A job is like an omerta role and mobbish fraternal position of violence often; It is sort of like payola to keep your mouth shut and not do the right thing according to broader holistic perspectives.  It keeps your focus on your job descriptions at any cost above all other responsibilities to others, people, all of humanity, and the entire planet.  Are job descriptions about static violence for takings purposes?  In the past, a job has embodied the goals and wishes of those in power while we overlook all other problems or opportunities to help someone in need or any problem that needs to be solved.  Do your job.  Do your job.  One of the problems is that all of you are told too often to do your job, and when you do not “do your job” and do something above and beyond your job, you’re notified, “That’s not your job.”

How often have you been asked a question on a job application or filled out a questionnaire and possibly contributed a considerable amount of positive impact to the world, and someone else got credit for everything you contributed because “that is not your job”?  “That is not your job” is merely a transference mechanism, which is extreme violence when people volunteer something to help.  It is even worse when they have done nothing but try to commit violence and hurt you ever since you contributed to solving one of the most significant problems on Earth.  That is not your job, son.  We have other people working on that.   That is not your job.  You have not been cleared enough, son.  That cannot be your job because someone above you has more clearance, acceptance, status, or political anointment.  The problem is that the larger the magnitude of the reason for a transference attempt, the more significant amount they will do to make sure you will never get the job or never get accepted, or have an opportunity to contribute to solving any problem even if the issue is a 100 + year closer to your family issue that has been occurring.  In other words, it seems like you are someone’s property, like the liberty cycle enslaved.  Everything you contribute outside of a conventional job is taken from you in itinerant ways for itinerant reasons so that they can solve the problems that you wanted to solve or contributed to solving starting decades ago.  Imagine a world with foundational fundamentals and relevant broader context with each individual’s passion, energy, love, care, compassion, and cumulative abilities.  Being a great parent may be all you need to do.

Politics should come after ecogeorelative, impact assessment, and ecogeorational decision-making.  It should be a gut-feeling indicator.  Maybe politics has been functioning at the wrong spatial resolution, so it has failed miserably (should we include everyone?).  Politics has become more about fighting and never-ending controversy as we support the means rather than any sustainable striving end.  Politics has become a way of life for some; it often occupies a significant amount of time regarding priorities rather than problem-solving.  I believe it might relate to the same concept of organizations’ resistance to change and individual complacency because politics works well for some people.  Politics gives people the lives they want in terms of the power they need to get acceptance to do anything they want, even if their actions are extremely destructive.  Because politics is at the wrong resolution and scale, it works as a destructive force as it takes it from the individual level and makes a cult out of it to maximize violence.  Politics at the individual level never becomes violence because no one knows or should know the totality of another person’s politics.  Instead, they should know the person as an integrated whole and not look at individual pieces of politics, which are often used to hurt someone rather than include them.  Those who start political wars find politics appealing because all they need to do is pry into an individual’s personal beliefs or manufactured perceptions of their beliefs.  We must go back to leaving a person’s politics at the proper resolution in their minds and let the whole person integrate their beliefs in a way that best strives to solve problems instead of creating violence and war.  We must get back to knowing people and respecting their ideas even if we disagree.  Although some extreme political functioning might like the power behind some extreme viewpoints.  The prioritization of more rationality in terms of holistic advice so people can learn is the best alternative; otherwise, people’s politics will take on whatever way they interpret their education, usually in an out-of-context way.  Only those who learn that learning is more than education out of context.  It is about all of the integrated contexts.  Otherwise, narrow-minded politics from educated people who never knew how to learn and adapt in a holistic problem-solving context will continue their destructive endeavors.  I wonder if the difference goes back to the motivations in the first place, as some are motivated to learn, and some are motivated to get educated to get rich or powerful or be a hero instead of contributing to the genuine holistic problem-solving effort.  Others want to learn to help in some way.  Focusing on politics instead of real holistic problem-solving is ignorance, as it does not make the world a better place but performs itinerant functioning to win only at any cost.  Politics works for those incapable of solving problems in any real way as they are more interested in their complacency and often dysfunctional organizations that resist change.  These compulsions only contribute to static elitism and political power alliances instead of more rational integrated problem-solving.  The old politics is like profit, power, drugs, sex, and rock and roll.  Genuine holistic politics is respect for individuals as each of us is cohesively similar, and the best part is that we are all diverse and different as this is a learning opportunity, not a divisive violence-creating concept.  Genuine holistic politics is about personal contributions in context with our broader nature regarding cohesive collaboration, problem-solving, and connectedness to all of humanity and nature.  We should no longer focus on personal politics as a priority as it serves no useful purpose.  We must get to know people for who they are as people, celebrate their similarities and differences, work together with our similarities, and learn from our differences.  It is one of the greatest concepts that we are all unique in our similarities and our diversity because if we were just all the same or if we were just all different, we would not have anything to talk about.  It is also like checks and balances and continual learning and continuous improvement.  The old politics is itinerant and destructive.  Genuine holistic, adaptive ecogeorelative politics build harmony, peace, and cohesive collaboration at the end of any rational decision-making process.  It creates lovers, not fighters.  What about you?  I am a lover, not a fighter.  We must transform profit, power, drugs, sex, and rock and roll lyrics into creating value, energy, benefits, creativity, holistic learning and advice, comfort, joy, love, peace, hope, and enlightened symphonies of all types.  At the same time, we strive to find sustainable striving happiness on Earth.  Again, politics should only represent a small fraction of the time at the end of a holistically rational decision-making process (for gut feel) UVM-SENR 1998.  For too long, it has been first and last.

