My dear friends, colleagues, and fellow inhabitants of this planet,

Lately, I’ve been seeing the world through the lens of process means and substantive ends functioning. (Dr. Schramm at Western Connecticut State University got me thinking about whether the means justify the ends or the ends justify the means in 1986.) We live in a world where the means often justify the ends.   However, the substantive ends should be our primary focus, rather than seeking a popularity process above them.  Processing means functioning people are more logical-minded and oriented toward winning at any cost.   Whereas the suffering, striving people are more rational, heart-energy people.  Generally, I see the collective masses as more substantive, striving to achieve a holistic transition towards a brighter, desired future on earth.   Means striving people are more concerned with the current condition and with how things function in the world.   In other words, they strive more for popularity than for wisdom. Mainly means functioning people are more closely associated with industrial Earth life, Kings, castles, and kingdoms, as they are more process-oriented and more concerned with their own well-being and traditional definitions of success.  

In contrast, people on Earth have the most diverse perspectives, as long as we share a common foundation.   Diverse perspectives, as long as they’re grounded in this foundation, are tremendously valuable because each offers unique observations.  This perspective should be harnessed like energy to transition the world from its current condition to the desired future.   However, I would caution against excessive means-focused observations, as that tends to end up in a downward spiral feedback loop leading to an inflection point of fighting (derived from manufactured logic mind-oriented behaviors only).  Fighting is a waste of time and effort. While learning, exploring, discovering, and loving our progressive meaning, we observe and strive toward the desired future.   Fighting leads us to the Road of endless controversy, conflict, and chaos, and it continues focus on functional irrational means behavior.   What we need most of all is sustainable striving. patterns, hypotheses, and thinking about desired future conditions.     We are all in this together on planet Earth, and it’s up to us to transition to a brighter future. We must not listen to the noise of the current state of affairs, as it distracts and diverts us from our sustainable, striving mission with our creator so that we can adapt and evolve.  Please let us be more involved in a holistic science endeavor, on Earth together.   Nobody does it better than each of us and all of us together. World without end….

I have been deeply contemplating the fundamental paradigms through which we navigate our shared existence, particularly the profound distinction between prioritizing process and striving for substantive ends. It has become increasingly evident that much of our collective energy is inadvertently absorbed by the ‘how’ – the established procedures, the pursuit of fleeting popularity, and the immediate, often superficial, victories. This focus, while seemingly practical, frequently diverts us from the far more crucial ‘what’ – the truly desirable future conditions we aspire to create.

The ‘means-driven’ approach, as I perceive it, often manifests as a commitment to manufactured logic, strategic maneuvering, and the acquisition of dominance at almost any cost. Historically, this mindset echoes the rigid structures of industrial power and traditional definitions of success, which can inadvertently tether us to the present. It frequently prioritizes the maintenance of existing systems and individual well-being over broader, transformative objectives, leading to divisive debates and superficial advancements that perpetuate cycles of conflict and chaos. This incessant ‘noise’ of immediate concerns and conventional methods serves as a potent distraction, siphoning our precious energy from genuine, long-term progress.

In stark contrast, an ‘ends-striving’ philosophy elevates a more profound and holistic vision. It is guided by a rational heart, an intrinsic energy that seeks true human flourishing and a brighter, more sustainable future for all life on Earth. This perspective inherently acknowledges that our most potent resource lies in the rich tapestry of human diversity. When these varied viewpoints are grounded in a shared commitment to fundamental well-being – a common foundation of empathy and purpose – they become incredibly valuable, offering unique observations essential for navigating our complex global challenges. These distinct insights are not merely additive; they are energetic catalysts, capable of powering our transition from the current state to a profoundly desired planetary condition.

However, we must remain vigilant against the seductive pull of excessive means-functioning, which invariably leads to a downward spiral of unproductive contention. Fighting, in all its forms – whether physical, ideological, or emotional – is an abysmal waste of our most precious resources: time, energy, and goodwill. Our true evolutionary path, and indeed our only sustainable one, lies in continuous learning, open exploration, discovery, and collective love. These are the dynamic engines of progress that empower us to consistently strive towards our desired future, transcending the immediate and embracing the enduring.

Therefore, I earnestly urge us all to consciously pivot towards sustainable, ends-driven patterns of thought and action. Let us dedicate ourselves to formulating hypotheses and forging pathways that are fundamentally oriented towards the desired future conditions for our planet and its inhabitants. We are undeniably interconnected, sharing this singular home. Our collective mission is to orchestrate a transformative transition, to move beyond the limitations of current circumstances.

Let us not be swayed by the cacophony of present-day distractions, which threaten to derail our vital, long-term missions. Inspired by a deeper purpose and an inherent connection to a grander design, I firmly believe our greatest strength lies in a collaborative, holistic science endeavor, where each unique contribution is honored and woven into a tapestry of shared progress. Together, our potential is limitless. This is our collective legacy, now and for all time.  Thank you to Pope Leo for sparking these revelations. In conclusion, we must forgive the primarily logic-oriented mind, as many of us must go to confessions, reconciliations, and counseling.

