Law is violent because it serves no educational continuous improvement role and only condemns instead of solving problems.  Likewise, process and procedural law is violent because it distracts people from doing higher relative importance things and causes them to focus all of their potential positive energy on things that do not contribute to solving problems most holistically and efficiently.  Law is violence because it causes the cyclic creation of more violence as people learn that law is the “only known way” to solve problems.  More people commit violence in the pursuit of justice by using the law.  Complexity, confusion, and prioritizing law are violence because they cause people to not focus on their foundational fundamentals of love, peace, caring, sharing, giving, forgiving, helping one another, holistic problem solving, education, and anything else that can help us strive for a more sustainable striving living experience on planet Earth.  Law is like the concept of opportunity cost.  The cost of what you spend your time and energy doing is the totality of what is lost doing what you could be doing.  I sometimes wonder if many people use law for itinerant reasons instead of holistic problem-solving or holistic arbitration because some have some ultra-competitive motivation and cannot compete in a genuine love, care, and compassionate way.  The law gives business opportunism a method and means to commit ultra-competitive violence because, when necessary, they will do whatever it takes to create an opportunity to use the law for transference control reasons.  I wonder if law is the most important concept in business because it is being used to keep some people in “king” positions and others in “slave” positions.  It makes sense because those who have the closer proximal connectivity to the law are those who can afford lawyers and itinerant lobbying to create more and more laws all the time.  The law itself might be used as an itinerant way to ultra-compete for fitness reasons, and those able to use it the most maximize the violence while getting more ecological fitness than others.  For example, I have written papers on the so-called “vice” in our society.  It is strange to me that for a long period, it seems like laws related to “vice” concepts served to put more focus on survival people than those in extreme comfort zones.  Vice law is a transference mechanism to create itinerant violence on some and not others often as a transference mechanism.  It would be interesting if there were some connectivity between those in extreme comfort zones and the law, which focuses on more survival people as easier people to use the law.  Do we create people that are easier to use the law on in an itinerant way?  Do we use the law to fire people when a business or government needs a transference mechanism?  Do we use the law to make people homeless?  Do we use the law to bankrupt people or to keep people struggling?  Do we use the law to kill?  Do we use the law to destroy all aspects of health?  Do we use the law as a reactionary adaptive planning tool?  Do we use the law to segment and separate into classes instead of creating community harmonizing behavior?  Do we use the law to create complexity and confusion in our society on what matters more?  Does law diminish the focus on love, peace, and harmony?  Do we spend time trying to focus law violence on some and not others in an itinerant way?  How important is politics in the law?  Do we use the law to create itinerant decisions?  Is the law being used as a tool of subservience?  Is law a tool of transference?  Do people closer to the law function like violence because it works for them?  Is the law creating conditions in our environment to create more itinerant ways to use the law?  Do we use the law to create itinerant decision-makers?  Is itinerant use of the law being used to manufacture gold and enslave and kill at the same?  Law has become nothing but an itinerant business-type tool of transference that works more for some and hurts others.  Law is about having access to power, as many of those who profiteer and strive for power and others have much more access to the law.  The more access to law people have, the more violence potential they have on one hand and the more they add to investigation on the other.  Itinerant controversy creation and use of the law is a way to have continual violence on someone for their whole lives while those that reap benefits from your life have excessively privileged lives.  In many ways, our world has become like a corporation organizational chart where those at the top do what is necessary to keep their positions and transfer all the productive energy from “the people” to those in power positions of control.  Law and business-like functioning collude for wealth transference reasons.  The higher the transference potential objective, the greater the use of itinerant use of the law to commit violence in every possible way, from extreme manufacturing of truth out of context concepts to eternal finding of truth violence, including investigation violence in every possible way imaginable.  If the transference potential is infinite, then the potential for law, justice, and investigation is also infinite.  Is law a source of complacency and status quo functioning, and are some people dying for it?  It reminds me of an essential book I read.  