Were there some obscure motivations of our founders? It seems like the Declaration of Independence is all we need. The Constitution is an anthropocentric and reductionist extreme management controlling document. It puts unnecessary anthropocentrism when we should be more natural, healthy, and functioning. We should be more focused on “We the people” and our Natural healthy living, natural striving humanity, Natural spirituality, and Natural environment as a holistic concept instead of a reactionary concept. The Declaration of Independence was more connected with discussing nature and nature and was more of a bigger-picture holistic perspective. The constitution seems like a playing king approach, more about telling the people what they could and could not do. It seems like it was written from a management-controlling perspective. Was the Constitution a copycat reductionist and controlling management document that took the thunder away from Jefferson? Most people have no idea what is in the Constitution except for the right to bear arms. It is a certain reductionistic management perspective meant to control the people.

Are we manufacturing violence in our world, so we need reactionary justice? Traditional justice is a reactionary concept that focuses on Nature striving, Natural healthy living, Natural spirituality, Natural humanity, environmental justice balancing, and social justice balancing on the holistic side of the spectrum to prevent violence in the first place. I wonder if we manufacture war and terrorism as an infinite variabilization strategy, so we need militaries and governmental organizations to preserve status quo functioning and structures? The government was used on Earth to protect overt and obscure past, present, and future globalization expansionism and infinite variabilization structures and functioning. It reminds me of a quote I read in 1985: “What is good for General Motors is good for America and Vice Versa.” Has it become what is suitable for preserving past, present, future, globalization expansionism infinite variabilization structures, functioning, and the entire obscure overt economy good for governments as well? An inclusive, holistic foundation and Holistic planning is a more nature-striving way like ecosystems.  This would eliminate the indirect and direct violence causing anthropocentric infinite variabilization hierarchical structures and detrimental structures and functioning. It is likely about the spatial-temporal integration of the last 50, 100, 200, 500, 1000, and 2000 years of adaptive evolution, with greater relative weights occurring in the later generations as adaptive creativity, obscurity, and adaptive controlling management techniques evolved.

Are the reactionary psychology fields used as a supporting mechanism to heal the damage from traditional hierarchical structures and infinite variabilization? This reactionary energy would much better be allocated on the holistic side of the spectrum. It seems as if we strive to label people with a reactionary diagnosis as well to show why they do not measure up to the manufactured perceptive illusion of perfection in traditional structures and functioning. Most mental health issues are response mechanisms to an extreme anthropocentric traditional functioning world, survival zone suffering, significant cumulative impact, and infinite variabilization employment violence where we do not get enough Natural healthy balance, nurturing, Natural healthy living, Natural healthy spirituality, and Nature striving structures/functioning. In contrast, reactionary diagnostic labeling, holistic healing, and teaching are part of our world’s significant restoration and rehabilitation needs. Focusing on holistic inputs like Natural healthy balancing and healing before a diagnostic occurs is much better.

Imagining using a gun on someone is a bizarre concept. With a generalized similarity foundation for all of humanity consisting of loving, caring, sharing, giving, forgiving, and genuine kind striving, we should be able to eliminate the thought of using guns on people. I think this arming people is a manufactured concept to project the image that we have much worse problems than exist and to carry on the control or liberty cycle exclusion of human resources functioning. It may be an important part of the ultra-competitive long-term war so that those who know how to manufacture conditions of subservience in the infinite variabilization hierarchical structures can have another kingdom to blame other than their own. It also may be a way to counterbalance future potential litigation or civil procedure because associating someone with criminal law problems impacts relevancy, validity, standing, and association with civil court functioning. Sometimes, it is easier to manufacture conditions and get someone associated with a criminal investigation than to compete in a civil court. This is especially true if there are infinite compulsions to win at any cost to preserve the status quo or to win a long-term war. The more a person has to offer and the more attention drawn to them, the more someone is considered a perceived threat against the status quo or the long-term war. Maybe the arming of the people allows the manufacturing of conditions and perceptions to occur without question. Along with manufacturing crime, it gives the perception that armed control is needed in our world. Is it about hierarchical stratification and control of the employees as well? The compulsion to have criminal law organizations with guns is so strong that even if we eliminated crime, there would be infinite compulsions to manufacture crimes. The same thing is true for war and terrorism. Crime, war, and terrorism are infinite variabilization and hierarchical structures blame strategies instead of holistically solving real problems. Solving real problems requires a long-term understanding of the adaptive evolution of current conditions that may have occurred over 50, 75, 100, 200, 500, 1000, 2000, or more years. It is the spatial-temporal integration of all of everything that happened that led up to the current condition.