Fighterish people are in certain professions because they might exhibit more fighterish tendencies. I even wonder if we consider these people as indicators and see where many come from and their associative characteristics. I wonder if some people’s life experiences and associations indicate their potential association with more fighterish behaviors. Maybe we should seek people for holistic roles so they can contribute to more needed holistic environmental justice, health, safety, social justice, holistic restoration, holistic arbitration, and safety roles. I wonder if we can do some associative characteristics with areas most of these people are from. The controversy creation types must stay on top and function in conjunction with connectivity that creates controversy for profiteering or powerteering primarily. This need creates an incredible compulsion to do anything to do their transference. Sometimes, they make connectivity with structures that can help them create pollution, judging, controversy creation, and wrenching cyclic functioning. Many of the fighters have nowhere near the knowledge to fight in any real sort of way. The best functioning might be doing help project mountaineering expeditions where either ecological restoration, missions, or Peace Corp project functioning puts you in a location where other potential to meet friends or even more sometimes. This concept encourages people to contribute and collaborate on important, helpful projects. We could have a high need index, which causes those with an increased desire to get high EEC (Ecological Equilibrium Compensation) or EVCI (Ecological value contribution index) points to select those projects first. Maybe higher EVCI and genuine holistic people get the first choice as to where they want to go (where to live). This puts similar but different people working together with similar but different people in holistic mountaineering, helping a collaborative effort that has a high chance of meeting people and may build friendships or lasting relationships. It seems that meeting someone is also more of a Venn diagram concept. Maybe we can live in more well-planned mountaineering, like doing more projects on shorter epochs instead of spending all our time in ENOs. It is up to each individual to live in a loving, learning way to have comfort, joy, love, hope, and sustainable striving for happiness.

The greatest strength comes from love, not fighting and violence. Is toughness and fighting behavior a sign of weakness that manifests itself in more of the same behaviors? You become weaker as you use more fighting behavior because you have less love. Therefore, those who fight may be very weak because they have fewer love behaviors. Have we created a society that produces more fighting and violence by making people who are more interested in other things besides love? Have we used all of our energy to compete using all types of fighting behavior and violence, even going so far as to solve problems for fighting purposes? People will do anything to compete when the prize is more significant in life. In the past, it has been about fighting and violence in some way, shape, or form. Let us transform to see if we can compete in a more loving problem-solving way. I wonder if more fighter behavior occurs because our society has produced fighters at an increasing rate, given how things are in this world. We seem to be creating circumstances all the time to create chaos, greed, ultra competitiveness, complexity, adequate funding for warfighting, reactionary justice, less proper funding of education, more unlivable wages, lack of holistic health care, and more transference mechanisms when those in control have been engaged in mainly violence of some type. We have been in a downward spiral feedback loop because we have created conditions for individuals to be in downward spiral feedback loops. Each individual’s health is essential for the overall health of our people and our natural environment.

