I believe it is our choice to stay in an era that is significantly reliant on medicine primarily and intensive reactionary procedures in the absence of a significant focus on genuine holistic health. I believe the preferred alternative ought to be to transform to a more preventative, integrated, holistic health perspective that includes important prioritization on natural Earth striving behaviors, focus on ecological health, preventable holistic health of the individual, holistic epidemiology, nutrition, fitness, strength and conditioning, and quality of life. The last resort ought to be medical intervention with medications. We ought to strive to minimize side effects or use medications closer to natural substances and perform more minimally invasive techniques if possible. As I have suggested in previous papers, maybe we ought to turn hospitals into integrated, holistic community health that considers the needs of the region rather than just traditional standard structure and functioning. Each should be planned to meet the integrated, holistic needs of the area. At the same time, we should have regional specialty hospitals for those remnants of our “way things are world” illnesses until they are holistically eradicated over time. Hopefully, this will happen sooner than later. A higher focus should be on ESH and prioritization of human health and environmental ecogeosystematic health mitigation and prevention. We ought to use holistic diagnostic methods that create indicators of potential risk.  EMS capability at increased density (preferably doctors or close to doctors at a little broader density) ought to be an essential skill for as many people as possible with the aptitude and ability to learn such basic skills.

I believe we ought to have a location-based connectivity system where not only people know where our health people are at all times to respond to essential life-threatening situations and emergencies. We ought to incentivize people to live and hang out in certain places relative to need and ecogeorelative prioritization. This depends on characteristics, population, special events with high numbers of people, or higher-risk events like skiing. All healthcare people ought to ski for free anywhere, and everywhere they would like in a well-planned way. Likewise, skiing lessons ought to be provided for free for everyone. The same goes for any other higher-risk event, sport, or area where increased need or risk may occur. Incentives to have more EMS, Paramedics, and health care experts, including Doctors in rural areas, especially those further away from trauma hospitals, is a must. It’s our choice.

It seems to me a teaching degree is a weird concept.  Instead, we ought to allow teachers to learn anything they want to know about, preferably something of higher relative importance and relevance to the needs of our children and our world.  It would be interesting to see if we can determine the origin of a weird concept called a teaching degree.  I wonder if some itinerant groups created a teaching degree or something because it seems as if the focus on teaching distracts us from doing the most critical role, inspiring children with fundamental knowledge about more substance.  This substance is often found in contexts related to passionate interests in something important, significant, and relevant rather than focusing on a weird skill concept that should come naturally to those inspired by learning.  This is something real instead of some itinerant job-seeking degree.  It might be one of the biggest problems in education today.  Is it any wonder why we have education issues?  It almost seems like a plot against sustainable striving for holistic progress.  Was it a top-down decision by a decision maker?  Is it an indicator that those in leadership positions were deciding on something they know little about?  Is it an ultra-competitive top-down diversion for the acquisition of political power to dominate someone or something?  I wonder if it was a political lobby to minimize someone’s relative importance by creating masses with similar interests to one another for over-topping?  It warrants further research as it might be about a behind-the-scenes political war of massive proportions.

I believe we ought to go back to the foundational disciplines so that teachers can live a life of living, learning, and loving as they strive towards their desired discipline of interests that ignite their passions in life instead of putting them in some perceptively subservientized means discipline that is sort of a dead end more limiting position.  When teachers can choose their real discipline of interest, they are continuously inspired to learn more in life and are able to transition to other niche organizations or advanced teaching roles in higher-level schools.  A teaching degree as it is creates the appearance of a dead-end job.  I believe it causes more depression, boredom, irrelevancy to a broader discipline, more isolation, and impacts the cumulative health of teachers negatively.  We need our teachers to be as healthy, inspired, and passionate as possible to be the most inspirational and influential while carrying out one of the most critical roles on Earth.  A traditional discipline would help with their self-esteem and confidence.  It will provide connectivity and context with broader inclusive academic disciplines, which are extremely valuable for general acceptance of the more big-picture functioning.  A discipline that inspires continuous learning creates endlessly sustainable striving healthiness and happiness in life.  The passion derived from this concept passes along as sustainable seeking for beneficial energy through inspirational energy and enthusiasm to our kids.  Our kids are our future.