Sincerely,

Richard Thomas Simmons

The Unidiversity Research Explorer Cycle would not be possible without NASA, thanks to the technologies we learned from them, such as GNSS, Remote sensing, change detection, and GPS.  In fact, we wouldn’t understand ourselves very well if we couldn’t see images of Earth or meteorological data.   However, there is so much that I don’t know about NASA, but one thing is for sure. It inspired me because of the mission to planet Earth, remote sensing, mapping, GIS, and the fact that I had professors affiliated with NASA.   In addition, I am immensely impressed by all the holistic technologies they have contributed to our world.   I also think going into space is inspiring, as is learning about the universe, too.  However, there’s a lot written about the concept of prioritization, and where does space travel fall on that priority spectrum?   Given that I don’t have the full picture of NASA’s work, I would argue that we should prioritize the mission to Earth.   Another concept I heard about was Earth as a classroom, or nature’s classroom, where NASA helped educate people through Universities on Earth, especially kids.   Educating people, especially our future generations, adds immeasurable value to our world.  Therefore, I’m sure that people at NASA are both heart and mind people.  However, given the current events on planet Earth, and the fact that we have wars, preventable suffering, children suffering, environmental problems, nuclear weapons, and a planet that’s run by industrial Earth, Kings, castles, and kingdoms, we ought to put more weight on the mission to planet Earth.  Based on what I’ve heard about the programs, I’m sure there is significant energy being put towards the mission to planet Earth and to Earth/nature’s classroom.   The mission to planet Earth is now called the Earth Science Enterprise.   Wouldn’t it be great to allocate energy to our people, our natural environment, our children, and other highly relevant, prioritized concepts on Earth?  For example, we could use changes in what’s happening in our world today over time to help us understand what we should do in the future.   Likewise, change detection should be used to understand the planet’s desired future condition and its current condition.   However, I have noticed that the budgeted amount for the first decade of the mission to Earth, or the Earth science enterprise, was $8 billion, which is likely insufficient compared to what they need.  As I said, I hypothesize that NASA is filled with hearts-and-minds people and likely has hearts as its context.   So, I imagine they are also contributing, in some way, shape, or form, to our desired future conditions on Earth and to our understanding of our current conditions. However, I am not privy to the full extent of the energy they’re allocating to missions to Earth, Planet Earth’s Nature Classroom, and the Earth Science enterprise.   So, if they have not already done so, I would recommend expanding the mission to Earth and the Earth science enterprise as soon as possible. In fact, change detection alone could solve many of our major problems. Therefore, their budget should be whatever they want it to be, given the overall potential to help solve our problems on Earth and beyond.   I have wondered how much technology NASA contributed to the development of the cell phone.   Likewise, I had an idea for a spatially enabled, integrated device that I would’ve consulted NASA on extensively before creating.   The We-Me Cycle, with location enabled and a spatially integrated device, would not be possible without NASA, as it would likely rely on a satellite communication link.   That’s my best guess anyway.   Anyway, before suggesting that NASA change its prioritization scheme, I’d want to understand what they’re already doing to contribute to our desired future condition and current conditions on planet Earth, beyond what I already know.  However, I agree with some papers that we might want to hold off on missions to Mars and the Moon unless NASA can accomplish both simultaneously.   It would be interesting to understand the types of energy and financial allocations required to propose the We-Me Unidiversity Research Explorers Cycle, because it not only addresses broad scales, which NASA excels at, but also finer scales.  It takes into consideration all the people on Earth and their connection to the broader Unidiversity.  The cycle goes from each of us to all of us, everyone, everything, everywhere on earth.   It allows all of us on Earth. everyone, everything, everywhere on earth, to contribute to problem-solving and holistic problem prevention on earth.  Therefore, I wonder how much it would take to get everyone connected on Earth so they can contribute to initiatives such as global census assessments and studies.  If we can collectively solve all the major problems on Earth with this technology, NASA’s budget should be infinite because the benefits would be infinite.   I’m not a physics major, but what I mean to say by infinite is too much to calculate.   Nobody does it better than each of us and all of us together. World without end….

We need the Unidiversity research explorer cycle because it will be responsible for ecological equilibrium compensation for similarity foundation remuneration for energy allocated.  Understanding this concept will involve ecological equilibrium compensation, derived from ecological impact assessment, self-assessment, and Eco Geo relativity.  Moreover, the cycle includes holistic, inclusive, and inspirational incentives for everyone, everywhere on earth.    In the future, individuals with unique diversity and unique life’s purpose may want to consider their similarity context as well and allocate more energy toward similarity foundation roles. The university will be able to weigh contributions from heart and mind, as well as contributions from physical energy allocation.   This is a really great thing because it removes the arbitrary and capricious salaries and wages people receive for the energy they allocate. Extremely arduous physical energy and heart energy allocation will be compensated at a much higher rate in the future.   This is because the human body can wear down, and you don’t have your entire life to contribute the physical energy. I learned this in several ways.   One person I talked to worked at Home Depot and sold flooring for $11 an hour.   Previously, he ran his own flooring installation business, where he made a decent living until his knees gave out, leaving him unable to continue.   My brother is also a physical and heart energy allocator, and he is having problems with his shoulders and arms because he has worked so hard throughout his life.   Therefore, because physical energy disability often occurs later in life, people in physical energy roles should be compensated at a higher rate.   The same is true for other heart-energy people on Earth.   They, too, need to be compensated at a relatively high rate because of the difficulties they endure and the balancing they must perform in their everyday roles.   I believe that heart-energy people are more collectively rational than manufactured-logic-only mind-energy people. It is often not the logic-oriented person’s fault because they were required to rely solely on their logic, a requirement imposed by industrial Earth and by kings, castles, and kingdoms. I forgive them because Logic manufactured logic-oriented people needed to allocate their energy with their brains only, which can be quite taxing, too.  But it is far more holistic and enduring to balance heart energy with brain energy.   If you weigh your heart energy more than your brain energy, you are probably contributing significantly to our society, our people, our natural environment, and our world.   Otherwise, if you work in industrial Earth, or in kings, castles, and kingdoms, it would be inspiring for you to transition as soon as possible to an in-context rational heart energy (or heart and mind) person. If you need help, email me, and I will try to assist you. The information in this paper is meant to help you.

Manufactured logic energy allocation is really something to do with an extreme anthropocentric role or manufacturing anthropogenic pollution in some way on this earth. However, some logic-oriented people have a holistic mission, yet they may not be as rational themselves.  For example, I respect architects, but those architects who designed with more heart energy are more valuable because they keep things in context with people, the natural environment, landscapes, society, and communities. However, it is possible to contribute to extreme human functioning while also taking on more balancing similarity roles that focus on nature, people, society, communities, and everything else (similarity foundation roles).  Thus, architects who balance nature and humanity in their work deserve higher compensation than those who rely solely on manufactured logic. Moreover, I believe this is true for every position now and on the horizon across the planet.  People who interact holistically with the People need to have a lot of heart energy; thus, they should be compensated at a higher relative rate than some logic-oriented professions.   Some heart-oriented professions include counselors, baristas, nurses, doctors, cashiers, bartenders, waitresses, waiters, and others who work holistically.  In many ways, the situation is upside down in our world, where logic-oriented, manufactured professions are paid higher rates than heart-energy people.   The same is true for manufacturing logic brain energy Investors who tend to be less involved in holistic functioning and more interested in just building anthropocentric wealth.   Being a heart energy person is more holistic and thus contributes more value, energy, and benefits to everyone, everything, and everywhere on earth. It should be all of us.  Consequently, manufactured logic-oriented businesses, investors, and professions are mainly about making as much money as possible.   There are many manufactured, logic-oriented people in government as well, and they should not be paid at a higher rate than heart-energy people.   It is my opinion that if you’re a heart-and-mind energy person, like an actuary, a politician, a scientist, or someone who contributes deeply to analysis, for example, you deserve to be paid at a higher rate if your energy allocation has a heart energy context.   The same is true for investigators, military personnel, government employees, presidents, vice presidents, members of Congress, members of the Senate, and everyone else.   How many politicians and government employees fail the heart energy self-assessment? It is not up to me to judge whether someone is a heart-energy or mind-energy person; it is really up to you, as an individual, to assess yourself.  One can start the assessment process by going to reconciliation, confessions, and counseling.  However, I believe everyone should have a rational heart and an energy context beyond their manufactured, logic-oriented mind.  The logic-oriented people tend to be in more extreme, unhealthy conditions than heart energy, manufactured people, unless they have been overtopped with pollution from a manufactured logic-oriented world.   At the outset, people in a survival zone suffering are heart energy people because they will not do anything to survive on industrial earth, unlike many logic-oriented, manufactured people.   Therefore, homeless people and other impacted people on Earth need help as soon as possible.

