I have a question about solar panels in their existing form.  It seems that if solar panels continue to gain popularity, it would significantly increase the albedo effect and the loss of snow and ice worldwide as more black absorbing albedo effect increases.  We seem to have already created blacktop and black roofs worldwide.  However, it may be a relative benefit to having solar panels because of less pollution from power generation in traditional fossil fuel consumption.  Maybe we must assess, problem-solve, and plan a more well-planned perspective.  Maybe it is about assessing trade-offs relatively.  It seems we ecogeorationalize a prioritization plan to incentivize solar panels more in certain areas and less in others.  We could make solar panels with less albedo effect and simultaneously strive to eliminate fossil fuel combustion.  Energy generation and conservation ought to be an integrative concept.  They ought to be related to the area’s characteristics, suitability, and potential while at the same time trying to reduce pollution in all forms as much as possible.  Maybe if we were more thoughtful about energy, we would reduce our consumption.  Imagine if we all worked with the Eco-Geo We-Me integrated device and brainstormed with everyone who wanted to contribute.  However, once we have everyone’s ideas, I can imagine a world where energy production is more of an integrative concept using as many ideas as possible.  We could generate energy while we have locomotion and trains.  It is just like the car concept.  We should be able to generate power while a train moves across the terrain with natural momentum.  We could have wave generation where it makes sense, the wind where it makes sense, and solar where it makes sense.  Maybe biomass where it makes sense and trains wherever possible.  It ought to be planned out in an ecogeorational way.  No other way is close to a rational or a real solution.  We could devote everybody to solving this problem; it would only be part of the overall effort to solve the problem.  I see contributions from everyone as a public scoping or contribution to problem-solving inclusion ideas.  However, most problem-solving will be accomplished in this integrative, all-inclusive way with those with more to offer regarding integrated ecogeorelative problem-solving ability.  However, some great ideas come from regular people; therefore, we must all have the opportunity to contribute.  So, it is both.  It is an evenness spatial equal opportunity to contribute because we all have the potential to come up with great ideas.  It is also the ecogeorational relative weighting regarding cumulative knowledge, expertise, and interdisciplinary way.  Many decisions are made from data; thus, the data are critical because interdisciplinary experts begin the rational decision process with data, which is often spatial.  In sum, we are all in this together, and we should be relatively incentivized and encouraged to collaborate and contribute what we can to help one another, everyone, everything, everywhere on Earth as much as we can.  It makes sense that everyone is the same, but at the same time, everybody is different.  The different part is an accumulation of characteristics that is up to each person relative to their interests, purpose, life’s path, aspirations, and who they are as individuals.  No matter what you choose for your life’s path, it is best to do what you can in terms of helping one another with the cumulativeness of who you are as an individual.  Every niche organization is made up of every role on this planet.  More weight should be put on everyone to do what they can, relative to their cumulativeness at whatever place or time you are in your life.  The rest is up to you.  Your cumulativeness should be ever increasing.  Otherwise, you are stagnant and somewhat static.  If you ever feel this way, you need help from mentors, counselors, inspirational people, education, health care, spirituality, and anyone else who will talk to you.  The ECVI Ecological Contribution Value Index inspires people to be genuinely holistic and sustainable, striving while we live on planet Earth.  Some people can help more or some less, but differently.  The ECVI is an ecogeorational way to look at a more important indicator because we should focus on EVCI instead of just how much money, power, or coolness a person has.  The EEC (Ecological Equilibrium Compensation) incentive is about striving for equality in terms of a dynamic equilibrium and homeostasis survivability for everyone, everything, everywhere.  The amount of EEC depends on how much you help with everyone, everything, everywhere.  The ECVI and EVPI (Ecological Values Potential Index) are about your potential and roles and your various sustainable striving behaviors in context with your chosen roles, regardless of whether they are genuine holistic public, genuine holistic private, or genuine holistic research knowledge.  However, it is more rational to have EVCI be an inspirational incentive for everyone so that everyone strives to do what they can relative to their interests and life’s path if it is in context with the bigger picture.  We should have several conferences on the EEC, EVPI, and EVCI.  Here are some ideas on EEC.  EEC should be related to the amount one helps (or it could be an ENO) with the public good.  It should relate to involvement in planned research and public scoping efforts.  It should relate to the energy, value, benefit, or help you do on the ground to help.  I imagine several roles or opportunities to help will be available on a point-based, ever-changing opportunity to help map (Part of the ecogeo scheduler).  Any of these public benefiting roles will contribute to one’s EEC.  Likewise, EVCI will be the cumulative totality you have to offer in several areas relative to your role in context with your environment and humanity.  These can be chosen, combined, or integrated in any way.  The closer you function to a sustainable striving nature, the closer you are to genuine holistic striving, your experience and education, continuous learning, creativity; role contribution, role collaboration, your knowledge/knowledge contribution index, holistic in context sustainable striving technology contribution, sustainable string investment index, closer to education/mentoring, ENOs EVCI, ideas you contribute, the index of EEC public good you contribute, genuine kindness, holistic problem solving, and prevention ability.  Furthermore, there is a Wow index to inspire people that add integrative beauty or creativity to the world, a difficult role or organization index, your sustainable striving investment index (products you buy index and organizations you invest in index), travel cost index relative to cumulative benefit including your fossil fuel consumption/pollution index related to cumulative benefit.  All you need to do is turn the potential into a holistic positive energy contribution.

As far as solar panels are concerned, it would be best to lessen the albedo effect, and one way to do this may be to use the color of sand ( I found this in the Sahara desert), as it is more of a natural color for solar panels.  Having more sand-colored roofs and limestone or gravel roads would make sense.