In a continuously adaptive striving world, It seems that the static concepts of liberal versus conservative are irrational. I prefer not to categorize people as it adds to confusion. It also shows that those who thought of the idea did not see the world as dynamic and ever-improving rather than static irrationality, and they are relatively unenlightened. It seems to me the integration of nature and humanity ought to represent intensive enlightened rationality with extensive public scoping after we have it. It is best to be natural Earth striving and functioning close to nature as the context. The weight of each depends on the issues determined by the most genuine responsible, most genuine holistic, most genuinely enlightened, most genuinely compassionate, most high-value contribution index people, and those with the best integration of everything well-meaning and natural holistic on Earth. Another reason is that whenever you have any categorization, boundary, structure, or bubble, it creates a situation where conflict and endless pontification and debate can occur instead of solving problems or holistically preventing issues from occurring in the first place. The absolute most crucial reason is inclusion. Everyone needs to be accepted and included in our world because we are all in this together. We must live harmoniously and give every individual the best chance of being able to help our collective well-being towards a genuine holistic, sustainable striving planet Earth. When we are inclusive, we enable individuals to contribute what they can. This is important because not only does it help our planet, but it also gives us self-esteem, confidence, belongingness needs, and survival needs. It also instills harmonious collaboration behaviors necessary to live together on Earth. Each person is an individual who has great energy potential to contribute not only their celebratory similarities but also the intriguing and unique differences that relatively contribute to the totality of any rational problem-solving venture on Earth.

We ought to eliminate liberal or conservative and look at similarities (foundational fundamentals) and stability-enhancing differences (striving for desired future conditions) while trying to find relative prioritized rationality first instead.