It does not make sense to have liberal or conservative labels.  It is a ridiculous concept.  It is even more foolish to put a wall around these concepts and stay in each respective proverbial country of liberal or conservative.  Since I went to university to learn, I do not understand these well enough to comment on each one because I try to be me (which is who I am as a person.) Conservatism and liberalism, to me, are a dynamic continuum instead of a controversial bubble war concept.  I tend to see the world as dynamic and ever-changing.  Laws and policies are primarily static and tend to stagnate progress and detrimentally impact severely.  This is because they are often out of context or insufficient to capture the essence of all it means to be human in our world of nature, God, and spirituality.  I favor educational learning, living, and exploring.  As a person who works with nature, it did not take me long to realize that forests and laws are incompatible in that what is best for the law is not the best for the forest and nature itself.  The same is true for our Earth as well.  All human influence and organizational boundaries do not unite us but fragment and isolate us, causing complexity and confusion over simplicity and getting closer to nature or natural Earth striving with planning.  Only those who use a reactionary system win at any cost.  We need holistic planning and must strive to integrate our humanity with nature in sustainable, holistic, and ecosystematic ways.  We must learn from nature and mimic its functioning, which contributes to helping strive toward those sustainable, enduring humanity and nature goals.

On the other hand, we must strive to keep enlightening ourselves with the foundational fundamentals learned from our educational learning.  We should internalize the beneficial, enlightening teachings known from God, spirituality, and any other helpful contributions from philosophy, nature, Buddhism, or anything else that helps bring harmony to our world.  We could even relatively weigh and prioritize each concept by assigning a relative importance index and relative societal acceptance index, which is a great way to prioritize learning.  (The same thing should be done on the internet with all potential classes someone might take).  The liberal-conservative concept is weird because people are individuals.  They are the total of all that is learned in their life.  These days, too often, people know how to be liberal or conservative, which is an itinerant acceptance ploy to get power or status rather than solve problems.  Does this function as a weapon?  Maybe it says something about the majority of our functioning.  Words that mean dynamic processes rather than static are more adaptively beneficial for our world.  If you want to call it something other than “all that you have learned,” why not call it the liberal-conservative liberalism continuum?  I would instead call it adaptive learning, adaptive rationalization, adaptive prioritizing, adaptive allocation of educational learning, adaptive problem solving, adaptive planning, or adaptive ecogeorelative ecogeosystematics.  Adaptive ecogeorelative Ecogeosystematics is probably a tremendous dynamic summary word.  We must also look at our world in a different light as well.  We must see our people and world as similar and different instead of liberal and conservative.