Dear Colleague,

Another way to address Earth’s problems and understand the planet’s current state is to map all events and headlines.   These can be used to understand changes over time. Subsequently, we can map these changes over time and arrive at the problem definition, which, in my hypothesis, likely refers to the industrial earth concept of kings, castles, and kingdoms.   In fact, looking back in history, one has to wonder about the crew castle and the tidal mill, and why they were replaced in 1801 with a new version.   Was the old tidal mill a sign of a more natural approach to energy generation?   Was it the beginnings of a more natural, creative industrial revolution, one created by people with a greater connection to nature?  Although the mill was initially used to grind corn, it appears to have been the spark that led to the concept of Hydroelectric tidal power.   These days, there is an incredible amount of adaptive creativity involving tidal power.  Could the Carew Castle tidal mill be an early example of an extraction-exclusion exchange?   Did financial logic-oriented manufacturing logic replace only the early creative industrial revolution?  Did the king back then take Wales for Dominance and control?   Were the owners of the castle, the tidal mill, assassinated?   

I wanted to share some evolving thoughts on an unconventional approach to analyzing the complex challenges currently facing our planet. My hypothesis suggests that many of our contemporary global issues can be traced back to fundamental shifts in human interaction with our environment and each other, which I term the “industrial earth concept.” By meticulously charting pivotal historical events – akin to mapping significant headlines across millennia – we can uncover the underlying patterns and transitions that have shaped our present condition. This methodology allows us to not only identify problem definitions but also to understand the deep-seated ideological frameworks that govern our societal structures, echoing ancient power dynamics often symbolized by “kings, castles, and kingdoms.”

Consider, for instance, the fascinating case of the Carew Castle tidal mill. Its reconstruction in 1801 prompts a deeper inquiry into the prevailing technological philosophies of the era. Was the original tidal mill a testament to a more integrated, nature-centric approach to harnessing energy, perhaps indicative of an nascent industrial revolution driven by individuals deeply connected to their natural surroundings? While initially purposed for grinding corn, its design inherently embodied principles of hydroelectric tidal power, a concept that continues to inspire significant adaptive creativity in our modern age. This raises crucial questions about the trajectory of early industrialization.

Could the Carew Castle tidal mill represent an early iteration of a “natural creative industrial revolution” that prioritized sustainable resource utilization? If so, why might such a path have been seemingly supplanted by a purely financial or manufactured logic? Was there a deliberate redirection of innovation, driven by emerging economic paradigms or even political imperatives? One might ponder the broader historical context, such as the strategic annexation of territories like Wales, and whether such actions were intertwined with the control of resources and suppression of alternative technological developments. The historical record invites us to explore whether the proprietors of such pioneering, nature-aligned technologies faced pressures or interventions that led to their eventual obsolescence or re-engineering, steering us towards a less harmonized, more extractive industrial model.

Sincerely,

Richard Thomas Simmons

The concept of liberty is a strange concept to me.   It appears there’s an obscure definition that higher-ups in the industrialized world, Kings, and the hierarchies of castles and kingdoms used when considering life on earth.  It is a strange concept to me because I believe we all should have a high degree of relative freedom, without anyone else telling us when we can be free. In many ways, liberty is a reactionary, reductionist concept of anthropometric rights.  I’m not in favor of any government or organization telling me when I can be free, in industrial earth, kings, castles, and kingdoms.    Precisely, I believe liberty as a term has been used to indicate that there’s some controlling domination over you.   However, we should have a high degree of relative natural freedom.  By relative, I mean that we all have responsibilities on earth to our people, our planet, our families, our communities, and our purposes in life.    However, I prefer the term “high relative natural freedom” to mean choosing what we want to do in life as we strive towards heaven.

 Knowing what I know, it appears that liberty was created in a time of war, slavery, kings, castles, and kingdoms, when it was about granting permission and telling people when they could be free.  Likewise, it is an extreme reactionary kind of reductionism, whereas high relative natural freedom is an expansive, all-inclusive kind of concept.   When you have a diverse number of offerings or opportunities, you experience joy.   Liberty is a concept that tells you when to work and when to be free.   The concept of natural rights is something that I believe in. I do not believe in the same kind of application of rights in Industrial Earth as in the kings, castles, and kingdoms approach, for example, through constitutions.  I believe in generalizing and naturalizing rights so that they are natural consequences of living on Earth.   I agree with the concept that high relative freedom, natural rights are universal and fundamental, inherent to all individuals, and not created by any government, legal system, or corporation. For example, I agree with almost everything the Declaration of Independence says, except for the concept of liberty.   I want to change the word liberty to high relative freedom.   For example, liberty was created to support a system with numerous laws, rules, regulations, policies, and procedures. In contrast, the high relative freedom I envision requires greater agreement on values.  For example, in the We-Me explorer cycle’s similarity foundation, we all strive to live, learn, love, and explore as we live on Earth.  Likewise, we need to be loving, caring, sharing, giving, forgiving, and genuinely kind, striving to bring them the conditions of comfort, joy, love, hope, unity, equity, faith, and sustainable, striving happiness.   This foundation replaces all laws, rules, regulations, policies, and procedures, giving us a high degree of relative freedom to live the way we want.   The concept of natural rights has long existed and has been discussed by many people.   I am more in favor of natural rights and greater relative freedom than of liberty.   Nobody does it better than each of us and all of us together. World without end….

