It seems like many or all organizations and individuals are either being used as transference mechanisms or are potential transference mechanisms. Are government and laws being used as a transference mechanism? If so, have we been hiring people in certain positions that may be something other than the best candidates for positions? Instead, are there some candidates themselves that have ulterior motives to weave themselves into the fabric of organizations for itinerant reasons?

Maybe what has happened is a roller coaster ride of political influence. Over time, the reason why politics has been the priority instead of problems is because of the need for the transference potential power players to be in a position to perform itinerant roles when needed to preserve the chances of keeping the big picture thing covered up, Maybe initially there were itinerant “plants” to perform roles to allow vice versa concepts to occur. Maybe it started as a way to keep resources in the hands of the elite. Perhaps it is to keep power in the hands of the people. It seems either way, those who have the most ability to solve problems and help in a genuinely holistic and sustainable striving way are not being included and prioritized as they should. Power to the people sounds good but does not make sense in an unplanned, irrational way. I fear that narrow perspectives will allocate resources to the people only, and all this will do is function to fund an out-of-control and unplanned, irrational, market-based, extreme ultra-capitalist system.

I am wondering if the hypothesis creation process has created a situation where they had to try and kill a scientist-type person to preserve politics or the way things are in a static type world. Maybe, initially, they were threatened by someone who could potentially get access to understanding something he should have understood the day he was born. Therefore, one of the greatest attributes and qualities of this person’s character and reputation were targeted. Have we gotten to the point where we try to attack a person’s abilities and strengths at any cost if they threaten your long-term manipulation, pollution, monkeywrenching, and itinerant judging behavior for itinerant reasons? Does secrecy and confidentiality have a dichotomous duality that serves the primary purpose of advancing the status quo and keeping the way things are churning at any cost? Are all jobs functioning as payola jobs to keep the “do your job” mentality serving so people can do their jobs and nothing else”? Is the law a concept that has been traditionally used as not only a justification to do something or not do something but is it a concept of or “does not have to do something” above all. In other words, if we all get up and start writing laws from the day we are born and stop the day we die, there will not be enough laws to capture everything in our anthropocentric and natural world. Maybe that is the most crucial point. The duty of love and care seems not to be written in the law. Therefore, so-called law-abiding people do not have to love and care or have compassion. They are not required to prioritize rationality because it is not the law. They are not required to take action to help someone because it is not the law. Are they not required to go beyond the law to solve problems? The law focuses on itinerant persecution, itinerant functioning, itinerant process, and itinerant procedure, which results in itinerant functioning out of context with the right thing to do in all situations. It is also a waste of time and inefficient. The law was mainly created out of the reactionary need to have specific functioning at the expense of problem-solving functioning. It is the itinerant placement of rocks in a stream so you do not have to get your feet wet solving real problems. Are jobs just jobs created by-laws to fill a niche of getting across to the other side of a problem without solving the problems? Have we decided it is better to fund law than education and learning? It seems weird and itinerant functioning to allocate resources towards reactionary functioning at any cost, while those more holistic and closer to rationally holistic preventative approaches get neglected. Is it really about preserving the way things are in the world and the preservation of each individual involved in the process? Do we hold these concepts in higher regard than the planning necessary to transform how things should be sustainable striving planet Earth? Do we put the law above humane functioning? Do we put the law above closer to rational natural functioning? Does law create unnecessary confusion, chaos, process, and control? Does it put perception above reality as all organizations and individuals try and function within the out-of-context anthropocentric “stones” to get across any stream? Does this perception operating increase the perception/reality index in all organizations?

