Donald Trump himself is part of a billionaire’s club that is a significant part of the world economy. I’m not sure if he knows it or not, but many of the idea billionaires have come from someone else. I call it the takings extraction exchange exclusion cycle, where an idea is taken and given to another, and then the original creator is turned into a subservient. Now, I believe that artificial intelligence is being used to take, extract, exchange, and exclude other people, as technology seems to be propelling itself beyond humanity. Without a doubt, artificial intelligence can read much faster than a human can, allowing it to quickly summarize much of what a human provides. Another theory is that Trump is being used by the globalist, controlling, dominating economy, in which these billionaires are concerned. A while ago, when he was getting his casino license in Atlantic City approved, he had to go through an extensive six-month background investigation, and apparently, he came out squeaky clean. I hypothesize that this might be his utility for the globalization, controlling domination, and the billionaire’s economy. Do they need a squeaky-clean president to do their dirty work for them? Is Trump protecting billionaire takers from getting figured out? Is Trump himself a taker? Does he give credit to those whom he has taken from? Regardless, whether my hypothesis is shown to be true or not, it appears as if the totality of all the taking ideas is worth more than $1 trillion and is infinite in some situations. This would be enough to compel all the billionaires and those who control the controlling domination economy to get behind Donald Trump because Donald Trump is on their side. Some of the billionaires I refer to include Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, Tim Cook, Jeff Bezos, Joe Gebbia, and others.
Donald Trump has taken over the government by weaponizing the various agencies to distract and divert the rest of us from real substantive problems. When I was learning about justice and law a long time ago, my first professor said, “Crime pays,” which I found quite astonishing. It’s really true. That’s why we have so much crime in our world, because it pays. Who is paying Donald Trump? Well, it appears that the people paid Donald Trump when he owned his casinos in Atlantic City in the 80s and 90s. Maybe that’s another characteristic that billionaires like about Donald Trump: he derives his money from people, real estate investments, being a real estate mogul, golf courses, and development. He is likely a significant investor in the stock market as well. Therefore, he has seen himself as an advocate for the way things are in the world (current condition). Consequently, he seems to be functioning in a way that preserves the billionaire’s controlling domination of the global economy, meaning he is overtopping creators and creative ideas. Consequently, I feel like it is strange that the loyalties of Donald Trump are with the corporate billionaires and not with the people. In many ways, I believe Donald Trump taught people to buy and sell real estate by buying low and selling high, turning our economy into a real estate economy. However, many people are suffering in this world and can’t afford to buy homes because of too much of this type of behavior. Regardless of whether this hypothesis proves to be true or not, it appears as if Donald Trump buddies up to people like Putin. From what I can summarize, Putin belongs in the hospital for doing what he did to Ukraine and a wide variety of other things. Does Donald Trump belong in the hospital as well? Either way, Putin and Trump seem not to value human life very much, nor the people’s contributions of ideas and creativity towards a brighter, more desirable future.
The current global economic landscape reveals a profound concentration of wealth and influence among a select few. This phenomenon frequently gives rise to a dynamic I term the “value extraction cycle,” where original contributions, whether intellectual or creative, are systematically absorbed and repurposed by dominant entities. In this process, the originators often find their innovations appropriated, reducing them to subordinate positions within the very systems they helped to build or created. We are observing this acceleration with the advent of artificial intelligence, which possesses an unparalleled capacity to analyze and synthesize information at speeds far beyond human capability, potentially amplifying this extraction of value from human endeavor.
Consider the trajectory of figures like Donald Trump, whose personal and professional history is deeply interwoven with this elite financial stratum. It’s often posited that individuals from this powerful cohort, while appearing self-made, frequently operate within a larger, interconnected framework of global economic dominance. A notable example is the extensive six-month background investigation he underwent for a casino license in Atlantic City, from which he reportedly emerged without blemish. This raises a compelling question: could such an unimpeachable public facade serve a strategic purpose for a broader network of powerful interests? Does it enable certain individuals to act as conduits or instruments for an overarching “controlling domination economy,” effectively executing agendas that might otherwise lack public legitimacy?
My hypothesis is that such a figure might serve as a strategic asset for this globalized economic power structure. The collective value derived from these extracted ideas and appropriated innovations is immense, conservatively estimated in the trillions of dollars and arguably infinite in its potential. This vast pool of value creates a powerful incentive for the world’s most influential billionaires and economic controllers to coalesce behind a leader who champions their interests. Indeed, observations suggest a pattern where political power is leveraged, and governmental agencies are strategically directed, potentially to divert public attention from substantive issues that challenge the existing power dynamics.
The notion that “crime pays,” a stark lesson imparted by my early legal education, resonates deeply in this context. It prompts us to consider who ultimately benefits from the prevailing economic and political arrangements. Donald Trump’s business legacy, built on real estate, casinos, golf course development, and substantial market investments, positions him as a vocal proponent for the status quo – an advocate for the very system that has enriched him. His perceived alignment with corporate billionaires rather than the broader populace becomes a point of considerable concern. While his success in real estate might have popularized strategies like buying low and selling high, inadvertently shaping our economy, it has also contributed to a climate where homeownership is increasingly unattainable for many.
Furthermore, his apparent affinity for leaders like Vladimir Putin, whose actions in Ukraine are globally condemned as profoundly destabilizing, adds another layer to this intricate web of global power. It compels us to reflect on the deeper implications of such alliances and the true beneficiaries of contemporary political leadership. The cumulative effect of these actions and affiliations suggests a system that prioritizes the interests of a select few, potentially at the expense of equitable societal progress and the well-being of the global community.
Richard Thomas Simmons