Those who put people in categories like criminals seem to be overlooking themselves in the analysis.  In essence, labeling someone as detrimental as a “criminal” kills them in some way, shape, or form.  We need to get to people first before they have a chance at being labeled something so negative.  Why don’t we get to the so-called criminals before they can get impacted by the law?  It is strange.  It seems to me that we ought to eliminate the word criminal.  Instead, we can have a scientific index assessment that involves the totality of one’s functioning, including one’s well-intentioned contributions toward improving our world.  It becomes more about inspiration incentives instead of waiting to be labeled something.  The word criminal is political and is often out of context with one’s totality.  In essence, simply labeling someone a criminal is criminal if we stick with arcane concepts of crime and punishment.  They dropped the ball on getting someone the help they needed in the first place.  It represents a cycle of violence that starts with confinement, loneliness, isolation, and destructive influences of others.  A more relevant assessment of what we used to call “criminal” would be a cumulative assessment of all the detrimentally impacting behaviors towards other people and our cumulative environment.  It makes sense for everyone to function in our world, contributing what they can towards loving, caring, and helping one another rather than trying to find people to label criminals.  Criminality is a war against the people without understanding the cumulative circumstances it took to get a person in a suffering survival zone in the first place.  Criminality is big business and supports a huge chunk of the traditional economy.  Thus, it is resistant to change.  Labeling people criminals is part of this archaic infrastructure bound and determined to find fault with natural spiritual miracles.  It makes God cry.  Remember that we were small children and are still relatively young.  Labeling someone a criminal means that the rest of us did not do our job of loving, caring, sharing, giving, forgiving, and genuine kindness striving in the first place.  Some were not nurtured enough.  It does not make sense to label people criminals at all.  In essence, it is like a war crime when people are labeled prisoners of war, but instead of war, they are victims of an out-of-context economy and traditional functioning.  Our priorities are all screwed up.  We need to put everyone, everything, everywhere on the relative priority list.  However, I wonder if we should look at a more rational context assessment and then put things in a ratio form of prioritization, a more acceptable form of assessment.  Furthermore, traditionally, this concept does not make sense because the data is not normalized relative to anything else.

This type of traditional out-of-context analysis has been going on for a long time, and the detrimental impacts are enormous.  This only leads to the furtherance of self-promulgating, out-of-context political violence from those who “know not what they do.” I believe Jesus said the exact quote.  It is true; they know not what they do.  I am trying to tell them what they do and have been trying to figure out our problems for a long time.  Let us now work together with a foundation of love, compassion, care, forgiveness, nature concepts, sharing, giving, simplicity, living, genuine kindness, striving, and learning in context to all that is highly relevant.  At the same time, we can spread the holistic inclusion project and inspirational inclusion incentives.  We must transform to this perspective.  I do not see another way.  Otherwise, we are trying to create “criminals”.  Creating “criminals” unknowingly serves no other purpose than to increase more fortunate people’s ultra-competitive edge over those less fortunate.  This allows the creation of enslaved people while those that may be more “criminal” are labeled slave labor so others can profit more from a money perspective.  Labeling people may significantly benefit the economy because of this slave labor and takings.  Maybe it makes the more fortunate look better, feel better, or get more privileges and benefits in our world.

Consequently, anybody labeled criminal indicates our current systems and processes are inadequate.  Criminal means that we have not done what is necessary to prevent this concept in the first place.  The problem was not solved promptly or contained in the first place.  It is an indicator that our relative priorities are in the wrong place.  Furthermore, every criminal is an out-of-context concept and a problem that was not prevented or solved when it should have been.  This is often because people are too concerned about making money, achieving success in the current definition, ultra-competing for a hierarchical position in society, and functioning in complacent organizations.  These organizations also use a set of rules and procedures to get people in trouble at work and limit their fitness success.

Furthermore, many hierarchical people may suffer in their positions and lack time or concern to look beyond their functioning.  I have also written that many people are in such a state of survival and living cycle that they sometimes gain satisfaction from others’ extreme suffering because it makes them feel better about their situation.  It is the same concept I have noticed with police blotter cultures.  The further we deviate from God, nature, humanity, and simplicity, the more stressed everyone gets.  The more complex and frustrating work piles up on everyone’s desks, and they work for the sake of work and drop all context.  This extreme reductionist approach to societal functioning creates a downward spiral feedback loop, reverberating throughout our reactive complexity society, creating transference to those most susceptible to perturbation and risk.  Is everyone too busy to care?

