Itinerant reactionary reductionism extraction, exchange, and exclusion include manufacturing conditions to sacrifice the male while the female works unknowingly for the controlling domination. Is the male then unknowingly sent to a pollution exclusion war? Does this process ensure victory for violent kings because of the manufactured conditions and pollution exclusion? This method allows itinerant violent kings to take over the world while secrecy and confidentiality bury all that happened on the front lines, which includes people’s bedrooms and sacred sanctuaries. Is the war to take over planet Earth taking place in behavior-altered controlled bedrooms and sacred sanctuaries? Do bedroom behavior interpreters run the economy? What happens to the manufacturers of conditions?

Reactionary reductionism is like itinerant process and procedure violence because it allows all the relevancy and validity to go to kings. In contrast, all the detrimental impacts and damages go to those itinerantly manufactured into victimization. It is similar to obscure employment, as people are employed unknowingly to work for someone else while forced to work against themselves. It almost seems like branches of extreme politics have been employed to work at a snail’s pace while people are being assassinated and our environment decimated. I prefer the we-me unidiversity research explorers cycle because we all get involved in solving problems for everyone, everything, everywhere on Earth. There are 8 billion people on planet Earth, and each of us knows the most about what we know. This would stop reactionary reductionism itinerant transference processes and procedures and would cease the killing as well as environmental degradation. Without the we-me cycle, traditional controlling power and domination will continue to extract, exchange, prioritize, and exclude people based on their top-down ideas about prioritization and pace. It would be interesting to see the beneficiaries of the last three generations of reactionary reductionism controlling domination to determine the priorities. I feel that at least two, maybe three kingdoms are involved, representing the three major political groupings.

Absolutism, if I am not mistaken, is a concept that allows anything at all to happen to an individual person, and if something detrimental occurs in the process, the phenomenon that led up to something detrimental happening is excused in favor of blaming the manufactured victim. It is for war-fighting reasons only when used in this circumstance. For example, if there is a rule against getting blood on the road and you drag someone around for 50 years by a pickup truck and you get blood on the road, you could be responsible. It is strange, but it seems like any type of manufactured anthropogenic fragmentation, absolutism, out-of-context functioning, employment violence, manufactured isolation, manufactured loneliness, investigations violence, reductionism extremism, pollution exclusion, war, terrorism, controlling domination, controlled environments, manufactured violence, controlled people, behavioral alteration, manipulation of cultures, manipulation of people, manufacturing survival zone suffering, cumulative significant impact, liberty cycle exclusion, manufacturing of conditions, manufacturing of circumstances, manufacturing of judging, manufactured hostile environments, manufactured perceptions of delinquency, pollution of the environment, itinerantly manufactured victimization, itinerantly manufactured friendships, itinerantly manufactured relationships, and reactionary adaptive planning against all rationality, reasonableness, Nature striving, and God-loving behavior. The cumulative totality pollution exclusion caused by the extreme anthropocentric cumulative totality war techniques results in the potential for highly unnatural and unhealthy adaptations in people that cause people to get blood on the road. Judging people with absolutism is a strange concept when you consider the cumulative totality of all the manufactured circumstances and the infinite compulsions, including everything related to the past, present, and future. Therefore, there is an urgent need for clarity in understanding absolutism and its implications.

Has traditional capitalism evolved into controlled victimization? Employment violence, liberty cycle exclusion, pollution exclusion, survival zone suffering, and cumulative significant impact may be itinerant controlled victimization because victimization is like an employment paycheck or futures investment kind of concept. Does traditional capitalism employ the traditional system to manufacture top-down controlled or employed victims? This is especially true if a person has attention drawn to them or a person is a perceived threat to the status quo. It may be like a spatial-temporal integration of many epochs starting thousands of years ago, with the last major epochs being the founding of America, the invention of the train and commerce, the automobile, and flight, along with the realization of the importance of Nature including conservation, nature immersion, skiing, hockey, and golf. Are people assigned an obscure omerta exchange optimization and exclusion victimization manager or perceptively perfect king in their early lives depending on the attention drawn to them, their perceived threat to the status quo, and their association with high-value assets in traditional capitalism? Are new holistic ideas the most extreme perceived threat? Is it all about the spatial-temporal integration of everything in history, the present, and everything in the future that created the compulsions to manufacture victimization? Are we manufacturing crimes and definitions to kill in the most extreme situations? Crimes and manufacturing definitions are like little castles or little prisons, depending on your perspective, to create extreme victimization without compensation. It occurs only when there are infinite compulsions to win at any cost, or there are infinite compulsions to preserve the status quo. It reminds me of the liberty cycle exclusion on Paris Hill Me in the 1800s.

