When we have the spectrum pyramid ecogeorelative ecogeosystematic way functioning in our world, it might be great to create a similarity index or even an opposite index to take some time and spend it in that location to see if it is a place you would like to spend time. Sometimes, getting an experience in an opposite place might also be a great life experience that provides an immense amount of learning. As I said, each one of us is similar, and each one is different. We can go to a place to work on our similarities, or we can go to a place to work on our differences so we can learn. Isn’t that one of the primary three reasons for breathing -living, learning, exploring, and loving? It reminds me of a similar concept that I learned as a child in a class that was talking about love, caring, forgiveness, helping people, and embracing others who are dissimilar to you because not only might you inspire them to believe more what you believe but you may believe things from others that you might think. It is a great way to learn in time and adapt continuously. However, some of these experiences in life might lead to essential revelations for further research to understand more so you can put it into your similarity side of the spectrum and be more confident about living.

It is interesting, but I believe the paper I wrote about education and learning the other day. It is true in any scenario, like trying to ultra-compete in any race to understand history or anything else. Those who are more about getting an education in school or life have more difficulty understanding the past, present, or future quickly. Learners in life find it more accessible. Likewise, it is the same thing when learning about love. Some people can read 100 books or go to church every Sunday and learn as much about love but treat people in the opposite love sorts ways or behave in such ways that border on the extreme opposite side of the spectrum. Educated people tend to use their education to get ahead in life for itinerant reasons. At the same time, learners have genuine holistic motivations to learn so they can help or make the world better somehow. For example, if someone takes an idea or concept from someone, educated people know how to follow process and law to accomplish what they need to have done or hire process people to do all of their process. A process feedback loop exists when there is a source of energy to create energy, like fusion or something. Education types and process types use energy to harness the energy of another and use part of that same energy to detrimentally impact the source of energy such that the source of energy is their own worst enemy because the more they work on their dissertation, the more the process educated people take and throw back more detrimental feedback pollution to keep the destruction going. It is weird because they continually impact the very source for their process-oriented pseudo-success with the skills they know from education. They never learned anything about higher relative importance concepts because they spent too much time educating themselves to use processes. This may have led them to do unspeakable continuous violence directly or indirectly on the very source of their energy. It is like what has been done to our environment and people. That is why I know it is an old world, a more industrial-only focus that is involved in this feedback loop. I hope they did not use any of my genuine holistic positive energy to hurt anyone or anything anywhere on planet Earth.

We ought to have MS and Ph.D. cashier/customer interaction assessments in certain places to assess people as they walk through grocery store lines, social security, people on welfare, people in sub-survival living, homeless, counselors, health professionals, places, and some high-rise apartment buildings. First, assess the need for finer help assessment needs. Concentrated resource allocation to these areas MS PhDs researching cashier’s interactions with people that may need help to do 5-minute assessments. Get help resources to befriend people who may need help and try to understand further needs and resources needed. Police and reactionary justice transform into holistic environmental justice health and safety. They could do rural assessments from pre-planned research assessment indicators.

