Reactionary Justice is the continuation of violence.  It also creates a pollution cycle negative feedback loop.  I would rather see it transition into Holistic Environmental Justice, Social Justice, Health, Holistic arbitration, and Safety.  It is a concept that is genuinely more holistic and sustainable striving.  It also eliminates the emotional hardening that goes along with challenging and demanding jobs when they consistently see people at their worst all the time.  This seems to be a feedback loop that may sometimes result in more emotionless and violent behavior.  The holistic concept is also more advantageous in terms of health for those in that Ecological Niche Organization because you feel good about the beneficial impact you have in terms of helping people who need help every day.  Likewise, the holistic concept creates practical harmony and striving behavior in communities, which increases comfort and trust.  Thus, improved communication can occur when someone needs help.

People are reluctant to ask for help in a reactionary justice or trouble-seeking paradigm.  It seems like reactionary Justice seeks not to end the cycle of violence but instead creates more in terms of detrimental impacts.  The use of reactionary Justice instead of rational problem-solving approaches and helping people in a more genuine holistic way indicates that we are focused on the wrong resolutions of problems and merely temporarily postponing the inevitable continuation of the problem and, thus, further violence.  Rational problem-solving is more humane, compassionate, and consistent with our foundational fundamentals instead of more shortsighted business-as-usual approaches.  Combining this concept with the Help Project and Holistic Inclusive Candle Lighting Blobification Project can prevent people from ever needing any reactionary justice.  All human problems are often very involved and complicated and often involve people’s entire lives, which no reactionary justice person can get their arms around in totality.  It is best to have love, care, compassion, and empathy for the circumstances many have endured, as many have suffered dearly in significant cumulative impact.  This sometimes leads to post-traumatic stress disorder or other forms of mental illness or behavioral competition mechanisms as well as survival mechanisms.  I believe that too many people are waiting around for something to happen instead of being genuine, holistic, loving, caring, and compassionate people.  While transforming to a natural, holistic, sustainable, striving planet Earth, we must only use minimal violence when we have exhausted every other means of problem resolution, like when a person has a gun to someone’s head, for example.  Over time, I suspect our need for this reactionary Justice will be minimized towards the baseline.  The overall paradigm should shift beyond laws and more inadequate life path resolution.  It does not consider the extremely high relative importance of every human being on this planet.  Everyone needs the absolute most help in terms of care, inclusion, help, and genuine ecological rehabilitation and restoration so they can have more comfort, joy, love, hope, and sustainable striving for happiness just like everyone else.  The reactionary justice concept is ignorance because it does not use holistic planning to prevent its use in the first place.  In the future, maybe it would be prudent to suggest that all of us are part of holistic environmental Justice, health safety, holistic arbitration, and holistic restoration.  Reactionary Justice is like a big family.  Why don’t we involve everyone in that family?  We should include everyone in health care as well.  Then, we can continually adaptively strive towards desired future conditions for all of us on Earth and beyond.

I wonder if we can map this phenomenon and show a correlation between reactionary Justice needed and sustainable striving for community cohesiveness functioning.  I suspect that inclusiveness is the most crucial concept.  Reactionary Justice impacts a person’s connectedness and inclusion, where most people build self-esteem and belonging needs, which are essential for human health and foundational fundamental functioning.  As people are impacted (sometimes by opportunistic ultra-competitiveness), people lose connectedness over time and become more vulnerable to perturbations, survival stressors, and lack of opportunities in society.  When all the cumulative survival stressors occur, and a lack of the ability to support yourself happens, you become vulnerable to illicit opportunistic organizations, which often have no compassion for anything.  (because they are products of the same processes).  Once this happens, people become more hardened and begin a downward spiral feedback loop, which often includes excessive self-medication to feel better, which can be another downward spiral feedback loop.  Social interactions are sought with anyone with similar lives, and the struggle continues without inclusion and with inadequate means of survival.  This creates more compulsion to enter into more risky ventures to survive, which sometimes turns “criminal or violent.” When this happens, the risk of traditional reactionary Justice occurs.  If arrested, the cycle begins again.  If not, survival living conditions occur where people start sleeping anywhere they can and often end up with people in dire straits themselves, contributing to more detrimental influence and the overall downward spiral feedback loop.  When this happens, the less violent become homeless, and the more violent live in survival conditions with survival stress until they are pushed beyond their inflection point.