As an alternative to war, terrorism is a border and boundaryless response mechanism for people who do not know what to do to solve problems on Earth. It may also be a manufactured condition, distraction, and diversion to what is going on in our world. Solving problems has traditionally been only for those in control or connected to traditional castles or manufactured power structures, such as infinite variabilization hierarchy kingdoms. These kingdoms may have been artificially created based on non-prioritized needs, primarily for ingratiation. It is not anyone’s fault, as it may be how things have been functioning for the last 200 to 500 or more years. Terrorism is a violent strategy and should not be supported. There are other ways to solve problems if we were inclusive of everyone on Earth. Protests are an indicator that people care but do not know what to do to help. Masses of people may also control them for itinerant reasons. Including everyone on Earth would allow everyone to work together with everyone else in an ecogeorelative way depending on where people are in their life’s path, their unique characteristics, and what milestones they have attained. Everyone knows the most about what they know about and what they go through every day. It would give people purpose and ownership in what is going on in our world instead of always accepting the status quo top-down functioning and conditions. Accepting people would allow their amazing creativity to work with everyone else’s ideas. It would eliminate borders and boundaries and violent response mechanisms like terrorism, war, and crime. Since terrorism is a border and boundaryless phenomenon, is it reasonable to assume that it was learned from globalization expansionism? Is it associated with obscure or overt globalization?

The scales of justice are a reactionary concept. It is best to have holistic preventative balancing before we need the scales of justice. Truth, in a reactionary sense, is really what is manufactured as truth. If we do not have holistic preventative balancing, we tend to focus more on traditional processes, procedures, rules, laws, policies, administrative districts, borders, and boundaries. This is violent prioritization when we have so many people in suffering survival zones, employment violence, experiencing war-like phenomena, starving, homeless, loneliness, isolation, and enslavement. When the scales of justice are “needed,” it is often too late as people have already been through cumulative totality pollution exclusion, manufactured conditions, survival zone suffering, cumulative significant impact, employment violence, liberty cycle exclusion, extraction, exchange, and exclusion. People need help in a holistic sense before inflection points and response mechanisms start occurring. I think the justice system was used as a distraction and diversion from what is going on in our world. We must stop manufacturing people who need reactionary justice.

Suppose you think about all the organizations and individual people. In that case, it is not too difficult to understand that there is much duplication of energy and effort and out-of-context infinite variabilization violence. It may get so extreme that it may be like castles and kingdoms competing with other castles and kingdoms while peasants are out in the fields doing what they are told. It seems like the opposite of high relative freedom natural healthy living to be lower in the hierarchies in a current condition world. Those who have released themselves from controlling hierarchies may be experiencing a more natural and healthy life. More holistic organizations may manifest in natural, healthy living conditions, especially those with lower hierarchies. The opposite is true when a person has been pollution excluded and affiliated with organizations that are opposite of holistic. The manifestation of cumulative totality health is in the appearance and cumulative characteristics of people. If this is mostly true, we should be able to get help for those people who may be affiliated with more detrimentally impacting infinite variabilization hierarchical structures, functioning, and people. Maybe it should be called cumulative totality impact assessment and self-introspective assessment. This would be an essential part of the We-Me cycle functioning so that people can get resources, inspirational incentives, and ecogeorelative equilibrium compensation. The only way is to bring us all together beyond our world’s manufactured pollution exclusion and cumulative totality of out of context fragmentation. It may be one of the highest relative priorities on Earth for our holistic health, Nature striving, Natural healthy living, Natural environment, and Natural humanity striving adaptation towards a more desired future condition for our communities, significant area aggregations, and Earth itself. Then, (ADAPT) area decision assessment for planning and tracking can allocate planning energy, inspiration incentives, and ecogeorelative equilibrium compensation at a variety of scales, which will begin balancing the needs of the individual to areas. The similarity foundation would bring about generalized loving, caring, giving, forgiving, sharing, and genuine kindness while we are living, learning, exploring, and collaborating with various communities on Earth. This and eliminating excess borders and boundaries would eliminate unnecessary fragmentation and out-of-context functioning. Then, we could focus on high relative priorities sooner rather than later for everyone everywhere on Earth.