Consequently, the well-being of all of us on planet Earth comes down to collectively how healthy we have been nurtured. I am standing up for the vulnerable people in this world who have been transference mechanisms for all of the “way things are world” violent behavior. They are more lovers than fighters. I wonder if those who fight need love more. Therefore, as part of my lover problem-solving, I will research and explore ways to help people love more and use more lover problem-solving instead of traditional methods. However, the weird concept here is that those who are more accepted in our society are those who fight more and use more violence. Is it possible that something supposed to be more about love has turned into behind-the-scenes violence?

Over time-fighting and violence have shown themselves to be an incubator of more fighting and violence. It is just a matter of when and where. It is an out-of-control downward spiral positive feedback loop. It may be mainly about a transference attempt from cowardly people who have no courage (because of subservientization). The reason for these behaviors is that many do not have any lover problem-solving skills, and many have been conditioned to use fighting and violence because that is what we are shown in our society to resolve conflict. I am ending all violence on planet Earth with lovers, not fighters. Then, I will try to find ways to give more love to fighters so they can become lovers, too. I will end the violence cycle everywhere on Earth by working together with lovers and anyone else who is interested.

I go back to the quote: “If people were angels, there would be no need for government.” or corporations in their current form.
Ok, let us all return to our roots as children before we were impacted by how things are in the world.  Let us all be angels once again.

Who says people or children are not angels when they start life?  What happens to them along the way impacts them, so they become something less than 100% angels.  Where do all the types of violence come from?  I believe we are all potential angels.  I fear that there has been a conspiracy to keep the so-called “economy” and all associated mechanisms creating more violence.  It may be the perfect conspiracy to keep all four in “business” in the way things are.

Are we killing angels to keep the traditional government concept, business, stock market, and economy in “business”?  All the potential in all those potential angels could have added more value, energy, and benefits than the entire economy, but no one will ever know.  I wonder if generations and ancestry of angels were killed in the name of the way things are world, thus causing the transference from angels to__________________(Self-assessment)

Why not look at people as angels first, just like I looked at my little kids when they were small?  It helps if you all think about people as kids.  We are all relative kids, too.  Let’s remember that.  I believe it helps.  An angel, to me, strives to be in complete harmony with all surrounding nature, including people.  We must all strive toward in context angels functioning in context with all of our nature and all of our people.  There is no other way.  If we did such a thing, do we need traditional concepts and functioning?  How much chaos, complexity, confusion, overwhelming work, process, out-of-context functioning, environmental injustice, violence of all types, ineffective bureaucracy, reactionary functioning, judging, law-making, frustration, inefficiencies, lack of duty of care, profit at any cost, power at any cost, heroics at any cost, gold miner at any cost, and ultra competition that knows no limits could we overcome?

If we were all angels, all the detrimental functioning on Earth would be obsolete.  We would need no laws, rules, regulations, power control, militaries, or reactionary justice.  Governments on Earth would integrate with all the universities to form a Unidiversity.

A long time ago, I wrote that we should wear a button with a picture of us as children.  Then, every neighbor (everyone) you meet will also see you as a child too.