Organizations are complacent because people are complacent.  This Is because the primary focus has been only on profiteering, seeking power, and heroteering instead of more sustainable striving objectives.  Thus, organizations and people are resistant to change.  I remember a quote from school that said if people were angels, there would be no need for government (or corporations).  It is true, but I believe it assumed that people did not have the potential to strive to become angels.  Currently, Law and reactionary justice keep people from being angels as well.  However, even though we may not have a traditional government concept in the future because of the root word “govern,” we should have a checks and balances perspective and the integrity of systems concept.  It is like ecogeorelative prioritization and ecogeorelative rationalization problem solving instead, and we all must be involved.

Anyway, I believe that when people are managed or governed in a traditional sense, it stifles creativity, imagination, problem-solving, continuous adaptation, and transitioning to a more sustainable striving life on Earth.  The energy spent doing such things is lost and cannot be spent on more genuine holistic, sustainable, striving ecogeorelative ways, ecogeosystematic ways, exponentially magnifying the return on energy investment.  Investing in holistic energy produces more holistic energy, value, and benefits over time.  Sometimes, striving to live closer to nature adds energy, value, and benefits.  I believe some deserve respect and responsibility for their chosen paths in life.  They matter more sometimes because they have broader contextual significance and higher relative importance.  I also believe in those who have immense creativity, innovation, imagination, and ability to plan and build solutions to problems, especially those that holistically prevent them from occurring in the first place.  These people have more fine contextual and relative significance in that area.  I also believe that people with genuine holistic and sustainable striving lives have higher relative significance and higher relative importance.  This is because they add all the love, mentoring, caring, nurturing, education, holistic advice, counseling, holistic health, and anything else that adds tremendous energy, value, and benefits to people in whatever way they can.  It has occurred to me that it all comes down to the individual’s motivations, passion, dedication, education, learning, experiences, embracing behaviors, inclusion behaviors, helping behaviors, and problem-solving behaviors.  It is how they allocate their tremendous energy totality towards a genuine holistic, sustainable striving planet Earth.  Being a great parent is a great start and maybe all you need.  It does not matter what role, profession, or life path you choose if it has the broader context knowledge and foundational fundamentals, mainly about love and nature.  Matching your passions, aspirations, interests, and learning with any need in our world as long as it is in context with broader needs of higher relative importance means that we are free to live life, adding as much energy, value, and benefits as desired.  It is about how you live your life.  Maybe life should be about learning, exploring, and loving in a genuine, holistic, sustainable, striving way.

Excessive role descriptions or itinerant roles that served itinerant purposes in the past that served to reallocate violence potential, create quid pro quo, and create transference mechanisms are violently destructive towards our collective wellbeing.  It seems that anything that serves to confuse, complicate, complexity, create controversy, create excess process, or some traditional business management perspectives have lost all connectivity to these things that matter more like people, parents, children, creativity, innovation, and our context and fundamental continuous improvement and adaptability towards a sustainable striving planet Earth.  I am in favor of ending all the preventable suffering on planet Earth, which depends on eliminating all of the massive amounts of all types of violence in all ways, shapes, and forms, including most of the traditional ways of doing things in a “way things are  world.” In addition to law” justice and business,” we must move towards more genuine holistic ecogeorelative and ecogeosystematic perspectives.  They are holistic and adaptive.  Maybe we can call it holistic living and loving in a continuous learning and dynamic adaptive way.  World without end…