Maybe a fruit basket of something might break the ice with people. Drop off the brochure to people about moving closer to town or community living, especially for older people. Let them know that moving help and expenses will be taken care of by the EEC. Some places will function as transitional community living centers within houses where people undergo further needs assessments. These positions include life coaches, counselors, and transition-to-life path experts. I believe those large apartment complexes in cities should function as transitional housing only where people usually do not live there longer than 3 to 5 years. These places should have ecological niche roles like nutrition and health assessment and advice, counselors, life coaches, and life path transitional counselors. Maybe the first floor could be about this concept. Ecological restoration and peace Corp resources could be located by priority, and allocation of resources by area of highest relative priority ought to occur first. Resources for people to help should come from surrounding high elevations with a high amount of source energy to contribute to sink areas in lower slope help areas. Areas in high-risk tornados, extreme cold regions, and high-risk hurricanes should be evaluated for rebuild assistance—large ecological restoration Peace Corp and surrounding high-elevation energy source areas. We should do a sustainable striving integrated impact assessment, which might conclude using bricks or concrete block construction. If chosen as the preferred alternative, we should have these community reconstruction events where many kids are helping as an apprentice type of credit for their geological materials masonry associate degree. It would be great if each of the former mobile home parks had a community center with a stone/rock saltwater swimming pool and community gardens. This should extend over borders as we should look at North America as a context for this project. This project, in its entirety, ought to be replicated worldwide on every continent organized by continent. Ecological restoration and peace corp and former militaries worldwide should be transitioned into peace corp and ecological restoration resources—prioritizing water systems, compost toilets, and community gardens or CSA. Planning in context with a broader nature is critical. Integrated planners ought to plan from an ecological perspective, considering the dynamic, systematic functioning of the desired pre-planned community and the needs of the community. At the same time, assessments of ecogeorelative energy contribution potential and well-planned ecological niche organizations and ecological niche roles opportunity potential should occur. Isolated villages in rural regions living as close to nature as possible ought to get connectivity with at least 12 computers connected to the internet for learning and exploration. These places should also get a satellite phone if these remote communities need help. Because these villages tend to have the least detrimental impact on our planet, we should put their need for help at the top of the list of priorities and give them whatever they need through needed resources and EEC energy compensation transfer. This should be a good start on getting people comfort, joy, love, hope, peace, and the ecological restoration, reconstruction, and rehabilitation needed to stay out of survival zones. This will give them the foundations required to get people to help get on their sustainable striving life path. The theory is that once people meet their needs, they can contribute as many benefits, energy, and value to themselves, their family, their community, their region, their continent, our planet Earth, and the natural environment.

*Most desirably, it would be great if we got to the point in society where everyone did a self-assessment with the We-me integrated device.