I am writing to share a perspective on a concept central to human existence: freedom. While ‘liberty’ is widely embraced, I find myself wrestling with its traditional interpretation, and I believe a more nuanced understanding is imperative.

My unease stems from the historical baggage associated with ‘liberty.’ It often seems to define freedom as something granted or withheld by external authorities—be it historical monarchies, industrial powers, or governmental structures. This perspective inadvertently suggests a controlling dynamic, where individuals are ‘permitted’ to be free, rather than inherently possessing that state. The term ‘liberty,’ in this context, has historically emerged from reactive efforts to define rights against an oppressive backdrop of kings, castles, and industrial hierarchies. It can feel like a restrictive concept, one that delineates when and how one is allowed to operate, rather than empowering boundless potential.

Instead, I advocate for ‘high relative natural freedom.’ This concept posits that genuine freedom is an intrinsic state, not a conditional grant. The term ‘relative’ is crucial here, as it acknowledges our inherent interconnectedness and responsibilities—to our families, communities, our planet, and our individual life’s purpose. It speaks to the expansive ability to self-determine one’s path, aligning with one’s highest aspirations and spiritual journey. This is a proactive, all-encompassing ideal that empowers individuals to thrive, explore, and find joy within a framework of shared values and abundant opportunities.

I wholeheartedly embrace the principle of natural rights—universal, fundamental entitlements inherent to every individual, independent of any governmental or legal decree. I find myself in strong agreement with the spirit of the Declaration of Independence in its assertion of these intrinsic rights. However, my divergence occurs with its embrace of ‘liberty’ as the ultimate expression of this freedom. I believe natural rights should be seen as the inherent consequences of our existence, a foundational truth for living on Earth, rather than codified permissions within systems that previously dictated our freedom.

My preference is to replace ‘liberty’ with ‘high relative natural freedom’ in our discourse. This isn’t merely a semantic shift; it signifies a fundamental paradigm change. ‘Liberty,’ as historically applied, often necessitates an extensive framework of laws, regulations, and policies to delineate its boundaries. ‘High relative natural freedom,’ conversely, flourishes within a framework built not on prescriptive rules, but on a collective agreement of values.

Consider, for instance, the ‘Similarity Foundation,’ as conceptualized within the ‘We-Me Explorer Cycle.’ This foundation champions core tenets: living, learning, loving, and exploring our existence on Earth. It emphasizes active cultivation of love, care, sharing, giving, forgiveness, and genuine kindness. These shared principles form the bedrock upon which we can cultivate an environment brimming with comfort, joy, love, hope, unity, equity, faith, and sustainable happiness. This value-driven approach, I believe, inherently fosters ‘high relative natural freedom,’ allowing individuals to navigate their lives authentically, without the restrictive burdens of excessive legislation.

The enduring concept of natural rights serves as a powerful testament to our intrinsic worth. My aspiration is to see these rights realized through the lens of ‘high relative natural freedom’—a vision of collective flourishing grounded in shared purpose and mutual respect, rather than a limited, externally defined ‘liberty.’ It is in our combined efforts, as individuals and as a global community, that we truly manifest a world without end, guided by an expansive and inherent sense of freedom.

Richard Thomas Simmons

Dear Everyone, ,

Making mistakes in the perfect world of industrial earth, Kings castles and kingdoms is a way to keep them above the rest of us.  If you write, every mistake that you make in your grammar and writing can be reviewed, so that you won’t get credit for your writing and creativity.    In other words, making a mistake is a justification that you need a supervisor or a manager over you.   Therefore, this is another way to increase the use of planet Earth. King’s castles and kingdoms: extraction, exchange, exclusion, and the taking cycle. This is a serious matter: those who intersect or intercept your contributions on earth may be taking them because they’re not perfect. Instead of contacting you for clarification, for example, they leave you hanging.   Thus, what I’ve indicated here is the concept of the exchange prioritization.  Creativity, ideas, and energy are shared and exchanged through this type of methodology.   Most of the time, people are left in a survival zone, suffering, lonely, and isolated in their cubicles or houses.   Moreover, I’ve tried to illustrate this concept before as a rotating hierarchical structure around a pivot point.   It appears that the extraction causes an exchange with other hierarchies andorganizations.  Therefore, this is one of the primary justifications for my hypothesis about Industrial Earth, Kings, castles, and kingdoms, confined, compartmentalized, hierarchical structures that take and give to others all the time.   The We-Me Explorers are holistically inclusive of everyone on earth.  Therefore, it’s sort of like human resources for planet Earth.   In other words, if you have a problem, it will be prevented before it even materializes.   In fact, I see the cycle as preventing most problems on earth, so that we never have human resources problems. To me, human resources is like natural resources. We are all natural contributors to our planet, not employees of industrial earth, kings, castles, and kingdoms.   The cycle allows us to transition to a more holistic, adaptive approach, striving towards the desired future condition.   Nobody does it better than each of us and all of us together. World without end….

I wanted to share some thoughts on the underlying mechanics of our current global systems and introduce a transformative vision for our collective future. It strikes me that within many established hierarchical paradigms, the concept of a “mistake” is often weaponized. Rather than being seen as an opportunity for growth or learning, individual errors, whether in grammar, output, or judgment, can be strategically leveraged to justify increased oversight, diminish personal credit, and ultimately reinforce a power dynamic where supervision is deemed perpetually necessary. This subtle yet pervasive mechanism often strips individuals of their autonomy and the full recognition of their creative contributions.   Even a typo or misplacement of a comma can get you into extreme trouble because of the extraction exchange exclusion cycle.

