Any time kids are killed or there is a mass shooting, it is a keystone indicator of extreme societal decline.  Most traditional investigations are out of context with the resolution, both temporally and spatially, of the closer-to-reality problems.  Many investigations are erroneous because they lack connectivity to a more thoroughly researched problem scope and definition.  Energy spent on these investigations is often wasted unless connected to some broader, genuine, holistic research.  The goal should be genuine holistic problem-solving, not getting people in trouble or fighting.  Getting people in trouble is like out-of-context reactionary justice violence, which contributes little to ending the cycle of violence.  I have even wondered if investigations themselves and the criminal justice system are being used to create confusion and transference other resolutions.  I have also asked if killings are a way to say, “I told you so someone was going to get hurt,” and a transference occurs, leaving the investigative baggage with the death and the real problems away to reap more havoc elsewhere.  Many times, crimes and horrific violence of intensive media attention may be distractions for some other issues going on in either the region or area.  When I think of kids getting killed, it is an indicator of severe problems in the region or location or a distraction, intimidation, controlling, sick, violent person.  I wonder if something was being investigated in the area, and   “s–t hits the fan” or something.  I also wonder about pedophilia and its relationship with certain drugs or other societal phenomena.  I also wonder about some sick transference game of massive proportions to transfer the attention to killings while control and transference stay with a concentric ring bubble.  In legal cases, investigations often die when someone gets hurt, and the higher the magnitude of the killings, the greater the shock factor and transference ceases or ends with pocketing the money instead of finishing an investigation.  I believe there are itinerant mental illnesses created in people inherently, and they have some repetitive voices in their heads from “killerish” sources that cause them to do what they do.  I believe that extreme control mechanisms of a human being create patterns of a downward spiral of mental illness until the person no longer knows closer to the reality of what is going on.  A person may not be in their state of mind or, combined with the detrimentally impacted mental state, causes them to do what they would not ordinarily do if they were not anthropocentrically controlled.  These situations, combined with desperation survival zone behaviors and mental illness, cause an integrated meltdown of a human being, causing them to directly or indirectly hurt children.  Sometimes, the proximity to solving the problem is a matter of looking at the proximity of any controlling phenomenon or person they may be interested in blaming for coincidental characteristics of some previously illegally obtained surveillance meant to harm.  It may be a way to bring intensive investigation into the area for purposes of causing transference to another or endless distraction and diversionary investigations.

Regardless of the fundamental reasons these tragedies happen, they must stop, but our society as a whole must ecogeorelatively prioritize our societal problems as well.  Solving the killings and tragedies solves the indicator only, not the microcosmic expansion to broader levels.  I think switching priorities from reactionary reductionism to holistic preventative might be a great place to start.