We should transition charity giving to more of a cumulative charity prioritization and allocation responsibility group. We ought to have all donated funds offered to a concept like a Real Angel Sustainable Striving Prioritization and allocation group connected to the top of the spectrum triangle research assessment ecogeorational allocation help project for determining EEC. Otherwise, we ought to have various predetermined categories of needed allocation. People can select the category to allocate their energy to feel good about contributing to a specific area that means a lot to them. The area can be a geographic area or a sector to be allocated later by those that can ecogeoallocate at the top of the spectrum triangle or those connected to the top. Once we have given potential energy in those needed areas around Planet Earth, it is relatively weighted in an ecogeorelative way, whatever way is deemed most appropriate given the proximity and the highest relative help needed depending on the relative importance, urgency need, and relative significance or any other indicator considered necessary. Some areas I might suggest that we ought to allocate toward humanitarian survival need and preventable suffering first, critical ecogeorelative ecogeosystematic environmental problems, stopping and preventing violence of all forms, Area Decisions Assessment Planning and Tracking, Help project mountaineering and peace corp ecological restoration, inclusion allocation and getting people on life’s path so they can contribute the most of what they have to offer, spectrum triangle ecological niche roles for everyone and public scoping, integrated environmental technology prioritization, incentives for education and helping kids and parents, ecogeorational conversion to Ecological Niche Organizations and Ecological Niche Roles in an ecogeosystematic and ecogeorelative context system, striving to help everyone get to comfort survival level, sustainable striving investment energy ecogeoallocation systems, EEC, and energy, value, and benefits creation in a continuous web and chain value adding way, inspiring genuine kind competition, inspirational spectrum milestones, stopping quid pro quo, inspiration and incentives for EVII, EVCI, EEC milestones, rail trails and nature trails, tiki copa cabanas mansions, resorts, natural areas, islands, sailboats, bed and breakfasts, restaurants. Culinary food science and nutrition expansion, photography courses, and anything else determined to add tremendous value to our planet, people, natural environment, communities, future (kids), and all associated contributing characteristics thereof.

All the world’s militaries ought to be converted to an Ecological Restoration Corps or a well-planned and prioritized Peace Corps-like concept.  I believe women can do anything they want to do in life.  However, It would help women more if they take advantage of their natural attributes like natural propensity toward love, caring, education, nature, and nurturing—compassion and helping one another rather than fighting in combat.  The same goes for many men.  It seems to me that we spend a lot trying to convert people to a more propensity towards being prepared to fight with violence (all types) rather than to contribute toward solving problems in a well-planned holistic way.  It goes against the principle of nature that we should expend the least energy while getting the most energy in return.  Conversion of our natural tendencies toward a more extreme anthropocentric and anthropogenic environment leads to more of the same.  It expends tremendous energy, converting our inherent nature to something less natural.  I believe those beneficially impacting characteristics inherent in our nature are closer to the most integrated concepts of God, love, and nature.  Focusing on anything that expends energy on efforts that yield more detrimental impacts than it creates makes no sense.  We must expend energy in the most holistic and rational ways as it is what we need the most today as we transition to an era where we focus more on planning and Interdisciplinary ecosystems.  The qualities naturally inherent in women and many men are what we need most, but being themselves is better than trying to conform or convert them to a “way things are world.” The military excels at training and preparing people and organizations, but it would be great if they helped change the context.  World without end…

I have an idea about bringing everyone together on planet Earth regarding spirituality, religion, nature principles, foundational fundamentals, prioritized classes, living, learning, and loving. It seems that the close to 7 billion people on planet Earth are similar and different simultaneously. What if we had a broader context where we focused on our unifying collective humanity regarding foundation principles that almost all religions have in common? We must integrate these concepts with nurturing principles learned from nature. These principles include love, care, compassion, nurturing, nature, helping one another, and others that are learned in religion, philosophy, nature nurturing, and other inspirational messages from nature and spirituality. At the same time, we are all different, leaving us the freedom and flexibility to study the finer points and various interpretations in the Bible (as long as they are genuine holistic interpretations), spirituality, nature writing, or any other writings or messages that have a positive benefiting genuine holistic sustainable striving concept to learn that would benefit all of humanity. Likewise, our differences give us the ability to learn whatever it is each of us wants to learn, which allows for a diversity of ideas that contribute to research ideas that allow us to learn. This way, we could all get an inspirational message on Sunday or whenever that we all should share as our core foundational principles as a human family. On the other hand, we can learn about differences by choosing a specific religion and/or spirituality as well as other educational enlightenment that may contribute in a highly relevant way at the same time. This satisfies both our commonality and our individuality at the same time. We can celebrate and work together on our similarities and continually learn from our differences. What do you think?