I’m not giving up hope for any manufactured-logic mind-energy person, but they need to allocate energy toward understanding how to transition to more heart energy and rationality.   If they fail to get help with counseling, reintegration, confessions, learning, enlightenment, or education, especially on how to transition to more heart-energy people perspective, they will be stuck in their current condition.  Currently, for highly paid manufactured logic, mind-oriented people, a certain percentage of their pay must be contributed to ecological equilibrium compensation to help homeless people, the natural environment, society, communities, and others who need help until our world reaches a holistic dynamic equilibrium. How many manufactured logic-oriented approaches in this world contributed to our detrimental impact on people, our natural environment, our society, our communities, and our planet on Earth?

Consequently, one way to become a more heart-centered rational person is to adopt and remember the We-Me cycle foundation. The suggested foundation of loving, caring, sharing, giving, forgiving, genuine kindness, striving to bring about conditions of comfort, joy, hope, Love, Unity, equity, faith, and sustainable, striving happiness. We also need to be more natural earth striving, natural healthy living striving, more holistic spirituality striving, and more natural humanity striving.   If everyone accepts this foundation on earth, or a similar one, everyone on earth will have a heart energy context, which is really great.   Nobody does it better than each of us and all of us together. World without end…

Dear Esteemed Colleagues,

In many ways, an investigation is a big black hole used when people do not know what to do. If you have to investigate someone, something, somewhere, it’s too late.  We need to adapt to current conditions to move toward more desirable future conditions on Earth.   Everyone should be uplifted enough that they don’t get into investigations. This means they should undergo reconciliation, confession, and counseling to rid themselves of potentially harmful behaviors that could lead to investigations.   Investigations are negative energy.   They occur only after somebody needed some help long ago.   Therefore, we need a more holistic research approach to mitigate the risk of investigations.   This holistic philosophy prevents people from getting hurt and protects everyone, everything, everywhere from the wasted energy involved in investigations.   The energy allocated towards investigations would be better allocated in a holistic paradigm. Whenever there is an investigation, there is some instability in something or someone.   It could be a person going through difficult times or instability, or an industrial process that pollutes the Earth and contributes to ill health in people and our natural environment.  

It’s time to pick people up with inspirational incentives, holistic inclusion, and holistic acceptance on Earth.   They need the energy to advocate for themselves and get the help they need before it’s too late.   The people involved in Investigations would surely like to contribute to a more holistic, preventive approach to research, as it contributes more to heart energy (more like creating holistic rationality and nurturing). In contrast, investigations contribute more to head energy (more like manufacturing logic), destructive energy, and negative energy.   Investigators themselves would find life much more rewarding if they could transition towards a more holistic preventative approach.   Investigators have tremendous potential for positive energy because they can see beyond conventional functioning.  They often use the term “connect the dots,” which is a way to understand phenomena beyond what is shown to us.   However, the desire to transition to a more desirable future condition includes everyone, everything, and everywhere on Earth and beyond.  Everyone should be holistically accepted, holistically included, and inspirationally incentivized to get beyond the reactionary reductionism investigation stage of our human existence on planet Earth.

Therefore, I write to you today to articulate a profound shift in our collective approach to societal well-being and problem-solving. It is my firm conviction that the very existence of an investigation signifies a systemic failure, a poignant indicator that preventative measures and compassionate support were absent at a critical juncture. Investigations, by their very nature, are reactive, consuming immense energy and resources in the aftermath of distress, rather than investing in the foresight to avert it. They represent a drain of energy, a focus on symptoms rather than root causes, and often deepen divides rather than heal them. In many ways, investigations produce information and so-called facts that are often information taken out of context. (Reidel pers Communication 1996)

Imagine a world where our primary focus is not on identifying wrongdoing after the fact, but on cultivating environments so robustly supportive that the conditions leading to such distress are significantly mitigated. We must transition from a paradigm of reactive scrutiny to one of proactive, holistic nurturance. This necessitates a fundamental re-evaluation of how we uplift every individual, fostering an inclusive global community where potential vulnerabilities are addressed long before they manifest as crises.

Our imperative is to foster a culture of comprehensive individual and communal well-being. This involves creating accessible pathways for reconciliation, encouraging open dialogue through confession, and providing robust counseling services designed to help individuals shed behaviors that could lead to detrimental outcomes. It means offering inspirational incentives for growth, championing unconditional acceptance, and ensuring that every person feels genuinely included and valued within our global tapestry. When individuals are empowered and supported, they possess the vital energy to advocate for themselves and seek assistance proactively, well before circumstances deteriorate into situations demanding intervention.  Therefore, they will be able to contribute their energy towards helping everyone, everything, everywhere on earth as a positive energy feedback loop along with the rest of us.

Indeed, even those currently engaged in investigative roles possess invaluable skills that could be profoundly redirected. Their unique ability to “connect the dots,” to perceive patterns and correlations that elude conventional observation, is not merely a tool for post-hoc analysis but a powerful asset for predictive foresight. Imagine these brilliant minds contributing to a holistic research and exploration framework, one dedicated to understanding and addressing the societal, psychological, and environmental factors that contribute to instability. This shift would transform their work from arduous inquiry into proactive contribution, channeling their formidable intellect into constructing a more resilient and harmonious future. This preventative paradigm would not only avert individual suffering but also protect our collective energy from the depletion inherent in crisis management.

Whenever an investigation arises, it is a clear signal of underlying instability—be it within an individual navigating profound challenges or a broader societal imbalance. The time has come to elevate humanity through compassionate infrastructure, widespread acceptance, and robust inclusion. Let us provide the encouragement and resources needed for everyone to thrive, ensuring they receive the support necessary to navigate life’s complexities effectively. Our shared aspiration must be to transcend the reductive, reactionary stage of human existence on this planet. We envision a future where everyone, everywhere, is holistically accepted, genuinely included, and continually inspired to contribute their best, moving beyond the need for investigative scrutiny towards a collective flourishing built on empathy and foresight. Imagine the holistic energy of 8 billion people (everyone), everything, everyone could contribute. The Unidiversity Earth Research Explorers Cycle is one way we could harness the ubiquitous energy needed to make this holistic transition, because it involves a Unidiversity of all known knowledge and a method for holistically interacting with everyone on Earth as we contribute to everyone, everything, everywhere as a cycle in a relatively considered way when needed.

Richard Thomas Simmons

Dear Everyone, 

Taxes are a strange concept because they are one-dimensional and relatively static.   We ought to have a more robust ecological equilibrium compensation system with more ecological methods.   Some people need help, and some people can provide it.   It’s kind of like that mountain range concept or erosion that I talked about in my previous papers.   We are all in this together on planet Earth, and we need to uplift everyone, everything, everywhere for the benefit of everyone, everything, everywhere.  We need everyone to contribute what they can to our desired future. 