Consequently, people function like their organizations in a highly perceived way to accomplish their objectives at any cost. It seems as if our natural functioning in learning and development of foundational fundamentals helps create a closer to harmonious natural functioning rather than out-of-context perceptions of people who are functioning “doing their job” out of context with everything else. Every rule, law process, and procedure created in an out-of-context way does not bring harmonious rational functioning, but a burden to prioritize means behavior at any cost. We are funding irrational anthropocentric idealism at the expense of the highest value-contributing functioning. As a consequence of law and derived complexity and process, we have prioritized the means instead of the ends. It seems that more law is a consequence of an irrational, extreme, anthropocentric society planned by law in the first place. Is it a feedback loop? The more laws we have, the more we will need laws in the future. The more laws, the more difficult it is to live, learn, and love more naturally. The less complex society, the more we can prioritize what should be prioritized instead of law and itinerant functioning. When I think of little kids, I think about their needs in terms of what they need to give them the best chance to follow their passions, dreams, and aspirations in context with what we need to accomplish in our world. I do not see a kid as transference potential.

We must move beyond the law as all the law does is give those who know more about the law tools to dominate over the best intentions of the most genuine, loving, and caring people on this planet who have more to offer than those who function in pollution, judging, itinerant controversy creation, and manipulative monkey wrenching way. Is it possible that those who know the most about law know the least about what needs to be done? I am hoping I am helping them understand the need to adapt.

In the future, we will all live, learn, explore, and love as a priority. We are all the energy in the world. Each one of us is a contributor and collaborator to the well-being of not only ourselves but everyone, everything, everywhere on Earth. I believe we will be all about our individuality and what we have to offer related to our individuality in context with everything in nature. Therefore, we should be as independent as possible as we strive to do the best we can to learn continuously, love, and continuously live in such a way that contributes all the energy, value, and benefits we can as we live genuinely holistically. This way, we will be able to function in context with a research knowledge perspective that uses data, information, and knowledge from people. This data will be put into in-context research meant to help and contribute energy, value, and benefits to individuals all the way up to planet Earth and beyond. Everyone will be free to schedule a life in any way they want to plan it. Obviously, the broad, longer-term plans will not be as etched in stone, but assessing and planning at stages of your life would be great. I believe we can pick out a life that strives to meet our needs and our collective needs regarding our society and natural environment. It comes down to understanding what kind of help is needed, when, where, why, how, and who you will work with on your dynamic life’s path. If you put this in context with what, when, where, and who you want to work with, we can associate the needs with the individual wants and needs over time. This way, you can get the most energy, benefits, and value for your life while trying to contribute and collaborate with some aspect of improving some part of our world or some part of our humanity in some way. Maybe working together is more about planning a life that fits your living, learning, loving, and what you can help with. You may no longer work for just one organization, or you may not work for any organization. You may work for all organizations. You may be a parent. Or you may work in an individual ENR that is contributing to the collective whole, which might be the top of the spectrum pyramid. You could do both or any unique combination or all of the above. The temporal