My observations suggest that this isn’t merely about individual management styles; it’s indicative of a systemic process I refer to as the “extraction-exchange paradigm.” In this framework, valuable contributions, innovative ideas, and personal energy are often siphoned off and redistributed within the existing power structures, frequently without the original contributor’s full understanding or fair compensation. Instead of engaging in clarifying dialogue when ambiguities arise, the system often leaves individuals in a state of uncertainty, their efforts potentially appropriated or devalued. This dynamic, which I have previously conceptualized as a “rotating hierarchical structure,” actively facilitates the transfer of value and influence between various organizations and established hierarchies.

Consequently, this systemic methodology frequently leaves individuals feeling marginalized, isolated, and struggling in what I term the “survival zone.” Their innate creativity and potential are often stifled, leading to widespread disillusionment and a sense of being disconnected from the broader purpose of their efforts. This forms the bedrock of my ongoing hypothesis regarding “Industrial Earth, Kings, Castles, and Kingdoms” – a metaphor for the confined, compartmentalized, and often self-serving hierarchical structures that perpetually dictate the ebb and flow of resources and opportunities.

It is precisely to counteract these limitations and foster a genuinely inclusive future that I advocate for “The We-Me Explorers.” This initiative represents a radical departure from conventional models, striving for a holistically inclusive global community where every individual is recognized as an indispensable contributor. We envision “The We-Me Explorers” as a proactive, planet-wide human resource framework – not in the corporate sense of managing personnel, but in the profound understanding that human potential is our most vital natural resource.

Our objective is to preemptively address and mitigate global challenges before they escalate, ensuring that human-centric problems become a relic of the past. Just as we cherish natural ecosystems, we must equally value and nurture the inherent contributions of every person on Earth. We are not merely employees or cogs in an “Industrial Earth” machine; we are sentient, creative agents vital to our planet’s well-being.

Through this transformative cycle, we aspire to transition towards a truly adaptive and holistic reality – a future meticulously designed to achieve our collective highest potential. No single entity, nor isolated individual, can achieve this monumental shift alone; it demands the synergistic power of each of us, working in concert, for a world without end.

With thoughtful consideration,

Richard Thomas Simmons

Building files on people as a practice of industrial earth, Kings, castles, and kingdoms, as well as investigations on earth.  If you’re put on a performance improvement plan or put under investigation, the rest of your life is about proving that you deserved it.   It’s a practice that King’s castles and kingdoms, Earth’s hierarchical structures, employ because they can never be proved wrong.   In other words, they must be known as perfect.   The same is true if you were fired or laid off.   The rest of your experiences are very challenging because all the organizations you’re part of, or investigations into them, are trying to prove that you are the problem.    It is hard to imagine how many people have been impacted by this kind of behavior.   Imagine all the people suffering with investigations and performance reviews, a downward spiral.    These behaviors are indicative of industrial Earth, Kings, castles, and kingdom systems, and of their perception that they are under attack all the time.   People in lower hierarchies are at greater risk than those in higher hierarchies.  Another hypothesisis that if your family ancestry has contributed significantly to our world, you are an infinite threat to the status quo, industrial earth, Kings, castles, and kingdoms’ approach to living on earth.  Moreover, if you’re part of a particular religion or spiritual group, you can be perceived as a threat as well.   The reason for this is that you’re striving to say that you’re holy, when industrial earth, kings, castles, and kingdoms want you to be low on the hierarchy?  

In industrialized societies, Kings, castles, and kingdoms often use religion to judge people as if they are playing God.   In other words, they use it to stratify their hierarchy.    However, I’m concerned that religion gives them a reason to judge in an absolutist sort of way instead of a relative sort of way.  This is a way to maintain the status quo, including their use of sin as ammunition factories and assembly lines.   If you’re a part of a religion, you have to act that way all the time.   Industrial Earth, Kings, castles, and kingdoms use this concept to prevent any uprising.   It keeps certain people in lower positions and advances those favored by the industrial Earth Kings, castles, and kingdoms.    The concept of sin is used most often in the hierarchy because unreconciled sin is treated as a policy violation.   Moreover, it can be used to address the extraction, exchange, and exclusion cycles, as sin is used to justify the takings.   As far as I know, God did not intend religion to be used in this way, as it creates a downward spiral feedback loop of suffering.   This kind of preventable suffering manifests itself in unemployment and homelessness at times.  

In the future, I see this world as a holistic, inclusive, inspirational, and accepting world.   Everyone deserves the chance to live a relatively free life, experiencing all they want on this planet.   Traditional industrial-era approaches to human resources, Kings, castles, and kingdoms are detrimental, impacting our people and our planet.   Therefore, we must transition to a more desirable future in which everyone has a chance.   Other than the 10 Commandments, the only thing a priest ever told me about sin was that carnal knowledge was a sin, and even a thought could be a sin.   Therefore, Industrial Earth, Kings Castle, and kingdoms and their hierarchical structures try to prove that you’re a sinner and don’t deserve anything other than hard labor and suffering.   It is another way to start the extraction-exclusion exchange cycle on Earth.   I am interested in transitioning to the We-Me Explorers’ Cycle, which helps everyone on their trail to heaven.  Nobody does it better than each of us and all of us together. World without end…..

