Sometimes my life feels like a roller coaster ride with ebbs and flows and natural ups and downs. Well, I’m not sure how natural it is, but I’m trying to express how I feel.   Do we all experience natural highs and lows in our lives as a natural cycle, or is it an anthropogenic, anthropocentric concept?   I noticed this phenomenon because some people get caught on the roller coaster and spend a lot of time in the troughs, wasting valuable energy for our planet and people.   We need to find a way to get people out of slumps more quickly, rather than into a long-term Depression era.   What if we could use ecological equilibrium compensation as inputs into a person‘s life to get them out of their slump and into holistic contribution mode?   Imagine all the people this would help. If we did this, we could begin to think about the best ways to address these economies and how to solve them in a cumulative, holistic way.   We need to solve all these major problems because I perceive the economy as being the most significant problem on earth. After all, it contributes to all the so-called externalities, suffering, preventable suffering, gun violence, mass shootings, nuclear proliferation, complexity, conflict, controversy, excessive laws, excessive rules, excessive regulations, excessive borders and boundaries, excessive pollution of all types, crime, killings of all sorts, and people in a slump or depression.    It seems like the ebbs and flows of a natural cycle are natural ups and downs, but it also seems like a stock-market-type phenomenon for investment purposes. Therefore, we need to be aware of whether these cycles are anthropogenic or anthropocentric. Maybe they are meant to serve as an economic investment we don’t know about.

My reflection on the human experience often brings me to the inherent undulations of life – the periods of ascent and descent, the highs and lows that can feel profoundly impactful, almost like navigating a complex personal landscape. It prompts a deeper question: are these fluctuations purely organic, an immutable part of our natural existence, or are they, at least in part, exacerbated or even shaped by the human-centric systems and constructs we ourselves have created?

I’ve observed with growing concern how many individuals become profoundly mired in these downturns, experiencing prolonged periods of emotional and psychological difficulty. This isn’t merely a personal struggle; it represents a vast, collective squandering of human potential and vitality. Imagine the immense energy and creativity lost when people are caught in persistent slumps, unable to contribute their unique gifts to our shared world. We must urgently seek methods to facilitate a swifter, more effective recovery from these challenging states, preventing them from solidifying into long-term conditions like chronic depression periods.

What if we could implement comprehensive, ecologically-inspired support systems – “restorative interventions” if you will – designed to rebalance individuals’ lives? The aim would be to guide them out of stagnation and into a mode of holistic contribution, where their well-being is intrinsically linked to their meaningful engagement with society. The cumulative impact of such an approach would be transformative, unlocking countless potentials currently dormant.

By fostering individual resilience and purpose, we could collectively begin to address some of humanity’s most foundational ecological and economic challenges. I posit that our prevailing economic paradigms often act as primary catalysts for a vast array of global issues. They fuel the externalities that lead to widespread suffering, preventable tragedies, escalating violence, environmental degradation, geopolitical instability, excessive regulation, and pervasive crime. Indeed, many of the conflicts and complexities we face seem to emanate from the very structure and priorities of our current global economy.

Therefore, it becomes imperative to critically examine these cycles of societal and individual well-being. Are they truly natural phenomena, or are they perhaps intricately linked to, or even driven by, underlying economic dynamics we have yet to fully understand? Could these very fluctuations, seemingly random, serve an unrecognized purpose within a larger, perhaps unintended, economic framework? Understanding these profound interconnections is crucial if we are to forge a path toward a more equitable, sustainable, and flourishing future for all. Ecological equilibrium compensation is needed for people to keep them contributing what they are meant to contribute or their desired purpose