We all understand the estimate of GDP. But what about a concept similar to the Gross Cost Index? Even if it would be tremendously challenging to determine all the costs of our current functioning on everything, everywhere, everybody, including individuals, families, communities, kids, regions, and Earth itself. It would be worth estimating a rough number for both indices. Likewise, there should be an opportunity cost concept for the future of continuing our functioning in the same way. Imagine if we calculated today’s cost with an opportunity cost concept of how much value-adding potential we would lose and how the externalized costs could be prevented. Maybe we should all take a month’s break from working and working and working or playing, playing, and playing and try to plan and self-assess the spectrum transference transition. These are inputs showing that each of us needs to get on a path to our sustainable striving and genuine holistic life’s path. We must be in context with our nature on Earth rather than doing what the boss tells us to do. Maybe we can balance needed functionality in our world, and an assessment planning effort in sort of a transition mode like pulling the full speed ahead lever pack to 1/4 speed ahead. This would be a great start. There may be some organizations that may be better off not functioning in their current form at all once they attempt to determine their ecogeorelativity rationality impact assessment. It may be best to start the (similarity unique diversity spectrum triangle we me unidiversity research explorers’ cycle) inclusion process for everyone first so we can keep people surviving, contributing, collaborating, learning, living, loving, and caring about one another. Advice in recommended foundational courses, mentoring, counseling health care, and other help resources. It will also help to plan highly prioritized niche roles and organizations as they contribute to ecological restoration and ecological rehabilitation and any additional necessary help needed. Immediately, we can decrease external costs and start functioning in a bottom-up, sustainable striving way.

In contrast, we strive to add as much as possible to creating benefits, value, beneficial energy, and sustainable striving investment. At the same time, we can have the presiding ecological planning group (including all of us together) work with all other planning groups, ENOs, and ENRs to inspire webs of connectedness and chains of energy flow that make the most sense from an ecogeorelativity rationality perspective. We should strive to have energy flow to other places that can generate more energy and prevent detrimental costs. In the future, we should be about everything, everyone, everywhere on Earth, ecogeorelatively considered.