I wish to share some critical reflections on the enduring, often unseen, mechanisms that underpin many of our societal structures. It appears that the pervasive hierarchical systems, which I refer to as “Industrial Earth, Kings, castles, and kingdoms,” operate under an implicit principle: their own inherent infallibility.

Consider the common institutional practices of placing individuals on performance improvement plans or initiating investigations. These are frequently presented as corrective measures, yet their practical effect can be deeply insidious. They often compel the individual to spend the remainder of their professional (and sometimes personal) life in a struggle to justify their very existence within the system, to prove they “deserved” the scrutiny. The system, by contrast, rarely needs to justify itself; it assumes a posture of unassailable perfection. Similarly, the aftermath of a termination or layoff can be profoundly isolating, as subsequent opportunities and interactions often frame the individual as the inherent “problem,” rather than questioning the systemic forces at play.

The human cost of these entrenched dynamics is immeasurable. We must contemplate the vast numbers of people who have been caught in this downward spiral of judgment and suspicion, enduring significant suffering and distress, which can tragically manifest as unemployment or even homelessness. These behaviors are symptomatic of a deeper insecurity within traditional power structures, which frequently perceive themselves as perpetually under threat. Consequently, individuals positioned at the lower echelons of these hierarchies bear a disproportionate share of the risk and burden.

Furthermore, it appears that any form of identity or affiliation that challenges the established order can be deemed a threat. Whether an individual’s ancestry carries a legacy of profound global contributions, or their spiritual convictions diverge from mainstream norms, they risk being perceived as an “infinite threat to the status quo.” This is particularly evident in the manipulation of religion. Spiritual paths, intended for profound personal growth and ethical guidance, are frequently co-opted and instrumentalized by these hierarchical systems. They are transformed into tools for judgment, stratification, and social control, effectively preventing any genuine form of uprising or collective empowerment. The concept of “sin,” in particular, is perverted from a spiritual concept of reconciliation into a harsh policy violation, a justification for exclusion and the perpetuation of an “extraction, exchange, exclusion” cycle that benefits only the entrenched powers. This tragically distorts the very essence of spiritual teaching, which I believe was never intended to foster suffering or hierarchical oppression.

We stand at a crucial juncture, compelled to envision and build a future that transcends these regressive paradigms. My aspiration is for a world founded on holistic inclusivity, driven by inspirational incentives, and underpinned by radical acceptance. A world where every individual is afforded the inherent right to a life of profound freedom and the opportunity to fully explore their potential on this planet. The antiquated, often detrimental, “human resources” approaches of these old systems are actively harming both our people and our planet.

It is imperative that we transition away from the current “extraction, exchange, exclusion” cycle towards a collaborative paradigm—a “We-Me Explorers Cycle.” This new model would focus on collective upliftment, where individual journeys of self-discovery and growth (“Me”) are supported by a powerful, empathetic community (“We”). It recognizes that true progress is achieved not through extreme competition and control, but through mutual aid and shared aspiration. There is no limit to what we can achieve when we unite, recognizing that each of us is an indispensable part of the collective journey toward a more enlightened existence, fostering a world without end.

I recently reflected on Dolly Parton’s song “9 to 5,” and it has me wondering about “Jolene.”  The song “Jolene” is about a woman who’s concerned that Jolene is taking her man (a recent song by Ella Langley, “Choosin’ Texas,” which is one of my favorite songs, may shed light on the same concept). If you expand this indicator species concept microcosmically to macrocosmically, it leads me to hypothesize that industrial earth Kings, cast manufacture Jolene’s concept, and kingdom approaches to living on earth (directly or indirectly).    I wonder if the same thing is true, considering the opposite sex, for example, Joe.   In other words, industrialization, Kings, castles, and kingdoms knew how to influence people to behave in ways that took advantage of them.  Again, it may be the concept of manufacturing behaviors that causes an inflection point according to your religion or laws, rules, regulations, policies, and procedures. Does it mean that manufacturers need to go to confession?   If you don’t go to confession, you can be taken advantage of by the higher-level King’s castles and kingdoms of industrial Earth.    In extreme cases, you can be pushed into a survival zone, suffering, putting you at risk for perturbations or worse.   Expanding this concept, one wonders whether domestic abuse, human trafficking, sexual violence, abuse, and other detrimental impacts and behaviors are a result of the King’s castles and kingdoms’ industrial Earth approach to living on Earth.   However, it may be something like manufactured drugs, influencing people‘s behavior.(does it mean that there is a war going on between drinking and drugs)   Therefore, stimulus addiction theory, such as the one professor Machell (The S.A.T was about everything that one could be addicted to, including power) discussed in 1982, may also be a consequence of the industrial Earth, Kings, Castles, and Kingdoms approach to living on Earth, directly or indirectly.    For example, it’s the same kind of concept I’ve talked about before: reading books backwards for the benefit of survival of the fittest on planet Earth.  