In many respects, taxes put people into a survival zone, suffering.  In many situations, taxes fund more pollution and the manufacture of pollution machines rather than holistic functioning. In other words, there should be no concept of homeless people in this world, because those who can provide assistance should do so in a holistic, cyclical way.  Taxes are a strange concept because they are one-dimensional and relatively static, as they change when you contribute more or less pollution to this world.  Instead, we ought to have a more robust ecological equilibrium compensation system that uses ecological methods such as ecogeo relativity.   Some people need help, and some can provide it.   It’s kind of like that mountain range balancing (erosion) concept that I talked about in my previous papers.   We are all in this together on planet Earth, and we need to uplift everyone, everything, everywhere for the benefit of everyone, everything, everywhere.  We need everyone to contribute what they can to our desired future.   In many respects, taxes put people into a survival zone, suffering, which contributes to detrimental impacts and pollution.   In other words, there should be no concept of homeless people in this world because those who can assist need to assist.   In the future, I see it more as an organizational concept in which organizations’ profits help end homelessness worldwide.   Those who live more naturally and strive to live more simply and naturally should not be penalized for not contributing to pollution on Earth.   They should be celebrated and uplifted for their commitment to the people and the natural environment. Therefore, organizations that contribute to pollution (in all forms) on Earth should also help end homelessness.   It is like a system or a natural cycle.

Moreover, the organizations on Earth that are contributing to pollution in all ways, shapes, and forms should provide ecological equilibrium compensation to the rest of us, everyone, everything, everywhere on Earth.   If you want to use the word taxes, this should be the only kind of so-called cyclic systemic tax existing on earth.   However, one thing I’ve been debating for a very long time is why people who contribute significantly to Earth’s industrial pollution receive such tremendous benefits from it.  It is only fair that we apply ecological equilibrium compensation cycles to the people who have benefited most from pollution on our planet, in all its forms.  Therefore, these people can help those suffering on Earth. It is kind of like leveling off those mountains (erosion), creating an evenness by bringing similar conditions. In many ways, mountains erode to make sand and soil in the valleys, where our world grows and thrives.   All of us need to be lifted out of our survival zone, suffering state of mind, and conditions.   Those who benefited the most from our polluted world need to contribute the most towards our most desired future condition on earth.   They should no longer be incentivized to contribute to multidimensional pollution and should instead invest in organizations and people working to mitigate its effects.   Therefore, I look forward to transitioning the concept of taxes to a more ecological equilibrium compensation cycle, whereby those who have benefited most from our polluted world contribute most to bringing the rest of us into a more even condition, as far as our similarity conditions are concerned.  Everyone deserves the natural right to have clothes, food, clean water, and a shelter like a house to experience joy.   People without these conditions need to be picked up as soon as possible and taken to a survival zone situation.   Then they will be comfortable enough to contribute what they have to offer on planet Earth, thus contributing to the rest of us, everyone, everything, everywhere on Earth.  It’s kind of like a cycle, and you can consider it to be like the We-Me Explorers cycle or the Unidiversity Earth Research Explorers cycle.  

In the future, I see it more as an organizational concept in which an organization’s profits help end homelessness worldwide.   Those who live more naturally and strive to live should not be penalized for not contributing to pollution. (However, a perception condition has been manufactured on Earth, leading one to believe that polluters are living life more naturally and simply.) People who genuinely live simply and naturally, minimizing their pollution, should be celebrated and uplifted for their commitment to people and the natural environment. Therefore, organizations that contribute to pollution or the current state of affairs should also help end homelessness.   It is like a system or a natural cycle. Moreover, organizations that contribute to pollution in all its forms should provide ecological equilibrium compensation to the rest of us.   If you want to use the word taxes, this should be the only kind of so-called cyclic systematic tax existing on earth.   However, one thing I’ve been debating for a very long time is that some people contribute to or invest significantly in Earth’s industrial pollution while receiving vast benefits from it.  It is only fair that we apply ecological equilibrium compensation cycles to the people who have benefited most from pollution on our planet, in all its forms.  Therefore, these people can help those suffering on Earth, and the survival zone is suffering now because of the world’s downward-spiraling feedback loops. It is kind of like leveling off those mountains I talk about and creating an evenness in terms of similarity conditions.   All of us need to be lifted out of our survival zone, suffering state of mind, and conditions.

Those who benefited the most from our polluted world need to contribute the most towards our most desired future condition on earth.   They should no longer be incentivized to contribute to multidimensional pollution and should invest in organizations working to mitigate the cumulative effects of their activities.   Therefore, I look forward to transitioning the concept of taxes to a more ecological equilibrium compensation cycle, whereby those who have benefited most from our polluted world contribute most to bringing the rest of us back into an even condition, as far as our similarity conditions are concerned.  Everyone deserves the natural right to have clothes, food, clean water, and a shelter like a house to experience joy.   People without these conditions on earth need to be picked up as soon as possible into a condition of survival zone suffering.   Then, they will be comfortable enough to contribute what they have to offer to planet Earth, thus contributing to the rest of us, everyone, everywhere on Earth.  It’s kind of like a cycle, and you can consider it to be like the We-Me Explorers cycle or the Unidiversity Earth Research Explorers cycle.   

I am writing to articulate a transformative vision for our global societal and economic structures, moving beyond the limitations of our current models. Our present taxation systems, often rigid and unidimensional, frequently place undue burdens on individuals, fostering conditions of mere survival rather than widespread prosperity. It’s time to evolve towards a more integrated and ecologically attuned paradigm.

Imagine a world where our collective well-being is anchored in a principle of ecological equilibrium and reciprocal compensation. This framework would fundamentally shift our approach from punitive measures to a proactive system designed to uplift every member of our global community. The current disparities, starkly visible in the existence of homelessness and widespread deprivation, are a testament to systemic imbalances that we are collectively capable of rectifying. My core belief, as explored in prior discussions, is that a truly equitable society eliminates the concept of ‘survival zone suffering’ by ensuring fundamental human rights are universally met.

At the heart of this proposed system is the recognition that certain entities and individuals have significantly benefited from processes that have, wittingly or unwittingly, contributed to environmental degradation and social stratification. It is only just that those who have reaped the greatest rewards from industrial activities impacting our planet should now bear the primary responsibility for fostering global restoration and equity. This isn’t about traditional taxation; it’s about a foundational shift where ecological impact directly correlates with a compensatory contribution towards human and planetary flourishing.

Consider, for instance, the pivotal role corporations could play. Instead of mere profit generation, their operational ethos could be intrinsically linked to societal contribution. A portion of organizational profits, particularly from those industries with a substantial ecological footprint, would be channeled directly into initiatives eradicating homelessness, ensuring access to clean water, nutritious food, decent shelter, and essential clothing for all. This redefines corporate social responsibility from an optional add-on to an inherent systemic function. Conversely, individuals and communities who live in harmony with nature, minimizing their ecological impact, should not face economic penalties but rather be celebrated and supported for their sustainable practices.