It seems to me that if someone considers someone else better, it may merely be that the original person has not reached their potential yet. In fact, knowing about different and similar things is a great thing and makes up who we are as individuals.  We all know the most about what we know about. Better is a concept that is really about privilege. Too many analyze better at a certain time or as cumulative better. How about both? If you must compare better for comparison reasons, why not only compare better when each person has reached their potential and include all their attributes, life’s path, characteristics, and the totality of everything in your better analysis? I prefer to say we are all the same and different, too. Sometimes, these better assessments are all about the subjective assessment of those who judge another worldview and use inadequate data, insufficient data, insufficient totality, insufficient resolution, insufficient or lack of relativity analysis, insufficient terms in the equation, or a misunderstanding of the totality of everything. Many people get to live their lives of privilege. Some go through their lives functioning off other people’s energy. Better really is about all the differential environments, all of your opportunities, all of your education opportunities, all of your political connections, all of your connections with power, all your connections with wealth, all of your connections with the movers and the shakers, and all the connectivity with those that have energy. Some people grow up in more difficult neighborhoods and are subjected to an increased amount of violence that comes from sources in every direction. These people often have to contend with numerous challenges and struggles to afford an education or a livable wage. It is strange to me that those people who can easily afford college do not have to work in these roles. Yet, do they consider themselves better? I believe they are different but not better. Likewise, there is extreme survival stress in some areas, causing people to rely more on their natural sexual side for attention or outer beauty instead of having a holistic balance in life. It would be great to focus on their desired integrated potential to contribute to what they would like to do with their lives. If some want to add value to their natural beauty, they often do so by just living their lives and being who they are as people, which has tremendous value. Some people have so much beauty inside and out that they radiate it everywhere they go. Many people who add value just by breathing and interacting with people in a positive, genuine, holistic, and beneficial way have amazing potential to add tremendous value to organizations. Maybe these people should add additional EEC to their ENR just for the positive energy, value, and benefits they add just by living. Too many people seem to have few opportunities, are bored, lack excitement, work for low wages, and have no benefit jobs. These people want to live, too. They are not industrial service machines. I believe they have been made to perform traditional jobs in more of an assembly line way that offers them no creative and constructive contribution opportunities that would add immense value to their lives in terms of adding self-esteem and confidence. Too often, these people feel they are not valued because they feel like these machines. We need to reignite passion and creative energy everywhere in every ENO. In the past, we treated people more like robots to perform the same repetitive tasks. In some of these positions, it wouldn’t be great to do an ESH assessment and determine if there are alternatives to adding more value, energy, and benefits back to those in actual roles in these organizations. One way is to look for ways to enhance the value, energy, and benefits that they have to offer as well. It would be great to offer education and other learning opportunities to increase their abilities to add energy, benefits, and value to others. For example, every cashier, bartender, waitperson, barista, and hostess may prefer to be known as a human relations expert or something similar. It may give them more meaning for what they are doing instead of the repetitive task. It seems to me that each of these roles adds tremendous value and energy to others just because they emit nothing but positive energy in comfort, love, hope, faith, and joy. Traditional business management has not given enough credit to these roles, which tend to add more value, energy, and benefit to people above and beyond the traditional job title, often known as the task instead of the more real value-contributing role. I believe many of these people represent why the organization is in so-called “business” in the first place. I find it weird that they get fewer incentives, fewer education and learning opportunities, fewer benefits, and less compensation when they are closer to the actual reason for the organization’s existence in the first place. I believe if these people were given more incentives, including partial sharing ownership in the organization, they would have incentives to create, offer suggestions for improved functioning, increase their human relations skills, get inspired to get more education, and as a result, have a more cohesive and collaborative environment. Not only does this help the organization, but it also helps people and everyone interacting with it. It is weird that all these organizations talk about sustainability yet miss the concept altogether as they continue to undervalue people who function in their most vital roles. The value, energy, and benefit-adding potential are enormous if people are inspired to contribute and function in such a way.

In the future, I hope to have a similar and unique diversity pyramid that celebrates our loving, caring, sharing, giving, forgiving, and genuine kindness, striving to bring around conditions of comfort, joy, love, hope, faith, and sustainable striving for happiness. This similarity applies to everyone, everything, everywhere on Earth, including all of humanity and all of our natural environment. Having the diversity section of the pyramid is also essential because of the stability associated with diversity. Everyone has unique contributions based on their unique life path.