There are two significant types of knowledge: one is destructive, and one is constructive.  Destructive knowledge serves as a destructive, detrimental impact-creation tool or manipulation mechanism.  It is often derived from more rumors or information intended to cause harm or severe harm for itinerant ultra-competitive reasons.  This knowledge is like a paparazzi or tabloid type of hurting people somehow.  People engage in these types of knowledge acquisition sometimes for itinerant controversy creation, transference, and or control reasons.  Sometimes, knowing information that you should not know because it is private and personal is used to maximize the detrimental impact on another for either destruction of a reputation for jealousy or envy reasons.  Likewise, it is used to destroy one’s credibility if they anticipate creating some violence against you.  It also functions as a transference mechanism, sometimes called extortion, that serves no problem-solving and harmony purpose.  Instead, it continues the violence cycle instead of solving problems.  Destructive knowledge is sometimes in the wrong hands and is used as “I know something you don’t,” a pseudo-poker game that never ends.  Sometimes, knowledge is highly destructive if it never gets told to those who should know it in the first place.  Destructive knowledge is any knowledge that is used as extreme profiteering, seeking power, seeking heroics, or any other extreme type of mountaineering that often has a reckless disregard for human life or the natural environment or any additional potential externalized cost that usually results in extreme cumulatively significant detrimental impact.

Positive holistic knowledge served nothing but genuine holistic knowledge creation, usually used as a learning mechanism.  It is often what research and sustainable striving for enlightenment is all about.  It serves no other purpose than to strive to make someone’s life better in a holistic way and make the world a better place in some way.  Positive energy- holistic knowledge does not hurt anyone or anything as it is used to solve problems peacefully.  Positive energy – holistic knowledge is contributing, collaborating, and working together to live, learn, explore, and love in a harmonious, peaceful existence.  World without end…

A job is like an omerta role and mobbish fraternal position of violence often; It is sort of like payola to keep your mouth shut and not do the right thing according to broader holistic perspectives.  It keeps your focus on your job descriptions at any cost above all other responsibilities to others, people, all of humanity, and the entire planet.  Are job descriptions about static violence for takings purposes?  In the past, a job has embodied the goals and wishes of those in power while we overlook all other problems or opportunities to help someone in need or any problem that needs to be solved.  Do your job.  Do your job.  One of the problems is that all of you are told too often to do your job, and when you do not “do your job” and do something above and beyond your job, you’re notified, “That’s not your job.”

How often have you been asked a question on a job application or filled out a questionnaire and possibly contributed a considerable amount of positive impact to the world, and someone else got credit for everything you contributed because “that is not your job”?  “That is not your job” is merely a transference mechanism, which is extreme violence when people volunteer something to help.  It is even worse when they have done nothing but try to commit violence and hurt you ever since you contributed to solving one of the most significant problems on Earth.  That is not your job, son.  We have other people working on that.   That is not your job.  You have not been cleared enough, son.  That cannot be your job because someone above you has more clearance, acceptance, status, or political anointment.  The problem is that the larger the magnitude of the reason for a transference attempt, the more significant amount they will do to make sure you will never get the job or never get accepted, or have an opportunity to contribute to solving any problem even if the issue is a 100 + year closer to your family issue that has been occurring.  In other words, it seems like you are someone’s property, like the liberty cycle enslaved.  Everything you contribute outside of a conventional job is taken from you in itinerant ways for itinerant reasons so that they can solve the problems that you wanted to solve or contributed to solving starting decades ago.  Imagine a world with foundational fundamentals and relevant broader context with each individual’s passion, energy, love, care, compassion, and cumulative abilities.  Being a great parent may be all you need to do.

