Economists have immense potential to help with a sustainable striving planet Earth because they can see how manipulation of one area of the economy leads to systematic reactionary manipulation in other areas of the economy. Thus, they should be able to quickly transform and broaden their perspective by trying to understand everything. However, supply and demand are not so simple. They ought to be transformed into a more cumulative impact understanding of what supply does and what demand does in our “free” society. Demand ought to be replaced by a sustainable striving concept of rational demand in a more Eco-geo relativity way. Otherwise, everything is out of context with everything else, and whatever happens to our planet happens. Understanding the impacts of a supply and demand system of economics ought to be transformed into a more natural system concept considering things of relatively higher ecological value than simple consumer demand and corporate supply. Often, demand is artificially created by those with the power to create demand. But they often disregard everything else and fail to plan according to the most well-intentioned integrated multi-dimensionality. Thus, they start multiplying detrimental impacts somewhere else in time, somewhere else on the planet, or something else entirely, including the natural environment and people. For example, the worst idea is to develop the gold standard. If we go forth with a gold standard, we will tear up every corner of the Earth with a higher probability of containing gold looking for gold. The detrimental impacts associated with this free market capitalistic idea are massive relative to gold’s real inherent ecological value. However, we need to put relative demand in context with everything else so relative supply will be more sustainable striving. World without end…