Because we do not have a similarity (and equity) foundation and unique diversity pyramid, we suffer from diversity ultra competition, resulting in greed. This is because everything is out of context with everything else. That is the main reason it is so easy to take advantage of how things are in the world. Why is it that many choose not to work together? I guess it is all about the diversity of only ultra-capitalist and ultra-market-based economy-type mechanisms that often are proponents of ultra-competition to the competitive exclusion of any perceived potential rival. Even if the perceived rival does not see themselves as rivals, it seems traditional functioning prefers to take the ultra-competitive approach, forgetting about our foundational fundamentals and similarities. I wonder if the integration of several forces is at work here: traditional capitalist expectations, traditional business or corporate practices, sports mentality, game mentality, alliances of a political nature, traditional greed concepts, profiteering, being a hero, striving for power only, materialism, social elevation, and plumage. I believe in a different paradigm that promotes cohesive, collaborative functioning, which aims to minimize detrimental impact while investing energy in areas that continually add more value, energy, and benefits throughout the system. Everyone benefits, relatively speaking, and when everybody benefits, everything else benefits because those able to contribute energy are healthy and able to contribute what they have to offer and collaborate to help in the ways they can. If I were an organization, I would strive to be rational and reasonable to include those with what it takes to contribute and collaborate in some way, shape, or form.

The ECO GEO WE-ME UNIDIVERSITY EARTH RESEARCH EXPLORERS CYCLE WITH LOCATION ENABLED INTEGRATED DEVICE with similarity and unique diversity pyramid seems to solve most of the significant problems of today. It creates an inclusive world with inspirational incentives to be similar and uniquely diverse. Energy allocation can be relatively in the similarity foundation or the unique diversity pyramid if the similarity foundation fundamentals are considered first.

It seems like many or all organizations and individuals are either being used as transference mechanisms or are potential transference mechanisms. Are government and laws being used as a transference mechanism? If so, have we been hiring people in certain positions that may be something other than the best candidates for positions? Instead, are there some candidates themselves that have ulterior motives to weave themselves into the fabric of organizations for itinerant reasons?

Maybe what has happened is a roller coaster ride of political influence. Over time, the reason why politics has been the priority instead of problems is because of the need for the transference potential power players to be in a position to perform itinerant roles when needed to preserve the chances of keeping the big picture thing covered up, Maybe initially there were itinerant “plants” to perform roles to allow vice versa concepts to occur. Maybe it started as a way to keep resources in the hands of the elite. Perhaps it is to keep power in the hands of the people. It seems either way, those who have the most ability to solve problems and help in a genuinely holistic and sustainable striving way are not being included and prioritized as they should. Power to the people sounds good but does not make sense in an unplanned, irrational way. I fear that narrow perspectives will allocate resources to the people only, and all this will do is function to fund an out-of-control and unplanned, irrational, market-based, extreme ultra-capitalist system.

