Ecological niche products could be evaluated according to the rational ecogeorelative integration of the following indices:
EGR index
ESH index
Durability Index
Longevity Index

Quality Index

The sustainable striving materials index
Resource Consumption Index
ENR roles in ENO cumulative EVCI
Public Scoping Intensity Satisfaction Index
Consumer testing reporting index
Replaceable warrantee index
An essential role in society index
Overall index
Each of these can be assigned a relative importance or relative significance weight, which could vary by the relative contribution of each index relative to each index contribution to the overall cumulative rating. Each ENP may be evaluated differently relative to the general relative importance of the role or function in society. Thus, the overall index could be compared to any other ENPs even though we arrived at the cumulative comprehensive index differently. It allows the flexibility to assess and evaluate each product based on the individual relative contribution of each indicator toward the total cumulative rating.

The following are some suggestions for ENO integrated rational Ecogeorelative assessment of an Ecological Niche Organization in a genuine holistic sustainable striving ENO in context with genuine holistic sustainable striving planet Earth.
EGR index
ESH index
Efficiency rating index
Renewable energy rating index
Cumulative EVCI of all ENRs index
Energy Contribution to Community Index
Integrated Holistic Health of ENR index
Sustainable striving R & D index
Cumulative Organization EVCI index
Organizational creativity ENRs. Index
ENR performance review of ENO index
An indicator of the totality of any organization is how it treats
the ENR (people in the organization)
Lowest satisfaction rating of any ENR
Value, energy, benefits to EGR index

Loving
Caring
Sharing
Giving
Forgiving
Genuine kindness striving
ENR index
EVCI index
Genuine Holistic index
Real Angel index
Creativity index
Effort Contribution index
Compassion and duty of care index
Loyalty to People Index
Cumulative non-violence indicator index
Itinerant Political/rationality index
Helping People/Hurting People Index
Itinerant Education/Educational Learning Index
Hurting & getting people in trouble/love index
Inclusion of other’s index
Ultra-competitive opportunistic behavior/love
Presence or absence of transference
Cumulative Life’s Path Experience Index
Educational learning
ENR contribution and collaboration index
Nurturing index

Creativity Index

Each of these indicators is a suggestion that could be used in the overall assessment of a person in terms of comprehensive evaluation and individual indicators. In the future, people will assess themselves. The particular indicators can be chosen and weighted relatively differently for each person relative to which indicators the person feels contribute more toward the overall assessment. For example, we could relatively weigh creativity, HVCI (High-Value Contribution Index), or genuine holistic index the most so that the relative contribution toward the total index rating score represents these indicators the most. Someone high in Genuine holistic may have most of their relative weight in that category. This more extensive functioning inspires more significant incentives by being yourself and who you are as a person because you strive to add as much comfort, joy, love, hope, helping behavior, inner beauty, nurturing, learning, outer beauty, inspirational strength, and conditioning, integrated miraculousness and sustainable striving happiness to our planet in all that you do. This elevates the high relative significance and high relative importance of parents, moms & dads, mentors, and women in general because most are born that way. HVCI people contribute high value, energy, and benefits in a genuine holistic, sustainable, striving way in Everything they do. However, they tend to be more focused, devote a significant amount of time to educational learning, and live life trying to figure out problems. They tend to notice Everything all the time, including patterns. They learn as much as they can as they live, learn, and love. These people often question traditional processes, rules, laws, organizational behaviors, anthropocentric extremes, standard functioning, and structures. They do this to help transition our planet into a more genuine, holistic, sustainable, striving planet Earth for the benefit of all humanity and Everything on planet Earth.

Furthermore, many of these people understand the higher relative importance of broader contexts of ecogeorelativity, love, and positively beneficial and inspirational teachings and educational learning from all spirituality, nature, and God. It is all about the nurturing index. Many people strive to share and work together while living, learning, nurturing, and loving. They try to inspire and help others with genuine intentions instead of perceptions. Many of these people are open-minded, strive to integrate perspectives, and accept others without judging others. They aim to solve problems over traditional dysfunctional human family behaviors and irrational functions, processes, and structures.