It seems like there has been a force categorizing people into job titles. This is a flawed approach because it does not consider the individual’s dreams, aspirations, future interests, or potential interests. This approach is wrong and non-inspirational as it represents a static categorization in a natural, dynamic world. It does not make sense. I wonder if this static categorization and compartmentalization leads to feelings of complacency, which may turn into boredom. In addition, I wonder if some professionals lose their self-esteem and confidence and are thus more likely to get taken advantage of for ultra-capitalist extreme roles. I see a pattern in this world of people in these categories with top-down demeaning bosses that command and control or stick people in stagnant or non-inspirational positions to attain one’s desired life path. I sometimes wonder if it is itinerant creation of undesirable detrimental impacting power dynamics and transference. This leads to several potential multiplying, direct, and indirect impacts. Obvious stagnation leads to quality-of-life issues, which leads to unhappiness and monotony. This could cause some people to have dynamic equilibrium compensation mechanisms or inflection points that may sometimes be overcompensating or extreme. This balancing mechanism occurs in more compounding ways in urban areas where exposure to more natural and natural, exciting experiences is minimal. Sometimes, one’s inner natural functioning in terms of more sexual behavior, more rough extreme sex, or maybe even deviant behavior might occur as exposure to natural balancing nature is limited. I wonder if this behavior could potentially lead to more violence if, over time, the compounding effects of a lifestyle with minimal job satisfaction, little comfort, joy, love, hope, and natural balancing mechanisms like nature and excitement are limited. On top of that, adding extreme anthropocentric controlling mechanisms to a person’s life could send a person’s life into a free-fall downward spiral feedback loop. There are potentially many other detrimentally impacting inputs into a person’s life that could further compound these problems. This could cause the person to reach inflection points that could put someone into depression or mental illness as well. Eventually, if there are no intervening compensating mechanisms, the person could get into a feedback loop that minimizes real recovery in any way. The other problem is that our society is too busy working to have enough love, care, and compassion to care about another human being genuinely. Sometimes, a person’s perceptive relative importance level is high. Still, their reality importance level is low regarding the value, energy, and benefits added to another, our society, or our planet. Sometimes, people get so low that they get into trouble with law enforcement. This is even more destructive as they are labeled as perpetrators, criminals, and offenders instead of a person. These impacts are very impacting as they usually occur after an individual has been through a long downward spiral of many detrimental impacts. Next, they are labeled by the criminal justice system publicly or otherwise as a criminal. Sometimes, they are watched, listened to, investigated, have their sanctuaries invaded, sacred places impacted, work relationships impacted, and relationships destroyed in communities and society. Then, the individual has difficulty finding work, paying the bills, providing for their family, and living a normal, healthy, productive, useful, contributing, and collaborating life, which helps no one. It does the exact opposite. It brings more detrimental impacts to our world. Most of all, these events destroy an individual and their potential contributions in value, energy, and benefits to our world. If you are part of any of these processes, it is best to turn it around and love, care for, help, and have compassion for the person by empathizing with them. talk with them and see if you can help get them the resources they need in the context of helping them. Use what you know about them to help them. We could turn it all around by focusing on Holistic Environmental Justice, Health, and Safety. This way, everything that happens has a problem-solving focus. If we have a pre-planned ecogeosystematic way of determining immediate help resources for whatever a person is going through. Likewise, not only will you get help for that person, but you will also learn about other people who may need help in the person’s life path. Then you can use this information to help them too. The opposite is a more genuine holistic perspective that never gets anyone in trouble. I believe this concept and all other concepts will end violence altogether. This has great positive, beneficial impacts on each person in all these related fields as each day they will go home and feel great about themselves in terms of all the beneficial impacts they had on people’s lives that day. Over time, they begin to heal as they contribute nothing but positive benefits, energy, and value to society. Their relationship improves, their kids are happier and healthier, and these positive impacts reverberate through communities, society, and planet Earth. When our cumulative health improves, we contribute more to others so they are as healthy as possible. I had a similar idea in the late 1980s, and I have since named the idea the Holistic Inclusive embracing concept. However, it is much more genuinely holistic and proactive. It involves seeking out and finding people who can help or of a certain affiliation who want to be included to act like a blob force to embrace and help everyone so they can become part of the blob. The blob becomes bigger and bigger over time until the blob has embraced everybody on Earth. Ideally, this effort should be coupled with a follow-up Ecological Restoration and Peace Corp project to help everyone get up to comfort, joy, love, hope, and sustainable striving for happiness. This helps with health. And when people are healthier, they can continually contribute all they can regarding value, energy, and benefits to humanity and our world. This contributes to a genuine holistic, sustainable striving for planet Earth. It contributes to ending all preventable suffering on Earth, ending all violence on Earth, ending all war on Earth, striving to end pollution in all forms, and most of all; it gets everyone re-allocating their energy to higher priority genuine holistic living and working together behaviors with everyone as well as the natural environment. It contributes to higher ecological fitness, which helps all of us and our offspring. It gives our kids the best chance when they start their life.

We are all the same, and we are all different. Once we are all on the same page and understand all of our similarities and all of our foundational fundamentals of love, nature, spirituality, and God’s love that are consistent with genuine holistic, sustainable striving knowledge and ways to live, learn, and love, these similarities are sort of like holistic prescriptive advice learned from the integration of all knowledge. It is kind of like everything that has been researched and integrated that applies to your life and society. I see it as prioritizing all knowledge by perceived relative importance and a guide to live your life. You will organize it as an individual, and we as a community, society, and all the people on Earth. The other side of a person and culture is our differences as people or our unanswered questions and all hypothesis questions and all patterns that have not been imagined or researched yet. Even our differences could be prioritized by relative importance. The concepts of similarities, differences, or both are a traditional way to describe a way to look at a more ecogeosystematic way of dynamic continuous improvement and continuous adaptation functioning. Another way to look at this concept is our similarities could be other concepts as well, like comfort, joy, love, hope, and sustainable striving happiness dynamic equilibrium survival level such that each of us will strive to stay at or near that equilibrium such that it minimizes the chances that people will be subjected to risk from detrimental perturbation of any type. It should be advice that gives people a suitable foundation to get on their genuine holistic, sustainable, striving life’s path to add as much value, energy, and benefits to our world, themselves, and everyone else. It makes sense. This allows us to know each other’s similarities so we can feel comfortable with anyone on Earth at any time. If anyone needs help, we will be pleased to help. When we meet, we can communicate with a level of comfort that sets the stage for talking about anything. It gets all the small talk out of the way and allows us to focus on the amazing, miraculous diversity of everyone’s differences and uniqueness. An exciting and intriguing concept. It eliminates the difficulty of learning someone’s personality to determine if someone is similar to you on the fundamental similarity level. From nature’s perspective, it is efficient and allows energy to be reallocated to those areas and differences of higher relative importance, which are often differences.

