Each time violence happens, we must use violence as an indicator and training site.  We must thoroughly research everything in the place and person’s life to determine possible associative characteristics and possible causal contributors to the associative characteristics and contributing characteristics.  First, we look at everything in an ecogeorelative way.  Second, from characteristics and indicators, we can look for these indicators and characteristics in certain areas to determine if there is a higher chance of finding such potential violence-creating terrain.  The null hypothesis may be the strongest indicator of all.  A significant amount of necessary resources should be devoted to helping people eliminate violence potential.  This is because the survival zone pressures and cumulative significant impact associated with these lives sometimes contribute to a higher probability of more violence.  It is necessary to do all that is needed to “tear down those walls” of all kinds that hinder progress toward ending all violence.  The first step is to let people know it is not about getting people in trouble anymore.  It is about each person getting the help they need.  This way, they will open up to healthcare people and researchers so we can define problems appropriately and contribute to rational problem-solving or knowledge creation to create advice.  This is the best option rather than contribute to more violence, as is done today in our current practices, processes, methods, techniques, and systems.  We decrease the likelihood of more once we remove the contributory expansion of violence.  When problems related to violence decrease, societal and community impacts will decrease as well; this will lessen other contributory impacts on people that bioaccumulate in people that cause more propensity toward more violence.  Essentially, this method approaches the problem in an integrated ecogeosystematic way and an ecosystem approach from webs and chains in every direction.  It looks at the entire integrated functioning and attempts to mitigate each potential contributor to violence and the sources.  On a broader level, the sources may be another rational problem-solving process that can be solved similarly but from a more macro perspective.

I hypothesize that it has something to do with the entirety of everything and how we function on planet Earth in this reactive, ultra-competitive perception/reality world we live in.  The contributory behaviors may be related to profiteering at any cost, powerteering at any price, and charioteering at any cost.  All of these behaviors integrated with the traditional system functioning and processes, which are really all functioning out of context with everything else, are contributing to an overly complex perception system that does not add as much potential value, energy, and benefits as a well-planned integrated way of doing things would.  I have wondered in the past whether it is interspecific competition and intraspecific competition at the same time.  Is it the same ecogeosystematic approach to solve this problem?  If so, it helps with the proposal to minimize complex borders and boundaries of confusion, transference, and compulsions toward violence.  This, coupled with leveling the playing field, uses sources and sinks holistic energy transference to get everyone up to comfort, joy, love, hope, and sustainable striving happiness.  It beats the reactively violent detrimental energy transference and processes that have dominated our world since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution and before.