As an alternative to war, terrorism is a border and boundaryless response mechanism for people who do not know what to do to solve problems on Earth. It may also be a manufactured condition, distraction, and diversion to what is going on in our world. Solving problems has traditionally been only for those in control or connected to traditional castles or manufactured power structures, such as infinite variabilization hierarchy kingdoms. These kingdoms may have been artificially created based on non-prioritized needs, primarily for ingratiation. It is not anyone’s fault, as it may be how things have been functioning for the last 200 to 500 or more years. Terrorism is a violent strategy and should not be supported. There are other ways to solve problems if we were inclusive of everyone on Earth. Protests are an indicator that people care but do not know what to do to help. Masses of people may also control them for itinerant reasons. Including everyone on Earth would allow everyone to work together with everyone else in an ecogeorelative way depending on where people are in their life’s path, their unique characteristics, and what milestones they have attained. Everyone knows the most about what they know about and what they go through every day. It would give people purpose and ownership in what is going on in our world instead of always accepting the status quo top-down functioning and conditions. Accepting people would allow their amazing creativity to work with everyone else’s ideas. It would eliminate borders and boundaries and violent response mechanisms like terrorism, war, and crime. Since terrorism is a border and boundaryless phenomenon, is it reasonable to assume that it was learned from globalization expansionism? Is it associated with obscure or overt globalization?