The great concept about this is that it allows everyone to contribute an enormous amount by being yourself. We all will strive to live life continuously, learning, loving, and constantly striving to contribute what we can towards a genuine holistic, sustainable planet, Earth. We can approach problems extensively through natural, holistic, and more intensive indices. What is great about all this is that there are so many ways to add more and more learning, living, and loving experiences all the time. Likewise, there are many extensive and intensive ways to contribute and collaborate towards adding as much value, energy, and benefits to humanity and our world. Assessing milestones over a life’s path based on integrated ecogeorelative rationality and inspiration incentives of helping one another is worth striving for. Other incentives could be anything Earthly imaginable consistent with foundational fundamentals and all additional prioritized educational learning as long as it is in the broader genuine holistic context. This represents a bottom-up (individual context) and top-down approach (general nature, Earth, humanity context) and Everything connected between ecogeorelative Ecogeosystematics functioning context. These indices are meant to get everyone on their life’s path with all three contexts in mind. The diversity of all indices accepts everyone and encourages continual learning, adaptation, and continual striving both extensively and intensively. This is an excellent idea because whatever your personality type, motivations, abilities, creativity, effort, educational learning, individuality, passion, and desire fits best. The relative importance weights and relative significance weights are really up to each person’s motivational desire or genuine holistic functioning. The actual ways to incentivize people regarding life’s path milestone contributions should be determined at a conference. This may be determined with an Ecogeorelative intensive and extensive decision-making process. This is the significant part of it as it combines those who know the most (relatively weighted in a manner that represents rationality) with extensive public scoping inputs from the people (relatively weighted in a way that represents rationality). Going a step further, we could relatively weigh everyone with their broad contribution significance in terms of their total educational learning enlightenment and experience and relevant area of study for making such a decision. Or we could leave this step alone and have everyone have the same weight. Or we could do both and relatively weight the “everyone is the same” ( no individual weights) and the “everyone is different” (relative weighting by contribution significance). A relative weight can be proportionally applied to both, or the relative weights could be the same. It does not matter when everyone self-assesses themselves. This method equalizes everyone and allows everyone to be different simultaneously.

It seems weird that we have a problem supporting higher education, which causes enormous expenses for individuals who cannot pay. What occurred to me is that educational learning is so important that we all should give as much as we should towards academic learning, which means whatever they need, including anything they need. This is because once we transition to an Earth-nature integrated ecogeorelative context, every major becomes integrated into the totality of all of nature and all interdisciplinary perspectives. We will all be in context with everything else because nature (eco), also known as everything, is related to everything else. Combined with geography (geo), all things are related to everything else, but near things are more connected than distant things, often putting everything in order spatially and temporally with everything else. As far as I know, this is where my educational learning has taken me. The value gained in great motivation through educational learning endeavors is relative to your inspiration, passions, interests, effort, and desire. But it is up to each one of you. We should not have problems allocating energy and resources for educational learning organizations or, in general, in the future, no matter what level. I find it difficult to imagine that those who have benefitted immensely from the past do not contribute what they can toward continual adaptation and educational learning. It would be a grand gesture to help transition to the most genuine holistic, sustainable striving future.
Educational learning is about a person’s adaptive living, adaptive learning, and adaptive exploration. In the future, there will be much more fieldwork such that it opens enough space at all universities and colleges so everyone can attend higher education. This sets us all up for continual milestone attainment throughout life. I have a dream that all universities, colleges, etc., and governments on Earth will form a cumulative totality Unidiversity Research Explorer Cycle for the benefit of everyone, including the natural environment, humanity, and every person on Earth. It will be how we care for everyone, everything, everywhere on Earth.

