It seems to me that in the past, there was too much passive violence resulting from categorizations and classifications. Many people have been somehow anointed into positions of privilege inside fortified structures, either literal, figurative, or imaginative. One of the significant problems associated with these behaviors is that sometimes, the comfort and complacency related to these positions promote less educational learning in favor of top-down and traditional perspectives. It is easy to understand that the resistance to change index is relatively high because all of these people are getting their needs met in every way, such that their position on Maslow’s hierarchy of needs is close to or at the top of self-actualization. The past functioning and structures are irrational if there is no effort to continually adapt towards a more genuine holistic, sustainable striving perspective that is inclusive of everyone no matter where they are along their life’s path. It seems that if you are fortunate to be very far along on your spectrum milestone life’s path, you ought not to confine yourselves to your position and care only about those that are proximal to you. I believe it is better to offer help, mentoring, assistance, advice, and continual improvement for everyone and anyone. Those who have attained the various positions on their continually improving milestone life’s path deserve incentives to continue striving to be more genuinely holistic and sustainable striving. We ought to have a conference to determine milestone incentives and continually change incentives to make it fun and exciting. I have thought of several different types of gemstones or something to signify the attainment of a milestone. Maybe the various milestone gems can function as an incentive and a conversation piece (separate from our similarities, which should allow anyone to talk to anyone) so that we can better work together to continually strive to make the world a more genuine holistic, sustainable, enduring place to live.

Cumulative violence, including passive violence, “kills” people by destroying their fitness over time because it bioaccumulates like pollution, causing people to live shorter lives or some not to live very much at all. People who engage in behaviors that are called “criminal,” people who are homeless, people who are in their survival zones, people who are being cumulatively significantly impacted, people who have a mental illness, violent people, people who are perfectly passive violent, people that use the system for violence, and everyone else on Earth are detrimentally impacted by all sorts of violence and our reactive violent processes and out of context systems. Violent reactionary out-of-context systems and societies, in addition to those functioning in such a manner, do not contribute to striving toward more homeostatic and desired future condition functioning, which has fewer extreme oscillations that can be highly detrimental. If we do not change, we will get into a downward spiral feedback loop that will be difficult to stop.

In a continuously adaptive striving world, It seems that the static concepts of liberal versus conservative are irrational. I prefer not to categorize people as it adds to confusion. It also shows that those who thought of the idea did not see the world as dynamic and ever-improving rather than static irrationality, and they are relatively unenlightened. It seems to me the integration of nature and humanity ought to represent intensive enlightened rationality with extensive public scoping after we have it. It is best to be natural Earth striving and functioning close to nature as the context. The weight of each depends on the issues determined by the most genuine responsible, most genuine holistic, most genuinely enlightened, most genuinely compassionate, most high-value contribution index people, and those with the best integration of everything well-meaning and natural holistic on Earth. Another reason is that whenever you have any categorization, boundary, structure, or bubble, it creates a situation where conflict and endless pontification and debate can occur instead of solving problems or holistically preventing issues from occurring in the first place. The absolute most crucial reason is inclusion. Everyone needs to be accepted and included in our world because we are all in this together. We must live harmoniously and give every individual the best chance of being able to help our collective well-being towards a genuine holistic, sustainable striving planet Earth. When we are inclusive, we enable individuals to contribute what they can. This is important because not only does it help our planet, but it also gives us self-esteem, confidence, belongingness needs, and survival needs. It also instills harmonious collaboration behaviors necessary to live together on Earth. Each person is an individual who has great energy potential to contribute not only their celebratory similarities but also the intriguing and unique differences that relatively contribute to the totality of any rational problem-solving venture on Earth.

We ought to eliminate liberal or conservative and look at similarities (foundational fundamentals) and stability-enhancing differences (striving for desired future conditions) while trying to find relative prioritized rationality first instead.