Politics should come after ecogeorelative, impact assessment, and ecogeorational decision-making.  It should be a gut-feeling indicator.  Maybe politics has been functioning at the wrong spatial resolution, so it has failed miserably (should we include everyone?).  Politics has become more about fighting and never-ending controversy as we support the means rather than any sustainable striving end.  Politics has become a way of life for some; it often occupies a significant amount of time regarding priorities rather than problem-solving.  I believe it might relate to the same concept of organizations’ resistance to change and individual complacency because politics works well for some people.  Politics gives people the lives they want in terms of the power they need to get acceptance to do anything they want, even if their actions are extremely destructive.  Because politics is at the wrong resolution and scale, it works as a destructive force as it takes it from the individual level and makes a cult out of it to maximize violence.  Politics at the individual level never becomes violence because no one knows or should know the totality of another person’s politics.  Instead, they should know the person as an integrated whole and not look at individual pieces of politics, which are often used to hurt someone rather than include them.  Those who start political wars find politics appealing because all they need to do is pry into an individual’s personal beliefs or manufactured perceptions of their beliefs.  We must go back to leaving a person’s politics at the proper resolution in their minds and let the whole person integrate their beliefs in a way that best strives to solve problems instead of creating violence and war.  We must get back to knowing people and respecting their ideas even if we disagree.  Although some extreme political functioning might like the power behind some extreme viewpoints.  The prioritization of more rationality in terms of holistic advice so people can learn is the best alternative; otherwise, people’s politics will take on whatever way they interpret their education, usually in an out-of-context way.  Only those who learn that learning is more than education out of context.  It is about all of the integrated contexts.  Otherwise, narrow-minded politics from educated people who never knew how to learn and adapt in a holistic problem-solving context will continue their destructive endeavors.  I wonder if the difference goes back to the motivations in the first place, as some are motivated to learn, and some are motivated to get educated to get rich or powerful or be a hero instead of contributing to the genuine holistic problem-solving effort.  Others want to learn to help in some way.  Focusing on politics instead of real holistic problem-solving is ignorance, as it does not make the world a better place but performs itinerant functioning to win only at any cost.  Politics works for those incapable of solving problems in any real way as they are more interested in their complacency and often dysfunctional organizations that resist change.  These compulsions only contribute to static elitism and political power alliances instead of more rational integrated problem-solving.  The old politics is like profit, power, drugs, sex, and rock and roll.  Genuine holistic politics is respect for individuals as each of us is cohesively similar, and the best part is that we are all diverse and different as this is a learning opportunity, not a divisive violence-creating concept.  Genuine holistic politics is about personal contributions in context with our broader nature regarding cohesive collaboration, problem-solving, and connectedness to all of humanity and nature.  We should no longer focus on personal politics as a priority as it serves no useful purpose.  We must get to know people for who they are as people, celebrate their similarities and differences, work together with our similarities, and learn from our differences.  It is one of the greatest concepts that we are all unique in our similarities and our diversity because if we were just all the same or if we were just all different, we would not have anything to talk about.  It is also like checks and balances and continual learning and continuous improvement.  The old politics is itinerant and destructive.  Genuine holistic, adaptive ecogeorelative politics build harmony, peace, and cohesive collaboration at the end of any rational decision-making process.  It creates lovers, not fighters.  What about you?  I am a lover, not a fighter.  We must transform profit, power, drugs, sex, and rock and roll lyrics into creating value, energy, benefits, creativity, holistic learning and advice, comfort, joy, love, peace, hope, and enlightened symphonies of all types.  At the same time, we strive to find sustainable striving happiness on Earth.  Again, politics should only represent a small fraction of the time at the end of a holistically rational decision-making process (for gut feel) UVM-SENR 1998.  For too long, it has been first and last.