Weirdly, some people love their country more than they love one another. Maybe we would be better off if we focused on loving one another. A while ago, I wondered if some people love America so much that they love her to death. It seems that loving America is like loving any organization or corporation. I wonder if people also love their organizations and corporations to death. I am proud of many of the ideals of America, but I am confused because I do not understand the lack of prioritization relative to those ideals. Maybe we fell in love with the process of America and trusted the process of America, and many have forgotten to strive for the ideals. It seems to me the beauty of America could be sharing the ideals of America with the rest of the world in a way that inspires the rest of the world instead of trying to get them to be like us. However, any attempt at transforming our planet ought to be an inclusive effort that respects and considers each region’s contributions in a collaborative effort to save our planet and our people. It seems to me that it is a significant effort, but we should consider these steps. We ought to have presentations to everyone from the most responsible holistic striving knowledge, planning, and interdisciplinary planning. These presentations should tell everyone that “we are the people” of planet Earth. We can assess, plan, and problem-solve and have a rational decision-making process considering everyone, everything, everywhere on Earth. Maybe we ought to share the ideals of humanity and the context of living on a miraculous planet where nature is not only of vital importance to our survival. It is our mentor. We are a part of nature as well as spiritual beings that should strive to take holistic responsibility for all our functioning, relationships, and behaviors while using our brain energy for positive, beneficial reasons that continually add to our ability to live in harmony with nature and ourselves on our planet but loving one another. Anything else is irrational. Let us love our natural Earth, which includes everything, everyone, and everywhere. That is why we should treat everyone around us with an honest, earth-striving ethic. It starts with loving, caring, sharing, giving, forgiving, and genuine kindness, striving towards everyone and everywhere.

I believe all work ought to be like a living experience instead of like work used to be. We ought to have nurturing environments that fit into our natural lives. We should be able to plan our lives and accomplish our various roles in our various organizations to minimize detrimental stress. Living should be an adventurous experience instead of a cubicle solitary confinement or confined space experience. I believe we ought to be able to contribute and collaborate wherever it is most convenient to your schedule rather than a rigid top-down requirement. This way, we can live, learn, and love in a closer to nature and a playful, fun context. We ought to be able to combine work with an enjoyable Earth experience. The experience could be at the beach, in the mountains, at a ski resort, on a lake, or in a place with a beautiful view. It could be anywhere. One could perform their roles on a train while traveling or in any natural setting. Changing the monotony and setting often leads to tremendous opportunities to add value to one’s life, as natural environments and humanity-inspired environments make you feel a part of nature and humanity. Combining any living experience or your life’s work with any exploration is best. Looking at life like an exploration is highly beneficial to your fitness. I wonder if being in a confined space always causes tunnel vision or restricts one’s creative abilities.

My theory is that the more you feel alive and part of nature or nature striving humanity, or a part of God’s miraculous creation on Earth or beyond, the more you can be an individual that contributes to a healthy and genuine holistic, sustainable striving way. For many traditionalists, these experiences enhance the check and balance capability we should all have as we function in organizations. Maybe if we are constricted in confined spaces all the time, people are less likely to feel naturally free to speak up when someone needs to speak up in organizations. Maybe office environments should have more windows and pictures of natural beauty, cityscapes, nature, people, kids, and maps and imagery that remind us of the broader context. I believe 4-5 hours at the office is enough. Maybe over time, as we continue to strive for closer to nature functioning and closer to sustainable striving functioning, life will indeed be nothing but living, learning, exploring, and loving more and more all the time (a positive energy negative feedback loop). The more we integrate nature, excitement, travel, fun, and play, the better we will function. The quality of life will improve for everyone. Some other benefits include more niche roles for people, more time with kids, more time spent in nature, more time spent with others, more time getting healthy, less traffic at rush hours, more time to help the community, and more getting to know others. These benefits broaden your perspective and help make you healthier and closer to your natural homeostatic balance. I hope we never use the word work again because it focuses on the less important process rather than the broader, more critical living experience in context with all of Nature and God.