I love and care about everyone on this planet.  Everyone else can, too, if they recognize that we should work on our similarities.  These include educational learning associated with foundational fundamentals, highly prioritized courses from “the best perspectives of all integrated disciplines,” ecogeorelativity, living, learning, and loving, as well as the recognition of our common Genuine Holistic positive energy Environmentalism and Humanitarianism (both are integrated).  It is ridiculous or irrational if you are not striving to be a genuine holistic environmentalist or a humanitarian or the integration of the two (homeostatic-environmentalist).  Maybe I am one of the few to realize that everyone has the potential to be the same and different simultaneously.  I have written about this concept in the past.  The recent belief is that if we focus on the “similarities, “we should be able to love and care about everyone on this planet.  Suppose we are fortunate enough to meet another person and learn about another human being.  In that case, we can also concentrate on our differences, which is the foundation of mutual enlightenment, diversity, stability, respect, and liking someone.

Consequently, as you can see, if we are all the same and all different, we will continuously have the best of both worlds working together with everyone, including the rest of this world.  We can love, care, and have the potential to like everyone on this planet.  This concept eliminates complexity, reactionary justice, process, fighting, violence, ultra-competition, war, destructive tendencies, detrimental functioning, and deleterious structures.  It makes it easy to justify the individual part of the transformation.  This is based on the humanitarian-environmental basis of all human beings, which is about unification.  All people will be essential in this world and represent an inclusive human family where all of us will contribute to continuous learning and continuously helping our planet.  This concept and other ideas will transition our world to a genuine holistic, sustainable striving for planet Earth and the most desirable future condition.