More than anything, industrial earth, Kings, castles, and kingdoms approach is about survival at any cost.  At least that’s my hypothesis as of today.   However, an alternative hypothesis is that we don’t have the collective wisdom or cumulative knowledge to understand what is going on in our world today.   Therefore. The We-Me Explorers Cycle may significantly help us understand current conditions, enabling us to strive toward our desired future condition adaptively over time.    The other approaches use conventional, law-oriented discovery, which tends to take a long time.   In fact, it could take centuries or more to determine how close the current state is, given the magnitude of the hypothesized problem.   I hypothesize that it’s a spatiotemporal proximity concept across multiple dimensions. It makes sense because investigations take so long and are very few that are successful.    Especially when you consider this concept and its magnitude (according to Professor Donnelly regarding environmental problem solving), problems must be defined before they can be solved, and determining the true nature of the problem can sometimes be daunting. It would take forever to figure things out in a discovery-type paradigm.  Alternatively, I favored transitioning to an Earth Research Explorers unidiversity approach to solve all of our problems as soon as possible.    This negates the need to use reactionary, reductionist, slower methods to figure things out on planet Earth.   I have long advocated transitioning people in the discovery paradigm to a more holistic, sustainable, striving, collaborative endeavor. As near as I can tell, the Unidiversity Research Explorers Cycle, coupled with the locational integrated device, seems to solve the problem, especially when integrated with GIS methods and technology, etc.   Nobody does it better than each of us and all of us together. World without end….

My recent reflections on Dolly Parton’s iconic songs, particularly the poignant narrative of “Jolene,” have sparked a deeper inquiry into the underlying structures that shape human interaction and societal challenges. The song, at its surface, speaks of a woman’s fear of losing her partner to a captivating rival. However, if we view this as an indicator species concept – a microcosmic manifestation of a broader pattern – it prompts a fascinating hypothesis.

Could it be that certain dynamics, akin to the “Jolene” dilemma, are not merely organic human emotions but are, in fact, strategically manufactured by the prevailing paradigms of our industrial Earth ? I refer to what I might call the “Kings, Castles, and Kingdoms” approach to living on Earth – the historical and ongoing legacy of hierarchical power structures, competition for resources, and control mechanisms. This perspective suggests that these systems have, over time, subtly or overtly influenced human behavior to maintain specific power distributions and extract advantage.

Consider the notion that anxieties, divisions, or even temptations could be, in a sense, ‘engineered.’ Perhaps this is done to redirect our focus from systemic issues towards interpersonal rivalries. In a world governed by such an ethos, the very act of seeking “confession,” as a metaphorical or literal act of compliance, might become a manufactured necessity. Deviating from these prescribed behaviors could leave individuals vulnerable to exploitation by these same entrenched powers, potentially pushing them into states of “survival zone suffering” and increasing their risk of severe perturbations.

Expanding this line of thought, one is compelled to consider whether deeply troubling societal issues such as domestic abuse, human trafficking, sexual violence, and other detrimentally impactful behaviors are, at least in part, byproducts indirectly or directly of this “Kings, Castles, and Kingdoms” industrial approach to civilization. Even manufactured drugs and the resultant stimulus addiction, as discussed by scholars like Professor Machell in 1982, could be direct or indirect consequences of this systemic orientation – a quest for survival and dominance at almost any cost. This mirrors my past reflections on the necessity of “reading books backwards” to truly grasp the undercurrents of survival on our planet.   However, much of drug abuse is about survival zone suffering, and needing to get medication affect to feel better.

An alternative, yet complementary, hypothesis is that humanity, as a collective, simply lacks the integrated wisdom and cumulative knowledge required to fully comprehend the intricate workings of our contemporary world. Our traditional methods of discovery, often steeped in conventional, law-oriented, and reductionist paradigms, are inherently slow and can take centuries to yield a comprehensive understanding of our current condition. This linear, siloed approach struggles with the spatial-temporal complexity and multi-dimensional nature of global challenges.

Therefore, I advocate for a radical shift towards what I envision as the “Earth Research Explorers Unidiversity” approach or a “We-Me Explorers Cycle.” for short. This framework aims to transcend the limitations of conventional discovery, moving away from reactionary, piecemeal solutions. It proposes a holistic, sustainable, and truly collaborative endeavor, fostering an environment where knowledge is shared and synthesized at an unprecedented pace. The fusion of this Unidiversity Research Explorers Cycle with locational integrated devices and advanced GIS methods promises an accelerated path to understanding and addressing our most pressing global issues.

I firmly believe that “Nobody does it better than each of us and all of us together.” By embracing this integrated, collaborative, and forward-thinking paradigm, we can collectively strive towards a desired future condition adaptively, evolving beyond the historical constraints industrial earth “Kings, Castles, and Kingdoms” and all direct or indirect hierarchical compartments reports.  

Richard Thomas Simmons

Greetings,

The only way industrial earth, Kings’ castles and kingdoms thought they could survive was to take control of everyone, everything, everywhere on earth.  They did this by creating higher structures. In other words, everyone on earth has a superior or supervisor.    Thus, the manufacture of controversy, conflict, and chaos with an employee on earth created the conditions to label the persona a troublemaker going against the grain of industrial earth King castles, and Kingdom.   In other words, it’s a way to transfer ownership, considering that we are all enslaved people on planet earth.   Those who are in closer proximity to industrial earth, Kings, castles, and kingdoms, get preferential treatment and are thus treated less like slaves.   A sure way to gain control over someone is to manufacture a violation.   The violation can be of a law, policy, rule, or regulation.   It can be as simple as running a red light and getting caught.    There is no relativity or relativeness, as it is about absolutism and judging.    I hypothesize that these kinds of behaviors are manufactured by industrial Earth, Kings, castles, and kingdoms controlling domination.   (although it is manufactured such that lower hierarchy compartments like police department bubbles get blamed) It makes no difference whether you are part of a private or public organization, because there is a kind of human resources concept on Earth for everyone.   As a conclusion, the concept appears to me to be a hypothesized planet earth slavery kind of concept, with those who have more energy to allocate, and those who are closer to the ability to create are closer to the slave domination concept.   It may also have something to do with proximity to industrial earth, Kings, castles, and kingdoms.  Thirdly, it may have something to do with those that threaten the traditional hierarchical order, industrial earth kings, castles, and kingdoms, somewhere or another.   Another hypothesis is that some people are born as an infinite threat to traditional industrial earth kings, castles, and kingdoms.  It would be prudent to let these people know in a preventive, holistic way as soon as possible, so they are aware of these issues throughout their lives.   Thus, letting the person know creates a state of awareness and, in context, knowledge, also known as wisdom.  Wisdom creates a feedback loop of positive energy.   The more positive energy wisdom we have in our world, the more we get, as a multiplier effect, depending on how you look at it.   We need to get absolutely everyone involved so we can take care of one another beyond the Earth slavery kind of concept. No one does it better than each of us, and all of us together.  World without end