The integrated device should be planned relative to the big-picture overall planning effort. However, it seems that one of the most crucial living, learning, and loving experiences we can do is make practical and visually functional so that a person always has an opportunity to learn and dynamically interrelate with the various environments or areas one finds oneself in. It ought to introduce a more fun and playful life experience as we live close in context with multiple areas. An area or region is the totality of potential opportunities to learn, live, explore, and love in context with that geographic area. Thus, we can continuously learn and contribute if we have a well-planned location-enabled integrated device in context. Traveling in a particular location will allow you to find restaurants, sports, pubs, entertainment, find hotels, rents and shares, natural areas, parks, learn historical landscapes, historical architecture, community centers and churches, cultural significance places, biological significance places, gnis-p places, hospitals, people to meet, places to go, places of interest, places to learn something, characteristics of the place, and anything else you can imagine as long as it is genuine holistic and sustainable striving context to improve your life experience. When we put these ideas in context with where you are, organizations can incentivize you to visit their place. This can be fun when you enter your needs and wants for the day, like a restaurant above four stars and a hotel above four stars. (In the future, we ought to have hotels and rents and shares and restaurants rated in an ecogeorelative  ecogeorationality way)

While traveling, a hotel that sees a request can make an offer or incentive to stay at their hotel. The same is true for a restaurant; if a particular restaurant has a gnocchi special, it sends you the information and incentive to visit their restaurant. If there is a conference or show on sailboats, you will be notified that this event is occurring in this area. If you prioritize learning, you can receive all relative ecogeonotification on the map showing your customized tour locations close to your interests. If you notice a sailboat tour of the coast has two spots available, you can book it for the evening. A great band is playing, and eight seats open up at the last minute; you could jump on that opportunity. If you need a ride, positioning yourself on a map and having someone pick you up is a matter. You could contribute to a natural beautification study by identifying pleasing places and those that are not. You could contribute to a public scoping on where the best place for a new community center might belong. You could send an ecogeonotification on a place that might need help or someone that might need help. You could identify an area where you would like to live so that when a house becomes vacant, it simply matches or associates the need to buy with the need to sell. The same is valid for house shares and home shares. Over time, we would be able to understand which areas are most desirable to live in and use relatively high EVCI to associate those people who might have the first opportunity or incentive to live in the place of their dreams. (This might be the only indicator we need to transform into a genuine holistic, sustainable striving planet Earth). ( It might end all detrimental impacting behavior on Earth by examining costs and impacts).

The integrated device allows you to do anything from any location. It will enable one to live an explorational and continuous learning life. Integrated with the unidiversity, it naturally integrates with everything, everyone, everywhere on Earth. It has a mapping grade GPS or GNSS for most science-related projects like training imagery and navigation with or without a compass, etc. It allows us to collaborate on missions or projects. In essence, it will enable planning, booking, organization, learning, living, exploration, values sharing, photo sharing, and sharing, caring, loving, giving, researching, keeping in touch, forgiving, collaboration, unification, and allows for comfort, joy, love, hope, and sustainable striving happiness. It does anything the internet can do and any specially designed applications. It has a science-grade camera for anything recreational, from remote sensing to sampling. It allows for ecogeorelativity planning and ecogeosystematics. It helps you assess yourself and enables you to make rational decisions. It is used when anyone, anything, anywhere, needs help. It uses indices for calculating anything you might be interested in doing for investing or otherwise. It is really about anything at all beyond your imagination.