I have been wondering if most violence comes from the top through traditional extreme ultra-competition and extreme market-based capitalism functioning.   This ultra competition results in greed, profiteering, striving for power, heroics, and any other mountain climbing venture. This includes all pseudo plumage that has perceptively outweighed the value of human beings. Maybe human beings are seen as tools, commodities, or slaves of low value. Suppose you combine these traditional goals and functioning with the concept of legal intelligence functioning. In that case, it is easy to see how it results in violence as people become mere tools of the elite or powerful. Likewise,  they may have become tools for the former high-priority goals in our society. Sometimes, they are what I call concentric ring transference bubbles that transfer either blame or credit up or down depending on the needs of the functioning organizations. Sometimes, the transference mechanism of choice by the most desperate killerish is a person. Sometimes, the functioning is similar to corporate functioning, which may function like the PsuedoEarth Corporation concept. Many corporations function this way, and have caused many public organizations to function this way. Putting dirt in files builds up what I call violence potential. This violence represents the “bullets” in the chamber meant to “kill” if you reveal their methods of destruction or if you stand up for what is right. I believe drugs and sex, etc., have been used as tools for creating this type of “dirt” files approach to destroying people in case s–t hits the fan. This functioning in either licit or illicit organizations is killing people over a long period by using these as tools of violence and itinerant controversy creation when needed. It is interesting, but there never seems to be any real problem-solving. Why? Because it is all about secrecy and behind-the-scenes mobbish omerta functioning. That way, they can fire or kill anyone without telling anyone anything. It has evolved to such a point where nobody talks to anyone. Violence creates more violence, and that violence creates more like a feedback loop. Violence creates suffering, which creates more suffering, like another feedback loop. Violent people usually become violent and have a higher risk of dying of violence. Some violent people want others to get violent to make them like the original violent people. This is an important point as it may be a reactionary planning technique to mitigate future violence potential or some potential legitimate or illegitimate transference. If the eventuality of a court proceeding comes up, the ultra-competitive needs evidence that the other people are “evil,” “criminal,” “bad,” or “worse.”  Dirt files contribute to people having no standing relative to the other person. It is a reason why the court and the entire justice system do not work and ought to be transitioned to something on the holistic preventative side of the spectrum. Holistic, Suffering people only are usually lovers. Lovers usually will suffer through anything and usually internalize everything. Some people get depressed, while some get motivated by their desire to love and care about solving problems. Some people become homeless, some suffer and die young, and some commit suicide. Either way, I believe there are origins in the broader functioning and higher levels. The anthropocentric functioning and extremes associated with out-of-context monkeywrenching, itinerant controversy creation, judging, and itinerant pollution of all forms contribute to the destruction of people and the degradation of our society. Instead, we must focus on holistic positive energy instead of all the negative energy. Actual problem-solving closer to the individual level seems like the last priority as power striving, profiteers, and heroes run away with all the value, energy, and benefits an individual offers. At the same time, the concentric ring concept works in the other direction as detrimental negative energy and violence hit the person who took everything from them. The people at the bottom are merely transference mechanisms that function like other levels in the dynamic of the concentric ring. When necessary, the other levels can take or get blamed depending on the need of the controlling force. Sometimes, people are “killed” for the transference value of big-picture concepts as a cover-up, prevention of figuring things out, distraction or diversion, actual transference, indirect transference, or whatever. Sometimes, other levels are vulnerable. When this happens, a CEO or someone else gets fired and collects a big severance. The organization also changes names, moves over boundaries of all types, IPO is formed, corporation goes public, an organization goes private, an entity is formed, mergers occur, division gets sold, globalization occurs, or whatever else can occur to protect the functioning of the status quo. It also seems like all organizations, public and private, are being used as tools as well. Some laws are itinerantly created and itinerantly used for violence, not problem-solving. Most legal problem-solving methods lack connectivity and context, which usually construes the worst for the most vulnerable on the concentric ring. Larger concentric ring functions always have more tools, connections, and connectivity. Loyal, broader, detrimentally functioning people have the most power because they have the most ability to control, transfer, and keep things secret. If they were “smarter,” they would create “dirt” at the beginning of someone’s life and use it throughout their lives. Then they would be able to have transference of history, their past life, and the present (future too). They could have slave creation potential functioning, which reverberates and multiplies throughout families, communities, and society. Sometimes transference and class action broader concentric ring functioning occur so that the extreme overtopping events on an individual get transferred to other classifications or concentric rings in society. Sometimes, people are the transference that uses complexity and confusion, making it more difficult to plan the future and continuously adapt to strive for a sustainable planet Earth. In other words, the most extreme political view on democracy is power to the people. Suppose the people cannot do what is necessary to transition and transform to a genuine holistic, sustainable striving planet Earth themselves. In that case, we need higher relative energy from those who can work together and transition to a sustainable, striving planet Earth (all of us). It seems to me that the power of the people is a ploy sometimes. If we are doing the Robin Hood concept, it accomplishes nothing. Still, it gives people energy to spend on things that fund an out-of-context economy that further destroys our environment and humanity.

I am a lover. I want to use loving, caring, sharing, giving, forgiving, genuine kindness striving, and integrated knowledge to plan in the absence of violence.

The first step is to create a holistic, inclusive project starting at a pre-planned rational starting point relative to the areas where help is needed. Everyone must be involved. I call it the help project. We can do such things by looking at identifiable associative indicators from training sites in the past. Much of this data can be obtained from various sources, including newspapers. One of the best books I read in my life a long time ago was a book where some was written from anecdotes and headlines. It was interesting because it created a sort of context for everything, which is really what I liked. It set the stage by creating interesting cultural phenomena that co-occurred with all other average history we usually read about. It was like reading a book with context, which resonated with me the most. Maybe the book was like how I see this world as part of an integrated big-picture nature like integration. Anyway, It of the best books because it allowed me to think of an exciting concept. I find it interesting, considering the context of everything going on.