The book is “Playing God in Yellowstone” where, for a long time, we were static while nature was dynamic; a tremendous amount of fuel had built up on the forest floor in Yellowstone National Park, which led to a huge forest fire resetting succession in much of the park.  It is an example of how we tend toward complacency and thinking that we know what we are doing, but we do not know closer to reality.  It is like striving to keep things status quo at any cost so that those who think they know what they are doing can continue doing what they are doing without knowing more about it.  It seems it all comes down to people’s motivations and who they are.  If you have lived your life with power striving, profiteering, charioteering, ultra competing, using any violence as a tool, and striving for your ideas of paradise above all without consideration of solving problems in a dynamic, ever-changing, continuously improving way.  If you lived your life trying to solve problems, helping people, loving and caring about people, being compassionate towards others, supporting education, planning, health, and being focused on everything that matters more in life, that is a different story.  People can change, especially through education and enlightenment, but it is strange to me that people who were more about part of the problems in the past seem to always stay on top while those who have so much to offer are subservientized.  We must eliminate top and bottom in favor of collaborative contributing concepts where respect and responsibility are more important than itinerant positions of political power and dominance at any cost.  Too often, we have created a society where people have all dressed up for court their whole lives while others are extremely susceptible to perturbation from violence and ultra-competition.  More law and justice forces seem to work towards violently dealing with problems instead of solving them.  It creates a huge amount of detrimental impact on our society and our people worldwide.  It allows others that have the most access to those forces to have more violence potential as well, which creates more violence in an ever-increasing way.  As a problem-solving enlightenment and constructive criticism mechanism, this paper is meant to help.  Still, if the law tries to solve the problem without me, they will create huge class action suits and try to sue everyone associated with this behavior instead of solving the problem.  This represents extreme violence as well because it gives people traditional money, which does not contribute to solving problems in any way.  It only serves to promulgate an out-of-control, extremely competitive, ill capitalist system that is violent.  It is violent because it lacks the relative prioritization and planning needed to take care of our people, our kids, our communities, our families, our natural environment, our planet, and our future.  The “way things are” world is mostly built on the backs of ultra-competitive violence, opportunism, and transference.
It seems to me we ought to use education, exploration, knowledge transference, and problem-solving.  Suppose we plan and use all of our holistic enlightenment from the law and other academic knowledge fields.  In that case, we can transform our society into a genuine, holistic, sustainable, striving place to live.  Instead of fighting and violence to stay in control positions, doesn’t it make sense to work together with the rest of us to live in peace, harmony, and love in a collaborative and contributing environment instead of a violent one?  Maybe we should use law one last time to propose a planning effort of massive proportions and to get rid of itself as soon as we can once we do what is necessary to transition to a more well-planned collaborative and cohesive functioning.  All the people in the law fields have a tremendous amount to offer if they can re-train their brains to allocate their energy towards more holistic and genuine attempts at solving real in-context problems on Earth.  If we continue to give energy towards violence and those things that create more violence, all we will have is more and more violence in the future.  This is especially true if transference and irrationally controlling violence prevail at any cost instead of rationality.  Suppose we use the law as an out-of-context tool, which is inconsistent with nature’s resolutions in space and time.  In that case, we will continue to create never-ending violence and unanticipated catastrophes and tragedies, including the propensity to create significant downward spiral feedback loops for individuals, humanity, and our planet.  Suppose we do not change in a well-planned, rational way.  In that case, we will forever increase the susceptibility and potential perturbation towards creating more and more of the same until, before we know it, doomsday will be here sooner than anticipated.

In the interim, it would be great to change all laws to holistic prescriptive advice and BeAware (Regions, etc. Esri), which is meant to prevent problems holistically in the first place before the law is needed.  It will serve as planning material about the current condition of our society.

We need everyone to collaborate and contribute what they can on Earth.  For too long, the law has taken all the people’s tremendous brain energy potential to problems on a more holistic, continuous, adaptive striving preventative scale.