This ecological equilibrium compensation cycle also extends to historical beneficiaries. Those who have accumulated vast wealth and advantage through processes that have exacerbated environmental pollution and societal inequalities have a unique opportunity, and indeed a moral imperative, to become catalysts for profound change. Their contributions, directed towards mitigating past harms and investing in a just future, would serve to level the socio-economic landscape, raising everyone out of states of hardship and into conditions where they can truly thrive and contribute their unique talents.

Our collective aspiration must be a world where joy, dignity, and opportunity are universal birthrights. By transitioning towards this holistic, regenerative system – one that views resources and responsibilities as part of an interconnected cycle – we can ensure that every individual is lifted out of survival mode and empowered to participate fully in shaping a prosperous future for all living beings. This integrated approach, a continuous cycle of contribution and restoration, represents the path to universal flourishing.

Sincerely,

Richard Thomas Simmons

Holistic inclusion, holistic acceptance, holistic, inspirational incentives are a way to end all crime, all violence, war, terrorism, mental illness, and traditional reactionary methods.  In a way, I feel like this proposal will be treated like the Declaration of Independence.   As with all information from people, it gets extracted and exchanged, and the original creator is excluded from contributing what they were meant to contribute.  It’s sort of like the Constitution of the United States.   The Constitution overrode the Declaration of Independence and Thomas Jefferson.   This may be why his monument is way off to the side of the mall in Washington, D.C.   The constitution was the reactionary document manufactured by the industrial earth-king philosophy and the establishment of extreme reactionary reductionism.   The constitution was meant to make Thomas Jefferson look inadequate and adequate.   The preamble is the indicator that it was all about the Declaration of Independence in the first place.   The Declaration of Independence mentioned self-government and promoted broad, fundamental natural rights to govern and to be free.   Holistic justice is meant to be about social justice, environmental justice, and holistic justice itself.  We need to have an adjusted, free society, but not in a reactionary, reductionist way, where everything is spelled out in law and the constitution.  

Therefore, it should be more about living naturally and healthily, contributing, collaborating, Learning, exploring, discovering, and being part of this miraculous planet Earth.   Justice was not meant to be a codified concept, but a natural, free concept, adapting and evolving toward a more holistic future condition.  As we eliminated Kings, castles, and kingdoms from our influence, we created a more natural freedom.   However, we can’t do this without holistic acceptance, holistic inclusion, and holistic inspirational incentives.   In many ways, what was created by the constitution excluded, separated, and neglected the rights of everyone, everywhere on earth.  It manufactured an us-and-them instead of creating we-the-people. In its reactionary reductionism, it excluded everyone, promoting only those who work with the constitution and the law itself.   Maybe this contribution will be over the top as well, as it is put through the extraction, exchange, exclusion, and takings machine, and will continue to give rise to the reactionary reductionist establishment.   However, this time, I’m more interested in a holistic conclusion. I have suggested a Unidiversity Research Explorers Cycle to focus more on holistic inclusion, holistic acceptance, and holistic inspirational incentives. enlightenment, loving, learning, exploring, discovering, and living on this miraculous planet.

I am writing to articulate a vision for societal transformation that moves beyond conventional approaches to address the profound challenges facing humanity. My proposal centers on the foundational power of holistic inclusion, authentic acceptance, and genuinely inspirational incentives as the most effective path to mitigate and ultimately eradicate systemic issues such as crime, violence, conflict, and widespread mental distress.

Imagine a society where the roots of discord are systematically dismantled, not through punitive measures or rigid, reactive frameworks, but by cultivating an environment of deep-seated belonging and shared purpose. Holistic inclusion means actively ensuring every individual, every community, and indeed every facet of our natural world, feels seen, valued, and inherently connected. It’s about dismantling barriers that isolate and marginalize, allowing diverse perspectives to enrich our collective understanding. Coupled with authentic acceptance, which transcends mere tolerance to embrace and celebrate difference, we begin to foster an unshakable social fabric.

When incentives are designed not for competition or control, but to genuinely inspire collaboration, innovation, and mutual upliftment, we unlock an extraordinary collective potential. These aren’t just monetary rewards, but systemic structures that promote education, health, environmental stewardship, and opportunities for all to contribute meaningfully. Such an approach transforms the drivers of human behavior from scarcity and fear to abundance and creativity, leading to sustainable peace and prosperity.

Our traditional reliance on reactive, reductionist methods, which attempt to regulate behavior through complex legal codes and after-the-fact interventions, has often inadvertently created more fragmentation and suffering. By defining justice almost exclusively through codified statutes and punishments, we frequently overlook the deeper social, economic, and environmental imbalances that perpetuate injustice. A truly just society, as I envision it, would be a dynamic, adaptive ecosystem, continually learning, exploring, and collaborating, profoundly integrated with our miraculous planet Earth. Justice, in this light, is not a static concept to be enforced, but a living principle that evolves to ensure collective flourishing—socially, environmentally, and individually. It echoes the spirit of natural rights and self-governance, allowing societies to organically adapt towards ever-improving conditions.

I recognize that groundbreaking ideas, particularly those that challenge established paradigms, can be vulnerable to misinterpretation or dilution as they enter public discourse. There’s a historical tendency for transformative concepts to be extracted, exchanged, and sometimes stripped of their original intent. However, the urgency of our global challenges demands that we strive for a truly holistic conclusion this time, ensuring that the essence of profound inclusion, acceptance, and genuinely inspirational incentives remains central to any collective action and policy.

By committing to these fundamental principles, we can move beyond merely managing symptoms of societal dysfunction. Instead, we can cultivate a world where every being is empowered to contribute, where collaboration is inherent, and where peace and well-being are the natural outcomes of a truly interconnected and compassionate civilization.

Sincerely,

Richard Thomas Simmons

I am striving to become a holistic environmental problem solver, focusing on the major problems on Earth with a concept I call the Unidiversity Earth Research Explorers Cycle with a location-enabled, spatial-enabled, integrated device. This cycle is all about continuous adaptive striving towards the desired future condition. As I learned in an Environmental Problem-Solving class from Dr. John Donnelly at the School of Environment and Natural Resources at the University of Vermont, understanding a problem is a problem in itself, as it often takes a very long time to grasp the true nature of a problem.   Once we understand the true nature of the problems on planet Earth, we will be able to strive towards a more desirable future.

My problem hypothesis without the benefit of all the people is as follows:

 Understanding problems on earth and the current omerta condition may be a significant problem in itself because there are so many different political spheres, experiences, Industrial earth structures, liberalism, conservatism, industrial earth functions, controlling dominations- kings, castles, out of context functioning, and kingdoms, and so many unique perspectives functioning without a similarity foundation for everyone, everything, everywhere on earth. Hence, everything is out of context with everything else.   The current condition is really good at creating more complexity, fragmentation, dysfunction, conflict, chaos, confrontations, borders, boundaries, walls, and controversy, which detrimentally impact functioning, living, learning, loving, exploring, and discovering. It is my hypothesis that we need everyone on Earth to share a common foundation before we can successfully identify and solve these problems. Then they will be able to commit their miraculous diversity towards solving problems. However, if the out-of-context structures of power feel threatened, they will launch a police action and war as a distraction and diversion.