Benign Holistic Environmental Justice is a concept that is not like reactionary justice at all.  It is a way that we can holistically improve the conditions in society by inspiring those with more energy potential to help those with less.  This is the best way to begin because it takes the relative energy transference from sources to sink in a benign, holistic environmental/social justice way.  This way, it can be a more disorganized passive effort or an organized active one.  It is like the extensive versus intensive effort.  The intensive efforts will involve finding or selecting areas that need help in terms of energy allocation.  This effort might identify areas where, when, and how much ecological equilibrium compensation and resources should be allocated and how much priority weight should go to the relative importance indicator.  At the same time, we should consider the possible involvement of kids and others interested in learning about ecological reconstruction and restoration efforts.  The mentors will include masons (associate degree in earth minerals, rocks, and minerals), carpenters (associate degree in human habitat construction), landscaping (associate degree in holistic horticulture), or relevant experience including other (ENR) Ecological niche roles.  One way to have a relative weighting transition process is to have a rational process (ecogeorelativity) striving to get people to agree to reallocate an appropriate amount of their past money made through relatively extreme flipping behaviors, relative extreme corruption, relative extreme malfeasance, cumulative violence, itinerant cover-ups, cumulative detrimental impacts from all types of violence on others or the natural environment.  This includes past “boss” functioning that detrimentally impacted and caused relative contributions to conspiratorial behaviors.  These allocations will be transitioned to an energy allocation storage for Ecological Value Contribution Index incentives and Ecological Equilibrium Compensation.  Then, we will have a process to determine those detrimentally impacted.  Then, people will be prioritized by comfort needs and increasing survival conditions such that people will be able to get out of their survival zone and they will be able to get educational learning allocation, etc.  Overall, this helps bring a “similarity” equity condition to everyone on Earth while having diverse life paths and purposes in the unique diversity pyramid.

We should consider planning our transition to a continuous adaptive striving, genuine, holistic, and sustainable striving planet Earth. However, we must consider a world ecogeorelative rational planning and prioritization project. If we can plan this out so that every person on Earth is involved somehow, we will get the planning stage over quicker and have the energy of everyone on Earth working together. We will all work toward the continuous adaptive, sustainable, striving goal of desired future conditions. If we do so, it seems as if we would have the beneficial impact of people committing what they have in terms of energy.

Additionally, we would have the cohesive, collaborative, and harmonious integration of everyone to see us collectively as an ecological Clement’s superorganism human family on planet Earth. The same could be done if we have a conference-intensive planning effort and extensive people scoping of our people. This integrative effort would bring everyone together in an ecogeorelative way, with each person contributing what they can to be stewards and stakeholders of all communities on Earth. It unites all and puts higher relative weight on those who have a genuine holistic, sustainable context and, at the same time, love and care the most about the totality of our planet and all our humanity. Then, those people with the best skills and abilities to help create a genuine holistic dream planning team with all the interdisciplinary planning effort needed to inspire everyone else to get involved. The positive momentum should be enormous such that convincing people to help and work together will be easier.

I believe that we ought to have more regional connectivity through the ecogeo internet so more regional help can occur and broader public scoping efforts of all the people for their relative contribution. This means there is a regional intensive effort and connectivity with a more overall public scoping effort. Regional connectivity is important because it provides a forum and a way to collaborate in a more collaborative communicative environment. Most should be planned and shared at these regional forums for constructive ideas, feedback, and continued public scoping. In both directions, we should have ecogeosystematic connectivity and integrated devices for Ecological Niche Role connectivity. Ideas, data, scoping, needs, availability for help, skills, CV, work history, and other needed data requested by genuine holistic researchers, health, mentors, and advisors at the top of the spectrum pyramid. Almost immediately, we will have the ability to know everyone from a planning perspective. There is no more selling or using data for malicious or ultra-competitive reasons. The only context is helping and genuine holistic endeavors. We must assess all this data with all other data and determine those areas that need help. Once we have a prioritized list of priorities developed by the people scoping, research, and planning process, we can start planning, prioritization, and allocation on the ground. At the same time, this will also be a holistic, inclusive effort to get everyone else involved. Once this idea goes through an area, everyone will be inspired to jump on the bandwagon and help. As more people help, the more out-of-survival-zone comfort they will experience, so they will have the best conditions and chances to continually improve, collaborate, and contribute (similarity condition).

