Please do not call me, sir. I know “Sir” is often meant as a sign of respect, so often, it is well-intentioned. Sir is also used when someone has the authority or power to kick you to the curb, fire you, give you a ticket, or arrest you. In many ways, using the word sir at times is a sign of being in a position of vulnerability such that if there is an occasion to use the word sir to protect yourself from being fired, getting the raise, getting a promotion, and showing your relentless devotion to your superior who controls your life with a paycheck or potential reference. Often, I believe respect should go in every direction all the time because we ought to think of an individual as knowing most about those things that each person knows about, and each person is a total of the cumulative totality of their entire life experience and education and their everything. What we have been doing for the longest time is pretending that some people are better than others because of their leadership position status rather than their cumulative leadership qualities and characteristics. We are all potential leaders. However, many in leadership positions who are more concerned with how great they are or the position they have missed out on the opportunity to truly lead by example by being inclusive and accepting by inspiring each individual to live, learn, and love by contributing what they can to help one another and help the bigger pictures at the same time. Maybe we ought to have a few upside-down sir days where we do nothing but turn around the sir in the opposite direction. You will find a need not to have to say sir at all as mutual respect for each individual takes over. It elevates each individual and gives one another confidence, self-esteem, and well-intentioned positive energy rather than destructive. I suppose calling a mentor sir would be well deserved, but the mentors I know may like to be known by their first names, and respect is implied and assumed. Let’s call one another by our first names. It is a way of respecting one another and one’s individuality and, at the same time, recognizing one for what each person has to offer, their efforts, and their life’s totality. Getting scientific, maybe we should have a sir index of those we should call sir more than others. But I suggest that “sir” is overused and may give someone the idea that they are omnipotent and perfect in an imperfect, struggling, and suffering world. Anyone who believes they are perfect is mistaken, as it is much more of a continuous concept than many concepts in nature. Maybe sir should be a continuous index concept; they consider concepts like the totality of contributions, effort, sustainable striving potential, value, benefits, energy contributions, problem-solving contributions, love, care, compassion, leader qualities, and the acceptance of the fact that no one is perfect but ought to strive to do the best you can with what you have. Maybe we ought to holistically respect individuals in the future to have an index like the EVCI I mentioned previously. This index would consider a variety of characteristics. We ought to have a conference or public scoping research study to develop a more ecogeorelativity rationalization of respect. Some ideas are as follows: genuine holistic functioning, sustainable striving behavior, contributions, collaborations, creativity, sustainable striving innovation, environmentalist index, mentor index, hard work in context contributions, helping people index, public good contribution index, love and care index, compassion for others index, genuine holistic ideas index, holistic knowledge, education and experience, how far along your holistic trail index, ENO index, ENR index, EEC contribution index, foundational preparation index, genuineness index, mimicry and cryptic coloration index for beneficial contribution to individuals and society reasons, inclusion index, leader index, close to nature index, member of sustainable striving community index, sustainable striving investment performance index, cumulative totality life index, and anything else anyone else can contribute. Next, maybe we ought to have some sort of prioritization and applicability relative to the indices you believe you have contributed the most because it is tough to have high index ratings in each of the contributing indices. Likewise, each contributing index may have a different relative weight towards the overall cumulative relative importance rating, as each indicator has a relative contributing influence and relative importance. Maybe you can choose ones with more weight because they contribute more to the overall sustainable striving and genuine holistic striving desired future condition. The desired future condition is a contextual context that considers the ecogeorelative rationalization prioritization of our planet, which includes everything down to the individual and the children and potential future generations. The desired future condition is also how you fit into the big picture once you go through the spectrum transference approach. This approach is about self-assessing yourself and figuring out your desired future condition. Then, it is a process of infusing the needed love and care, help resources, ENO ENR association matching opportunities, mentoring, education, health care, counseling, foundation nature and love courses, connectivity, inclusion, and integration in the spectrum triangle to help you transition. In the future, it is up to the person how they weigh themselves and which categories they choose to allocate the most energy. Being a great parent could put you at the top of your desired future condition. World without end…