I have a question about solar panels in their existing form.  It seems that if solar panels continue to gain popularity, it would significantly increase the albedo effect and the loss of snow and ice worldwide as more black absorbing albedo effect increases.  We seem to have already created blacktop and black roofs worldwide.  However, it may be a relative benefit to having solar panels because of less pollution from power generation in traditional fossil fuel consumption.  Maybe we must assess, problem-solve, and plan a more well-planned perspective.  Maybe it is about assessing trade-offs relatively.  It seems we ecogeorationalize a prioritization plan to incentivize solar panels more in certain areas and less in others.  We could make solar panels with less albedo effect and simultaneously strive to eliminate fossil fuel combustion.  Energy generation and conservation ought to be an integrative concept.  They ought to be related to the area’s characteristics, suitability, and potential while at the same time trying to reduce pollution in all forms as much as possible.  Maybe if we were more thoughtful about energy, we would reduce our consumption.  Imagine if we all worked with the Eco-Geo We-Me integrated device and brainstormed with everyone who wanted to contribute.  However, once we have everyone’s ideas, I can imagine a world where energy production is more of an integrative concept using as many ideas as possible.  We could generate energy while we have locomotion and trains.  It is just like the car concept.  We should be able to generate power while a train moves across the terrain with natural momentum.  We could have wave generation where it makes sense, the wind where it makes sense, and solar where it makes sense.  Maybe biomass where it makes sense and trains wherever possible.  It ought to be planned out in an ecogeorational way.  No other way is close to a rational or a real solution.  We could devote everybody to solving this problem; it would only be part of the overall effort to solve the problem.  I see contributions from everyone as a public scoping or contribution to problem-solving inclusion ideas.  However, most problem-solving will be accomplished in this integrative, all-inclusive way with those with more to offer regarding integrated ecogeorelative problem-solving ability.  However, some great ideas come from regular people; therefore, we must all have the opportunity to contribute.  So, it is both.  It is an evenness spatial equal opportunity to contribute because we all have the potential to come up with great ideas.  It is also the ecogeorational relative weighting regarding cumulative knowledge, expertise, and interdisciplinary way.  Many decisions are made from data; thus, the data are critical because interdisciplinary experts begin the rational decision process with data, which is often spatial.  In sum, we are all in this together, and we should be relatively incentivized and encouraged to collaborate and contribute what we can to help one another, everyone, everything, everywhere on Earth as much as we can.  It makes sense that everyone is the same, but at the same time, everybody is different.  The different part is an accumulation of characteristics that is up to each person relative to their interests, purpose, life’s path, aspirations, and who they are as individuals.  No matter what you choose for your life’s path, it is best to do what you can in terms of helping one another with the cumulativeness of who you are as an individual.  Every niche organization is made up of every role on this planet.  More weight should be put on everyone to do what they can, relative to their cumulativeness at whatever place or time you are in your life.  The rest is up to you.  Your cumulativeness should be ever increasing.  Otherwise, you are stagnant and somewhat static.  If you ever feel this way, you need help from mentors, counselors, inspirational people, education, health care, spirituality, and anyone else who will talk to you.  The ECVI Ecological Contribution Value Index inspires people to be genuinely holistic and sustainable, striving while we live on planet Earth.  Some people can help more or some less, but differently.  The ECVI is an ecogeorational way to look at a more important indicator because we should focus on EVCI instead of just how much money, power, or coolness a person has.  The EEC (Ecological Equilibrium Compensation) incentive is about striving for equality in terms of a dynamic equilibrium and homeostasis survivability for everyone, everything, everywhere.  The amount of EEC depends on how much you help with everyone, everything, everywhere.  The ECVI and EVPI (Ecological Values Potential Index) are about your potential and roles and your various sustainable striving behaviors in context with your chosen roles, regardless of whether they are genuine holistic public, genuine holistic private, or genuine holistic research knowledge.  However, it is more rational to have EVCI be an inspirational incentive for everyone so that everyone strives to do what they can relative to their interests and life’s path if it is in context with the bigger picture.  We should have several conferences on the EEC, EVPI, and EVCI.  Here are some ideas on EEC.  EEC should be related to the amount one helps (or it could be an ENO) with the public good.  It should relate to involvement in planned research and public scoping efforts.  It should relate to the energy, value, benefit, or help you do on the ground to help.  I imagine several roles or opportunities to help will be available on a point-based, ever-changing opportunity to help map (Part of the ecogeo scheduler).  Any of these public benefiting roles will contribute to one’s EEC.  Likewise, EVCI will be the cumulative totality you have to offer in several areas relative to your role in context with your environment and humanity.  These can be chosen, combined, or integrated in any way.  The closer you function to a sustainable striving nature, the closer you are to genuine holistic striving, your experience and education, continuous learning, creativity; role contribution, role collaboration, your knowledge/knowledge contribution index, holistic in context sustainable striving technology contribution, sustainable string investment index, closer to education/mentoring, ENOs EVCI, ideas you contribute, the index of EEC public good you contribute, genuine kindness, holistic problem solving, and prevention ability.  Furthermore, there is a Wow index to inspire people that add integrative beauty or creativity to the world, a difficult role or organization index, your sustainable striving investment index (products you buy index and organizations you invest in index), travel cost index relative to cumulative benefit including your fossil fuel consumption/pollution index related to cumulative benefit.  All you need to do is turn the potential into a holistic positive energy contribution.