… as an addendum, I am (everyone else should too) prepared to holistically accept, holistically include, and promote the holistic inspirational incentives for everyone on earth.    God accepts everyone, no matter what they’ve done, so it’s the best idea to go to confession, reconciliation, and holistic counseling.  I recently wrote a racism paper.   The Revelation in this paper is an alternative hypothesis to why we have racism on planet Earth.   In other words, we’re all under control somehow.  This is especially true of Everyone who is in a threatening “position of potential power,” or those who can assert themselves to get in the way of the desires of industrial earth, Kings’ castles, and kingdoms’ approach to living on earth.   Drawing attention to racism seems to distract and divert from a broader concept called slavery.    

My reflections often lead me to ponder the foundational structures that govern our shared existence. It appears that throughout history, dominant societal paradigms – akin to what one might metaphorically call ‘entrenched kingdoms and industrial Earth’ (many of which are functioning within manufactured survival zones that suffer themselves) – have sought to establish and maintain comprehensive influence over resources, narratives, and, indeed, individual agency. This aspiration for control frequently manifests as intricate, infinitely variable hierarchies and supervisory frameworks woven into the fabric of our public and private institutions.

Within such systems, any deviation from established norms or challenging of prevailing orthodoxies can be swiftly categorized, often leading to individuals being labeled as ‘disruptive’ or ‘contrarian.’ This subtle yet powerful mechanism serves to reinforce conformity and manage potential dissent, creating conditions where one’s autonomy can feel profoundly compromised, almost as if ownership of one’s destiny is implicitly transferred. Those who align closely with, or benefit from, these established power centers often experience preferential treatment, enjoying a degree of perceived liberation not afforded to others within this complex societal tapestry.

A cornerstone of maintaining this pervasive influence lies in the strategic application, and at times the deliberate ‘manufacturing,’ of rule violations. Whether pertaining to legal statutes, organizational policies, or social regulations, the enforcement of these can become a primary tool for asserting dominance. This often operates on principles of absolutism, with little room for contextual nuance or empathetic understanding, thereby reinforcing a judgmental framework that prioritizes control over collaboration. I hypothesize that this overarching dynamic is a deeply ingrained strategy employed by systems seeking to preserve their established hegemony.

Crucially, some individuals possess an inherent capacity to challenge these traditional structures, not through overt rebellion, but by their very nature as independent thinkers or catalysts for new paradigms. Rather than viewing them as threats, it would be profoundly beneficial to proactively foster their awareness and understanding of these systemic dynamics. Imparting this knowledge and wisdom can cultivate a deeper self-awareness, creating a virtuous feedback loop of positive energy and collective empowerment. The more we collectively embody this enlightened understanding, the more capacity we build for genuine growth and harmonious coexistence.

Therefore, it is incumbent upon all of us to transcend these historical paradigms of control and collective disempowerment. We must actively cultivate a society founded on mutual care, holistic acceptance, and the conscious recognition of every individual’s inherent worth, no matter how much they contribute. My recent work, including a paper on the complexities of racism, suggests that focusing solely on specific manifestations of injustice, while absolutely vital, may sometimes divert our collective attention from an even broader, underlying system of societal control – a pervasive form of systemic ‘slavery’ that subtly underpins many of our contemporary challenges. Those with inherent ‘potential power’ or the capacity to challenge the status quo often find themselves at the intersection of these controlling mechanisms.

My unwavering commitment is to champion a holistic approach: to accept, include, and inspire every individual on Earth. Drawing inspiration from principles of universal acceptance, I believe that engaging in processes of introspection, reconciliation, and holistic guidance offers an energetic pathway forward. Together, we can strive towards a world defined not by manufactured divisions, but by boundless creativity, energy allocation, holistic, well motivated positive energy and shared human dignity.