Fighterish people are in certain professions because they might exhibit more fighterish tendencies. I even wonder if we consider these people as indicators and see where many come from and their associative characteristics. I wonder if some people’s life experiences and associations indicate their potential association with more fighterish behaviors. Maybe we should seek people for holistic roles so they can contribute to more needed holistic environmental justice, health, safety, social justice, holistic restoration, holistic arbitration, and safety roles. I wonder if we can do some associative characteristics with areas most of these people are from. The controversy creation types must stay on top and function in conjunction with connectivity that creates controversy for profiteering or powerteering primarily. This need creates an incredible compulsion to do anything to do their transference. Sometimes, they make connectivity with structures that can help them create pollution, judging, controversy creation, and wrenching cyclic functioning. Many of the fighters have nowhere near the knowledge to fight in any real sort of way. The best functioning might be doing help project mountaineering expeditions where either ecological restoration, missions, or Peace Corp project functioning puts you in a location where other potential to meet friends or even more sometimes. This concept encourages people to contribute and collaborate on important, helpful projects. We could have a high need index, which causes those with an increased desire to get high EEC (Ecological Equilibrium Compensation) or EVCI (Ecological value contribution index) points to select those projects first. Maybe higher EVCI and genuine holistic people get the first choice as to where they want to go (where to live). This puts similar but different people working together with similar but different people in holistic mountaineering, helping a collaborative effort that has a high chance of meeting people and may build friendships or lasting relationships. It seems that meeting someone is also more of a Venn diagram concept. Maybe we can live in more well-planned mountaineering, like doing more projects on shorter epochs instead of spending all our time in ENOs. It is up to each individual to live in a loving, learning way to have comfort, joy, love, hope, and sustainable striving for happiness.

The greatest strength comes from love, not fighting and violence. Is toughness and fighting behavior a sign of weakness that manifests itself in more of the same behaviors? You become weaker as you use more fighting behavior because you have less love. Therefore, those who fight may be very weak because they have fewer love behaviors. Have we created a society that produces more fighting and violence by making people who are more interested in other things besides love? Have we used all of our energy to compete using all types of fighting behavior and violence, even going so far as to solve problems for fighting purposes? People will do anything to compete when the prize is more significant in life. In the past, it has been about fighting and violence in some way, shape, or form. Let us transform to see if we can compete in a more loving problem-solving way. I wonder if more fighter behavior occurs because our society has produced fighters at an increasing rate, given how things are in this world. We seem to be creating circumstances all the time to create chaos, greed, ultra competitiveness, complexity, adequate funding for warfighting, reactionary justice, less proper funding of education, more unlivable wages, lack of holistic health care, and more transference mechanisms when those in control have been engaged in mainly violence of some type. We have been in a downward spiral feedback loop because we have created conditions for individuals to be in downward spiral feedback loops. Each individual’s health is essential for the overall health of our people and our natural environment.

Consequently, the well-being of all of us on planet Earth comes down to collectively how healthy we have been nurtured. I am standing up for the vulnerable people in this world who have been transference mechanisms for all of the “way things are world” violent behavior. They are more lovers than fighters. I wonder if those who fight need love more. Therefore, as part of my lover problem-solving, I will research and explore ways to help people love more and use more lover problem-solving instead of traditional methods. However, the weird concept here is that those who are more accepted in our society are those who fight more and use more violence. Is it possible that something supposed to be more about love has turned into behind-the-scenes violence?

Over time-fighting and violence have shown themselves to be an incubator of more fighting and violence. It is just a matter of when and where. It is an out-of-control downward spiral positive feedback loop. It may be mainly about a transference attempt from cowardly people who have no courage (because of subservientization). The reason for these behaviors is that many do not have any lover problem-solving skills, and many have been conditioned to use fighting and violence because that is what we are shown in our society to resolve conflict. I am ending all violence on planet Earth with lovers, not fighters. Then, I will try to find ways to give more love to fighters so they can become lovers, too. I will end the violence cycle everywhere on Earth by working together with lovers and anyone else who is interested.

I go back to the quote: “If people were angels, there would be no need for government.” or corporations in their current form.
Ok, let us all return to our roots as children before we were impacted by how things are in the world.  Let us all be angels once again.

