Building files on people as a practice of industrial earth, Kings, castles, and kingdoms, as well as investigations on earth.  If you’re put on a performance improvement plan or put under investigation, the rest of your life is about proving that you deserved it.   It’s a practice that King’s castles and kingdoms, Earth’s hierarchical structures, employ because they can never be proved wrong.   In other words, they must be known as perfect.   The same is true if you were fired or laid off.   The rest of your experiences are very challenging because all the organizations you’re part of, or investigations into them, are trying to prove that you are the problem.    It is hard to imagine how many people have been impacted by this kind of behavior.   Imagine all the people suffering with investigations and performance reviews, a downward spiral.    These behaviors are indicative of industrial Earth, Kings, castles, and kingdom systems, and of their perception that they are under attack all the time.   People in lower hierarchies are at greater risk than those in higher hierarchies.  Another hypothesisis that if your family ancestry has contributed significantly to our world, you are an infinite threat to the status quo, industrial earth, Kings, castles, and kingdoms’ approach to living on earth.  Moreover, if you’re part of a particular religion or spiritual group, you can be perceived as a threat as well.   The reason for this is that you’re striving to say that you’re holy, when industrial earth, kings, castles, and kingdoms want you to be low on the hierarchy?  

In industrialized societies, Kings, castles, and kingdoms often use religion to judge people as if they are playing God.   In other words, they use it to stratify their hierarchy.    However, I’m concerned that religion gives them a reason to judge in an absolutist sort of way instead of a relative sort of way.  This is a way to maintain the status quo, including their use of sin as ammunition factories and assembly lines.   If you’re a part of a religion, you have to act that way all the time.   Industrial Earth, Kings, castles, and kingdoms use this concept to prevent any uprising.   It keeps certain people in lower positions and advances those favored by the industrial Earth Kings, castles, and kingdoms.    The concept of sin is used most often in the hierarchy because unreconciled sin is treated as a policy violation.   Moreover, it can be used to address the extraction, exchange, and exclusion cycles, as sin is used to justify the takings.   As far as I know, God did not intend religion to be used in this way, as it creates a downward spiral feedback loop of suffering.   This kind of preventable suffering manifests itself in unemployment and homelessness at times.  

In the future, I see this world as a holistic, inclusive, inspirational, and accepting world.   Everyone deserves the chance to live a relatively free life, experiencing all they want on this planet.   Traditional industrial-era approaches to human resources, Kings, castles, and kingdoms are detrimental, impacting our people and our planet.   Therefore, we must transition to a more desirable future in which everyone has a chance.   Other than the 10 Commandments, the only thing a priest ever told me about sin was that carnal knowledge was a sin, and even a thought could be a sin.   Therefore, Industrial Earth, Kings Castle, and kingdoms and their hierarchical structures try to prove that you’re a sinner and don’t deserve anything other than hard labor and suffering.   It is another way to start the extraction-exclusion exchange cycle on Earth.   I am interested in transitioning to the We-Me Explorers’ Cycle, which helps everyone on their trail to heaven.  Nobody does it better than each of us and all of us together. World without end…..

I wish to share some critical reflections on the enduring, often unseen, mechanisms that underpin many of our societal structures. It appears that the pervasive hierarchical systems, which I refer to as “Industrial Earth, Kings, castles, and kingdoms,” operate under an implicit principle: their own inherent infallibility.

Consider the common institutional practices of placing individuals on performance improvement plans or initiating investigations. These are frequently presented as corrective measures, yet their practical effect can be deeply insidious. They often compel the individual to spend the remainder of their professional (and sometimes personal) life in a struggle to justify their very existence within the system, to prove they “deserved” the scrutiny. The system, by contrast, rarely needs to justify itself; it assumes a posture of unassailable perfection. Similarly, the aftermath of a termination or layoff can be profoundly isolating, as subsequent opportunities and interactions often frame the individual as the inherent “problem,” rather than questioning the systemic forces at play.

The human cost of these entrenched dynamics is immeasurable. We must contemplate the vast numbers of people who have been caught in this downward spiral of judgment and suspicion, enduring significant suffering and distress, which can tragically manifest as unemployment or even homelessness. These behaviors are symptomatic of a deeper insecurity within traditional power structures, which frequently perceive themselves as perpetually under threat. Consequently, individuals positioned at the lower echelons of these hierarchies bear a disproportionate share of the risk and burden.

Furthermore, it appears that any form of identity or affiliation that challenges the established order can be deemed a threat. Whether an individual’s ancestry carries a legacy of profound global contributions, or their spiritual convictions diverge from mainstream norms, they risk being perceived as an “infinite threat to the status quo.” This is particularly evident in the manipulation of religion. Spiritual paths, intended for profound personal growth and ethical guidance, are frequently co-opted and instrumentalized by these hierarchical systems. They are transformed into tools for judgment, stratification, and social control, effectively preventing any genuine form of uprising or collective empowerment. The concept of “sin,” in particular, is perverted from a spiritual concept of reconciliation into a harsh policy violation, a justification for exclusion and the perpetuation of an “extraction, exchange, exclusion” cycle that benefits only the entrenched powers. This tragically distorts the very essence of spiritual teaching, which I believe was never intended to foster suffering or hierarchical oppression.

We stand at a crucial juncture, compelled to envision and build a future that transcends these regressive paradigms. My aspiration is for a world founded on holistic inclusivity, driven by inspirational incentives, and underpinned by radical acceptance. A world where every individual is afforded the inherent right to a life of profound freedom and the opportunity to fully explore their potential on this planet. The antiquated, often detrimental, “human resources” approaches of these old systems are actively harming both our people and our planet.

It is imperative that we transition away from the current “extraction, exchange, exclusion” cycle towards a collaborative paradigm—a “We-Me Explorers Cycle.” This new model would focus on collective upliftment, where individual journeys of self-discovery and growth (“Me”) are supported by a powerful, empathetic community (“We”). It recognizes that true progress is achieved not through extreme competition and control, but through mutual aid and shared aspiration. There is no limit to what we can achieve when we unite, recognizing that each of us is an indispensable part of the collective journey toward a more enlightened existence, fostering a world without end.