Sincerely,

Richard Thomas Simmons

As a hypothesis, I’m realizing that the concept of the devil may be a human creation.    Its source may be an extreme survival zone, suffering, or a need to make a living.   However, I’m not God, so I’m not really sure whether it’s true.   It is, however, the product of ancient times who are in a more survival-oriented zone, suffering because of a lack of ability to provide for themselves in terms of food, shelter, and water, as well as from interactions with others.  Moreover, over time, battles and competition for resources occurred, magnifying the survival zone’s suffering.   It brought forth techniques of Horrific proportions.   This is especially true in medieval times. When people were tortured, like on the stretch rack, for example, however, it appears as if industrial earth Kings, castles, and kingdoms have learned from history and employees, similar concepts on earth, impacting a huge number of people, by impacting a huge number of people, directly or indirectly, our natural environment, social, and human environments.  Therefore, as a human, I see the concept of the devil as a manufactured condition, either directly or indirectly, stemming from the industrial Earth Kings’ castles and kingdoms’ approach to living on Earth.   However, my current hypothesis is that it started with the survival zone suffering.  Hence, I’ve written papers on whether it is the original concept of survival zone suffering or a consequence of learning from all of the survival zone suffering.   For example, it is really about how you read books and function in our society.   If you read things backwards or interpret things backwards, you can create a plan to take over the world with violence.    The Cumulative totality of this concept may be construed as the “devil.” However, it really is a source of survival-zone suffering, and of how we dealt with it.  Certain people learn from observing suffering in survival and create conditions to produce more of the same.   This creates a downward spiral of feedback until it hits inflection points onEarth.  Ultimately, we can call it what we want to call it however, we need to understand the cumulative totality of its functioning and structure on earth so we can adapt beyond these current conditions towards our desired future conditions    Unless we can do it another simpler way, I suggested the creation of a WeMe Explorers cycle To get everyone involved on planet earth solving our problems.   The act of doing such a thing may solve the problem at its source because everyone’s involved, and everyone gets the help they need.   Thus, holistic inclusion, holistic acceptance, and holistic inspirational incentives will occur sooner rather than later.  Loyalty or allegiance to the concept of the devil will not solve problems on planet Earth. It will only create more problems.   Is industrial earth king, castles, and kingdoms manufacturing the devil as a logical only concept? Therefore, I suggest transitioning as soon as possible. Nobody does it better than each of us, and all of us together.  World without end…

Dear Esteemed Colleagues,

As a hypothesis, I am curious to understand the source of terrorism and gangs on planet Earth.  I have no answers yet, but it appears to be the same kind of distraction and diversion phenomenon when I analyze it as a similarity-index concept. In other words, again, it seems like industrial earth, Kings, castles, and kingdoms approach to living on earth, giving us distractions and diversions to keep us from understanding what’s really going on.  Likewise, the machine that’s been manufactured wants us to continue supporting those compartmentalized Hierarchical structures that have been manufactured on planet earth.   It is a concept I call the industrial Earth, Kings, castles, and kingdoms approach.   It is an infinite variable hierarchy that exists on earth, including countries, corporations, and any other entity it employs.   I’m not sure at this time, but it appears that terrorism and gangs meet the similarity index criterion. Pointing to the industrial Earth, kings, castles, and kingdoms approached living on Earth.  

However, it may be a reactionary reductionist response mechanism for people who were in an extreme survival zone suffering condition.   This alternative hypothesis means that the industrial era, kings, castles, and the kingdoms approach had a more indirect impact on people on Earth.   Therefore, industrial Earth, Kings, castles, and kingdoms are indirectly responsible for the rise of terrorism and gangs on planet Earth.   Immigration and immigration are a result of survival zone suffering, manufactured by industrial Earth Kings, castles and kingdoms approached living on earth.   Therefore, I feel sad for all of the immigrants striving for a better life.   However, a small minority of these people have been through rejection, extreme preventable suffering, and extreme survival zone suffering, rendering them violent like a wild animal.  Wild animals act out when backed into a corner.   Therefore, we need everyone involved in the We-Me Explorers Cycle to self-identify or be identified as people who need urgent help.  Nobody does it better than each of us and all of us together.  World without end…

I find myself compelled to explore the profound and unsettling origins of global terrorism and organized gang structures. While my investigation remains in its nascent stages, a compelling hypothesis has begun to crystallize, pointing towards a pervasive societal framework I refer to as the “Industrial Earth, Kings, Castles, and Kingdoms” paradigm.

This conceptual framework posits that humanity’s historical and ongoing societal organization relies on deeply entrenched, often manufactured, hierarchical structures. These systems, whether they manifest as national borders, corporate behemoths, or other compartmentalized entities, seem to inadvertently or even deliberately create an environment rich in distractions and diversions. From this perspective, phenomena like terrorism and gang proliferation could be viewed as unfortunate byproducts designed, perhaps subconsciously, to maintain existing power dynamics by diverting collective attention from fundamental systemic issues.

Alternatively, and perhaps more profoundly, these disturbing manifestations might represent a primal, reactionary response from individuals or communities pushed into extreme “survival zones.” When systemic inequities, perpetuated by the very “Industrial Earth” structures we inhabit, lead to chronic suffering, dispossession, and a profound sense of hopelessness, a segment of the population may unfortunately resort to extreme measures. This perspective suggests that the entrenched hierarchies, by their very design, bear an indirect but significant responsibility for fostering the conditions that give rise to such desperate actions.

Consider, too, the global phenomenon of migration and immigration. It is overwhelmingly a direct consequence of “survival zone suffering”—a harsh reality often engineered or exacerbated by the same “Industrial Earth, Kings, Castles, and Kingdoms” approach to resource distribution and governance. My heart goes out to all individuals striving for dignity and a better life across borders. However, it is a sobering truth that a small, tragic minority, having endured unimaginable rejection, preventable suffering, and prolonged survival pressures, can become profoundly disoriented and, tragically, violent. Like any creature cornered and desperate, their actions become a testament to the intolerable conditions they have faced.