Structural and functional opportunism and reactionary adaptive planning thereof create situations very similar to employment violence. Are we all hierarchical employees of opportunistic extremism? Does our hierarchical structure position begin at birth? I am not sure when this started, but this extreme opportunistic behavior seems to appear more when enduring and survival zone people strive to make a difference by creating creativity and energy allocation that aims to make the world a better place. On the one hand, it seems like liberty cycle extremism; on the other, it seems like process privilege. It may even be a long-term obscure war to keep certain people low in the hierarchies while others have controlling management and supervision roles. Did we start to focus more on finance, insurance, risk, extraction, exchange, exclusion, employment securities, and the management of money over the inclusive Natural health of people and the Environment? Consequently, the selective promotion of business structure, function, process, and procedure, as well as the high elevation of political opportunism and legal opportunism over the people, seems to have taken over the world. A significant amount of intensity may have started with business extremism, the takings of the train idea in the 1800s. We would prefer to live in a world focused on aspects of higher relative importance of living on Earth. This includes considering everyone, everything, and everywhere as an ecogeorelativity equilibrium compensation concept, considering needs and impacts in the similarity foundation to bring everyone out of the survival zone into natural healthy living. Then, we can also have our unique diversity, creativity, contributions, and holistic opportunity.

Without a doubt, Frederick Law Olmstead was the best landscape architect of his time. He designed Central Park and the Biltmore Estate lands and advocated for the conservation of Adirondack Park, among many other significant accomplishments. As far as I know, the first town green on this continent was Guilford, Connecticut, but we do not hear much about its origins. Was Thomas Griswold the first Guilford Town Green and the Town Center designer?

Knowing what I know about extreme competitiveness, it seems like Olmstead was very hard-working, and some power source drove him. Was he promoted by a certain power source to be ultra-competitive during the railroad because Natural beauty was touted as one of the benefits of railroading? If so, it reminds me of an itinerant hierarchical structure promotion for some extreme competition. Was he a part of the political machine that may have had something to do with extreme business, agriculture competition, and iron industry competition? I am not sure at this point, but he seemed driven beyond Natural healthiness when considering his sleep schedule and commitments. Was he an employee of big money competition? He was associated with Central Park in New York and the Biltmore Estate of the Vanderbilts. Was it a competition to master the important Nature values and Nature immersion similar to the early town centers and town greens? I still respect him for his contributions because it is likely more about the power structures, processes, procedures, politics, extreme competition, and manufactured favoritism.

Regardless of whether it is true, it may provide insight into methods, practices, processes, and procedures used in hierarchical structure extraction, exchange, exclusion, employment violence, or liberty cycle extremism that developed during the 1800s. It shows the competitive promotion processes as itinerantly created, perfect, hard-working people take over the original creators of ideas and energy allocators. It also gives a clearer picture of how adaptive leveraging and creativity work without inclusion or credit for original ideas. Does it show the taking process? Does it show how planes, trains, and automobiles proliferated worldwide? Does it show how golf and skiing proliferated around the world?

Out of context, anthropocentric and reductionist policies, laws, procedures, processes, fragmentation, borders, boundaries, and manipulation of the environment may cause adaptation in people that is unhealthy and unnatural. Combined with the manufacturing of conditions, manufacturing of judging, manufacturing of hostile environments, pollution exclusion, and survival zone suffering, it creates a cumulatively significant impact that results in the cumulative total pollution exclusion of people. Everyone should be accepted and included from birth, and the environment should be as Natural Earth striving and holistic Humanity striving as possible. People should be considered an integral part of Natural Humanity instead of manipulated with anthropocentric constructs and behavior-altering extreme reductionism. Are we putting people into polluted environments so that they will take on the characteristics of the environment? Why are some people manufactured into being the sum totals of their environment, thus creating unnatural and unhealthy conditions or vice versa into a condition of Holistic, Natural, and Healthy Living? Do the cumulative totality pollution exclusion, survival zone suffering, and cumulative significant impact stressors eventually kill people in a variety of ways?

There is some kind of anthropocentric controlling domination that creates the illusion that certain traits including cancer are from genetics.