resolution or epochs is dynamic and ever-changing depending on organizations’ roles and needs as determined by closer-to-reality research and planning. I believe we ought to have more area-based planning where many of our opportunities to help are offered to us in a visual way. This is a great way because it sort of integrates all of the factors by which we all make rational decisions. We can choose destinations that we have not been to, want to explore, have a need for your help resources, match your criterion, meet our needs, increase chances of meeting someone, have a community we want to live in for a while, or anything else for that matter. If you are anything like me, I like to live in more naturally beautiful areas that provide opportunities to recharge my energy. Areas that are close to exploration, adventure, excitement, the ocean, the mountains, culture, fun, education and learning, and people I would like to be around like genuine holistic, high EVCI index people, creative and imaginative dreamer types of people. I like to be creative by striving to solve problems or developing ideas to help somehow. I have a more visual, analytical, integrative brain, so I would like to have all the software and tools to help me come up with ideas and patterns by which I can understand or hypothesize possible correlations for further research. I would like to be able to connect to learning resources as well. It would also be great to think of a life that involves continual exploration and the ability to help someone or something that needs help when my integrative assessment skills determine there is a need. Wouldn’t it be great if we all had an integrative device where we could all contribute in the same way all the time? Likewise, it would be great to know as much as possible about any area on Earth. It would be great to know the history of buildings, nature, and anything else for that matter. I have an idea if having a rentsandshares idea where your life can become a dynamic adventure all the time so you can live life to the fullest sometimes or most of the time. Our infrastructure will be ecogeorelatively planned for ecogeorelative index efficiency. When you leave your current destination, you may take a terramentum-like train to any number of meeting places and oasis places. These places are designed around living, learning, loving, fun, and excitement. During the day you may go to a conference. At night, you might enjoy meeting people, music, fun, food, dancing, and excitement. At each hub, there will be a rentsandshares place where you can have a more local efficient vehicle to explore and travel with. This idea is great because you can drive any type of vehicle you want relative to your needs at the time. Rentsandshares also has houses of any type to live in relative to your needs. These places are organized by individual attributes so that houses that are suitable for you relative to who you are relatively weighted and prioritized at a higher rating to maximize your comfort. The places you go, the places you stay, the vehicle you use, the places you live, the people you meet, the mountains you climb to help, the schedule you have, and the life you live will be assisted by ecogeorelativity rationality and ecogeosystematics. It makes life optimal relative to you and everything else that matters in a more highly relatively prioritized way. In fact, because everything is available on your device or computer, you will be able to function at minimal preplanning sometimes and will have maximum enjoyment in life as various deals are continuously presented to you relative to your needs in the area or the time period. These deals can be anything that strives to make your life better. The great thing is you can add data as you live your life to help everyone else as well. This may add to your EVCI index, giving you more incentives. I believe my life will be living, learning, exploring, and loving as I try to attend conferences to learn, contribute, and collaborate on what I have to offer. I am one of the most honest, relatively balanced, desire-to-help, loyal, working-together people who genuinely want to strive for a sustainable planet Earth for everyone, everything, and everywhere.