As far as solar panels are concerned, it would be best to lessen the albedo effect, and one way to do this may be to use the color of sand ( I found this in the Sahara desert), as it is more of a natural color for solar panels.  Having more sand-colored roofs and limestone or gravel roads would make sense.

One of the first steps is to get a planning group together and plan how to transition from the current justice and law fields to a more helpful team (which could include all of us together on Earth when we involve everyone and everything everywhere). First, an interdisciplinary team ought to get together and put a presentation together, letting people know that there is no such thing as having to deal with survival stress, difficult living conditions, or “crime” to get by in our world today. Let them know we are removing the word crime from a holistic perspective instead. Let them know that any information provided will be used in a well-intentioned help project meant to get people the help they need no matter what the problem (before they need help). It is no longer about getting people in trouble or punishing people. No longer will anyone be using surveillance techniques to try to investigate people. We must help people on the street and in highly susceptible areas to perturbation and violence with as many helping people as possible, especially in high-density areas. Many have been collecting data for a long time. It is just that they were collecting data for the wrong reasons. The significant data they collected will be used to immediately help people and for reasons that add multiplying value, energy, and benefits to our world. This leads to a more genuine holistic, sustainable striving approach to problem-solving. It allows significant research and helps forces (maybe all of us) intensify their integrated interdisciplinary efforts in prioritized areas. It would be best if management and administration took the lead and went to the streets to help. Maybe incentives ought to go to those who interact with the most people. I suggested giving people a flower with a presentation or a genuine kind note written by an interdisciplinary team. We must get everyone to trust one another again. People need to feel free to ask for help with absolutely anything whatsoever. Food or EEC ought to be distributed to those in need as well. The presentations might be in a central area like a community center or school and on the Internet. The help project could be combined with the holistic inclusion project I thought of in the 1980s. This would incorporate a similar foundation of loving, caring, sharing, giving, forgiving, and genuine kindness, striving to bring around conditions of comfort, joy, love, hope, faith, and sustainable striving for happiness.

Those who put people in categories like criminals seem to be overlooking themselves in the analysis.  In essence, labeling someone as detrimental as a “criminal” kills them in some way, shape, or form.  We need to get to people first before they have a chance at being labeled something so negative.  Why don’t we get to the so-called criminals before they can get impacted by the law?  It is strange.  It seems to me that we ought to eliminate the word criminal.  Instead, we can have a scientific index assessment that involves the totality of one’s functioning, including one’s well-intentioned contributions toward improving our world.  It becomes more about inspiration incentives instead of waiting to be labeled something.  The word criminal is political and is often out of context with one’s totality.  In essence, simply labeling someone a criminal is criminal if we stick with arcane concepts of crime and punishment.  They dropped the ball on getting someone the help they needed in the first place.  It represents a cycle of violence that starts with confinement, loneliness, isolation, and destructive influences of others.  A more relevant assessment of what we used to call “criminal” would be a cumulative assessment of all the detrimentally impacting behaviors towards other people and our cumulative environment.  It makes sense for everyone to function in our world, contributing what they can towards loving, caring, and helping one another rather than trying to find people to label criminals.  Criminality is a war against the people without understanding the cumulative circumstances it took to get a person in a suffering survival zone in the first place.  Criminality is big business and supports a huge chunk of the traditional economy.  Thus, it is resistant to change.  Labeling people criminals is part of this archaic infrastructure bound and determined to find fault with natural spiritual miracles.  It makes God cry.  Remember that we were small children and are still relatively young.  Labeling someone a criminal means that the rest of us did not do our job of loving, caring, sharing, giving, forgiving, and genuine kindness striving in the first place.  Some were not nurtured enough.  It does not make sense to label people criminals at all.  In essence, it is like a war crime when people are labeled prisoners of war, but instead of war, they are victims of an out-of-context economy and traditional functioning.  Our priorities are all screwed up.  We need to put everyone, everything, everywhere on the relative priority list.  However, I wonder if we should look at a more rational context assessment and then put things in a ratio form of prioritization, a more acceptable form of assessment.  Furthermore, traditionally, this concept does not make sense because the data is not normalized relative to anything else.

