Loving
Caring
Sharing
Giving
Forgiving
Genuine kindness striving
ENR index
EVCI index
Genuine Holistic index
Real Angel index
Creativity index
Effort Contribution index
Compassion and duty of care index
Loyalty to People Index
Cumulative non-violence indicator index
Itinerant Political/rationality index
Helping People/Hurting People Index
Itinerant Education/Educational Learning Index
Hurting & getting people in trouble/love index
Inclusion of other’s index
Ultra-competitive opportunistic behavior/love
Presence or absence of transference
Cumulative Life’s Path Experience Index
Educational learning
ENR contribution and collaboration index
Nurturing index
Creativity Index
Each of these indicators is a suggestion that could be used in the overall assessment of a person in terms of comprehensive evaluation and individual indicators. In the future, people will assess themselves. The particular indicators can be chosen and weighted relatively differently for each person relative to which indicators the person feels contribute more toward the overall assessment. For example, we could relatively weigh creativity, HVCI (High-Value Contribution Index), or genuine holistic index the most so that the relative contribution toward the total index rating score represents these indicators the most. Someone high in Genuine holistic may have most of their relative weight in that category. This more extensive functioning inspires more significant incentives by being yourself and who you are as a person because you strive to add as much comfort, joy, love, hope, helping behavior, inner beauty, nurturing, learning, outer beauty, inspirational strength, and conditioning, integrated miraculousness and sustainable striving happiness to our planet in all that you do. This elevates the high relative significance and high relative importance of parents, moms & dads, mentors, and women in general because most are born that way. HVCI people contribute high value, energy, and benefits in a genuine holistic, sustainable, striving way in Everything they do. However, they tend to be more focused, devote a significant amount of time to educational learning, and live life trying to figure out problems. They tend to notice Everything all the time, including patterns. They learn as much as they can as they live, learn, and love. These people often question traditional processes, rules, laws, organizational behaviors, anthropocentric extremes, standard functioning, and structures. They do this to help transition our planet into a more genuine, holistic, sustainable, striving planet Earth for the benefit of all humanity and Everything on planet Earth.
Furthermore, many of these people understand the higher relative importance of broader contexts of ecogeorelativity, love, and positively beneficial and inspirational teachings and educational learning from all spirituality, nature, and God. It is all about the nurturing index. Many people strive to share and work together while living, learning, nurturing, and loving. They try to inspire and help others with genuine intentions instead of perceptions. Many of these people are open-minded, strive to integrate perspectives, and accept others without judging others. They aim to solve problems over traditional dysfunctional human family behaviors and irrational functions, processes, and structures.
The great concept about this is that it allows everyone to contribute an enormous amount by being yourself. We all will strive to live life continuously, learning, loving, and constantly striving to contribute what we can towards a genuine holistic, sustainable planet, Earth. We can approach problems extensively through natural, holistic, and more intensive indices. What is great about all this is that there are so many ways to add more and more learning, living, and loving experiences all the time. Likewise, there are many extensive and intensive ways to contribute and collaborate towards adding as much value, energy, and benefits to humanity and our world. Assessing milestones over a life’s path based on integrated ecogeorelative rationality and inspiration incentives of helping one another is worth striving for. Other incentives could be anything Earthly imaginable consistent with foundational fundamentals and all additional prioritized educational learning as long as it is in the broader genuine holistic context. This represents a bottom-up (individual context) and top-down approach (general nature, Earth, humanity context) and Everything connected between ecogeorelative Ecogeosystematics functioning context. These indices are meant to get everyone on their life’s path with all three contexts in mind. The diversity of all indices accepts everyone and encourages continual learning, adaptation, and continual striving both extensively and intensively. This is an excellent idea because whatever your personality type, motivations, abilities, creativity, effort, educational learning, individuality, passion, and desire fits best. The relative importance weights and relative significance weights are really up to each person’s motivational desire or genuine holistic functioning. The actual ways to incentivize people regarding life’s path milestone contributions should be determined at a conference. This may be determined with an Ecogeorelative intensive and extensive decision-making process. This is the significant part of it as it combines those who know the most (relatively weighted in a manner that represents rationality) with extensive public scoping inputs from the people (relatively weighted in a way that represents rationality). Going a step further, we could relatively weigh everyone with their broad contribution significance in terms of their total educational learning enlightenment and experience and relevant area of study for making such a decision. Or we could leave this step alone and have everyone have the same weight. Or we could do both and relatively weight the “everyone is the same” ( no individual weights) and the “everyone is different” (relative weighting by contribution significance). A relative weight can be proportionally applied to both, or the relative weights could be the same. It does not matter when everyone self-assesses themselves. This method equalizes everyone and allows everyone to be different simultaneously.