Legal in a reactionary way or an anthropocentric extreme way should not be considered a priority. We have so many other high relative priorities that we must first pay attention to. If they transition and transform to more holistic prescriptive advice or try to understand what is going on with people for holistic reasons, it would be better for all of us. It is similar to a paper about police functioning. Legal functions at the wrong pace, scale, and temporal resolution and is out of context with cumulative totality reality. They have fantastic contribution potential if they focus on solving real problems instead of those manufactured by the planet Earth’s monoculture or pray to the man god-king. I am optimistic for the day when we can all live, learn, and explore harmoniously on planet Earth instead of building castles, borders, boundaries, and walls with legality. I have concluded that there are word castles, element castles, and definition castles, which seem to be an endless source of reactionary reductionism and absolutist extremism. I believe Isaiah Thomas was trying to get us to understand that concept in the early 1800s. It may have been an early indicator that legal functioning was something terrible that happened as a reactionary reductionism warfighting tool for planet Earth’s monoculture. What was Litchfield Law School really about?