To start transitioning, maybe we can consider the following: It appears to be one of the most significant problems is our allegiance and alliances and loyalty to either the republican party, democratic party, independent party, liberal, conservative, or any other football team concept classification or compartmentalization. It seems like it immediately creates an “us and them” team, which causes an instinct to win. In a way, “things are world”. This is especially true in an ultra-competitive environment where people do their jobs over being involved in a “genuine problem-solving venture.” Life should not be about endless debate. Endless debate seems to be about showing what a great orator you are instead of a genuine holistic problem solver. We ought to consider everyone’s contributions in an ecogeorelative organizational way that recognizes each of our unique contributions. It is a matter of getting higher proximal related people who are all similarly able to contribute and collaborate to solve a problem they may be relatively more qualified to solve. Anyone can also contribute because a layperson’s idea might be better sometimes.

However, most of the time, working together should or could have something to do with place or area, the particular issue of importance, issue of significance, ability to help on a project, interest in a specific area, and most of all, expertise. Everyone can be a part of a team, but decisions should be weighed relatively more toward those with more significant knowledge and responsibility. We are not trying to win. Winning is a sporting concept. When combined with an ultra-competitive traditional extreme market-based economy, it has the makings of a colossal diversion, distraction, tool for traditional business or organization to do its job, a transference mechanism power source, a confusion creation and complexity tool, a way to get things done for industry and business, an out of context way of organizing, and making policy when we could be all working together and helping one another so we can transition the world together. We do not need any more needless, unnecessary classification because all we have to know is that we are all similar and we are all different. We must celebrate our similarities by getting along and creating a foundation to discuss our differences. The eventual goal is to solve problems and create research, which leads to knowledge when our differences are conflicting and should not be. Sometimes, being different and having diverse perspectives is okay, as it makes us miraculous. Everyone’s Life would be more static if we were all the same. Because we are all different, we can live in continuous learning, exploration, adaptation, and continuous improvement. Maybe we all should be classified as genuine holistic, continuous adaptive striving humanity to benefit everything, including planet Earth.

Each time violence happens, we must use violence as an indicator and training site.  We must thoroughly research everything in the place and person’s life to determine possible associative characteristics and possible causal contributors to the associative characteristics and contributing characteristics.  First, we look at everything in an ecogeorelative way.  Second, from characteristics and indicators, we can look for these indicators and characteristics in certain areas to determine if there is a higher chance of finding such potential violence-creating terrain.  The null hypothesis may be the strongest indicator of all.  A significant amount of necessary resources should be devoted to helping people eliminate violence potential.  This is because the survival zone pressures and cumulative significant impact associated with these lives sometimes contribute to a higher probability of more violence.  It is necessary to do all that is needed to “tear down those walls” of all kinds that hinder progress toward ending all violence.  The first step is to let people know it is not about getting people in trouble anymore.  It is about each person getting the help they need.  This way, they will open up to healthcare people and researchers so we can define problems appropriately and contribute to rational problem-solving or knowledge creation to create advice.  This is the best option rather than contribute to more violence, as is done today in our current practices, processes, methods, techniques, and systems.  We decrease the likelihood of more once we remove the contributory expansion of violence.  When problems related to violence decrease, societal and community impacts will decrease as well; this will lessen other contributory impacts on people that bioaccumulate in people that cause more propensity toward more violence.  Essentially, this method approaches the problem in an integrated ecogeosystematic way and an ecosystem approach from webs and chains in every direction.  It looks at the entire integrated functioning and attempts to mitigate each potential contributor to violence and the sources.  On a broader level, the sources may be another rational problem-solving process that can be solved similarly but from a more macro perspective.