Does this create a pollution feedback loop?

From a traditional perspective, are we all relative “criminals” really?  Let us get rid of the word reactionary justice because it is the most negative concept ever created.  It represents a positive feedback pollution loop.  Please understand me; I believe people who exhibit these behaviors need help, and it is not their fault.  But they need real help as well from everyone, everything, everywhere on Earth too.  We ought to be compassionate in such a way that provides them with the care needed and chances of reintegration into a higher, relatively accessible, contributing life.  We must research and try and learn as much as we can from them to better find ways to minimize the chance that people get into these pollution manufacturing positions in the future.  The real reason is that we need everyone on Earth to contribute what they can in terms of energy so we can live on this planet in a sustainable, striving way.

In summary, we must holistically include everyone on Earth with inspirational incentives and inclusion.  People need to learn to become holistic, holy, or both.  We must strive to be loving, caring, sharing, giving, forgiving, and genuine kindness, striving to bring around conditions of comfort, joy, love, hope, faith, and sustainable striving for happiness.  World without end…

The need for a conventional Supreme Court and” Equal justice under law” is being transitioned into a holistic concept.  This is because we do not need the reactionary idea of traditional reactionary justice at all when we are genuinely a holistic striving, sustainable striving planet Earth.  We should focus on environmental justice, holistic arbitration, holistic restoration, holistic prescriptive advice, Awareness, and social justice.  We do need holistic arbitration, however, at least for now.  Besides, the justices will have much more balanced lives because they do not have to deal with justice violence and pollution cycle issues, reactionary complexity, heart-wrenching human suffering, politics, the extreme process-only type of functioning that focuses on the means instead of a sustainable striving end goals, and suffering of people.  The need for reactionary justice is an example of our system and society that has failed to plan, relatively prioritize and problem-solve in the first place.  One of the most outstanding pictures and feelings I ever had was taking a blue-sky picture of the Equal Justice Under Law saying on the Supreme Court building.  I sometimes wonder if there was a glimpse into my future broad problem-solving and planning genuine holistic striving life path.  Maybe it should say Equity Similarity with Ecogeorelative Planning.

We all understand the estimate of GDP. But what about a concept similar to the Gross Cost Index? Even if it would be tremendously challenging to determine all the costs of our current functioning on everything, everywhere, everybody, including individuals, families, communities, kids, regions, and Earth itself. It would be worth estimating a rough number for both indices. Likewise, there should be an opportunity cost concept for the future of continuing our functioning in the same way. Imagine if we calculated today’s cost with an opportunity cost concept of how much value-adding potential we would lose and how the externalized costs could be prevented. Maybe we should all take a month’s break from working and working and working or playing, playing, and playing and try to plan and self-assess the spectrum transference transition. These are inputs showing that each of us needs to get on a path to our sustainable striving and genuine holistic life’s path. We must be in context with our nature on Earth rather than doing what the boss tells us to do. Maybe we can balance needed functionality in our world, and an assessment planning effort in sort of a transition mode like pulling the full speed ahead lever pack to 1/4 speed ahead. This would be a great start. There may be some organizations that may be better off not functioning in their current form at all once they attempt to determine their ecogeorelativity rationality impact assessment. It may be best to start the (similarity unique diversity spectrum triangle we me unidiversity research explorers’ cycle) inclusion process for everyone first so we can keep people surviving, contributing, collaborating, learning, living, loving, and caring about one another. Advice in recommended foundational courses, mentoring, counseling health care, and other help resources. It will also help to plan highly prioritized niche roles and organizations as they contribute to ecological restoration and ecological rehabilitation and any additional necessary help needed. Immediately, we can decrease external costs and start functioning in a bottom-up, sustainable striving way.

In contrast, we strive to add as much as possible to creating benefits, value, beneficial energy, and sustainable striving investment. At the same time, we can have the presiding ecological planning group (including all of us together) work with all other planning groups, ENOs, and ENRs to inspire webs of connectedness and chains of energy flow that make the most sense from an ecogeorelativity rationality perspective. We should strive to have energy flow to other places that can generate more energy and prevent detrimental costs. In the future, we should be about everything, everyone, everywhere on Earth, ecogeorelatively considered.