People experience epoch transference on a more micro resolution working for various organizations.  Epoch transference is a way to transfer an idea from those who came up with the ideas to those who stole ideas.  This is how it works.  Someone conceives of an idea.  The controlling organization that recognizes that in time, anything is possible does what I call epoch transference.  An idea from a different epoch occurs.  The controlling organization or itinerant ultra-competitive thieves spend a significant amount of energy covering up that the ideas came from someone else.  Over time, they create the illusion that they are the originators of the ideas by expanding the concept and thoroughly researching them.

All the creativity surrounding the ideas is expanded to the maximum amount in a race to dominate the ideas.  This is when the original person says something about their idea, and they can be ready for the typical heart-wrenching, laborious task of trying to prove that the ideas came from you.  The interesting concept here is that they most likely have many resources because maybe they have been doing such things for a century or more.  Therefore, they have created legislation itinerantly to control others.  Likewise, events in history may have enabled them to get complete control over people to allow their transference processes.  While doing the epoch transference, they cover up everything along the way to indicate that the ideas were from somewhere else.  They are taking over companies, altering data in organizations, deleting web pages, changing dates and content of documents, creating fictitious police reports, creating false allegations, making you look bad, making you fight for survival, putting you in your survival zone, and doing whatever it takes to expand the perception.  When you bring up these ideas in a different epoch, you are rejected and made to feel like a fool because they have so much more knowledge than you and have expanded the concepts the most they can.  Sometimes, when you try to help someone understand a concept, they turn things around, and the more dominating say, “That’s right…” as if they are the idea’s originator or some mentor.  Eventually, in time, all things are possible as the overwhelming momentum rolls over the originators of the ideas, making it more and more difficult for them to be involved in their ideas.  Meanwhile, a tremendous effort is made to destroy the originators in many ways, including making them ill and destroying their reputations.