I learned that itinerant controversy creation, violence, and war create power in the hands of those most willing to go to any extreme to cause controversy. In essence, it causes transference potential to increase violent conflict, complexity, and controversy creation. It is their motive because they had a chance to solve problems holistically and chose not to in favor of creating more controversy to have ultra-competitive means of exclusion so that power can remain with those willing to do the most violence rather than solve problems in a genuinely holistic way. It is how those with power hedge and stay in power over the rest of us. The itinerant controversy creation potential increases with the potential to profiteer, powerteer, heroteer, or mountaineer for anything of extreme value. If we found a way to take away all the destructive energy from these destructive forces, they would not be able to destroy people, families, communities, our society, and our planet anymore. We then would become genuine holistic problem-solving people instead of itinerant dominating, controversy-creating, violence-creating, ultra-competitive, and destructive types of people. It seems to me that all individuals are susceptible to the abuse and power associated with everything possible. If we could transform into nothing but holistic, this would not happen. It comes down to this. If we devote all our resources to everything possible to destructive transference forces, that is what we will get. The degree to which they go depends on the amount to be gained, the amount to be lost, or both, depending on your perspective. If we look at things from a more genuine holistic perspective, we could allocate all this energy towards nothing but energy, value, and benefit-producing ways. Instead of violence, death, and destruction, we would have love, peace, collaboration, cohesion, and positive energy-producing holistic generators in the future. The way of the future is to assess, plan, and use ecogeorelativity rationality, prioritization, and allocation, all for problem-solving and genuine holistic future problem prevention. Once we do such a thing, we will be able to inspire inclusive people by providing in-context knowledge that they can use to help add more value, energy, and benefits to the world. We can determine what, where, when, how much, and anything else. This will enable us to give everyone what they need in terms of knowledge to make better decisions about their life while striving to contribute as much as possible to the bigger picture of planet Earth. We will be able to determine where to help, what type of help, how much help, and how we will carry out the planning and help effort. Once we have helped enough to level out the terrain, we can integrate the foundational fundamentals to have comfort, hope, joy, love, and peace everywhere. Consequently, we will have everyone similar on similar sides of their dichotomous duality in terms of being out of their survival zone and functioning in a stability-producing oscillation. No more extreme survival zone behaviors. What we have is the strongest foundation to build the rest of humanity on in context with our natural environment. It is the most important part because once people do their Venn diagrams and get on their sustainable striving life’s path, we will be able to have a situation where each individual will have the most self-producing energy in terms of genuine sustainable striving happiness and comfort, love, peace, joy, and hope. The health potential is phenomenal. We can contribute the most towards the house + love = home concept when we are the healthiest. We are building love in all of humanity everywhere on planet Earth, which is essential to have a home concept. A home without love is just a house. The love part is the part that keeps everything in humanity relating in genuine holistic ways all the time. Without love, our house would get cluttered, complex, and confusing, controversy would increase, arguments and violence would occur, and people would start caring less about maintaining and working with the home over time. Earth is our home. All of humanity ought to represent love. Therefore, all humanity should get what it needs to create conditions for comfort, joy, love, hope, peace, family, and community to start with foundational fundamentals on their sustainable striving life’s path. This life’s path will be anything the person wants it to be. It will be a lifelong learning, loving, and living path that expands on each person’s interests, passions, desires, and interests in context with the greater good or all of nature functioning. This way, the person is in a niche throughout their entire life. We are dynamic and ever-changing, so as we learn more or change our interests in time, we will adapt and find new niches in life. It makes sense because stagnation and static behavior create dogma as organizations and people in positions of power spend time finding ways to keep their positions at any cost rather than learning how to adapt. That is destructive. If we all strive to function genuinely holistically, we will add value, energy, and benefits by living, learning, and loving, which is what we should do every day. Eventually, the result of all this is an upward spiral feedback loop instead of a downward spiral one. It is up to each individual whether they devote all their energy towards destructive fighting and ultra-competitive and violent forces or put all their energy into efforts to save everyone, everything, everywhere on Earth. Education, knowledge, exploration, and learning for genuine holistic reasons have much greater energy potential. It is sort of like fusion. Fusion seems to mimic a natural and spiritual phenomenon found in the sun, whereas fission is science without knowledge from nature. All of us should be students of nature first, as it should be our context. I believe the key is integrating nature with a spiritual, loving humanity.

