Interestingly, some insurance companies are not paying for holistic health. It seems like such ignorance. I have an idea about having a holistic compensation approach called Ecological Equilibrium Compensation, which takes more of a big-picture systematic approach to understanding how we can have people living in a world recognizing that everything is connected to everything else. Essentially, it takes from more destructive functioning where detrimental ESH ecological impact assessment index values are high, where there is excess energy source from high charges, and allocates to the more holistic alternatives elsewhere where there is an energy sink. These holistic health alternatives are energy sinks that contribute to enormous potential to help significantly with cumulative human health throughout someone’s life. I believe it is like a cycle that states that cumulative human health is a vital component of the health of nature (stability), ecosystem health, and humanity health, which are also related or vice versa. (See figure 1.)
I find an interesting relationship or complex functioning regarding business and industry. Some licit and illicit parallel functioning organizations might be connected to more prominent organizations that always seem “perfect” as they rarely admit to doing anything wrong. Some exciting considerations should be areas that change a lot and organizations that do not. Likewise, organizations that change a lot or are resistant to change are complacent. Some organizations care more about money and investing than their primary reason for functioning. This should be more holistically researched for other traditional money-making investment schemes, both illicit and illicit, with direct or indirect connectivity to other connected or parallel functions. Investment and “children” organizations or “children” industries should be researched holistically. It seems as if, once again, business and industry have been in control again as they seem to align themselves closer to traditional money. For some reason*, they have built a fortress around the inner sanctum and act as proximity to funds and control matters more than any other consideration of much higher priority. Some of the problems come from the fact that money itself is not in context with anything else and thus is not normalized. This creates a situation where we have no idea what action helps human or ecosystem health or cumulative ecogeosystematics. Suppose a business and industry is functioning with traditional money-based assets and liabilities accounting. In that case, it is not an adequate representation of the cumulative cost or cumulative impact of any transaction in context. Likewise, three people can make $30,000 from selling a $300,000 house in one transaction that took three weeks. A teacher can make $30,000 in one year and be responsible for 15 kids’ educational enlightenment, helping them learn, inspiring them to learn, encouraging them to want to know, and their care every day. A vice president or CEO can make this amount in one month. In each one of the situations, I believe the most positive value, benefits, and energy goes to the kids while the teacher receives significantly less relative compensation for contributing a vastly more positive impact on each of those kids, their future, our future generations, their health, their comfort, and their future inspirational learning, more than each of the other combined. It is a weird system and is often backward. I hope to contribute towards a genuinely holistic and sustainable striving way of functioning in the future. Until then, I suggest a responsible organization of health experts, researchers, nature experts, and interdisciplinary experts must put everything in the Ecogeohealth context that is more ecogeosystematic in nature. The graphic below shows that each individual’s health affects our overall health potential. Therefore, we must put the responsibility on those responsible for higher priority concepts, as indicated above, instead of leaving them to traditional process functioning and dogmatic anthropocentric constructs that function like blame magnets like “the law.” Much of everything is at the wrong ecogeosystematic resolution of the problems in our world.

Meanwhile, people are being impacted. This plays into the above cycle. The cycle goes round and round until someone stops it. It is time to stop the cycle and plan a more holistic functioning planet Earth. Anything that impacts human health impacts others, too. The same is true for the natural environment in an opposite vice versa way. Suppose our people are polluted with pollution bio-accumulation of all types. In that case, there is a higher chance our environment will also be degraded from inadequate prioritization, opportunity cost allocation concepts, and lack of conscience because of cumulative significant impact. It continued a complacent focus on traditional functioning, often the opposite of rationality.

Cycle Health Relationships Between Individuals and Broader Contexts