I have an affinity for people who like to learn to help instead of those who go to school to learn to hurt.  We ought to consider that entire spectrum relatively when determining some transition index.  Getting the number of people required to support such a thing is challenging because so many people are hurting.  At least, that is my impression after all of my years.  With all of my heart and the rational parts of my mind, I wish to help those who desire to learn to help out this world in a relatively weighted, relatively speaking way.  We must have a conference of Genuine Holistic people, people with high-value contributions, Real Angels, and people who can help create a cumulative index rating for those most hurt.  Suppose something happens to me, or they put me on the porch, or whatever way they carry out their violent expressions and ultra-competitive behaviors because of their lack of ability to contribute, collaborate, create, and, above all, help our world.  In that case, I hope to contribute what I can to helping those who choose to learn for great helpful motivations, whatever they are, and simultaneously try to be as genuine, holistic, and sustainable striving throughout their lives.  However, the index works out; my personal opinion is I would like to relatively weigh those who chose educational learning for anything that helps our world relative to the context of genuine holistic sustainable striving for humanity and nature.  I have an affinity for such people, and I think I was fortunate to be near some of them in my life, although I never got to know anyone.  I do not have an affinity for the itinerant controversy creation of people who had no regard for my health, anyone else’s health, wellbeing, comfort, joy, love, hope, sensitivity, emotions, or anything else.  I do not believe in polluting people, destroying people, harming people, ultra-competing with people, monkeywrenching people, manipulating people, invading someone’s sanctuaries, invading someone’s sacred places, destroying someone’s productive potential, firing people, isolating people, destroying someone’s reputation, using people for violence, using organizations for violence, judging people, being malicious toward people, destroying someone’s will to live, making someone’s life so dull and miserable, putting people in their survival zones, taking advantage of people, killing people, making people lonely and isolated, and anything else that serves to destroy instead of help.  I want to suggest some perception/reality index and a mimicry index to cancel out those who were trying to help but had to engage in behaviors because they were controlled or trying to help.  Lastly, one of my best courses in school was problem-solving.  I would like to somehow add a term in the algorithm for people who want to problem solve instead of violently using their knowledge about the world to destroy people by using traditional processes, power, using law as a tool to commit violence, using law as a tool to give people the ability to do anything to someone, using the law as a tool to know everything else they can do to hurt people or to win.  Another idea for an index that may help understand transitioning better is those people who used power, wealth, and heroics to get into a leadership position in life and did not have the duty of helping and caring for those people who were hurt or ultra-competed against.  Maybe we can have a leadership position behavior/helping behavior index to show how genuine each of you is and how much you genuinely care.  If my holistic, inclusive idea in the late 1980s were accepted, I could contribute at that point.  We may have been well on our way back then towards transforming our world and saving all those lives lost.  We must move beyond those days when people can do anything to another person to try to kill them in multiple ways and expect people to be healthy.  We cannot impact people’s minds and health, but we can significantly impact them throughout their lives and expect people to be healthy.  People are resilient unless they are affected over and repeatedly.

I do not want people to suffer who enjoy making people suffer without genuine holistic problem-solving methods; I want them to transition.  I can’t entirely agree with promoting ignorance.  Itinerant ignorance has been used as a tool to win over solve problems.  I believe that our Bill of Rights may have given people the right to use ignorance as a tool to war against another person.  Itinerant ignorance is being promulgated so those with itinerant motivations can profit.  We choose to fund reactionary violence instead of education, learning, exploring, and living are the most prominent examples.  I want to transition our world from a reactionary, violent world to a harmonious, peaceful, loving, and holistic world that is more about ecogeorational and ecogeorelative planning so that downward spirals never have a chance to begin again.