Fast food should be transitioned to offer a wider variety of healthier options. These healthier options should cost less than the more unhealthy options on the menu. We ought to consider EEC to help ESH indices and EGR ecogeosystematic indices. Menu options might include a salad, soup, and pasta bar at each restaurant that strives to put higher weight on healthier, more locally sourced options or low impact longer distance options. When we have Terramentum trains, I expect we can grow food in the most suitable regions that minimize the intensity and impact. Trying to produce something in the wrong climate might create a scenario where more inputs, resources, and excessive degradation or deviation further from natural conditions might be too intensive. In my opinion, those living closer to low-impact functioning and closer to nature functioning deserve to have great nutrition options because they contribute much less degradation to our planet, often relatively speaking. Better nutrition must cost less for all people. It appears to me that we are merely creating an unhealthy, obese, and overweight world. From an environmental justice point of view, it seems like the detrimental impacts are balanced on those who are much less fortunate in terms of traditional success but more successful in other ways many times. R-selected species like chicken and their eggs should be more on the menu because fresh eggs and chicken can be sourced anywhere near railroad grain storage places. Meat ought to be less of an option, but if it is going to be an option, we must grow livestock in the most suitable areas and produce healthier meat, like in warmer climates. But livestock red meat, etc., ought to be minimized over time if possible or should be a minimal part of our diet. Natural prey species like venison are a healthy alternative in suitable areas, but I believe in more bow and arrow hunting rather than rifles but prefer the most humane way. We should resort primarily to nuts, vegetables, healthy fats, fish, chicken, eggs, and everything else in moderation. We ought to have a sustainable striving food conference and a public scoping of the public to determine a well-planned integrated ecogeosystematic way of feeding our world that makes the most EGR rational sense. We ought to grow our food in an environment with minimal pollution and synthetic hormones that could pose problems in another part of the chain or web regarding bioaccumulation or unhealthiness. I think having a local name and a chain name would be a great idea. The local name represents the people and the area instead of just the chain. It would be great if local people could be partial ENO site owners so that their innovative spirit, enthusiasm, hard work, creativity, inspiration, and ideas for continual adaptation and improvement keep these organizations from stagnating. Likewise, scholarships ought to be given to anyone interested in culinary, nutrition, food science, human relations, etc. Maybe these places will look more like a well-respected career ENR than a low-wage job.