Currently, almost everything on earth is part of the industrial earth, the industrial machine concept. Unfortunately, even people are treated as industrial machines as well. The industrial machine concept supports people like extreme industrial politicians who favor an industrial earth only. The latest thing that irritated me was the idea of promoting homes and home ownership investment only for those who are hard-working and rich. It is an indicator that Industrial Earth puts profits, money, and pollution above all else on planet Earth. I’m not against profits; however, they need a holistic, well-motivated, positive-energy, sustainable, striving context before we can achieve holistic profits. Profits need to do the holistic work of transitioning to a sustainable, thriving planet Earth. Moreover, people who are unwilling to do anything on earth to survive, or those often left behind, struggling near the survival zone, suffering, should be holistically accepted, included, and inspired to contribute. These people naturally contribute more value, energy, and benefits, and are more harmoniously balanced for our people, humanity, families, natural environment, cultures, and the planet. Many of them are holistic, well-motivated, and positive-energy people. They are genuine. If you’re treated like an industrial machine and working hard because your conveyor belt and assembly lines have been turned up, it does not mean you are contributing more to our society, our natural environment, our cultures, communities, and our planet. I am an industrial machine too, but I am striving to be holistic, well-motivated, and positive in energy, while the industrial earth controls me. I will not do anything to survive. Are most homeless and underemployed people like this? Many people in the industrial Earth paradigm will do absolutely anything to survive, including killing people. I am in favor of hard work, but it needs a holistic context and self-assessed impact assessment.
Industrial Earth wants you in a home, not because it’s a loving, caring, sharing, giving, forgiving, and genuinely kind concept, so we can bring our conditions of comfort, joy, love, Hope, faith, unity, equity, and sustainable, striving happiness, but because it wants you as an employee for Industrial Planet Earth. In essence, it is your reward for being a productive contributor to industrial processes, investments, procedures, laws, rules, and regulations that confined compartmentalized functioning and pollution. In actuality, the political industrial machine wants your votes and support. In essence, we are all treated and made to feel like employees in industrial Earth. This is wrong. If industrial Earth employees had this in mind, they would be able to make decisions that include all of us, rather than just wealthy, ingratiating believers in the industrial Earth paradigm. In essence, the way it’s portrayed is that owning a home is quid pro quo for believing in an Industrial Earth paradigm as an investor, employee, or ingratiating politician. I submit to you that it is better to pay someone to stay home than to contribute to the Extreme industrial Earth paradigm in this manner. Staying home prevents them from harming people, the natural environment, our cultures, and our planet Earth. Consequently, I am an advocate for everyone to have a home on earth, as well as the concept of sharing. In many ways, homeless people contribute more value, energy, and benefits to our world by doing nothing, even if they unfortunately harm themselves. Are there some industrial earth employees who are below homeless people in terms of value, energy, and benefits they contribute? Do they detrimentally impact more than they help? Why do the people who impact more than they help often have big mansions and a multitude of homes? Is it true they know not what they do? Do we not know what they do either? Is transparency a farce because the indirect impacts are the problems?
The latest industrial Earth practice of promoting homeownership for the wealthy and the hard-working only is going to create homelessness in a downward spiral feedback loop sort of way. Because people experiencing homelessness and those in survival zones aren’t the majority on planet Earth, the planet Earth industrial employees are not concerned with their vote or support. However, struggling in a survival zone can be beneficial for our society because it allows me to put in a great deal of energy into figuring things out. Although I did not benefit from my ideas, I can see a brighter future for everyone, including me, on Earth because of them, even though those who took them had only their own context, not mine. Maybe I will benefit in the near future, but I will not sacrifice everyone, everything, everywhere to do such a concept. Should people on Earth be above industrial Earth practices?
Industrial earth created the conditions for extracting, exchanging, and excluding in the taking cycle. Industrial machines require very little to carry out their industrial roles. They need food and energy, and hope for optimism. In contrast, I am for everyone, everything, everywhere on Earth, in an Eco Geo, rational prioritization way. In many ways, there are cultures on this planet that have minimal detrimental impact on all of us and our natural environment. They often contribute as much as they can to a holistic ecological economy while living in harmony and peace within their cultures. I’m not advocating for all of us to go back to an Aboriginal type of living, but we need to keep everything in context and in perspective. First, let me say that I forgive the behavior of our Industrial Earth employees. However, I want everyone to start transitioning toward a more holistic, well-motivated, positive-energy, sustainable Striving planet Earth. Consequently, all of our investment, including our homes, needs to be holistic and sustainable, striving to bring around conditions of comfort, joy, love, hope, unity, equity, faith, sustainable, striving happiness to bring about conditions of comfort, joy, love, hope, unity, faith, equity, and sustainable, striving happiness. These holistic, cultural considerations and criteria should be the primary reasons for homeownership and investment. I’m not sure the proponents of the industrial earth perspective are meeting any of the criteria set forth above. It is essential to see beyond the industrial-earth political rhetoric by paying attention to what is important, in context, and in a holistic or holy way.