People need connectivity, inclusion, and opportunities to mingle with people that could inspire them to get on a particular life’s path.  In the past, people with less mentoring and less parenting wondered what to do.  Our past freedom society was more like freedom because we let people with great potential slip through the cracks.  This availed these people to opportunists who preyed upon their desperate need for a job doing anything that would support them.  In this era, there were a lot of opportunities to get distracted.  Many, I noticed, were starting to drink, smoke, and do drugs and pay less attention to the higher relative importance of finding ways to get inspired to get on the path of their dreams.  Some itinerant distracting and corrupting force may have been meant to knock people off their potential life’s path.  Life is about balance, but it is more like a relative balance at various stages of one’s life.  High school should be about having fun, socializing, becoming socialized, and learning.  It should not be about classifying people according to characteristics or criteria.  We should inspire kids to have holistic fun, but the higher relative importance should be keeping kids on genuinely holistic and well-balanced learning and exploring paths.  We should have a team of caring and loving people who look out for kids (and integrated internet communities) who may be struggling during this period, as it is vital.  Too often, I have wondered whether struggling kids can rise out of the temptation to have fun only and put academics and exploring last.  This sets them up for a more slavish type experience, often when they make low wages and get low benefits, as those who could potentially advocate for them are preoccupied with supremacist categorizations of them.  Likewise, some resort to dealing drugs because opportunists have sought out people for various reasons to do such things.  The same goes for one-dimensional extreme anthropocentric bottom-line money-making potential opportunities.  Sometimes, beautiful women were selected primarily for their good looks and put on an intentional trail instead of choosing a more balanced, genuine, holistic trail.  Some women genuinely want to be in certain holistic professions.  Still, it seems to me that in the past, it was only an attempt to have some control over beautiful women to make money directly or indirectly.  I believe women themselves are born more genuinely holistic because of their natural characteristics and qualities given to them by Nature and God.  This is why so many women are in some of the highest EVCI roles like health, teaching, parenting, holistic counseling, and positions that love and care about people, kids, families, communities, society, and many nature and environment positions.  However, I believe that many have been controlled and domineered by wolf opportunists sometimes instead of loving and caring for more nature-centric people.  I may be wrong sometimes, and maybe things have changed (I wonder why things have changed interestingly).  I want to ensure that everyone can do whatever they want in life as long as their functioning is genuinely holistic.  Still, it must be in context with genuine holistic, sustainable striving advice, which is often the integration of well-meaning mentoring from genuine holistic people.  Did people intentionally cause others to get on certain life paths so their lives could be controlled and maximum profit extracted from them?  I have wondered if some of the large wealth centers on Earth have been created by taking advantage of people in this way or if it is also a distraction.  I believe it is all part of the big picture.  I will do whatever is necessary to help people get out of their servitude roles and connect them with genuine people who genuinely care about them as individuals above all.  We must stop the itinerant controversy creation involving drugs and sex as well.  It has become a complacency behind-the-scenes functioning that appears to be enjoyed by all behind the scenes because nobody ever speaks out about it.  They might be ill and may need urgent help.  Likewise, we must get rid of the extreme anthropocentric destruction of people because of the itinerant controversy created about love and sex.  It appears to me that those who have guided us on sex in the past have lacked the necessary foundational enlightenment from a more compassionate, nature-centric love approach.We must stop the ultra-capitalistic mobbish and oversized destruction of people that involves the most brutal and inhumane behaviors.  People who do such things are experts at destroying people’s inner core spirit and will to live.  These behaviors are in the category of what Jesus said: “They know not what they do.”  Dragging people’s sanctuaries out into the public streets for itinerant reasons to destroy a person, a relationship, a community, or whatever else is one of the destructive, inhumane behaviors that serves no constructive, genuine, holistic, and sustainable striving purpose whatsoever.  Often, these tools of war and extreme violence are dormant until the need for ammunition arises, a profiteering motive occurs, or the potential loss of something occurs, like someone who blows the whistle on the most destructive force ever in the history of humanity free out of context mobbish omerta perception based capitalism.  