When we have the spectrum pyramid ecogeorelative ecogeosystematic way functioning in our world, it might be great to create a similarity index or even an opposite index to take some time and spend it in that location to see if it is a place you would like to spend time. Sometimes, getting an experience in an opposite place might also be a great life experience that provides an immense amount of learning. As I said, each one of us is similar, and each one is different. We can go to a place to work on our similarities, or we can go to a place to work on our differences so we can learn. Isn’t that one of the primary three reasons for breathing -living, learning, exploring, and loving? It reminds me of a similar concept that I learned as a child in a class that was talking about love, caring, forgiveness, helping people, and embracing others who are dissimilar to you because not only might you inspire them to believe more what you believe but you may believe things from others that you might think. It is a great way to learn in time and adapt continuously. However, some of these experiences in life might lead to essential revelations for further research to understand more so you can put it into your similarity side of the spectrum and be more confident about living.

It is interesting, but I believe the paper I wrote about education and learning the other day. It is true in any scenario, like trying to ultra-compete in any race to understand history or anything else. Those who are more about getting an education in school or life have more difficulty understanding the past, present, or future quickly. Learners in life find it more accessible. Likewise, it is the same thing when learning about love. Some people can read 100 books or go to church every Sunday and learn as much about love but treat people in the opposite love sorts ways or behave in such ways that border on the extreme opposite side of the spectrum. Educated people tend to use their education to get ahead in life for itinerant reasons. At the same time, learners have genuine holistic motivations to learn so they can help or make the world better somehow. For example, if someone takes an idea or concept from someone, educated people know how to follow process and law to accomplish what they need to have done or hire process people to do all of their process. A process feedback loop exists when there is a source of energy to create energy, like fusion or something. Education types and process types use energy to harness the energy of another and use part of that same energy to detrimentally impact the source of energy such that the source of energy is their own worst enemy because the more they work on their dissertation, the more the process educated people take and throw back more detrimental feedback pollution to keep the destruction going. It is weird because they continually impact the very source for their process-oriented pseudo-success with the skills they know from education. They never learned anything about higher relative importance concepts because they spent too much time educating themselves to use processes. This may have led them to do unspeakable continuous violence directly or indirectly on the very source of their energy. It is like what has been done to our environment and people. That is why I know it is an old world, a more industrial-only focus that is involved in this feedback loop. I hope they did not use any of my genuine holistic positive energy to hurt anyone or anything anywhere on planet Earth.

We ought to have MS and Ph.D. cashier/customer interaction assessments in certain places to assess people as they walk through grocery store lines, social security, people on welfare, people in sub-survival living, homeless, counselors, health professionals, places, and some high-rise apartment buildings. First, assess the need for finer help assessment needs. Concentrated resource allocation to these areas MS PhDs researching cashier’s interactions with people that may need help to do 5-minute assessments. Get help resources to befriend people who may need help and try to understand further needs and resources needed. Police and reactionary justice transform into holistic environmental justice health and safety. They could do rural assessments from pre-planned research assessment indicators.

Maybe a fruit basket of something might break the ice with people. Drop off the brochure to people about moving closer to town or community living, especially for older people. Let them know that moving help and expenses will be taken care of by the EEC. Some places will function as transitional community living centers within houses where people undergo further needs assessments. These positions include life coaches, counselors, and transition-to-life path experts. I believe those large apartment complexes in cities should function as transitional housing only where people usually do not live there longer than 3 to 5 years. These places should have ecological niche roles like nutrition and health assessment and advice, counselors, life coaches, and life path transitional counselors. Maybe the first floor could be about this concept. Ecological restoration and peace Corp resources could be located by priority, and allocation of resources by area of highest relative priority ought to occur first. Resources for people to help should come from surrounding high elevations with a high amount of source energy to contribute to sink areas in lower slope help areas. Areas in high-risk tornados, extreme cold regions, and high-risk hurricanes should be evaluated for rebuild assistance—large ecological restoration Peace Corp and surrounding high-elevation energy source areas. We should do a sustainable striving integrated impact assessment, which might conclude using bricks or concrete block construction. If chosen as the preferred alternative, we should have these community reconstruction events where many kids are helping as an apprentice type of credit for their geological materials masonry associate degree. It would be great if each of the former mobile home parks had a community center with a stone/rock saltwater swimming pool and community gardens. This should extend over borders as we should look at North America as a context for this project. This project, in its entirety, ought to be replicated worldwide on every continent organized by continent. Ecological restoration and peace corp and former militaries worldwide should be transitioned into peace corp and ecological restoration resources—prioritizing water systems, compost toilets, and community gardens or CSA. Planning in context with a broader nature is critical. Integrated planners ought to plan from an ecological perspective, considering the dynamic, systematic functioning of the desired pre-planned community and the needs of the community. At the same time, assessments of ecogeorelative energy contribution potential and well-planned ecological niche organizations and ecological niche roles opportunity potential should occur. Isolated villages in rural regions living as close to nature as possible ought to get connectivity with at least 12 computers connected to the internet for learning and exploration. These places should also get a satellite phone if these remote communities need help. Because these villages tend to have the least detrimental impact on our planet, we should put their need for help at the top of the list of priorities and give them whatever they need through needed resources and EEC energy compensation transfer. This should be a good start on getting people comfort, joy, love, hope, peace, and the ecological restoration, reconstruction, and rehabilitation needed to stay out of survival zones. This will give them the foundations required to get people to help get on their sustainable striving life path. The theory is that once people meet their needs, they can contribute as many benefits, energy, and value to themselves, their family, their community, their region, their continent, our planet Earth, and the natural environment.