This type of traditional out-of-context analysis has been going on for a long time, and the detrimental impacts are enormous.  This only leads to the furtherance of self-promulgating, out-of-context political violence from those who “know not what they do.” I believe Jesus said the exact quote.  It is true; they know not what they do.  I am trying to tell them what they do and have been trying to figure out our problems for a long time.  Let us now work together with a foundation of love, compassion, care, forgiveness, nature concepts, sharing, giving, simplicity, living, genuine kindness, striving, and learning in context to all that is highly relevant.  At the same time, we can spread the holistic inclusion project and inspirational inclusion incentives.  We must transform to this perspective.  I do not see another way.  Otherwise, we are trying to create “criminals”.  Creating “criminals” unknowingly serves no other purpose than to increase more fortunate people’s ultra-competitive edge over those less fortunate.  This allows the creation of enslaved people while those that may be more “criminal” are labeled slave labor so others can profit more from a money perspective.  Labeling people may significantly benefit the economy because of this slave labor and takings.  Maybe it makes the more fortunate look better, feel better, or get more privileges and benefits in our world.

Consequently, anybody labeled criminal indicates our current systems and processes are inadequate.  Criminal means that we have not done what is necessary to prevent this concept in the first place.  The problem was not solved promptly or contained in the first place.  It is an indicator that our relative priorities are in the wrong place.  Furthermore, every criminal is an out-of-context concept and a problem that was not prevented or solved when it should have been.  This is often because people are too concerned about making money, achieving success in the current definition, ultra-competing for a hierarchical position in society, and functioning in complacent organizations.  These organizations also use a set of rules and procedures to get people in trouble at work and limit their fitness success.

Furthermore, many hierarchical people may suffer in their positions and lack time or concern to look beyond their functioning.  I have also written that many people are in such a state of survival and living cycle that they sometimes gain satisfaction from others’ extreme suffering because it makes them feel better about their situation.  It is the same concept I have noticed with police blotter cultures.  The further we deviate from God, nature, humanity, and simplicity, the more stressed everyone gets.  The more complex and frustrating work piles up on everyone’s desks, and they work for the sake of work and drop all context.  This extreme reductionist approach to societal functioning creates a downward spiral feedback loop, reverberating throughout our reactive complexity society, creating transference to those most susceptible to perturbation and risk.  Is everyone too busy to care?

Does this create a pollution feedback loop?

From a traditional perspective, are we all relative “criminals” really?  Let us get rid of the word reactionary justice because it is the most negative concept ever created.  It represents a positive feedback pollution loop.  Please understand me; I believe people who exhibit these behaviors need help, and it is not their fault.  But they need real help as well from everyone, everything, everywhere on Earth too.  We ought to be compassionate in such a way that provides them with the care needed and chances of reintegration into a higher, relatively accessible, contributing life.  We must research and try and learn as much as we can from them to better find ways to minimize the chance that people get into these pollution manufacturing positions in the future.  The real reason is that we need everyone on Earth to contribute what they can in terms of energy so we can live on this planet in a sustainable, striving way.

In summary, we must holistically include everyone on Earth with inspirational incentives and inclusion.  People need to learn to become holistic, holy, or both.  We must strive to be loving, caring, sharing, giving, forgiving, and genuine kindness, striving to bring around conditions of comfort, joy, love, hope, faith, and sustainable striving for happiness.  World without end…