Negotiations in business take a variety of forms.  However, negotiations have a lot to do with perceptions of power.  These perceptions of power are sometimes created to force the person to negotiate with forceful ferocity or timidity, like lightheartedness.  I believe that either side of the negotiation table can make either one appear.  However, before getting to the negotiation stage, one has to set up the environment for negotiation.  The person who wants to win the most or is at a competitive advantage has probably aligned themselves with all the power, all the wealth, the prestige, and everything that gives them the appearance of having a competitive advantage.  The more lighthearted negotiator is a more real arbiter with genuine intentions to reach a fair, peaceful resolution to a problem.  You can tell which one is which often.  Often, it is the environment.  Suppose you are in a more intimidating environment, such as a high-power place like the Supreme Court, the Oval Office, or any chief executive officer’s office.  In that case, it seems like a top-down power environment.  Suppose you are in the middle of a park or natural area, listening to the birds and feeling the breeze at your back, overlooking the ocean around people enjoying life.  In that case, the environment represents a genuine holistic, sustainable striving for dynamic equilibrium with nature.  Intimidating environments, enticement places or environments, creating illusions of potential success, traditional golf course settings, or getting the upper hand represents everything in power and prestige of the “the way things are” world.  It is like the concept of leverage in simple machine physics (or maybe that is how it used to be).  In situations where negotiation is of the highest priority and the potential to transition our planet to a sustainable, striving planet Earth eventually, traditional power and control intimidators will use every tactic in the book to intimidate you into a position of subservience.  I am not ever worried about negotiations because I will be able to work together with the top of the spectrum pyramid, the presiding ecological functional planning group, HVCI (High-Value Compensation Index), RAs, Genuine Holistic, and everyone else in a relatively weighted rational decision-making and prioritization process in tandem with ecogeosystematics and ecogeorelative rationality.  I believe I have one of the best contexts as one of the least ultra-competitive people and someone who loves and cares the most about the entirety of everything in a relatively weighted and prioritized way based on a rational determination of all the integrated ecogeorationality and ecogeorelativity.  A better approach to negotiations is relative rationality and ecogeorelativity.  It involves research, assessment, prioritization, allocations of relative significance, allocations of relative importance, cumulative analysis, and public scoping to round out the edginess and infuse humanity to select preferred potential alternatives.  This produces the highest probable selection of the best alternatives.  This solution involves both intensive relative ecogeorationality and the extensive effort of public scoping of people’s high, relatively important contributions.  This gets everyone involved.  I believe this approach will be desirable to propose a rational solution to all problems and simultaneously bring us together as a cohesive human family with nature-inspired functioning.  It replaces the archaic, out-of-context, and often reactively itinerant and irrational ultra-competitive planet Earth of the past.  It replaces irrational, out-of-context negotiations until the end of the process.  It saves all people and transitions them relative to their life’s path current condition spectrum by giving them needed help in the form of inputs needed to transition to their desired future condition.  The desired future condition is in context with the broader needs of the ecogeorelativity of everything, everyone, everywhere on Earth.  It is not just the value, energy, and benefits created; the significant number of detrimental impacts and costs are mitigated holistically.  The energy formerly allocated in detrimental ways gets allocated in genuine, holistic, sustainable striving.  I believe this solution will contribute to ending all violence, all war, all preventable suffering, preventing illness, and put the highest relative weight back on people, our natural environment, and our collective humanity.  I believe I can work together with everyone, relatively speaking, and strive to solve problems in this rational, ecogeorelative way rather than a heavy-handed, itinerant political power group stacked with everything that it needs to win a war or a fight.  We must not fight.  We must solve problems in a genuinely holistic way.  We all have a tremendous capacity for love, caring, compassion, and genuine holistic behavior, but we must continuously find ways to help those who need more help.  The context, organization, prioritization, planning, and rational decision-making ought to be the responsibility of chosen people, not for their ability to control, ultra-compete, lead, judge, manage, or use power and control to dominate as a priority.  I think many of these people should be motivated to get on their trails in life for the best of intentions.  I suggest those people who are interested in educational learning and exploring are a priority.  Less weight ought to go to those emphasizing education mainly for positions of power, dominance, traditional process, ultra competition, or control as the main purpose.  Those with motivations for power, profit, heroics, or anything other than genuine holistic sustainable striving objectives, motivations, and problem-solving must have less relative weight.  Those who have nothing but genuine motivations and the highest relative importance for the totality of all our ecogeosystematic functioning, including all of the genuine holistic motivations for all our nature, including humanity and the integration thereof on Earth, must be responsible no matter what their technical skills.  I do not believe the extreme opposite, motivated ultra-competitive extremes, would be compatible with this genuine holistic group even if they have the skills.  However, they may be able to do so with more transitional educational learning and enlightenment.  However, they still can be connected and work together, contribute, and collaborate.  This is one important way people should continuously learn in a genuine, holistic, sustainable striving way.  Those who are not ultra-competitive and have genuine motivations (derived in non-ultra-competitive ways except mimicries) for the same genuine holistic, sustainable striving ideals with high technical and relevant science skills ought to work together.  I believe we ought to all be involved.  Still, it is a matter of everyone contributing to the similarity foundation (where we are all the same)  and, at the same time, where we are all different (because we all have various life experiences), educational learning enlightenment, passions, interests, and creativity in various areas.  For example, every person on Earth can contribute in some way relative to their cumulative expertise, no matter what it is and how they got it.  It is a matter of understanding a person and getting them to help with those different areas where they can help the most.  I believe it is best to have a similarity and differences perspective on the differences side.  It also helps break down ideas for improvement in specific diverse areas of interest where the similarity offers ideas from everyone in the area.  This is because even though a person may not have as much expertise in a specific area, they may develop a great idea.  It is like the factory worker or private first-class person who comes up with a great idea.  Still, because of a process, structure, ultra competition, and detrimental functioning, the idea never sees the light of day or gets taken by the itinerant.  Likewise, we ought to have a spatial component (ecogeorelativity) and similarities and differences because ecogeorelative context is the most important consideration.  It is like the accumulation of all the problems on Earth spatially in an ecogeorelative way so we can rationally prioritize them. Be aware of regions leading to cumulative totality ecogeorelative integration.  Everything considered, negotiations will be the last step to get a gut feeling on accomplishing prioritization needs.