I am wondering if the hypothesis creation process has created a situation where they had to try and kill a scientist-type person to preserve politics or the way things are in a static type world. Maybe, initially, they were threatened by someone who could potentially get access to understanding something he should have understood the day he was born. Therefore, one of the greatest attributes and qualities of this person’s character and reputation were targeted. Have we gotten to the point where we try to attack a person’s abilities and strengths at any cost if they threaten your long-term manipulation, pollution, monkeywrenching, and itinerant judging behavior for itinerant reasons? Does secrecy and confidentiality have a dichotomous duality that serves the primary purpose of advancing the status quo and keeping the way things are churning at any cost? Are all jobs functioning as payola jobs to keep the “do your job” mentality serving so people can do their jobs and nothing else”? Is the law a concept that has been traditionally used as not only a justification to do something or not do something but is it a concept of or “does not have to do something” above all. In other words, if we all get up and start writing laws from the day we are born and stop the day we die, there will not be enough laws to capture everything in our anthropocentric and natural world. Maybe that is the most crucial point. The duty of love and care seems not to be written in the law. Therefore, so-called law-abiding people do not have to love and care or have compassion. They are not required to prioritize rationality because it is not the law. They are not required to take action to help someone because it is not the law. Are they not required to go beyond the law to solve problems? The law focuses on itinerant persecution, itinerant functioning, itinerant process, and itinerant procedure, which results in itinerant functioning out of context with the right thing to do in all situations. It is also a waste of time and inefficient. The law was mainly created out of the reactionary need to have specific functioning at the expense of problem-solving functioning. It is the itinerant placement of rocks in a stream so you do not have to get your feet wet solving real problems. Are jobs just jobs created by-laws to fill a niche of getting across to the other side of a problem without solving the problems? Have we decided it is better to fund law than education and learning? It seems weird and itinerant functioning to allocate resources towards reactionary functioning at any cost, while those more holistic and closer to rationally holistic preventative approaches get neglected. Is it really about preserving the way things are in the world and the preservation of each individual involved in the process? Do we hold these concepts in higher regard than the planning necessary to transform how things should be sustainable striving planet Earth? Do we put the law above humane functioning? Do we put the law above closer to rational natural functioning? Does law create unnecessary confusion, chaos, process, and control? Does it put perception above reality as all organizations and individuals try and function within the out-of-context anthropocentric “stones” to get across any stream? Does this perception operating increase the perception/reality index in all organizations?

Consequently, people function like their organizations in a highly perceived way to accomplish their objectives at any cost. It seems as if our natural functioning in learning and development of foundational fundamentals helps create a closer to harmonious natural functioning rather than out-of-context perceptions of people who are functioning “doing their job” out of context with everything else. Every rule, law process, and procedure created in an out-of-context way does not bring harmonious rational functioning, but a burden to prioritize means behavior at any cost. We are funding irrational anthropocentric idealism at the expense of the highest value-contributing functioning. As a consequence of law and derived complexity and process, we have prioritized the means instead of the ends. It seems that more law is a consequence of an irrational, extreme, anthropocentric society planned by law in the first place. Is it a feedback loop? The more laws we have, the more we will need laws in the future. The more laws, the more difficult it is to live, learn, and love more naturally. The less complex society, the more we can prioritize what should be prioritized instead of law and itinerant functioning. When I think of little kids, I think about their needs in terms of what they need to give them the best chance to follow their passions, dreams, and aspirations in context with what we need to accomplish in our world. I do not see a kid as transference potential.

We must move beyond the law as all the law does is give those who know more about the law tools to dominate over the best intentions of the most genuine, loving, and caring people on this planet who have more to offer than those who function in pollution, judging, itinerant controversy creation, and manipulative monkey wrenching way. Is it possible that those who know the most about law know the least about what needs to be done? I am hoping I am helping them understand the need to adapt.