Judging behavior and ultra competitiveness are itinerant societal stratification and classification processes that “execute” people because they are irradiated with fallout from a world that has not been planned or because someone wants to steal something from another. It is like a transference process for those who matter more or have a reactionary complexity creation agenda. I believe it is those who have more and, at the same time, watch others suffer more who are doing something like justifying their lives and lack a conscious understanding of the pain of others. In essence, it is like another form of transference to discuss. I see many types of transference processes that take the fallout from the problems in our world and transfer them to the less fortunate because they are more susceptible and less protected. Every suffering person and so-called criminal is a result of our society’s inability to problem-solve and plan. Everyone needed help at some point, and no one would help them. Many were too busy working, judging, or paying attention to their survival needs only. Sometimes, the person’s parents need help, but no one helps them either. Sometimes, the parents of the parents need help, but no one helps them either. Sometimes, it is the parents of the parents of the parents that needed help, and no one helped them either. We have reached the point where we must bring the full speed ahead to regain 1/4 speed and realize what we are doing. Otherwise, the intentional and unintentional transference processes will continue in an out-of-control “way things are” world. Every transference of this sort is very detrimental as it serves no purpose but to further the continuance of a reactionary complexity creation world. This reactionary, complex world is out of control, and it does not know what it does. It is ignorant of the actual costs that are created. It is weird.

How can we continue functioning in ways that seem to use our process, laws, and categorization of out-of-context better concepts while at the same time watching so much suffering and despair? How do we sit back and watch the war, chaos, destruction, terrorism, crime, mass shootings, and violence? We are all in an out-of-control, complexity-loving world because this type of functioning works great for some people functioning at that pace and at that scale. It reminds me of our investigation-loving world, where many are so reactive and lack the necessary skills to solve problems in any natural way. Thus, we have become an extreme reductionist investigation world. Investigations are complexity creators because most of the information goes into persecuting those who needed help the most earlier but were not helped. This creates more complexity because we pay attention to counting every grain of sand on the beach; meanwhile, our entire planet and everyone on it needs help somehow.

We are paying attention to the promulgation of negativity and destruction and are distracting everyone by saying we must investigate. We are putting off the inevitable necessity to genuinely problem solve and plan instead of confusing people about prioritizing some individual’s needs above what is needed. Every piece of sand will take infinite time while the beach erodes around us. It does not make sense. I wonder if we are in a downward spiral feedback loop in some professions because they are self-promulgating and complacent. This is a terrible combination when they coincidentally have so much power, authority, and wealth. I do not want to hurt anyone, but maybe they will improve their functioning through self-assessment to understand that they need to transition to a more desirable and sustainable future condition. This change may be challenging but necessary. However, if we invest our brain energy into making everyone’s transition a genuine holistic functioning one, people will be released from the controlling forces. Then, people can breathe fresh air as you contribute towards one of the most well-intentioned, loving, and caring planning and problem-solving efforts ever. Anything is possible if we all work together, contributing what each of us can. Monkey wrenching is the wrong approach and merely indicates how desperately complacent some have become.

I look forward to working with everyone, everything, everywhere on Earth.

Killing can either be a shot to the head or a lifelong endeavor.  It can be any epoch or more extended temporal resolution.  Maybe we all ought to do a self-assessment of “killerish” behaviors that contribute to killing people.  Are the most “killerish” people contributing more violence in every sense of the word over time?  It appears to me that torture chambers in medieval days accomplished the same longer temporal resolution type killings as well.  It is just like a Crucifixion.  It is time to end all the violence and “killerish” behaviors on planet Earth without killing anyone.  No longer are we going to have OK corral functioning where so many killerish behaviors occur over time that no one knows who did what to whom?  Ultimately, it is just a bunch of cowboyish, killerish people in the OK corral pointing the fingers or proverbial 45s at one another while the real masterminds get away with the prizes.  Starting now, there will be no killerish behaviors on planet Earth.  Whether you are authorized by an out of context and thus irrelevant legal system, or are ultra competing for money, power, authority, political prowess, “the girl”, a place to live, a job, a position you desire, respect, complacent functioning, your reputation, your status, your elitist functioning, your fun and pleasure, an organization, position in society, notoriety, fame, fortune, gold, stature, a spot on the board, a chance at a hefty severance package, stock options, a carefree life, a big raise, the rights to someone else’s ideas, travel opportunities, command and control, desire to be president, win an election, freedom, revenge, jealousy or envy competition, battle for patents and trademarks, vindication, paradise, out of context quest for heaven, stature in organizations, stature in church, perception of perfection; a chance to live in a more desirable place, inclusion in elite communities, inclusion in select fraternal organizations, membership at an elite club like a golf course, fringe benefits or protection from perturbation etc.  We must transition to a different, more nature-centric, humanity-centric, and genuine holistic functioning where, at the broadest level, we are one harmonious people striving to live, learn, and love sustainably.  We must continually adapt towards desired future conditions.  World without end…