I believe Jesus gave us the beatitudes because all of the major problems come from controlling domination of man’s interests on Earth, confined compartmentalized structures, high elevation confined and compartmentalized metaphoric “kings, castles, kingdoms” that manufacture negative energy controlling domination (many of these self-manufactured or organizational manufactured survival zone (suffering) confined compartments) are dynamic (many are monocultures) and fluid such that they exhibit infinite politization and are infinite variable changing when necessary to preserve their out of context functioning, king-made out of context laws-(all playing president or “God in Yellowstone” microcosmic to macrocosmic expansion to planet Earth scale), manufacturing, rules, regulations, policies and procedures, complexity, conflict, chaos, controversy, and a phenomenon I call metaphoric industrial Earth whereby I  mean striving to manufacture a anthropocentric “man’s world” instead of creating a Gods world and how God wanted it to be.  (Man’s World, out of context, man’s Justice, man’s rules and Laws, man’s controlling domination, man’s definitions of success, industrial earth kings’ castles and kingdoms confining compartmentalized structures-most have created monocultures which are at an extreme risk of perturbation). These conditions cause feedback loops or multiplier effects: once you are in a survival zone, suffering, they either stay the same or get worse, in a downward spiral. These survival-zone conditions put not-holistically accepted, not-holistically included, and not-holistically inspirationally incentivized manufactured-survival-zone people in a state of relentless suffering, which explains much of the language in the beatitudes. Some survival zone people will do absolutely anything to survive (a major problem in the infinite politicization infinite variabilization confined and compartmentalized hierarchical structures, including killing, war, and others choose to suffer or be homeless). Many corporations and governments have attempted to add sustainability indices and sustainable professionals to their hierarchies to address these problems, but they remain part of traditional out-of-context industrial earth kings, castles, and kingdoms hierarchies, preventing them from solving them. Much of the persecution, wars, crime, violence, terrorism, pollution, lack of holistic prioritization, environmental problems, environmental injustice, social injustice, and other detrimental impacting behaviors come from out of context survival zone confined compartmentalized hierarchical structures creating mayhem. According to the Beatitudes, it was better to be closer to the bottom, not contributing to the mayhem. Maybe we should elevate everyone to a state of holistic thriving on Earth once we solve all the major problems on Earth.

Jesus said-
3 “Blessed are the poor in spirit,
for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
4 Blessed are those who mourn,
for they will be comforted.
5 Blessed are the meek,
for they will inherit the earth.
6 Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness,
for they will be filled.
7 Blessed are the merciful,
for they will be shown mercy.
8 Blessed are the pure in heart,
for they will see God.
9 Blessed are the peacemakers,
for they will be called children of God.
10 Blessed are those who are persecuted because of righteousness,
for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%205&version=NIV
Advice on focusing on the beatitudes for a definition of holy (I am also interested in the word “holistic”) came from Father Roger Hall of St. Joseph’s Parish, Winsted, CT.

As a similarity condition,

What if we had a foundation of similarity?
What if we all become peacemakers?
What if we were all pure in heart?
What if we were all meek?
What if we were all merciful?
What if we had all the qualities of the beatitudes?

What if we had foundational similarities for everyone on Earth? I believe this is a necessary step to spark holistic problem identification, understanding the true nature of problems and needs, holistic problem-solving, holistic problem prevention, and the inclusion of everyone on Earth to contribute.

If we were all striving to be like angels as a similarity condition, there would be no need for industrial Earth kings, castles, and kingdoms functioning out of context, for manufactured survival-zone compartmentalized structures like governments and corporations, just an ecosystem of holistic relationships, which I call an ecosystem of niche organizations (ecosystems/ecology/natural Earth striving). Thus, we could eliminate the manufactured need for the manufactured crime, out-of-context investigations, complexity, controversy, conflict, confusion, and chaos on Earth.

What if we were all loving, caring, sharing, giving, forgiving, and genuinely kind, striving to create conditions of comfort, joy, love, hope, and sustainable, striving happiness (stability)? (learned a lot along the way in catholic church and at the university) Would this create conditions of comfort, joy, love, hope, unity, equity, faith, and sustainable striving for happiness? Consequently, we would all be free to explore, contribute, collaborate, create, and work together with whatever interests us on this miraculous planet. Furthermore, I have suggested an Earth ethic of natural earth striving, natural spirituality striving, natural healthy living, and natural humanity striving.

I have committed to solving all the major problems on Earth and to building a similarity foundation pyramid on top of that foundation.  Please read about it in the links below.

Moreover, I have created what I call a We-Me Earth Unidiversity Earth Research Explorers Cycle to bring everyone together on Earth through the Earth Help Project, universal health care, holistic acceptance, holistic inspirational incentives, holistic inclusion, universal peace, the ability to conduct a census on Earth, Earth insurance coverage, sharing/cycling, and a universal foundation of similarity. Moreover, it ends all war, crime, violence, homelessness, drug trafficking, drug abuse, alcohol abuse, relationship problems, human trafficking, and preventable suffering, among other things, that are detrimentally impacting.  

I am urgently asking for your help because my work is undergoing an extraction, exchange, exclusion takings cycle (40 or more years), making all that I say, do, think about, and write in the control of other confined controlling domination organizations that may not be as holistic, well-intentioned, well-motivated, and committed to see us transition to more desired future conditions on Earth with God.  In fact, I am concerned from experience that these takings may get into the hands of those who lack my context, thus may spend a tremendous amount of energy and money, which would be better allocated elsewhere. 

I accept the collaboration of Holistic, well-motivated, positive-energy people who have a genuine desire to transition our planet Earth to a more desired future condition as God intended.  Eventually, it is my hope to collaborate with everyone, everything, everywhere on Earth, especially including God.  I believe in Jesus and God the Father as well as holistic evolution. Please continue reading the papers contained herein for a more complete understanding of problems and potential solutions. No one does it better than each of us and all of us together. World Without End… 

When you consider all the problems on Earth, the first and most urgent may be that we lack a common foundation of shared values. Without a common similarity foundation, we cannot arrive at problem definitions on Earth because of conflict, controversy, chaos, differing perspectives, different religions, different states, different communities, different countries, compartmentalized organizational structures, and cultures of controlling domination over us from various places. The following image from NASA, captured today, shows a desired future condition for planet Earth.   You’ll notice that the map has no boundaries and covers everything on Earth.   However, what is not shown are the problems that exist on Earth. To solve problems, we need a foundation of similarity. Moreover, the similarity condition in my opinion should be loving, caring, sharing, giving, forgiving, and genuine kindness, striving to bring about conditions of comfort, joy, love, hope, unity, equity, faith, and sustainable, striving happiness. The foundation of similarity ethics includes natural earth striving, natural humanity striving, natural healthy living striving, and natural spirituality striving.   Hence, if everyone shared this desired future, we could start figuring out more long-term desired future conditions and our unique diversity. In my estimation, this foundation is the secret to solving all the major problems on Earth.  I have said in my previous papers that conservatism and liberalism are like a continuum, like a continuous elevation change on a mountain.   Shouldn’t we see this map as a continuum of elevations across our planet, representing our problems on Earth?  

