I came up with one of the best ideas on Earth, and many others, and got fired.  Communications in corporations are inherently manufactured by the industrial planet Earth.   Coupled with information systems and several servers, it was designed as a taking extraction change, an exclusion type of phenomenon. It has been my experience that Global manufacturing conditions, which create itinerant dysfunction in organizations, are the likely cause. This itinerant dysfunction, amidst the infinite-variable politicization and hierarchical structures, makes the circumstances that spark the taking, extraction, and exclusion cycle.  Furthermore, this itinerant manufacturing creates conditions for taking from energy allocators, creators, Inventors, innovators, and workers.  In exchange for the takings of some great ideas and vast amounts of holistic labor from people, politicization and criminalization occur as ideas are exchanged, misappropriated, and individuals like creators and energy allocators are fired, or even worse.  This idea arises from the infinite politicization and variabilization of hierarchies on industrial planet Earth.  Therefore, specific hierarchies are meant to be taken from, while other hierarchies are meant to receive the takings.   I’m not even sure of the reality of the situation because I was put in a lonely office and not communicated with.   Every hierarchical level was designed to be isolated and confined to the reality of the takings, extraction, exchange, and exclusion cycle. Some people didn’t even know about it. I’m sure.  Consequently, hierarchical dysfunction in corporations and government functions as a protective mechanism for those in control.  In reality, there are hierarchies of organizations, corporations, governments, and employees in each of these sectors. Each entity in the hierarchy is its own compartmentalized structure and function. Oftentimes, we don’t even know who’s in control when we’re going through a trying circumstance.   In my case, the corporation I worked for was taken over by another corporation, which took everything I had and created its own division, bringing many of my interests and reappropriating them.   However, it doesn’t stop there. Ideas and creativity are like widgets on a manufacturing assembly line in corporate planet Earth.   Globalization, controlling domination, industrial Earth, and the extraction, exchange, and exclusion cycle are related to this, as some of the ideas spread to South Korea, China, and Taiwan. Moreover, I am concerned that the Holistic businesses and conferences I interacted with during that period were affected by the same kinds of forces that shaped my circumstances.   If the same thing happens again, I have learned to organize a meeting of all the managers, all the supervisors, all the information systems professionals, and all the counterparts.   During this meeting, I would try to get everybody on the same page, given that everyone is functioning on different pages and understanding. Email does not work as it can be compromised.   Regardless of what happens in this situation, one thing is for sure: I experienced a microcosm of what happens. On our industrial planet, misappropriation could be a significant phenomenon.   Workers are in jeopardy as they get labeled as political outcasts, criminals, health-challenged, and terrorists, or worse. Consequently, a considerable amount of preventable suffering, such as survival zone suffering, occurs on planet Earth.

My recent departure, following significant contributions and the development of numerous innovative concepts, has illuminated what I perceive as a pervasive and deeply concerning systemic issue within organizational structures. It appears that the mechanisms of communication and information flow within many corporations are not merely inefficient but are, at times, deliberately designed to be opaque. This lack of transparency, often reinforced by intricate information systems, seems to facilitate a systematic process of intellectual property appropriation and the marginalization of its originators.

I’ve observed a troubling trend where systemic dysfunctions within both corporate and, by extension, governmental entities are not merely accidental but appear to be actively fostered. This creates an environment ripe for the systematic extraction of value from the ingenuity and hard work of creators, inventors, innovators, and the general workforce. Instead of recognition or equitable reward, those who contribute groundbreaking ideas often face politicization, marginalization, or even outright dismissal, while their intellectual contributions are subsequently misappropriated and leveraged by others.

My personal experience involved being increasingly isolated and cut off from critical information, a tactic that seems designed to prevent a holistic understanding of these processes across hierarchical levels. It became clear that this pervasive dysfunction functions as a protective barrier for those who orchestrate such appropriations, making true accountability remarkably elusive.

In my own situation, my former employer was acquired, leading to the swift absorption and re-purposing of my significant intellectual contributions and projects into a new division by the acquiring entity. It has become evident that in the globalized corporate landscape, ideas and creative output are increasingly treated as mere commodities or widgets, readily transferable across borders. (while we are forced to pay attention to the national boundaries on Earth for circumstances like the immigration of poor people into a survival zone suffering condition). I’ve seen my own concepts disseminated internationally to regions like South Korea, China, and Taiwan, highlighting the global scale of this misappropriation cycle. Even the holistic businesses and conferences I engaged with during that period seem to have been impacted by similar forces.

Looking ahead, I am convinced that addressing these issues requires a concerted effort to foster true transparency and unified understanding across all levels – from management and supervisors to IT professionals and their counterparts. My goal, should such a situation arise again, would be to bridge the current disconnects and establish a shared reality regarding these critical vulnerabilities. This is impossible in today’s top-down, controlling, dominating industrial Earth practices.

Ultimately, my experience feels like a microcosm of a much broader global phenomenon: the systematic devaluation and exploitation of intellectual capital. Without collective vigilance and robust ethical frameworks, innovators and workers risk being politically marginalized, unjustly accused, or worse, their invaluable contributions systematically erased.

Sincerely,

Richard Thomas Simmons