Negotiations in business take a variety of forms.  However, negotiations have a lot to do with perceptions of power.  These perceptions of power are sometimes created to force the person to negotiate with forceful ferocity or timidity, like lightheartedness.  I believe that either side of the negotiation table can make either one appear.  However, before getting to the negotiation stage, one has to set up the environment for negotiation.  The person who wants to win the most or is at a competitive advantage has probably aligned themselves with all the power, all the wealth, the prestige, and everything that gives them the appearance of having a competitive advantage.  The more lighthearted negotiator is a more real arbiter with genuine intentions to reach a fair, peaceful resolution to a problem.  You can tell which one is which often.  Often, it is the environment.  Suppose you are in a more intimidating environment, such as a high-power place like the Supreme Court, the Oval Office, or any chief executive officer’s office.  In that case, it seems like a top-down power environment.  Suppose you are in the middle of a park or natural area, listening to the birds and feeling the breeze at your back, overlooking the ocean around people enjoying life.  In that case, the environment represents a genuine holistic, sustainable striving for dynamic equilibrium with nature.  Intimidating environments, enticement places or environments, creating illusions of potential success, traditional golf course settings, or getting the upper hand represents everything in power and prestige of the “the way things are” world.  It is like the concept of leverage in simple machine physics (or maybe that is how it used to be).  In situations where negotiation is of the highest priority and the potential to transition our planet to a sustainable, striving planet Earth eventually, traditional power and control intimidators will use every tactic in the book to intimidate you into a position of subservience.  I am not ever worried about negotiations because I will be able to work together with the top of the spectrum pyramid, the presiding ecological functional planning group, HVCI (High-Value Compensation Index), RAs, Genuine Holistic, and everyone else in a relatively weighted rational decision-making and prioritization process in tandem with ecogeosystematics and ecogeorelative rationality.  I believe I have one of the best contexts as one of the least ultra-competitive people and someone who loves and cares the most about the entirety of everything in a relatively weighted and prioritized way based on a rational determination of all the integrated ecogeorationality and ecogeorelativity.  A better approach to negotiations is relative rationality and ecogeorelativity.  It involves research, assessment, prioritization, allocations of relative significance, allocations of relative importance, cumulative analysis, and public scoping to round out the edginess and infuse humanity to select preferred potential alternatives.  This produces the highest probable selection of the best alternatives.  This solution involves both intensive relative ecogeorationality and the extensive effort of public scoping of people’s high, relatively important contributions.  This gets everyone involved.  I believe this approach will be desirable to propose a rational solution to all problems and simultaneously bring us together as a cohesive human family with nature-inspired functioning.  It replaces the archaic, out-of-context, and often reactively itinerant and irrational ultra-competitive planet Earth of the past.  It replaces irrational, out-of-context negotiations until the end of the process.  It saves all people and transitions them relative to their life’s path current condition spectrum by giving them needed help in the form of inputs needed to transition to their desired future condition.  The desired future condition is in context with the broader needs of the ecogeorelativity of everything, everyone, everywhere on Earth.  It is not just the value, energy, and benefits created; the significant number of detrimental impacts and costs are mitigated holistically.  The energy formerly allocated in detrimental ways gets allocated in genuine, holistic, sustainable striving.  I believe this solution will contribute to ending all violence, all war, all preventable suffering, preventing illness, and put the highest relative weight back on people, our natural environment, and our collective humanity.  I believe I can work together with everyone, relatively speaking, and strive to solve problems in this rational, ecogeorelative way rather than a heavy-handed, itinerant political power group stacked with everything that it needs to win a war or a fight.  We must not fight.  We must solve problems in a genuinely holistic way.  We all have a tremendous capacity for love, caring, compassion, and genuine holistic behavior, but we must continuously find ways to help those who need more help.  The context, organization, prioritization, planning, and rational decision-making ought to be the responsibility of chosen people, not for their ability to control, ultra-compete, lead, judge, manage, or use power and control to dominate as a priority.  I think many of these people should be motivated to get on their trails in life for the best of intentions.  I suggest those people who are interested in educational learning and exploring are a priority.  Less weight ought to go to those emphasizing education mainly for positions of power, dominance, traditional process, ultra competition, or control as the main purpose.  Those with motivations for power, profit, heroics, or anything other than genuine holistic sustainable striving objectives, motivations, and problem-solving must have less relative weight.  Those who have nothing but genuine motivations and the highest relative importance for the totality of all our ecogeosystematic functioning, including all of the genuine holistic motivations for all our nature, including humanity and the integration thereof on Earth, must be responsible no matter what their technical skills.  I do not believe the extreme opposite, motivated ultra-competitive extremes, would be compatible with this genuine holistic group even if they have the skills.  However, they may be able to do so with more transitional educational learning and enlightenment.  However, they still can be connected and work together, contribute, and collaborate.  This is one important way people should continuously learn in a genuine, holistic, sustainable striving way.  Those who are not ultra-competitive and have genuine motivations (derived in non-ultra-competitive ways except mimicries) for the same genuine holistic, sustainable striving ideals with high technical and relevant science skills ought to work together.  I believe we ought to all be involved.  Still, it is a matter of everyone contributing to the similarity foundation (where we are all the same)  and, at the same time, where we are all different (because we all have various life experiences), educational learning enlightenment, passions, interests, and creativity in various areas.  For example, every person on Earth can contribute in some way relative to their cumulative expertise, no matter what it is and how they got it.  It is a matter of understanding a person and getting them to help with those different areas where they can help the most.  I believe it is best to have a similarity and differences perspective on the differences side.  It also helps break down ideas for improvement in specific diverse areas of interest where the similarity offers ideas from everyone in the area.  This is because even though a person may not have as much expertise in a specific area, they may develop a great idea.  It is like the factory worker or private first-class person who comes up with a great idea.  Still, because of a process, structure, ultra competition, and detrimental functioning, the idea never sees the light of day or gets taken by the itinerant.  Likewise, we ought to have a spatial component (ecogeorelativity) and similarities and differences because ecogeorelative context is the most important consideration.  It is like the accumulation of all the problems on Earth spatially in an ecogeorelative way so we can rationally prioritize them. Be aware of regions leading to cumulative totality ecogeorelative integration.  Everything considered, negotiations will be the last step to get a gut feeling on accomplishing prioritization needs.