The only thing we really need to know is where people and our natural environment need help, and which areas are most suitable for helping them.    To me, the most important cultural consideration is the concept of a similarity foundation on Earth.   Without these cultural considerations, it would be dangerous to create unique diversity, ideas, creativity, perspectives, innovations, hypotheses, and everything else.   Therefore, all of our current functioning is based solely on our unique perspectives (diversity only). This is a major problem because it creates chaos. Hence, once we have a shared foundation, we can draw on different perspectives to solve problems. Currently, we all have our own belief systems, our own religions, our own experiences, our own political parties, our own organizations, our own countries, our own states, our own communities, and our own unique locations on Earth.   Hence, what is needed is a similarity condition to bind us together, whether you believe in the similarity-based ethics I have proposed or not. However, I am interested in hearing other people’s perspectives and potential contributions to the foundation.

I have memorized the similarity foundation conditions, and we should strive to create a foundation on earth where everyone can memorize them.   Therefore, it must not be too long and complicated for people to memorize.  To me, the foundational similarity in ethics is also a condition, like a criterion.   They are holistic, well-meaning, and positive energy ways to check and balance ourselves before any action.   I believe this concept replaces most laws, rules, regulations, policies, and procedures on Earth.   Likewise, it strives to minimize complexity, fragmentation, conflict, controversy, chaos, and any other detrimental behaviors as well as potential negative impacts on Earth.   These phenomena are often feedback loops or multiplier effects because they create more of the same over time.  Thus, what comes to mind are the holistic, prescriptive advice concepts I discussed previously.  

By transitioning all laws, rules, regulations, policies, and procedures into holistic, prescriptive advice, it becomes a more holistic approach to preventing problems from occurring in the first place, rather than responding with reactionary reductionism.   I’m looking forward to a world of this shared foundation everywhere on Earth for everyone.   Then we should be able to create as many types of maps as we need (perspectives), because maps are meant for use in all environmental problem-solving endeavors.   In other words, unique diversity is something we can recognize as we map out our world.  I use mountains as a metaphor for problems on Earth. If we map out the problems by elevation (the higher the elevation, the more severe the problem), Mountain ranges (problems), and valleys (people who can solve problems) will cover our entire planet, depicting where our most pressing problems exist, and the people who can solve them (valleys).   Solving problems really takes all of us, even if you’re on top of one of the highest mountains (problems), struggling to survive.  However, the relative contribution of energy will come from those who are relatively healthy, have an earth ethic, unique diversity, and holistically strive towards a desired future condition.  

As I learned in an Environmental Problem-Solving class from Dr. John Donnelly at the School of Environment and Natural Resources at the University of Vermont, understanding a problem is a problem in itself, as it often takes a very long time to grasp the true nature of a problem.   Once we understand the true nature of the problems on planet Earth, we will be able to strive towards a more desirable future.   Understanding problems on earth and the current condition may be a significant problem in itself because there are so many different political spheres, experiences, Industrial earth structures, industrial earth functions, controlling dominations- kings, castles, and kingdoms, and so many unique perspectives functioning without a similarity foundation for everyone, everything, everywhere on earth.   The current condition is really good at creating more complexity, fragmentation, conflict, chaos, and controversy, which detrimentally impacts functioning living, learning, loving, exploring, and discovering.   Once we have a solid foundation of similarity on Earth, we will understand the true nature of the problem in a more holistic, sustainable way.   From a hypothesis perspective, the nearest I can tell is that most of the problems come from the structures and functions of compartmentalized kings, castles, and kingdoms, and from Industrial Earth’s confining, compartmentalized hierarchies that function as infinite variables, politicized and capable of changing at any time depending on the needs of controlling domination. Each of these is a diversity-only (like countries) organization and lacks a similarity foundation.   In many ways, trying to solve problems without having a similarity condition on Earth is a problem in itself.  Therefore, I propose we put forth a similarity condition of loving, caring, sharing, giving, forgiving, and genuine kindness, striving to bring about conditions of comfort, joy, love, hope, unity, equity, faith, and sustainable, striving happiness everywhere on Earth. These similarity foundation ethics include natural earth striving, natural humanity striving, natural healthy living striving, and natural spirituality striving. I look forward to the day when we work together, building on our shared foundation, as we celebrate our contributions to diversity.  Only then will we be able to solve most problems on Earth as we strive for the desired future conditions. Nobody does it better than each of us and all of us together. World without end….

Liberalism and conservatism are like climbing a continuous mountain range

Dear Colleagues and Collaborators,

With the We-Me Unidiversity Research Explorers Cycle, there is no such thing as being a liberal or conservative.   The borders and boundaries between the two concepts have been completely erased.  However, if you want to look at it a certain way, think of conservatism as the foundation and liberalism as closer to the peak of the pyramid.   We-Me Unidiversity Research Explorers Cycle has a concept of a similarity foundation (relatively conservative) and a pyramid mountain on top of that foundation (relatively liberal).   The foundation contains our Earth ethics: loving, caring, sharing, giving, forgiving, genuine kindness, striving to bring about conditions of comfort, joy, love, Hope, unity, equity, and sustainable, striving happiness. (I include natural earth striving, natural healthy living, natural spirituality striving, and natural humanity striving in our Earth ethics.) That means, before we build a pyramid, we must have these concepts to keep us all grounded as we do the most critical work of innovation, creativity, exploration, discovery, and learning while living. (relatively more liberal).  In my earlier presentations, I mistakenly put a line between similarity and unique diversity.  There should be no line between the two, as they are both part of a unifying concept.   Therefore, it should be seen as a continuous mountain and continuous elevations when you think about it metaphorically.   Consequently, I see all of us as both liberal and relatively considerate.  

I am writing to share a refined perspective on the core philosophy underpinning the We-Me Unidiversity Research Explorers Cycle, an insight that has significantly deepened our understanding of human progress and societal cohesion.

Our work fundamentally redefines the often-polarized discourse surrounding concepts like “liberal” and “conservative.” Rather than viewing these as opposing ideologies, we recognize them as integral, complementary aspects of a singular, continuous journey towards collective advancement. Imagine this journey as a magnificent mountain range, where its vast, solid base represents the enduring foundational principles, and its soaring, diverse peaks embody the spirit of innovation and expansive growth.