I have an affinity for people who like to learn to help instead of those who go to school to learn to hurt.  We ought to consider that entire spectrum relatively when determining some transition index.  Getting the number of people required to support such a thing is challenging because so many people are hurting.  At least, that is my impression after all of my years.  With all of my heart and the rational parts of my mind, I wish to help those who desire to learn to help out this world in a relatively weighted, relatively speaking way.  We must have a conference of Genuine Holistic people, people with high-value contributions, Real Angels, and people who can help create a cumulative index rating for those most hurt.  Suppose something happens to me, or they put me on the porch, or whatever way they carry out their violent expressions and ultra-competitive behaviors because of their lack of ability to contribute, collaborate, create, and, above all, help our world.  In that case, I hope to contribute what I can to helping those who choose to learn for great helpful motivations, whatever they are, and simultaneously try to be as genuine, holistic, and sustainable striving throughout their lives.  However, the index works out; my personal opinion is I would like to relatively weigh those who chose educational learning for anything that helps our world relative to the context of genuine holistic sustainable striving for humanity and nature.  I have an affinity for such people, and I think I was fortunate to be near some of them in my life, although I never got to know anyone.  I do not have an affinity for the itinerant controversy creation of people who had no regard for my health, anyone else’s health, wellbeing, comfort, joy, love, hope, sensitivity, emotions, or anything else.  I do not believe in polluting people, destroying people, harming people, ultra-competing with people, monkeywrenching people, manipulating people, invading someone’s sanctuaries, invading someone’s sacred places, destroying someone’s productive potential, firing people, isolating people, destroying someone’s reputation, using people for violence, using organizations for violence, judging people, being malicious toward people, destroying someone’s will to live, making someone’s life so dull and miserable, putting people in their survival zones, taking advantage of people, killing people, making people lonely and isolated, and anything else that serves to destroy instead of help.  I want to suggest some perception/reality index and a mimicry index to cancel out those who were trying to help but had to engage in behaviors because they were controlled or trying to help.  Lastly, one of my best courses in school was problem-solving.  I would like to somehow add a term in the algorithm for people who want to problem solve instead of violently using their knowledge about the world to destroy people by using traditional processes, power, using law as a tool to commit violence, using law as a tool to give people the ability to do anything to someone, using the law as a tool to know everything else they can do to hurt people or to win.  Another idea for an index that may help understand transitioning better is those people who used power, wealth, and heroics to get into a leadership position in life and did not have the duty of helping and caring for those people who were hurt or ultra-competed against.  Maybe we can have a leadership position behavior/helping behavior index to show how genuine each of you is and how much you genuinely care.  If my holistic, inclusive idea in the late 1980s were accepted, I could contribute at that point.  We may have been well on our way back then towards transforming our world and saving all those lives lost.  We must move beyond those days when people can do anything to another person to try to kill them in multiple ways and expect people to be healthy.  We cannot impact people’s minds and health, but we can significantly impact them throughout their lives and expect people to be healthy.  People are resilient unless they are affected over and repeatedly.

I do not want people to suffer who enjoy making people suffer without genuine holistic problem-solving methods; I want them to transition.  I can’t entirely agree with promoting ignorance.  Itinerant ignorance has been used as a tool to win over solve problems.  I believe that our Bill of Rights may have given people the right to use ignorance as a tool to war against another person.  Itinerant ignorance is being promulgated so those with itinerant motivations can profit.  We choose to fund reactionary violence instead of education, learning, exploring, and living are the most prominent examples.  I want to transition our world from a reactionary, violent world to a harmonious, peaceful, loving, and holistic world that is more about ecogeorational and ecogeorelative planning so that downward spirals never have a chance to begin again.