I must learn more about whether this destructive force started in illicit mobbish organizations as a tool for subversion, then became a corporate tool, and then a government tool.  Either way, this trichotomous functioning and structure have worked quite well for a long time as both a peanut under the walnut shell game or an OK corral pointing the 45 at one another.  The one thing these people did not know (or did they) was that their behaviors not only contributed to killing people, but they also contributed to people living in isolated, lonely, empty, and very impoverished conditions where they have suffered immensely in their survival zones.  It is not all their fault, as many were doing what they were told.  However, now would be a great time for people to become educated and enlightened before we all can hurt one another again.  Those who have hurt the most know who they are and ought to get help for their illness and lack of holistic learning.  In the future, I would like to have a planet based on a foundation of love, caring, compassion, and naturecentricsm balanced with holistic anthropocentric.  Without guidance, mentoring, foundational education, compassion, love and care, and genuine inclusion, we will continue to put more kids at risk of either being itinerantly over or forced into servitude and lives of suffering.  We must let those extreme opportunists take advantage of our youth while those least knowledgeable about the nature of things do their jobs and do what they are told by persecuting and contributing to detrimental impacts on individuals, families, communities, and, eventually, our natural environment.  They know not what they do.  ( At least I hope they do not know what they do as it is better than knowing what they do).  Either way, I am letting them know so they can help transition to a genuine holistic perspective.  I often wonder about the multiplier effects associated with all of these behaviors, especially when an individual is thoroughly over-topped and suffering in extreme suffering survival zones.  Imagine how many people have violent tendencies because of the various contributing characteristics and attempts at stopping the pain within.  These experiences and totality result in a cumulative significant impact on individuals, which multiplies in a downward spiral feedback loop in our society.  I have often wondered how much detrimental impacts could be considered catalysts to adding to multiplying detrimental impacts and downward spiral feedback loops.  These mechanisms in society become like a complexity and chaos creation force that continually adds more and more to an already out-of-control cumulatively and significantly impacted populace.  Let’s go on functioning holistically.  The reactive complexity and continuous controversy creation cycles contribute more and more to the problems.  At the same time, the narrow perspectives and functioning of those with power and authority do their jobs at a different pace out of context with the magnitude and resolution of the closer-to-reality appropriately defined problems.  In the past, the real opportunistic people who take advantage of our extreme context, reactionary complexity, and controversy-creation world have learned that they can exponentially maximize their profit by inflicting detrimental influences and servitude functioning as well as overtopping behaviors.  At the same time, they use the rigid, structured, extreme, traditional, slow-paced system to their advantage.  They profiteer in extremely ultra-competitive ways and let others do the dirty work of wasting people’s lives away or eradicating them.  In a more planned approach with genuine holistic and sustainable striving methods, we can eliminate the detrimental functioning and deleterious structures to get every individual to self-assess themselves to understand their current position on the spectrum.  Then, we can transition once they find out their desired future condition in context with the desired future condition of our planet and every part thereof.  It is just a matter of understanding the inputs needed to get from here to there when, historically, not many were being helped because many felt they couldn’t get there from here ( An old Maine saying).  The inputs include an infusion of nature love and holistic spirituality, nature education, nurturing, education itself, highly prioritized courses, health care, counseling, and mentoring, all to get each individual on their life path doing what they want to contribute.  Therefore, I am attempting to plan out an inclusion and connectivity progression starting in high school.  In high school, some effort ought to be devoted to letting kids know that finding their niche in life is paramount, but it does not have to be a rigid, etched-in-stone determination at earlier ages.  It is sort of like the pyramid concept.  At this stage, we should have a broad foundation in understanding all the broad areas kids might be interested in to inspire them to learn.  