Who says people or children are not angels when they start life?  What happens to them along the way impacts them, so they become something less than 100% angels.  Where do all the types of violence come from?  I believe we are all potential angels.  I fear that there has been a conspiracy to keep the so-called “economy” and all associated mechanisms creating more violence.  It may be the perfect conspiracy to keep all four in “business” in the way things are.

Are we killing angels to keep the traditional government concept, business, stock market, and economy in “business”?  All the potential in all those potential angels could have added more value, energy, and benefits than the entire economy, but no one will ever know.  I wonder if generations and ancestry of angels were killed in the name of the way things are world, thus causing the transference from angels to__________________(Self-assessment)

Why not look at people as angels first, just like I looked at my little kids when they were small?  It helps if you all think about people as kids.  We are all relative kids, too.  Let’s remember that.  I believe it helps.  An angel, to me, strives to be in complete harmony with all surrounding nature, including people.  We must all strive toward in context angels functioning in context with all of our nature and all of our people.  There is no other way.  If we did such a thing, do we need traditional concepts and functioning?  How much chaos, complexity, confusion, overwhelming work, process, out-of-context functioning, environmental injustice, violence of all types, ineffective bureaucracy, reactionary functioning, judging, law-making, frustration, inefficiencies, lack of duty of care, profit at any cost, power at any cost, heroics at any cost, gold miner at any cost, and ultra competition that knows no limits could we overcome?

If we were all angels, all the detrimental functioning on Earth would be obsolete.  We would need no laws, rules, regulations, power control, militaries, or reactionary justice.  Governments on Earth would integrate with all the universities to form a Unidiversity.

A long time ago, I wrote that we should wear a button with a picture of us as children.  Then, every neighbor (everyone) you meet will also see you as a child too.

It seems to me that if someone considers someone else better, it may merely be that the original person has not reached their potential yet. In fact, knowing about different and similar things is a great thing and makes up who we are as individuals.  We all know the most about what we know about. Better is a concept that is really about privilege. Too many analyze better at a certain time or as cumulative better. How about both? If you must compare better for comparison reasons, why not only compare better when each person has reached their potential and include all their attributes, life’s path, characteristics, and the totality of everything in your better analysis? I prefer to say we are all the same and different, too. Sometimes, these better assessments are all about the subjective assessment of those who judge another worldview and use inadequate data, insufficient data, insufficient totality, insufficient resolution, insufficient or lack of relativity analysis, insufficient terms in the equation, or a misunderstanding of the totality of everything. Many people get to live their lives of privilege. Some go through their lives functioning off other people’s energy. Better really is about all the differential environments, all of your opportunities, all of your education opportunities, all of your political connections, all of your connections with power, all your connections with wealth, all of your connections with the movers and the shakers, and all the connectivity with those that have energy. Some people grow up in more difficult neighborhoods and are subjected to an increased amount of violence that comes from sources in every direction. These people often have to contend with numerous challenges and struggles to afford an education or a livable wage. It is strange to me that those people who can easily afford college do not have to work in these roles. Yet, do they consider themselves better? I believe they are different but not better. Likewise, there is extreme survival stress in some areas, causing people to rely more on their natural sexual side for attention or outer beauty instead of having a holistic balance in life. It would be great to focus on their desired integrated potential to contribute to what they would like to do with their lives. If some want to add value to their natural beauty, they often do so by just living their lives and being who they are as people, which has tremendous value. Some people have so much beauty inside and out that they radiate it everywhere they go. Many people who add value just by breathing and interacting with people in a positive, genuine, holistic, and beneficial way have amazing potential to add tremendous value to organizations. Maybe these people should add additional EEC to their ENR just for the positive energy, value, and benefits they add just by living. Too many people seem to have few opportunities, are bored, lack excitement, work for low wages, and have no benefit jobs. These people want to live, too. They are not industrial service machines. I believe they have been made to perform traditional jobs in more of an assembly line way that offers them no creative and constructive contribution opportunities that would add immense value to their lives in terms of adding self-esteem and confidence. Too often, these people feel they are not valued because they feel like these machines. We need to reignite passion and creative energy everywhere in every ENO. In the past, we treated people more like robots to perform the same repetitive tasks. In some of these positions, it wouldn’t be great to do an ESH assessment and determine if there are alternatives to adding more value, energy, and benefits back to those in actual roles in these organizations. One way is to look for ways to enhance the value, energy, and benefits that they have to offer as well. It would be great to offer education and other learning opportunities to increase their abilities to add energy, benefits, and value to others. For example, every cashier, bartender, waitperson, barista, and hostess may prefer to be known as a human relations expert or something similar. It may give them more meaning for what they are doing instead of the repetitive task. It seems to me that each of these roles adds tremendous value and energy to others just because they emit nothing but positive energy in comfort, love, hope, faith, and joy. Traditional business management has not given enough credit to these roles, which tend to add more value, energy, and benefit to people above and beyond the traditional job title, often known as the task instead of the more real value-contributing role. I believe many of these people represent why the organization is in so-called “business” in the first place. I find it weird that they get fewer incentives, fewer education and learning opportunities, fewer benefits, and less compensation when they are closer to the actual reason for the organization’s existence in the first place. I believe if these people were given more incentives, including partial sharing ownership in the organization, they would have incentives to create, offer suggestions for improved functioning, increase their human relations skills, get inspired to get more education, and as a result, have a more cohesive and collaborative environment. Not only does this help the organization, but it also helps people and everyone interacting with it. It is weird that all these organizations talk about sustainability yet miss the concept altogether as they continue to undervalue people who function in their most vital roles. The value, energy, and benefit-adding potential are enormous if people are inspired to contribute and function in such a way.