I hypothesize that it has something to do with the entirety of everything and how we function on planet Earth in this reactive, ultra-competitive perception/reality world we live in.  The contributory behaviors may be related to profiteering at any cost, powerteering at any price, and charioteering at any cost.  All of these behaviors integrated with the traditional system functioning and processes, which are really all functioning out of context with everything else, are contributing to an overly complex perception system that does not add as much potential value, energy, and benefits as a well-planned integrated way of doing things would.  I have wondered in the past whether it is interspecific competition and intraspecific competition at the same time.  Is it the same ecogeosystematic approach to solve this problem?  If so, it helps with the proposal to minimize complex borders and boundaries of confusion, transference, and compulsions toward violence.  This, coupled with leveling the playing field, uses sources and sinks holistic energy transference to get everyone up to comfort, joy, love, hope, and sustainable striving happiness.  It beats the reactively violent detrimental energy transference and processes that have dominated our world since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution and before.

It does not make sense to have liberal or conservative. It is a ridiculous concept. It is even more foolish to put a wall around these concepts and stay in each respective proverbial country of liberal or conservative. Since I went to university to learn, I do not understand these well enough to comment on each one because I try to be me (which is who I am as a person.) Conservatism and liberalism, to me, are a dynamic continuum instead of a controversial bubble war concept. Not that it is anyone’s business, but I tend to see the world as dynamic and ever-changing. Laws and policies are primarily static and tend to stagnate progress and detrimentally impact severely. This is because they are often out of context or insufficient to capture the essence of all it means to be human in our world of nature, God, and spirituality. I favor educational learning. As a person who works with nature, it did not take long to realize that forests and laws are incompatible because what is best for the law is not the best for the forest and nature itself. The same is true for our Earth as well. All human influence and organizational boundaries do not unite but fragment and isolate us, causing complexity and confusion over simplicity and closer to nature functioning with planning. This planning must integrate humanity with nature sustainably, holistically, and ecologically. We must learn from nature and mimic its functioning, where it contributes to helping strive toward those sustainable goals.

On the other hand, we must strive to keep enlightening ourselves with the foundational fundamentals learned from our educational learning. We should internalize the beneficial, enlightening teachings from God, spirituality, and any other beneficial contributions from philosophy, Buddhism, or anything else that helps bring harmony to our world. We could even relatively weigh and prioritize each concept by assigning a relative importance index and relative societal acceptance index, which is a great way to prioritize learning. (The same thing should be done on the internet with all potential classes someone might take). The liberal, conservative concept is weird because people are individuals. They are the sum total of all that is learned in their life. These days, too often, people know how to be liberal or conservative, which is an itinerant acceptance ploy to get power or status rather than solve problems. Maybe it says something about the majority of our functioning. Words that mean dynamic processes rather than static are more adaptively beneficial for our world. If you want to call it something other than “all that you have learned,” why not call it the liberal-conservative liberalism continuum? I would instead call it adaptive learning, adaptive rationalization, adaptive prioritizing, adaptive allocation of educational learning, adaptive problem solving, adaptive planning, or adaptive ecogeosytematics. Adaptive Ecogeosytematics is probably a tremendous dynamic summary word.

Law is status quo staticness.  It is a static way to look at a dynamic functioning planet Earth.  Law is too cumbersome for anyone to understand in its entirety.   However, it was developed when we did not have holistic technologies, and holistic science thus is archaic in transitioning toward a more desired future condition.  Don’t get me wrong.  I think lawyers and people who work in the field of law are tremendously valuable in a different, more holistic prescriptive advice and holistic arbitration context.  We must transition from this reactionary reductionistic perspective as soon as possible.