*Most desirably, it would be great if we got to the point in society where everyone did a self-assessment with the We-me integrated device.

It seems like there has been a force categorizing people into job titles. This is a flawed approach because it does not consider the individual’s dreams, aspirations, future interests, or potential interests. This approach is wrong and non-inspirational as it represents a static categorization in a natural, dynamic world. It does not make sense. I wonder if this static categorization and compartmentalization leads to feelings of complacency, which may turn into boredom. In addition, I wonder if some professionals lose their self-esteem and confidence and are thus more likely to get taken advantage of for ultra-capitalist extreme roles. I see a pattern in this world of people in these categories with top-down demeaning bosses that command and control or stick people in stagnant or non-inspirational positions to attain one’s desired life path. I sometimes wonder if it is itinerant creation of undesirable detrimental impacting power dynamics and transference. This leads to several potential multiplying, direct, and indirect impacts. Obvious stagnation leads to quality-of-life issues, which leads to unhappiness and monotony. This could cause some people to have dynamic equilibrium compensation mechanisms or inflection points that may sometimes be overcompensating or extreme. This balancing mechanism occurs in more compounding ways in urban areas where exposure to more natural and natural, exciting experiences is minimal. Sometimes, one’s inner natural functioning in terms of more sexual behavior, more rough extreme sex, or maybe even deviant behavior might occur as exposure to natural balancing nature is limited. I wonder if this behavior could potentially lead to more violence if, over time, the compounding effects of a lifestyle with minimal job satisfaction, little comfort, joy, love, hope, and natural balancing mechanisms like nature and excitement are limited. On top of that, adding extreme anthropocentric controlling mechanisms to a person’s life could send a person’s life into a free-fall downward spiral feedback loop. There are potentially many other detrimentally impacting inputs into a person’s life that could further compound these problems. This could cause the person to reach inflection points that could put someone into depression or mental illness as well. Eventually, if there are no intervening compensating mechanisms, the person could get into a feedback loop that minimizes real recovery in any way. The other problem is that our society is too busy working to have enough love, care, and compassion to care about another human being genuinely. Sometimes, a person’s perceptive relative importance level is high. Still, their reality importance level is low regarding the value, energy, and benefits added to another, our society, or our planet. Sometimes, people get so low that they get into trouble with law enforcement. This is even more destructive as they are labeled as perpetrators, criminals, and offenders instead of a person. These impacts are very impacting as they usually occur after an individual has been through a long downward spiral of many detrimental impacts. Next, they are labeled by the criminal justice system publicly or otherwise as a criminal. Sometimes, they are watched, listened to, investigated, have their sanctuaries invaded, sacred places impacted, work relationships impacted, and relationships destroyed in communities and society. Then, the individual has difficulty finding work, paying the bills, providing for their family, and living a normal, healthy, productive, useful, contributing, and collaborating life, which helps no one. It does the exact opposite. It brings more detrimental impacts to our world. Most of all, these events destroy an individual and their potential contributions in value, energy, and benefits to our world. If you are part of any of these processes, it is best to turn it around and love, care for, help, and have compassion for the person by empathizing with them. talk with them and see if you can help get them the resources they need in the context of helping them. Use what you know about them to help them. We could turn it all around by focusing on Holistic Environmental Justice, Health, and Safety. This way, everything that happens has a problem-solving focus. If we have a pre-planned ecogeosystematic way of determining immediate help resources for whatever a person is going through. Likewise, not only will you get help for that person, but you will also learn about other people who may need help in the person’s life path. Then you can use this information to help them too. The opposite is a more genuine holistic perspective that never gets anyone in trouble. I believe this concept and all other concepts will end violence altogether. This has great positive, beneficial impacts on each person in all these related fields as each day they will go home and feel great about themselves in terms of all the beneficial impacts they had on people’s lives that day. Over time, they begin to heal as they contribute nothing but positive benefits, energy, and value to society. Their relationship improves, their kids are happier and healthier, and these positive impacts reverberate through communities, society, and planet Earth. When our cumulative health improves, we contribute more to others so they are as healthy as possible. I had a similar idea in the late 1980s, and I have since named the idea the Holistic Inclusive embracing concept. However, it is much more genuinely holistic and proactive. It involves seeking out and finding people who can help or of a certain affiliation who want to be included to act like a blob force to embrace and help everyone so they can become part of the blob. The blob becomes bigger and bigger over time until the blob has embraced everybody on Earth. Ideally, this effort should be coupled with a follow-up Ecological Restoration and Peace Corp project to help everyone get up to comfort, joy, love, hope, and sustainable striving for happiness. This helps with health. And when people are healthier, they can continually contribute all they can regarding value, energy, and benefits to humanity and our world. This contributes to a genuine holistic, sustainable striving for planet Earth. It contributes to ending all preventable suffering on Earth, ending all violence on Earth, ending all war on Earth, striving to end pollution in all forms, and most of all; it gets everyone re-allocating their energy to higher priority genuine holistic living and working together behaviors with everyone as well as the natural environment. It contributes to higher ecological fitness, which helps all of us and our offspring. It gives our kids the best chance when they start their life.