Once kids find what it is that interests them in life, then they either broaden their interests or narrow their interests as they learn more about what they want to learn about in life so they can contribute what they can and what makes them live the way they want to live in context with genuine holistic and sustainable striving needs.  As we get higher on the pyramid, we get more focused on the areas of knowledge needed while keeping in touch and being supported by the rest of the foundation.  The rest of the pyramid is going to be the best inspirational plan that tries to have multiple ways of connecting, mentoring, and inspiring people to get on their life’s path.  These places might start in the new community inclusion wing in high schools where community members get EEC for presenting and talking with kids about their ecological niche roles and their ecological niche organizations.  They will help kids understand the education and experiences it takes to get on paths leading to similar high-value contribution potential roles, which can be anything from opening a pizza place, repair shop, physician, or a marine biologist, or anything else that is in need or creative or innovative in a genuine holistic, sustainable striving way.  Events could be held at other local community centers as well.  However we decide to plan these inspirational events, they should be done to make the kids feel important and worthy of inclusion.  It is a necessary step in socialization and development.  We ought to have restaurants and pubs that cater to advisers and mentors.  (They ought to be the best well-planned integrated inspirational places with culinary-inspired cuisine) , planned nature mingling clubs with mentors and advisers, mingling sailing with mentors and advisors, natural places and locations picnics and well-planned events, and finally, the most inspirational of all are the experiences when you get through your first two years of college when you get to go to mansions, resorts, and natural places of distinction that are planned to have the most inspirational setting, miraculous people, the best culinary and food science people, the best of everything so that the students of all ages after their respective degree or milestone can connect with mentors, advisers, and other ENR of significance.  These events are critical and significant in a person’s life, so a reasonably substantial amount of resources, investment potential, and EEC must be allocated for such a purpose.  These events must be planned in a nature-centered and classy way that considers the inspirational incentives necessary to inspire people to attend and want to return.  It is also about providing the best experience for people living there.

I wonder if drugs, sex, and rock and roll lyrics were about creating a way to control people.  Others were more politically proximate or closer to utopia conditions because they had all the power of persuasion because, let’s face it, almost everyone who prioritizes such things will do anything to achieve such a concept.  However, it concerns me that this compulsion does nothing but foster the continuance of behaviors that tend to exclude people who should be included.  Everyone should be included broadly, but it is a relatively speaking concept related to each person’s cumulative totality.  We should not execute or kill anyone, but we should put people in locked hospitals to research and understand them as well as try to get them on their sustainable striving life path.  Those who kill intentionally create more “killers” over the horizon.  It never ends unless we end it, and that is what I intend to do to contribute.  Maybe 60 years ago, it all was based on ultra competition, greed, and utopia, striving at any cost, all to have their cake and eat it too.  This anthropocentric concept based on extreme behaviors has historically produced nothing but more of the same types of behaviors that caused one side to war the other side of the political spectrum for domination.  Maybe some were against the more rational nature and love concept in context with Earth, Nature, and God, which I have proposed for some time.  I prefer working with those initially who have a firm footing in foundational, genuine, holistic striving, more dynamic, continually learning, more natural living, and learning-loving people rather than warfighters and various temporal “killers” of all kinds.  I prefer those with priorities such as these to get to the high relative importance of making genuine holistic music together so we can play their metaphorical instruments and contribute to the whole.  I love you.  But you have to love yourselves enough to love everyone else first.  A good starting point would be to either start with assessing your current condition or get help with whatever you need help with so you can assess your current condition.  I have mentioned several times that bringing the ship’s lever from full speed ahead to maybe 1/4 speed makes sense.  This will enable each one of you to understand more context and foundational principles, enlighten yourselves, help one another, offer suggestions to top-down control one-dimensional people, and allow you to not only understand your current conditions but your desired future condition relative to not only your passions in life but the context of your passions in context with broader needs of our world and every aspect of our world for that matter.