Please do not call me, sir. I know “Sir” is often meant as a sign of respect, so often, it is well-intentioned. Sir is also used when someone has the authority or power to kick you to the curb, fire you, give you a ticket, or arrest you. In many ways, using the word sir at times is a sign of being in a position of vulnerability such that if there is an occasion to use the word sir to protect yourself from being fired, getting the raise, getting a promotion, and showing your relentless devotion to your superior who controls your life with a paycheck or potential reference. Often, I believe respect should go in every direction all the time because we ought to think of an individual as knowing most about those things that each person knows about, and each person is a total of the cumulative totality of their entire life experience and education and their everything. What we have been doing for the longest time is pretending that some people are better than others because of their leadership position status rather than their cumulative leadership qualities and characteristics. We are all potential leaders. However, many in leadership positions who are more concerned with how great they are or the position they have missed out on the opportunity to truly lead by example by being inclusive and accepting by inspiring each individual to live, learn, and love by contributing what they can to help one another and help the bigger pictures at the same time. Maybe we ought to have a few upside-down sir days where we do nothing but turn around the sir in the opposite direction. You will find a need not to have to say sir at all as mutual respect for each individual takes over. It elevates each individual and gives one another confidence, self-esteem, and well-intentioned positive energy rather than destructive. I suppose calling a mentor sir would be well deserved, but the mentors I know may like to be known by their first names, and respect is implied and assumed. Let’s call one another by our first names. It is a way of respecting one another and one’s individuality and, at the same time, recognizing one for what each person has to offer, their efforts, and their life’s totality. Getting scientific, maybe we should have a sir index of those we should call sir more than others. But I suggest that “sir” is overused and may give someone the idea that they are omnipotent and perfect in an imperfect, struggling, and suffering world. Anyone who believes they are perfect is mistaken, as it is much more of a continuous concept than many concepts in nature. Maybe sir should be a continuous index concept; they consider concepts like the totality of contributions, effort, sustainable striving potential, value, benefits, energy contributions, problem-solving contributions, love, care, compassion, leader qualities, and the acceptance of the fact that no one is perfect but ought to strive to do the best you can with what you have. Maybe we ought to holistically respect individuals in the future to have an index like the EVCI I mentioned previously. This index would consider a variety of characteristics. We ought to have a conference or public scoping research study to develop a more ecogeorelativity rationalization of respect. Some ideas are as follows: genuine holistic functioning, sustainable striving behavior, contributions, collaborations, creativity, sustainable striving innovation, environmentalist index, mentor index, hard work in context contributions, helping people index, public good contribution index, love and care index, compassion for others index, genuine holistic ideas index, holistic knowledge, education and experience, how far along your holistic trail index, ENO index, ENR index, EEC contribution index, foundational preparation index, genuineness index, mimicry and cryptic coloration index for beneficial contribution to individuals and society reasons, inclusion index, leader index, close to nature index, member of sustainable striving community index, sustainable striving investment performance index, cumulative totality life index, and anything else anyone else can contribute. Next, maybe we ought to have some sort of prioritization and applicability relative to the indices you believe you have contributed the most because it is tough to have high index ratings in each of the contributing indices. Likewise, each contributing index may have a different relative weight towards the overall cumulative relative importance rating, as each indicator has a relative contributing influence and relative importance. Maybe you can choose ones with more weight because they contribute more to the overall sustainable striving and genuine holistic striving desired future condition. The desired future condition is a contextual context that considers the ecogeorelative rationalization prioritization of our planet, which includes everything down to the individual and the children and potential future generations. The desired future condition is also how you fit into the big picture once you go through the spectrum transference approach. This approach is about self-assessing yourself and figuring out your desired future condition. Then, it is a process of infusing the needed love and care, help resources, ENO ENR association matching opportunities, mentoring, education, health care, counseling, foundation nature and love courses, connectivity, inclusion, and integration in the spectrum triangle to help you transition. In the future, it is up to the person how they weigh themselves and which categories they choose to allocate the most energy. Being a great parent could put you at the top of your desired future condition. World without end…

