I have been interested in population stability regarding a well-balanced holistic approach that considers the needs and health of everyone and our natural environment.  On a broader level, I had thought it would be a great way to assess and understand population by areas on Earth with discerning differences relative to the characteristics of the environment and the health of the people and their cumulative totality.  One way is to assess an area with high population growth and find another similar area with similar characteristics using a relatively weighted similarity index.  Then, try to determine the difference between the two areas so that you can identify prescriptive advice to either suggest incentives to people in the area to disperse to a more sustainable striving area or give incentives to consider having fewer children.  I have even explored an option of relatively significant incentives for those that choose one child or none in exchange for higher relative freedom incentives like important explorational and experiential roles on Earth being a roving “parent” of planet Earth, Nature, and humanity that helps look after people and kids as well as our natural environment by contributing to and organizing “mountaineering” events, working together with nature, working together with oceans and ocean life, working together with humanity, or higher and accelerated milestone as an Environmental Justice, Health, and Safety as well as holistic mission role.  Essentially, they will be viewed as “parents” of Earth at another broader level at different ecogeosystematic resolutions, dynamic variable spatial areas, and temporal epochs based on relative need.  It could also be in one area where you choose to live your life.  I suspect most will determine a comparable percentage of both scenarios close to how they want to schedule their selected life experiences and how they want to live their lives.
Their high relative freedom life will be scheduled and planned spatially and temporally in an ecogeosystematic way with higher relative importance and higher relative significance areas or sites being more desirable choices because of a higher chance of getting much higher HVCI (High-Value Contribution Index) or EEC (Ecological Equilibrium Compensation).  Likewise, desired potential experiences may involve a place incentive.  Planning to go to a place that satisfies their interests or needs may outweigh more desirable HVCI or EEC accumulation.  The high relative freedom associated with this life is a tremendous incentive as scheduling events, duration, location, and planning are entirely up to them.  This contributes to solving exponential population growth extremes while at the same time allocating energy towards our existing population in need, our natural environment in need, our kids in need, holistic health, our people in need, our oceans in need, and anything else of higher relative importance and significance.  Any mountaineering event, project, mission, and other planned event is available to anyone in this program as they get first choice over others unless specific expertise is needed, like particular milestone Aspiring Doctors (AKA Nurses), etc.  It also gives a tremendously rewarding and contributing life experience to people who choose not to have children and to accept Earth, humanity, nature, people, and kids as a parental role.

If people want to have kids, they should.  There should be more inspired times to have kids in life as it is a relative concept with unique circumstances that may adaptively change soon as we prioritize higher relative importance and temporal prescriptive advice for a person’s health throughout life.  The prescriptive advice must consider the whole person for the longevity of a lifetime such that all of their cumulative health and life experience is assumed.  Each epoch contributes relatively to the overall cumulative totality of life itself; thus, holistic prescriptive advice that considers this resolution is highly beneficial from the entire life perspective.  In contrast, if people cannot have children, they should have the potential and inspired relative freedom to be a “parent” at the broader level and incentives that accompany their sacrifice and contributions.