Pure democracy principles like people scoping is a way to protest current functioning. In a way it’s a way to have everyone contribute to everything relatively speaking on earth.  Assessing people’s opinions about various matters could be accomplished by geographic coordinates through pure democracy and people scoping. This is especially true when we use yes or no answers to a specific questions and polls.  Eventually, we’ll be able to have a census of everybody in earth when we have something of earth scale to problem solve. In fact, multidimensional and multicriteria problems solving starts with people, scoping and pure democracy. Everyone has their own knowledge and relevancy to certain problems on earth therefore, they will be able to contribute relatively speaking in a weight sort of way sometimes and other times may contribute equally among the masses. This is the concept of Eco Geo relative voting that I had a long time ago. With people scoping, pure democracy we have no need for gerrymandering or districts because each person has the same way and different ways at the same time. It is actually dynamic aggregation and can be an aggregated anyway we so choose. The ideas of districts is kind of a strange one when we consider that there are different Eco regions that are more similar than different. This way we were able to aggregate areas that are over a vast amount area or regions. Wouldn’t it be great to have everyone be a representative of our world and our continent as well as our local region? We can still have political representatives to assess gut feel at the end of a rational decision-making process. (environmental problem-solving 1998. ) This method encourages learning, exploration, discovery, and experiencing on earth. In order to contribute more to our world then you have to know more about our world and our people. It is really strange the way things occur these days with popular elections and electoral college results. If we want to have leaders that are elected then I suggest Eco Geo relative voting where on one hand it’s about similarities and on the other hand it’s about differences. I said previously, sometimes you will contribute more to a vote than other times, depending on the subject area involved. If the question is about bridge building and if you are an engineer, you probably have more to contribute on the bridge building process however, from an everybody perspective, visual quality is one of those ideas where everyone can contribute because it doesn’t require extra expertise as does the engineering. It would be great to ask people questions where everyone can be involved and use their knowledge to get contribution weight towards solving problems. These pure democracy, people coping perspectives contribute towards solving all the major problems on earth.