A while ago, I proposed a duality with people who work together with nature in terms of the actual natural environment and integrated totality. The opposite perspective of ownership, leasing, and renting is relative to the context of those who know more about integrated functioning, nature, integrated connectivity, and ecogeosystematics that are nature-centric with the totality of everything. This concept should be applied to every ENO on planet Earth because a business in the traditional sense is only a business that is often out of context with sustainable striving perspectives. The only way to have an ENO is to have ENR roles that are integrated and connected to other ENOs who work together with all other aspects of nature, including people, in its prioritized relative position of importance. It is the only way. Otherwise, we will continue functioning out of context in inefficient resource extraction (people, too) and environmentally degrading ways. Excess pollution (of all types, including the pollution of people) and all other externalized costs that were formerly considered of less relative importance ought to be considered. The environment is great for business, but it must be in this connected ENO context within webs of connectedness and chains of energy that make more rational sense to the cumulative totality of the entirety of nature itself (including people). We must similarly do things. The main reason concerns data and metadata standards, accuracy, and precision in all forms, including consistency and evenness concepts. We need an Earth unity concept. Suppose we all have data collected differently in each organization or individual. In that case, we will never be able to do any assessment, aggregation, analysis, environmental planning, impact assessment, ecogeorelativity rationalization, understanding of present conditions, desirable future conditions, paleoenvironmental assessment, efficiency assessment, environmental cost minimization, understanding of our world closer to reality, chain assessment, EEC calculation, network analysis in all forms and dynamic segmentation in terms of energy costs, flow, and multiplier sustainable striving investment of energy all over the Earth but more often closer to home. Planning is the key to everything, and the more we plan, the less detrimental impacts on our natural environment, our society, our communities, our planet, our families, our individuals, our kids, and their kids and their kids, too…Then, we will be able to strive to do no harm and err on the side of caution in terms of minimizing risk and perturbation to all people and the natural environment. The Earth should be at the level of planning necessary as the Earth is the unifying home where we live. It is also the unifying holistic scale. Comparing apples to apples, if we have planned to have a tree (metaphorically like Earth) with all different apples (which represents each planning area or individuals), we cannot assess or analyze or compare any data with anything else because each apple has a different requirement, data standards, scale, and every other planning accuracy and precision characteristic like logical constancy, data items, and data dictionary. The alternative is to have each apple the same size and scale with all the same metadata requirements, etc., so we can analyze anything relative to anything else, initially in a spatial context. Then we can estimate the areas of green relative to the amount of red on your apple, including the dark spots, worms, illnesses, how much and where pesticide residue exists, if any, how organic the apple is, dark spots and blemishes, and anything else you can think of. Only when the apples are planned with the same requirements can we then do the apples-to-apples assessment, further planning, or any analysis; I believe we ought to look at people like this too, but instead of requirements and laws, we all need a nature love and positive energy spirituality foundation as well as holistic prescriptive advice needed. We all ought to have access to a prioritized list of courses, missions, and explorations in various ways as well all the time so we can continually learn more about ourselves and our environment and the interactivity of both. This concept is like an understanding of Earth itself and nature itself. We need to understand the fundamentals and strive to have everyone on a firm foundation to generate as much sustainable striving energy as possible and understand how our energy and sustainable striving investment potential benefits Earth itself or communities. Either way, whether you are in an ENR in an ENO that has more to do with operations and the organizational functionality and purpose or in an ENR that has more to do with bigger picture functionality that strives to do the best we can in terms of helping the organization as well as everything else including individuals on our planet. This is so we can ecogeorelatively rationalize, learn, assess, plan, continually adapt, research anything, anywhere, anytime, help, prioritize, allocate, eliminate redundancies, eliminate complexity, simplify, harmonize, associate, connect, match, associate potential roles and opportunities to help, connect every person so there is no unemployment anywhere, increase efficiencies, reduce resource consumption, minimize pollution, know when someone needs help, minimize or eliminate detrimental impacts, siting opportunities for ENRs or ENOs, evenness, stability striving terrain leveling, resource allocation, improve all our health and wellness, and EEC allocation and calculations. We must integrate all data when and where needed. Each person will be helped in the following ways as well: continued inclusion and participation, elimination of loneliness and isolation, elimination of boredom, multiple communities, connectivity to people of similar interests, connectivity with interdisciplinary diversity, continual life path planning and mentoring, holistic ecogeorelativity epidemiology illness prevention and pattern analysis, health and wellness prescriptive advice to continually make your life more holistic and comfortably stable and filled with love, comfort, joy, and hope so we can be the most healthy. What we can do is really up to all of our imaginations so that I could go on forever. Still, we could have a conference and get every discipline and public scoping to determine opportunities to help with anything. Still, it is close to the most important concept, your cumulative individuality.