Therefore, addressing these deeply rooted issues demands a r evolutionary and collaborative approach. I propose that our collective engagement through initiatives like the “We-Me Explorers Cycle” is not merely beneficial, but essential. Such a framework could empower individuals to self-identify or be recognized as urgently needing support, intervention, and pathways to integration and healing. We possess an unparalleled capacity for collective action and empathy. Truly, no one can achieve what we all can accomplish together. This endeavor is for a future without end…

Sincerely,

Richard Thomas Simmons

I am concerned that industrial earth Kings, castles, and kingdoms are resorting to identifying with extreme far-right politics.  I am concerned that industrial earth, Kings, castles, and kingdoms want to bring back Nazism and fascism to distract and divert attention to the activities of the King’s castles and kingdoms, the industrial earth concept on earth, in essence.  The traditional approach to living on planet Earth will do absolutely anything, relying on ideas from the past, present, and future to survive at any cost.   Shouldn’t each of us and all of us, everyone, everything, everywhere be urgently concerned?  

I am writing to convey my profound concerns regarding observed shifts within established global power structures. There is a disturbing trend suggesting that certain entrenched entities, often operating within traditional paradigms of industrial influence and governance, are increasingly aligning themselves with radical far-right political ideologies.

Furthermore, I am deeply troubled by the apparent willingness of these very same factions to flirt with, and potentially actively promote, concepts reminiscent of Nazism and fascism. My apprehension stems from the belief that this is a calculated maneuver designed to create social unrest and ideological division, thereby diverting critical public scrutiny from their core operations and the systemic impacts of their approach to resource utilization and societal organization.

It appears that this established way of navigating our planet, reliant on a particular interpretation of historical precedent and future projections, is prepared to pursue its survival and maintain its dominance at any cost, even if it means manipulating collective memory and fostering extremist narratives.

A source of ecological equilibrium compensation and investment should come from those who are creating AI-generated images online to distract and divert us from the impacts of industrial earth, Kings, castles, and kingdoms.   In other words, I have heard the phrase “fake news.” In fact, maybe these concepts are just distractions and diversions as well   It seems to me, that the illegitimacy of some articles is an extreme distraction and diversion Allowing us to pay attention to frivolous banter and rhetoric as well as ridiculous concepts   I’m convinced that this concept is an industrial earth, kings, castles, kingdoms process, and procedure because it gives less Weight to those that have more to contribute on our planet.  It may also be a way to discredit those ideas that I came up with initially because the masses, if not dealt with in a Geo relative sort of way, can be used to divert attention in a way, flooding the Internet with unimportant and irrational perspectives, which distracts and diverts us once again from paying attention to our priorities on earth.   This may be an indicator that industrial earth, Kings, castles, and kingdoms’ approach to living on earth is trying to make the rest of us look silly.   In other words, it prioritizes a top-down approach to living on earth rather than a collective, community-based, eco-geographic, relatively considerate approach.   However, it appears that we should elevate those contributions that people highly value when they consider their contribution very important.   I hypothesize that there’s a malicious, compartmentalized organizational bubble contributing to this distraction and diversion on our planet.   It would be interesting to understand how they’re funded.   Nobody does it better than each of us and all of us together.  World without end…

The pervasive proliferation of digitally manufactured content, particularly AI-generated visuals and algorithmically amplified narratives, poses a profound challenge to our collective focus and environmental consciousness. It increasingly appears that these digital phenomena, often designed for engagement and distraction, subtly divert our attention from the critical planetary impacts wrought by established industrial and hierarchical systems—what might be metaphorically described as the “Industrial Earth” operating under the archaic paradigms of “Kings, Castles, and Kingdoms.”

A compelling case can be made that entities benefiting significantly from the widespread dissemination of such distracting digital content bear a proportionate responsibility for contributing to ecological equilibrium and sustainability investments. Their digital footprint, in essence, carries an unacknowledged environmental and societal cost that warrants tangible compensation and restorative action.

The deluge of information, including what is commonly labeled “fake news” and articles of dubious legitimacy, functions as a powerful instrument of deliberate diversion. This calculated strategy allows our collective intellectual and emotional energy to be siphoned into frivolous banter, inconsequential rhetoric, and ridiculous concepts. This manufactured cacophony prevents us from confronting substantive issues and discerning our true priorities for the planet.

I am increasingly convinced that this entire apparatus – the engineered distractions, the promotion of superficial discourse – constitutes a sophisticated process within this dominant “Industrial Earth” model. Its primary objective appears to be the systemic marginalization of profound insights and genuine contributions. By flooding the public sphere with unimportant and often irrational perspectives, it effectively discredits alternative ideas and silences those who offer genuine solutions, especially when those solutions challenge the prevailing power structures. This strategic obfuscation may well be an attempt by entrenched interests to portray more community-centric, “eco-georelatively considerate” approaches as naive or impractical, thereby reinforcing a top-down, rather than truly collaborative, stewardship of our shared home.

Therefore, it becomes imperative to actively seek out and elevate contributions where individuals themselves recognize the intrinsic importance and profound value of their work. We must foster an environment where thoughtful insight and genuine impact are celebrated, rather than being eclipsed by superficial digital noise.

My working hypothesis suggests the existence of a meticulously organized and perhaps compartmented structure facilitating this planetary-scale distraction. Understanding the funding mechanisms and operational architects behind such pervasive influence would undoubtedly be an enlightening endeavor.

Ultimately, the profound truth remains: our greatest strength lies in our collective wisdom and concerted action. No single entity can effect change as powerfully as each of us, working in unison, for a world that endures, vibrantly and equitably, without end.