In the future, we will all live, learn, explore, and love as a priority. We are all the energy in the world. Each one of us is a contributor and collaborator to the well-being of not only ourselves but everyone, everything, everywhere on Earth. I believe we will be all about our individuality and what we have to offer related to our individuality in context with everything in nature. Therefore, we should be as independent as possible as we strive to do the best we can to learn continuously, love, and continuously live in such a way that contributes all the energy, value, and benefits we can as we live genuinely holistically. This way, we will be able to function in context with a research knowledge perspective that uses data, information, and knowledge from people. This data will be put into in-context research meant to help and contribute energy, value, and benefits to individuals all the way up to planet Earth and beyond. Everyone will be free to schedule a life in any way they want to plan it. Obviously, the broad, longer-term plans will not be as etched in stone, but assessing and planning at stages of your life would be great. I believe we can pick out a life that strives to meet our needs and our collective needs regarding our society and natural environment. It comes down to understanding what kind of help is needed, when, where, why, how, and who you will work with on your dynamic life’s path. If you put this in context with what, when, where, and who you want to work with, we can associate the needs with the individual wants and needs over time. This way, you can get the most energy, benefits, and value for your life while trying to contribute and collaborate with some aspect of improving some part of our world or some part of our humanity in some way. Maybe working together is more about planning a life that fits your living, learning, loving, and what you can help with. You may no longer work for just one organization, or you may not work for any organization. You may work for all organizations. You may be a parent. Or you may work in an individual ENR that is contributing to the collective whole, which might be the top of the spectrum pyramid. You could do both or any unique combination or all of the above. The temporal resolution or epochs is dynamic and ever-changing depending on organizations’ roles and needs as determined by closer-to-reality research and planning. I believe we ought to have more area-based planning where many of our opportunities to help are offered to us in a visual way. This is a great way because it sort of integrates all of the factors by which we all make rational decisions. We can choose destinations that we have not been to, want to explore, have a need for your help resources, match your criterion, meet our needs, increase chances of meeting someone, have a community we want to live in for a while, or anything else for that matter. If you are anything like me, I like to live in more naturally beautiful areas that provide opportunities to recharge my energy. Areas that are close to exploration, adventure, excitement, the ocean, the mountains, culture, fun, education and learning, and people I would like to be around like genuine holistic, high EVCI index people, creative and imaginative dreamer types of people. I like to be creative by striving to solve problems or developing ideas to help somehow. I have a more visual, analytical, integrative brain, so I would like to have all the software and tools to help me come up with ideas and patterns by which I can understand or hypothesize possible correlations for further research. I would like to be able to connect to learning resources as well. It would also be great to think of a life that involves continual exploration and the ability to help someone or something that needs help when my integrative assessment skills determine there is a need. Wouldn’t it be great if we all had an integrative device where we could all contribute in the same way all the time? Likewise, it would be great to know as much as possible about any area on Earth. It would be great to know the history of buildings, nature, and anything else for that matter. I have an idea if having a rentsandshares idea where your life can become a dynamic adventure all the time so you can live life to the fullest sometimes or most of the time. Our infrastructure will be ecogeorelatively planned for ecogeorelative index efficiency. When you leave your current destination, you may take a terramentum-like train to any number of meeting places and oasis places. These places are designed around living, learning, loving, fun, and excitement. During the day you may go to a conference. At night, you might enjoy meeting people, music, fun, food, dancing, and excitement. At each hub, there will be a rentsandshares place where you can have a more local efficient vehicle to explore and travel with. This idea is great because you can drive any type of vehicle you want relative to your needs at the time. Rentsandshares also has houses of any type to live in relative to your needs. These places are organized by individual attributes so that houses that are suitable for you relative to who you are relatively weighted and prioritized at a higher rating to maximize your comfort. The places you go, the places you stay, the vehicle you use, the places you live, the people you meet, the mountains you climb to help, the schedule you have, and the life you live will be assisted by ecogeorelativity rationality and ecogeosystematics. It makes life optimal relative to you and everything else that matters in a more highly relatively prioritized way. In fact, because everything is available on your device or computer, you will be able to function at minimal preplanning sometimes and will have maximum enjoyment in life as various deals are continuously presented to you relative to your needs in the area or the time period. These deals can be anything that strives to make your life better. The great thing is you can add data as you live your life to help everyone else as well. This may add to your EVCI index, giving you more incentives. I believe my life will be living, learning, exploring, and loving as I try to attend conferences to learn, contribute, and collaborate on what I have to offer. I am one of the most honest, relatively balanced, desire-to-help, loyal, working-together people who genuinely want to strive for a sustainable planet Earth for everyone, everything, and everywhere.