A pyramid is a great illustrative example of many metaphorical comparisons of importance. A pyramid illustrates an allocation paradigm that shows most of the allocation should go closer to the ground and individuals themselves as they are of higher relative importance and significance. In contrast, the rest trickles up to help or broader levels. Another illustrative paradigm is the importance of a foundation in nature, love, caring, sharing, giving, forgiving, genuine kindness, and striving. This includes relevant positive energy, spirituality, compassion, helping one another, contributing, collaborating, and working together. Once this foundation is built, we can begin developing the rest of positive energy enlightenment on the broader, more appropriate building blocks of priority and substance toward the bottom first (like a foundation in a building). After nature and love, etc., we must develop essential contexts for the lower levels as we learn more about fundamental concepts. Next, we should integrate maps and spatial concepts beyond those known at the broadest foundational expanse. This allows people to think spatially, allowing your brain to think beyond your role and task. It also allows visualizing concepts and placement on a map, which only represents reality. It also allows us to get our brains to conceptualize and visualize, preparing us for those levels closer to the top, like problem-solving, recognizing patterns, etc. The following levels include more focused problem-solving relative to broad environmental problem-solving and finer levels of specific disciplines. Next, we get into understanding impact assessment techniques as well as individual interdisciplinary contributory roles. Next, more research and analytical methods for those that desire, but it would be great if we could have as many as possible understand these concepts. Next is professional development, like health care and other disciplines, which are ecological as well as spatial disciplines. It makes sense because everything is much easier to learn when you can put things in spatial, functional, and systematic contexts. Learning more detailed systems and cycles is toward the top as well. This is highly important no matter what you decide to study and explore. Closer to the top are both fine-scale science and broad-scale science and concepts of ecogeorelativity rationalization. At the top is a continual improvement over time in an individual, unique, diverse way.

People need connectivity and inclusion and opportunities to mingle with people that could inspire them to get on a particular life’s path. In the past, people with less mentoring and less parenting wondered what to do in life. In our past freedom society, it was more like freedumb because we let people with great potential slip through the cracks.

The best holistic, inspirational inclusion should start with loving, caring, sharing, giving, and forgiving to bring comfort, joy, love, hope, faith, and sustainable striving for happiness. Inclusion is about embracing everyone over time and inspiring them to spread the same. It is also about positive energy and getting inspired by nature and humanity. It should spread like wildfire worldwide because it is like a candlelighting ceremony. The more candles each person lights, the faster everyone gets holistically included.

Chaos works as a transference issue, and people are getting hurt.  In the past, people were not valued as much as they should be.  Societal chaos creates conditions that cause people to be susceptible to perturbation from non-well-intentioned forces.  It is interesting to see areas where many people or a density of people live without significant opportunities.  These areas have several different interesting criterion characteristics.  It makes me wonder if many people over a broad expanse of land are being used as their existence value rather than their actual potential consistent with their passions in life.  Suppose these conditions are prevalent in our society in various places.  In that case, we must understand the phenomenon before people are used for their low wages, low incentives, low benefits, slavish work roles, sex, drugs, and extreme rock and roll existence value potential only.  This powerful opportunistic form of slavish survival zone existence only serves to keep certain people down while others become more accepted in our society.  It seems to me like some commodification of people where their life value appears to have been given the lowest priority relative to their value as a machine instead of an integrated natural spiritual miracle child of God.  It concerns me that if anyone describes what is going on according to their perceptions, those with power can flex their muscles and use whatever is available as a subservience tool to ensure people who perceptively matter less stay in their present condition without any opportunity to improve.  In essence, it seems to me that some areas are similar or comparable to slavish plantations that create humans for their living utility as natural organisms only instead of a child of God, Nature, and the Universe.  This is without consideration of the tremendous value, energy, and benefits potential that we all have when inspired to get on our desired and inspired life path.  The first thing that is impacted is a person’s “standing” as a hush method to keep people down.  Therefore, societal chaos works great for certain people and not for others.  In some circumstances, itinerant controversy creation leads to behind-the-scenes condemnation, which shows certain people turn others into enslaved people without them even knowing about it.  The creation of a suffering slavish society is unacceptable, and systematic processes and functions must cease to exist.