We are all the same, and we are all different. Once we are all on the same page and understand all of our similarities and all of our foundational fundamentals of love, nature, spirituality, and God’s love that are consistent with genuine holistic, sustainable striving knowledge and ways to live, learn, and love, these similarities are sort of like holistic prescriptive advice learned from the integration of all knowledge. It is kind of like everything that has been researched and integrated that applies to your life and society. I see it as prioritizing all knowledge by perceived relative importance and a guide to live your life. You will organize it as an individual, and we as a community, society, and all the people on Earth. The other side of a person and culture is our differences as people or our unanswered questions and all hypothesis questions and all patterns that have not been imagined or researched yet. Even our differences could be prioritized by relative importance. The concepts of similarities, differences, or both are a traditional way to describe a way to look at a more ecogeosystematic way of dynamic continuous improvement and continuous adaptation functioning. Another way to look at this concept is our similarities could be other concepts as well, like comfort, joy, love, hope, and sustainable striving happiness dynamic equilibrium survival level such that each of us will strive to stay at or near that equilibrium such that it minimizes the chances that people will be subjected to risk from detrimental perturbation of any type. It should be advice that gives people a suitable foundation to get on their genuine holistic, sustainable, striving life’s path to add as much value, energy, and benefits to our world, themselves, and everyone else. It makes sense. This allows us to know each other’s similarities so we can feel comfortable with anyone on Earth at any time. If anyone needs help, we will be pleased to help. When we meet, we can communicate with a level of comfort that sets the stage for talking about anything. It gets all the small talk out of the way and allows us to focus on the amazing, miraculous diversity of everyone’s differences and uniqueness. An exciting and intriguing concept. It eliminates the difficulty of learning someone’s personality to determine if someone is similar to you on the fundamental similarity level. From nature’s perspective, it is efficient and allows energy to be reallocated to those areas and differences of higher relative importance, which are often differences.

To start transitioning, maybe we can consider the following: It appears to be one of the most significant problems is our allegiance and alliances and loyalty to either the republican party, democratic party, independent party, liberal, conservative, or any other football team concept classification or compartmentalization. It seems like it immediately creates an “us and them” team, which causes an instinct to win. In a way, “things are world”. This is especially true in an ultra-competitive environment where people do their jobs over being involved in a “genuine problem-solving venture.” Life should not be about endless debate. Endless debate seems to be about showing what a great orator you are instead of a genuine holistic problem solver. We ought to consider everyone’s contributions in an ecogeorelative organizational way that recognizes each of our unique contributions. It is a matter of getting higher proximal related people who are all similarly able to contribute and collaborate to solve a problem they may be relatively more qualified to solve. Anyone can also contribute because a layperson’s idea might be better sometimes.