Impacting people is a cumulative, significant thing that creates the compulsion to impact more and more. Once a person has been through pollution exclusion, another successive pollution event is probable because if you get sick, you will be blamed for the first exposure to pollution. Pollution exclusion is an escalation and occurs to the most incredible people on Earth. It is an extreme way to kill attractiveness, which is like killing a person in totality. Once exposed to pollution, there is an incredible compulsion to expose a person to more and more pollution to cover up for the early pollution events or to create confusion in the situation or circumstance in which a person is cumulatively significantly impacted or becomes ill. It is like covering up for a conventional so-called crime. Crime is also a manifestation of an extremely anthropocentric or competitive world where pollution exclusion, significant cumulative impact, survival zone extremes, manufacturing unhealthiness, unnatural conditions, infinite variabilization, employment violence, and the cumulative totality of a nonprioritized world. Conventional so-called crime is a revolving door feedback loop that involves successive treatment, successive manufacturing of conditions, and extreme judging. It is a way for anthropocentric extremism and reactionary reductionism extremism to get rid of their frustration in a lack of Nature striving world, a Natural humanity world, or a Natural healthy living world. The more people go through suffering, extreme out-of-context structures, functions, rules, laws, procedures, and extreme anthropocentrism, the more they get the relative satisfaction of judging someone else. Is that where some mass shootings come from? The last three generations have been through bioaccumulation of cumulative totality pollution exclusion, and I am worried about the next generation. Do we have an epidemic where we are intentionally polluting everyone to cover up for some targeted pollution exclusions? Are we manufacturing illnesses for the reactionary health industry? I hope it is just my imagination. I hope it is not true. I am concerned about everyone in my family as well as everyone else. We should start with the holistic similarity foundation of loving, caring, sharing, giving, forgiving, and genuine kindness. We should strive through introspection and self-assessment to determine how to adapt ourselves in a desired future condition-striving world.

Most illness is a response mechanism from cumulative totality pollution exclusion, survival zone extremes, survival zone suffering, overtopping, cumulative significant impact, lack of holistic preventative health, anthropocentric intervention extremes, lack of Nature, cumulative stressors, lack of a significant other, infinite variabilization aspatial hierarchical structures employment violence, loneliness, isolation, keeping people out of the loop, manufacturing walking dead people, and the cumulative totality of the current anthropocentric extreme structures and functioning like extreme competition. Most mental illness is the response mechanism and an overwhelmingness inflection point from the brain protecting itself from cumulative totality pollution exclusion and cumulative totality stressors. Are some people put through these conditions for itinerant reasons of ultra-competitive extreme competition? Do some families go through multiple generations replicating the same types of impacts? Does it get blamed on genetics? Are diagnostics and response mechanisms itinerantly created for controlling domination reasons? Does the traditional employment environment manufacture illness, especially mental illness? Does anthropocentric manipulation, domination, and control create response mechanisms in people? Are definitions of illness created for purposes of extreme ultra-competitive competition? It is our choice.  We can use knowledge for holistic purposes or to fight wars.

Suppose we pool everyone up on Earth. Health should be free, and everyone should prioritize ecological equilibrium compensation. We should have access to it, but I suspect holistic health and natural healthy living will also reduce illness significantly. Holistic nutrition and the environmental safety and health index would help people make better choices. Inspirational incentives and ecological equilibrium compensation would go to those structures, functioning, and areas that are relatively the most healthy, nutritional, and beneficial to the environment. This would provide suitable and appropriate balancing inspiration for those needing it to adapt to a desired future condition.