find out their desired future condition in context with the desired future condition of our planet and every part thereof.  It is just a matter of understanding the inputs needed to get from here to there when, historically, not many were being helped because many felt they couldn’t get there from here ( An old Maine saying).  The inputs include an infusion of nature love and holistic spirituality, nature education, nurturing, education itself, highly prioritized courses, health care, counseling, and mentoring, all to get each individual on their life path doing what they want to contribute.  Therefore, I am attempting to plan out an inclusion and connectivity progression starting in high school.  In high school, some effort ought to be devoted to letting kids know that finding their niche in life is paramount, but it does not have to be a rigid, etched-in-stone determination at earlier ages.  It is sort of like the pyramid concept.  At this stage, we should have a broad foundation in understanding all the broad areas kids might be interested in to inspire them to learn.  Once kids find what it is that interests them in life, then they either broaden their interests or narrow their interests as they learn more about what they want to learn about in life so they can contribute what they can and what makes them live the way they want to live in context with genuine holistic and sustainable striving needs.  As we get higher on the pyramid, we get more focused on the areas of knowledge needed while keeping in touch and being supported by the rest of the foundation.  The rest of the pyramid is going to be the best inspirational plan that tries to have multiple ways of connecting, mentoring, and inspiring people to get on their life’s path.  These places might start in the new community inclusion wing in high schools where community members get EEC for presenting and talking with kids about their ecological niche roles and their ecological niche organizations.  They will help kids understand the education and experiences it takes to get on paths leading to similar high-value contribution potential roles, which can be anything from opening a pizza place, repair shop, physician, or a marine biologist, or anything else that is in need or creative or innovative in a genuine holistic, sustainable striving way.  Events could be held at other local community centers as well.  However we decide to plan these inspirational events, they should be done to make the kids feel important and worthy of inclusion.  It is a necessary step in socialization and development.  We ought to have restaurants and pubs that cater to advisers and mentors.  (They ought to be the best well-planned integrated inspirational places with culinary-inspired cuisine) , planned nature mingling clubs with mentors and advisers, mingling sailing with mentors and advisors, natural places and locations picnics and well-planned events, and finally, the most inspirational of all are the experiences when you get through your first two years of college when you get to go to mansions, resorts, and natural places of distinction that are planned to have the most inspirational setting, miraculous people, the best culinary and food science people, the best of everything so that the students of all ages after their respective degree or milestone can connect with mentors, advisers, and other ENR of significance.  These events are critical and significant in a person’s life, so a reasonably substantial amount of resources, investment potential, and EEC must be allocated for such a purpose.  These events must be planned in a nature-centered and classy way that considers the inspirational incentives necessary to inspire people to attend and want to return.  It is also about providing the best experience for people living there.