I believe America should be less relatively important than the broader Earth context. This is especially true for areas that need help the most. Maybe we should share the best ideals America has to offer as everywhere else on Earth ought to share with us. There should be no us and them because we are all the same and different. We would be better off focusing on harmonizing similarities and working together on our differences that need further research. Other than that, diversity is great because if we were all the same, we would be a mono-culture, which leaves us susceptible to perturbation from oversights or the unforeseen. Unfortunately, sometimes those who speak the loudest are either those who have tried to buy or fight for freedom with just wealth when it should be earned with learning, love, living, and genuine holistic effort. I am more the type of person who would fly an Earth flag above any other (but never at the top) as it should be of higher relative contextual priority to keep striving and never say we are perfectly at the top.
Perfection at one level may be an opposite disaster at another. In the past, we have been functioning like the OK corral, where guns are always pointed in every direction when something goes wrong. Even worse, we are planning through organizational chart positions to place blame instead of holistically solving problems. In the broader context, human, societal, and environmental destruction occurs because we have conditioned ourselves to blame symptoms and signs instead of solving problems. Because there is no direct person to blame, it goes on because we have somehow not considered this cumulative destruction as a direct correlation to our functioning. It seems like this concept is the “perfection” fallacy, where many people focused so much on being “perfect” and caring about themselves and their families primarily in the former extreme competitive model that we created the opposite at another level. Breaking the news to these people must be interesting to make them realize what has been happening. It is even more interesting if some people have been extremely violent towards others, thinking they are perfect, but they were contributing to the exact opposite in significant ways. The traditional cycle approach would be to fight the enlightenment with file stacking and searching, political attacks, firing, being violent, polluting people, creating controversy with the enlightened, hiring investigators, surveillance, criminalization attempts, scandal creation, media reputation assassinations, distractions, diversions, transference across a boundary, transference across a border, creation of confusion, complexity, more process, chaos, and blaming the fact that “we cannot afford to do that right now” approach on fiscal responsibility. Fiscal responsibility is the most irrational concept because it is rarely rationally prioritized. Likewise, budgetary responsibility is based on the traditional concept of money, which has become the most irrational concept. Any anthropogenic boundary or border of any type has the potential to be a distraction, diversion, or a means of transference, which increases complexity somehow. This complexity leads to more energy allocation on complex processes and functions, which leads to less allocation for creating relative rational freedom. I believe America was loved too much in an irrational way. Why not spread the love everywhere?
We should not give up the pursuit of, in context, more rational freedom.
America was loved too much in an irrational way, which led to too much focus on the anthropogenic process of freedom instead of genuine holistic natural freedom, which should be attained with sharing, living, learning, loving, and real holistic effort. From a similarity equity perspective, let us transition to loving and liberty more rationally everywhere on Earth, including in America.
Here is an idea to consider:
