Success must be in context with our similar condition for the surface area on planet Earth, which should be in the most natural striving condition relative to its more desired natural condition or current condition. The unique diversity desired in the future should depend on meeting the condition of nature’s striving for similarity. The responsibility for the surface area on planet Earth should be “all of us,” relatively speaking. Those that know the most about the natural condition of any area and context, community, ocean, wetland, woodland, wildlands, krummholz, mountain environments, pastoral landscapes, farmland, orchards, vineyards, forests, beaches, rivers, streams, natural communities, prairies, and any ecoregion should have higher relative weight when it comes to making decisions about the similarity condition and the planning of suitable and appropriate unique diversity. This is a great idea because it can be mapped so all people can understand anything they want to learn and explore. Therefore, all people should be able to contribute, collaborate, have ideas, propose alterations and creativity, have suitable and appropriate leasing, have investment ownership, invest in areas of importance to them, and any other unique diversity as long as it meets the similarity condition. The native Americans did not have ownership of borders and boundaries as they dynamically moved around the landscapes; they worked together with nature. Suppose we have a borderless and boundaryless similarity condition on the surface area of planet Earth. In that case, we can work together with nature and have a unique diversity of adaptive lease areas, investment ownership areas, ecological equilibrium compensation, investment areas, creativity, and proposed alterations on the surface of planet Earth as well.