Utopia seems like a static concept to me.  Life is dynamic and ever-changing, like the seasons, the cycle of a day, or the tides.  We, too, are dynamic, and when you put dynamic nature and spirituality in a static utopia concept, it could lead to an inflection point where we strive to stay in utopia instead of helping one another, loving one another, caring for one another, enlightening one another, and live, learn, and love for the benefit of nurturing yourselves as well as the rest of everyone, everything, everywhere on planet Earth.  Nature is dynamic and ever-changing, but we, as people who influence the totality of nature, can choose how to preserve and conserve nature; we also can work together with nature in a sustainable, striving way to meet our needs in a minimally detrimentally impacting way.  If we only choose the extreme anthropocentric utopia route, we are doomed sooner than if we take the responsible, well-planned, sustainable striving path.  It is also more fun to have more enlightened living, learning, and loving on our planet rather than fun as an extreme way to waste time in a utopian ideal that does not serve any sustainable striving purpose other than creating enslaved people to do all the work for you while you do whatever you want.  It sounds to me like the making of war concept.  I am getting rid of preventable suffering, war, and violence, so promoting behaviors that eventually lead to war and violence does not make sense to me.  Utopia is a politically sexy idea, but sex without love leads to violence because we forget about the most crucial concept, love, which is an integral part of the foundation, if not the most important.  By the way, I want to work together with everyone else, but it is up to all of you.  I want to like everyone as well.  We must stop controlling people in favor of more relative freedom.

-Presiding ecological functional and structural planning group
-Ecogeomodeling planning group
-Research and assessment and planning and public scoping planning
-Ecogeo nature modeling of our world planning group
-Help project planning group
-Ecological restoration planning group
-Ecogeorelative rationalization group for prioritization and allocation
-Ecological rehabilitation for those impacted planning group
-ENO area-based incentives and help planning group
-Research knowledge integration planning group
-Visualization planning group
-Data and information storage cloud web and chain security planning group
-Nature Environment and natural resources prioritization planning group
-Epidemiology and holistic health care planning group
-ENR inclusion for everyone planning group
-Network dynamics and EEC prioritization and allocation of energy
-Sustainable striving investment integration ecogeosystematics planning
-Natural human ecogeocommunity interdisciplinary planning advisory group
-Ecogeoplanning visualization and modeling planning group
-Ecogeo Peace Corp operational planning group-
-Real angel miracle makers and Earth research explorers planning group
-Educational advising and mentoring and inclusion of post-associate degree min
-EVCI and self-assessment planning group
-Ecogeoprioritized foundational classes dissemination planning group
-Curriculum sharing and creation of classes, conferences, and planning committee
-Holistic prescriptive advice planning group
-Ecogeorelativity rationality environmental impacts and costs planning group
-ENR and ENO prioritization and needs for the future planning group
– Holistic planning multiple purposes conference meeting places planning group
-Energy Continental trains optimized for exploring living learning connection
-ENR assessment for EEC incentives and advice for ESH
-Ecological niche products and services assessment and incentives planning
-Ecological niche products and services public scoping planning group
-Community inputs and infusion for creating cumulative health and stability
-Nature and experiential perspectives creation for urbanized population
-Interdisciplinary intra-regional hospitals and extra-regional specialty hospitals
-Internet ecogeorelativity prioritization and understanding the integrity of information
-Integrated nature ENO functioning relative to spectrum triangle planning group
-Earth resources duality planning people that work together with nature planning
-Earth resources duality ownership, leasing, renting, and associative interests
-Oceans and oceanography prioritization and planning
-Mimicking nature aquaculture, fish hatcheries, shellfish production siting
-Organic r selected species (ex: chicken) farm siting to feed the population
-Population problem-solving in an Ecogeorelative rationality incentives way
-Transforming existing ENOs to context organizations planning
-Naturally miraculous ecogeorelative associative matching and chance meetings
-Ecogeorelativity friendship, EVCI discipline collaborators, interdisciplinary collaborators, mentors, and relative connectivity to everyone.