In the future, I hope to have a similar and unique diversity pyramid that celebrates our loving, caring, sharing, giving, forgiving, and genuine kindness, striving to bring around conditions of comfort, joy, love, hope, faith, and sustainable striving for happiness. This similarity applies to everyone, everything, everywhere on Earth, including all of humanity and all of our natural environment. Having the diversity section of the pyramid is also essential because of the stability associated with diversity. Everyone has unique contributions based on their unique life path.

Because we do not have a similarity (and equity) foundation and unique diversity pyramid, we suffer from diversity ultra competition, resulting in greed. This is because everything is out of context with everything else. That is the main reason it is so easy to take advantage of how things are in the world. Why is it that many choose not to work together? I guess it is all about the diversity of only ultra-capitalist and ultra-market-based economy-type mechanisms that often are proponents of ultra-competition to the competitive exclusion of any perceived potential rival. Even if the perceived rival does not see themselves as rivals, it seems traditional functioning prefers to take the ultra-competitive approach, forgetting about our foundational fundamentals and similarities. I wonder if the integration of several forces is at work here: traditional capitalist expectations, traditional business or corporate practices, sports mentality, game mentality, alliances of a political nature, traditional greed concepts, profiteering, being a hero, striving for power only, materialism, social elevation, and plumage. I believe in a different paradigm that promotes cohesive, collaborative functioning, which aims to minimize detrimental impact while investing energy in areas that continually add more value, energy, and benefits throughout the system. Everyone benefits, relatively speaking, and when everybody benefits, everything else benefits because those able to contribute energy are healthy and able to contribute what they have to offer and collaborate to help in the ways they can. If I were an organization, I would strive to be rational and reasonable to include those with what it takes to contribute and collaborate in some way, shape, or form.

The ECO GEO WE-ME UNIDIVERSITY EARTH RESEARCH EXPLORERS CYCLE WITH LOCATION ENABLED INTEGRATED DEVICE with similarity and unique diversity pyramid seems to solve most of the significant problems of today. It creates an inclusive world with inspirational incentives to be similar and uniquely diverse. Energy allocation can be relatively in the similarity foundation or the unique diversity pyramid if the similarity foundation fundamentals are considered first.