I learned that itinerant controversy creation, violence, and war create power in the hands of those most willing to go to any extreme to cause controversy. In essence, it causes transference potential to increase violent conflict, complexity, and controversy creation. It is their motive because they had a chance to solve problems holistically and chose not to in favor of creating more controversy to have ultra-competitive means of exclusion so that power can remain with those willing to do the most violence rather than solve problems in a genuinely holistic way. It is how those with power hedge and stay in power over the rest of us. The itinerant controversy creation potential increases with the potential to profiteer, powerteer, heroteer, or mountaineer for anything of extreme value. If we found a way to take away all the destructive energy from these destructive forces, they would not be able to destroy people, families, communities, our society, and our planet anymore. We then would become genuine holistic problem-solving people instead of itinerant dominating, controversy-creating, violence-creating, ultra-competitive, and destructive types of people. It seems to me that all individuals are susceptible to the abuse and power associated with everything possible. If we could transform into nothing but holistic, this would not happen. It comes down to this. If we devote all our resources to everything possible to destructive transference forces, that is what we will get. The degree to which they go depends on the amount to be gained, the amount to be lost, or both, depending on your perspective. If we look at things from a more genuine holistic perspective, we could allocate all this energy towards nothing but energy, value, and benefit-producing ways. Instead of violence, death, and destruction, we would have love, peace, collaboration, cohesion, and positive energy-producing holistic generators in the future. The way of the future is to assess, plan, and use ecogeorelativity rationality, prioritization, and allocation, all for problem-solving and genuine holistic future problem prevention. Once we do such a thing, we will be able to inspire inclusive people by providing in-context knowledge that they can use to help add more value, energy, and benefits to the world. We can determine what, where, when, how much, and anything else. This will enable us to give everyone what they need in terms of knowledge to make better decisions about their life while striving to contribute as much as possible to the bigger picture of planet Earth. We will be able to determine where to help, what type of help, how much help, and how we will carry out the planning and help effort. Once we have helped enough to level out the terrain, we can integrate the foundational fundamentals to have comfort, hope, joy, love, and peace everywhere. Consequently, we will have everyone similar on similar sides of their dichotomous duality in terms of being out of their survival zone and functioning in a stability-producing oscillation. No more extreme survival zone behaviors. What we have is the strongest foundation to build the rest of humanity on in context with our natural environment. It is the most important part because once people do their Venn diagrams and get on their sustainable striving life’s path, we will be able to have a situation where each individual will have the most self-producing energy in terms of genuine sustainable striving happiness and comfort, love, peace, joy, and hope. The health potential is phenomenal. We can contribute the most towards the house + love = home concept when we are the healthiest. We are building love in all of humanity everywhere on planet Earth, which is essential to have a home concept. A home without love is just a house. The love part is the part that keeps everything in humanity relating in genuine holistic ways all the time. Without love, our house would get cluttered, complex, and confusing, controversy would increase, arguments and violence would occur, and people would start caring less about maintaining and working with the home over time. Earth is our home. All of humanity ought to represent love. Therefore, all humanity should get what it needs to create conditions for comfort, joy, love, hope, peace, family, and community to start with foundational fundamentals on their sustainable striving life’s path. This life’s path will be anything the person wants it to be. It will be a lifelong learning, loving, and living path that expands on each person’s interests, passions, desires, and interests in context with the greater good or all of nature functioning. This way, the person is in a niche throughout their entire life. We are dynamic and ever-changing, so as we learn more or change our interests in time, we will adapt and find new niches in life. It makes sense because stagnation and static behavior create dogma as organizations and people in positions of power spend time finding ways to keep their positions at any cost rather than learning how to adapt. That is destructive. If we all strive to function genuinely holistically, we will add value, energy, and benefits by living, learning, and loving, which is what we should do every day. Eventually, the result of all this is an upward spiral feedback loop instead of a downward spiral one. It is up to each individual whether they devote all their energy towards destructive fighting and ultra-competitive and violent forces or put all their energy into efforts to save everyone, everything, everywhere on Earth. Education, knowledge, exploration, and learning for genuine holistic reasons have much greater energy potential. It is sort of like fusion. Fusion seems to mimic a natural and spiritual phenomenon found in the sun, whereas fission is science without knowledge from nature. All of us should be students of nature first, as it should be our context. I believe the key is integrating nature with a spiritual, loving humanity.