However, most of the time, working together should or could have something to do with place or area, the particular issue of importance, issue of significance, ability to help on a project, interest in a specific area, and most of all, expertise. Everyone can be a part of a team, but decisions should be weighed relatively more toward those with more significant knowledge and responsibility. We are not trying to win. Winning is a sporting concept. When combined with an ultra-competitive traditional extreme market-based economy, it has the makings of a colossal diversion, distraction, tool for traditional business or organization to do its job, a transference mechanism power source, a confusion creation and complexity tool, a way to get things done for industry and business, an out of context way of organizing, and making policy when we could be all working together and helping one another so we can transition the world together. We do not need any more needless, unnecessary classification because all we have to know is that we are all similar and we are all different. We must celebrate our similarities by getting along and creating a foundation to discuss our differences. The eventual goal is to solve problems and create research, which leads to knowledge when our differences are conflicting and should not be. Sometimes, being different and having diverse perspectives is okay, as it makes us miraculous. Everyone’s Life would be more static if we were all the same. Because we are all different, we can live in continuous learning, exploration, adaptation, and continuous improvement. Maybe we all should be classified as genuine holistic, continuous adaptive striving humanity to benefit everything, including planet Earth.

Each time violence happens, we must use violence as an indicator and training site.  We must thoroughly research everything in the place and person’s life to determine possible associative characteristics and possible causal contributors to the associative characteristics and contributing characteristics.  First, we look at everything in an ecogeorelative way.  Second, from characteristics and indicators, we can look for these indicators and characteristics in certain areas to determine if there is a higher chance of finding such potential violence-creating terrain.  The null hypothesis may be the strongest indicator of all.  A significant amount of necessary resources should be devoted to helping people eliminate violence potential.  This is because the survival zone pressures and cumulative significant impact associated with these lives sometimes contribute to a higher probability of more violence.  It is necessary to do all that is needed to “tear down those walls” of all kinds that hinder progress toward ending all violence.  The first step is to let people know it is not about getting people in trouble anymore.  It is about each person getting the help they need.  This way, they will open up to healthcare people and researchers so we can define problems appropriately and contribute to rational problem-solving or knowledge creation to create advice.  This is the best option rather than contribute to more violence, as is done today in our current practices, processes, methods, techniques, and systems.  We decrease the likelihood of more once we remove the contributory expansion of violence.  When problems related to violence decrease, societal and community impacts will decrease as well; this will lessen other contributory impacts on people that bioaccumulate in people that cause more propensity toward more violence.  Essentially, this method approaches the problem in an integrated ecogeosystematic way and an ecosystem approach from webs and chains in every direction.  It looks at the entire integrated functioning and attempts to mitigate each potential contributor to violence and the sources.  On a broader level, the sources may be another rational problem-solving process that can be solved similarly but from a more macro perspective.

I hypothesize that it has something to do with the entirety of everything and how we function on planet Earth in this reactive, ultra-competitive perception/reality world we live in.  The contributory behaviors may be related to profiteering at any cost, powerteering at any price, and charioteering at any cost.  All of these behaviors integrated with the traditional system functioning and processes, which are really all functioning out of context with everything else, are contributing to an overly complex perception system that does not add as much potential value, energy, and benefits as a well-planned integrated way of doing things would.  I have wondered in the past whether it is interspecific competition and intraspecific competition at the same time.  Is it the same ecogeosystematic approach to solve this problem?  If so, it helps with the proposal to minimize complex borders and boundaries of confusion, transference, and compulsions toward violence.  This, coupled with leveling the playing field, uses sources and sinks holistic energy transference to get everyone up to comfort, joy, love, hope, and sustainable striving happiness.  It beats the reactively violent detrimental energy transference and processes that have dominated our world since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution and before.