Reactionary justice is the continuation of violence. I would rather see it transform into a Holistic Environmental Justice Health and Safety. It is a concept that is genuinely more holistic and sustainable striving. It also eliminates the emotional hardening that goes along with challenging and demanding jobs when they consistently see people at their worst all the time. This seems to be a feedback loop that may sometimes result in more emotionless and violent behavior. The holistic concept is also more advantageous in terms of health for those in that Ecological Niche Organization because you feel good about the beneficial impact you have in terms of helping people who need help every day. Likewise, the holistic concept creates practical harmony and striving behavior in communities, which increases comfort and trust. Thus, improved communication can occur when someone needs help.

People are reluctant to ask for help in a reactionary justice or trouble-seeking paradigm. It seems like reactionary justice seeks not to end the cycle of violence but instead creates more in terms of detrimental impacts. Using reactionary justice instead of rational problem-solving approaches and helping people in a more genuine holistic way indicates that we are focused on the wrong resolutions of problems and merely temporarily postponing the inevitable continuation of the problem and, thus, further violence. Rational problem-solving is more humane, compassionate, and consistent with our foundational fundamentals instead of more shortsighted business-as-usual approaches. Combining this concept with the Help Project and Holistic Inclusive Blobification Project can prevent people from ever needing any reactionary justice. All human problems are often very involved and complicated and often involve people’s entire lives, which no reactionary justice person can get their arms around in totality. It is best to have love, care, compassion, and empathy for the circumstances many have endured, as many have suffered dearly in significant cumulative impact. This sometimes leads to post-traumatic stress disorder or other forms of mental illness or behavioral competition mechanisms as well as survival mechanisms. I believe too many people are waiting for something to happen instead of being genuine, holistic, loving, caring, and compassionate people. While transforming to a natural, holistic, sustainable, striving planet Earth, we must only use minimal violence when we have exhausted every other means of problem resolution, like when a person has a gun to someone’s head, for example. Over time, I suspect our need for this reactionary justice will be minimized towards the baseline. The paradigm should shift beyond laws and more inadequate life path resolution, which is reactionary violence. It does not consider the extremely high relative importance of every human being on this planet. Everyone needs the absolute most help in terms of care, inclusion, help, and genuine ecological rehabilitation and restoration so they can have more comfort, joy, love, hope, and sustainable striving happiness just like everyone else. The reactionary justice concept is out of context ignorance.

I wonder if we can map this phenomenon and show a correlation between reactionary justice needed and sustainable striving community cohesiveness functioning. I suspect that inclusiveness is the most crucial concept. Reactionary justice impacts a person’s connectedness and inclusion, where most people build self-esteem and need to belong, which are essential for human health and foundational fundamental functioning. As people are impacted (sometimes by opportunistic ultra-competitiveness), people lose connectedness over time and become more vulnerable to perturbations, survival stressors, and lack of opportunities in society. When all the cumulative survival stressors and absence of the ability to support yourself happen, you become vulnerable to illicit opportunistic organizations that often have no compassion at all for anything. (Because they are products of the same processes). Once this happens, people become more hardened and begin a downward spiral feedback loop, which often includes excessive self-medication to feel better, which can be another downward spiral feedback loop. Social interactions are sought with anyone with similar lives, and the struggle continues without inclusion and inadequate means of survival. This creates more compulsion to enter riskier ventures to survive, which sometimes turns criminal or violent. When this happens, the risk of traditional reactionary justice occurs. If arrested, the cycle begins again. If not, survival living conditions occur where people start sleeping anywhere they can and often end up with people in dire straits themselves, contributing to more detrimental influence and the overall downward spiral feedback loop. When this happens, the less violent become homeless, and the more violent live in survival conditions with survival stress until they are pushed beyond their inflection point.