The foundation of this ‘Unidiversity Mountain’ is rooted in what we term our Earth Ethics. These are the timeless, universal values that anchor us: profound love, compassionate care, genuine sharing, generous giving, boundless forgiveness, and a sincere commitment to kindness. These ethics serve as the bedrock upon which we build, meticulously cultivating environments of comfort, profound joy, unwavering hope, true unity, equitable opportunity, and sustainable, thriving happiness for all. This foundational phase, while crucial for stability and common ground, also lays the groundwork for all future achievements.

Building directly upon this indispensable ethical base, we ascend to the ‘peaks’ of our mountain range. This represents the dynamic, outward-looking aspect of our cycle, dedicated to fostering groundbreaking innovation, unrestrained creativity, daring exploration, transformative discovery, and continuous, lifelong learning. It is within this realm that the potential for human ingenuity and progress truly flourishes, always grounded by the ethical principles below.

In previous discussions, I may have inadvertently presented a separation between the concept of underlying similarity and the celebration of unique diversity. My evolving insight, however, reveals that these are not distinct entities but rather interwoven threads of the same fabric. They are, in fact, two sides of a singular, unifying concept – an unbroken continuum that mirrors the continuous ascent of our metaphorical mountain. Every elevation, every unique feature of the landscape, contributes to the grandeur of the whole, inextricably linked to the foundational mass from which it rises.

Therefore, within the framework of the We-Me Unidiversity Research Explorers Cycle, we transcend simplistic labels. We perceive every individual as embodying both the foundational ethics that unify us and the expansive spirit of exploration that propels us forward. We are all, in essence, integral to this continuous, collaborative ascent towards a more integrated and flourishing future.

Warmly,

Richard Thomas Simmons

My esteemed colleagues,

The Unidiversity Research Explorers Cycle, or We-Me Explorers Cycle for short, enables the Health Care for All on Earth concept.   The only problem is that I see a shortage of doctors, but expanding the number of doctors without borders seems to address it.  Likewise, there is the concept of bringing patients to other areas of the world with more technology and capabilities to treat people who are ill.  The shortage of doctors can be addressed, too, because the Unidiversity Research Explorers Cycle, or We-Me Explorers Cycle for short, promotes healthy living and learning as much as we can about everyone, everything, and everywhere on Earth, thereby fostering a concept of holistic prevention.  So, it really is a concept of holistic adaptation more towards a desirable future condition.  Most importantly, as I have indicated in my other papers, the affordability problem is solved because health insurance is spread among 8 billion people. This pool enables all of us on Earth to take care of one another.   Unless health insurance becomes obsolete, it seems to solve the problem for everyone on earth.   With the cycle, we can study areas of ill health and send more people, such as doctors, to help.   We can also use Geographic Information Systems to help explain why we have so much ill health in certain areas. I hypothesize that it has something to do with industrial earth (dynamic, confined, and compartmentalized, kings, castles, and kingdoms) and its practices.   It may be the concept of the cumulative totality of pollution concentrations and pollution exclusion, whereby the more industrial earth practices that you put in an area, the more ill people seem to be.   Hence, war is the ultimate industrial earth activity, and I have noticed that children, in particular, in regions of the Gaza Strip and elsewhere on earth, are exhibiting symptoms and signs of being extremely ill.  Likewise, we can think of healthcare as climbing a mountain, and GIS helps us visualize the areas on Earth where healthcare is needed, so we can attack the problem by climbing it.   If we have no borders, like Doctors Without Borders, we can have a dynamic, fluid help team that climbs the mountain together anywhere on earth.   Therefore, the We-Me Explorers cycle ought to be a desired future condition in the short term so that we can have planetary health in the long term.   It creates universal healthcare for everyone, everything, everywhere on Earth.  However, I’m not sure whether it should be an insurance function or simply universal healthcare for everyone as an ecological equilibrium compensation concept.   Either way, the desired future condition far surpasses the current condition as a desirable outcome.   

I am writing to articulate a comprehensive vision for global well-being, spearheaded by the Unidiversity Research Explorers Cycle, or simply the We-Me Explorers Cycle. This initiative is designed to fundamentally redefine healthcare, transforming the aspiration of universal health for all inhabitants of Earth into a tangible reality.

One of the most pervasive obstacles to global health equity is the uneven distribution of medical expertise and resources. While the notion of expanding efforts akin to “Doctors Without Borders” is commendable, the We-Me Cycle proposes a more integrated strategy. This includes not only deploying highly mobile, interdisciplinary medical teams to underserved regions but also facilitating access to advanced medical centers for patients requiring specialized care currently unavailable in their locales. Crucially, the We-Me Cycle champions a paradigm of proactive, holistic prevention, fostering widespread health literacy and promoting well-being across all communities. Our aim is to cultivate a global culture where comprehensive knowledge about human and planetary health empowers individuals to lead healthier lives, thereby mitigating the burden on curative healthcare systems.

Beyond access, the economic burden of healthcare remains a formidable barrier for billions. My proposition, elaborated upon in previous discussions, addresses this through an innovative global solidarity model. By establishing a universal health insurance framework, the financial risk is distributed across Earth’s entire population of 8 billion. This unprecedented pooling of resources transforms healthcare from an exclusive commodity into a universal right, ensuring that no individual is deprived of essential medical attention due to financial constraints. Such a collective endeavor would render current affordability challenges obsolete, leveraging the power of collective responsibility.

Furthermore, the We-Me Cycle endeavors to systematically uncover and address the root causes of ill health, particularly geographical disparities. Through the sophisticated application of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and advanced data analytics, we can precisely map disease prevalence and correlate it with environmental, industrial, and socio-economic factors. My hypothesis suggests a significant link between the cumulative ecological burden – stemming from concentrated industrial Earth practices, pollution concentrations, and pervasive environmental degradation – and heightened health crises in affected populations. Indeed, the devastating health consequences of large-scale human activities, including armed conflict, are starkly evident in regions like the Gaza Strip, where children exhibit alarming rates of illness. By understanding these intricate connections, we can move beyond treating symptoms to dismantling the systemic drivers of ill health.

Conceptualizing the journey toward universal health as scaling a formidable mountain, GIS acts as our indispensable guide, illuminating the most challenging terrain and pinpointing critical areas of need. Embracing a borderless philosophy, akin to the ethos of “Doctors Without Borders,” and the We-Me Explorers cycle will enable dynamic, agile global teams to collaborate seamlessly, collectively ascending this challenge. The We-Me Explorers Cycle is not merely a short-term project; it is an essential strategic imperative designed to lay the groundwork for enduring planetary health. It promises to cultivate conditions for universal healthcare, ensuring comprehensive well-being for everyone, everywhere.

While the precise mechanism—whether structured as a global insurance function or as a more expansive ecological equilibrium compensation model—warrants further strategic deliberation, the overarching goal remains resolute. The desired future state, characterized by unprecedented access, affordability, and preventative health, unequivocally surpasses our current global health landscape.

Sincerely,

Richard Thomas Simmons