It appears real estate is in a positive feedback situation. This is especially true in areas that promote quick turnover for maximum profits. If several successive owners do the same thing, it manufactures an out-of-control feedback loop, erosion of the middle class, and homelessness. In fact, there is even a term called “flipping” to turn over houses quickly without investing too much in the property. It has gotten so bad that people cannot afford to live in an ownership situation as the number of houses grows slowly. Restoration of existing houses is great, but price gouging must not occur. I suggest normalizing house prices in areas that have gotten extremely out of control. Give people what they paid for the house and use ecological equilibrium compensation to lower the prices to make them affordable once again. This would be like a resetting of a clock, allowing people to live once again in houses deemed desirable in various areas. It seems strange, but I know of two personal houses that doubled after they were sold with minimal investment required. Now they are unaffordable to normal people. Only people desiring second homes from urban areas seem to be able to afford housing in suburban and rural areas. This must change as locals are pushed out into the street or rentals. I know of another example where a college graduate moved to a desirable location and pays $2000 per month for rent, and when you couple it with student loans, there is little chance to save any money for a home of their own; this must adaptively transition to a more desirable sustainable striving condition. Another idea would be to create ecological equilibrium compensation based on people who can choose to invest in these areas (source) and those who are locals (sink). Ecological equilibrium compensation can be from cumulative total profits from all niche organizations on Earth.