-Continuous ENR continuous inclusion for everyone on Earth planning
-Potential ENR helping roles or public good need associations
-Incentivizing excitement, fun nature, experiences, recreation, exploration, learning, adventure, and integration thereof
-Integrated eco geo value energy benefit prioritization stock market to high ecological value eocgeorelative systematic energy -infusion investment flow concept, which includes integration of commerce, IRS, banks, investment organs, social security, EEC assessment, EGR Environmental Impact functioning, etc.
-Spectrum transference inputs and infusions for people to help them transform
To be continued…

Chaos works as a transference issue, and people are getting hurt. It seems to me that in the past, people have not been valued as much as they should be. Societal chaos creates conditions causing people to be susceptible to perturbation from non-well-intentioned forces. It is interesting to see areas where many people or a density of people live without significant opportunities. These areas have several different exciting criterion characteristics. It makes me wonder if many people over a broad expanse of land are being used as their existence value rather than their desired actual potential consistent with their passions in life. Suppose these conditions are prevalent in our society in various places. In that case, we must understand the phenomenon before people are used for their low wages, low incentives, low benefits, slavish work roles, sex, drugs, and, in some cases, rock and roll lyrics existence value potential only. This extreme opportunistic form of slavish survival zone existence only serves to keep certain people down while others become more accepted in our society. It seems like some commodification of people whose life value appears to have been given the lowest priority relative to their value as a machine instead of an integrated natural spiritual miracle. It concerns me that if anyone tries to say what is going on according to their perceptions, those with power can flex their muscles and use whatever is available as a tool of subservience to make sure people who perceptively matter less stay in their present condition without any opportunity to improve. In essence, it seems to me that some areas are similar or comparable to slavish plantations that create humans for their living utility as a natural organism without any consideration of the tremendous value, energy, and benefits potential that we all have when inspired to get on our desired and inspired life path. The first thing that is impacted is a person’s “standing” as a hush method to keep people down. Therefore, societal chaos works great for certain people and not for others. In some circumstances, itinerant controversy creation leads to behind-the-scenes condemnation, which turns certain people into enslaved people without them even knowing about it. The creation of a suffering slavish society is unacceptable, and systematic processes and functions must cease to exist. We must transform this concept with a transition spectrum where the current condition is assessed so that we can create incentives and inputs to help people transition into their desired future condition and support them as soon as possible with something more meaningful than just financial assistance.

I prefer incentivizing people to do what they want relative to their passions and interests. We ought to create incentives for simpler, closer-to-nature striving functioning that adds value, energy, and benefits to our society. We should not force people into any profession, ENO or ENR. People ought to know as much as they can about ecological niche roles. However, they need foundations and relative education and context to associate their individual interests and passions with our world’s needs and sustainable striving opportunities. Those less desirable, more laborious, more complex, and dangerous roles ought to have incentives to do such work. Most incentives ought to go to the highest EVCI people. Relative EEC will function as an incentive for everyone.