Richard Thomas Simmons
12/3/2022
Was the Biblical concept of justice supposed to stand for social or environmental justice but was misinterpreted over the years to mean reactionary justice? * This makes more sense to me based on the cumulative totality of the divine life, the teachings, and the experience of Jesus. Furthermore, God and the divine should be about a more holistic preventative approach. If we change our perspectives on Earth to be more about the similarity of conditions in an Earth scale similarity foundation, it will seem closer to God and the divine. For example, if we have loving, caring, sharing, giving, forgiving, and genuine kindness striving, we bring inspirational incentive conditions of comfort, joy, love, hope, and sustainable striving for happiness. In a more holistic approach, resources and energy from the reactionary would be allocated to survival zone needs in the similarity foundation. Currently, we are in a positive feedback loop of reactionary reductionism, which creates more and more detrimental impacts all the time as well as survival zones, so we allocate more and more energy on war, terrorism, fighting crime, and litigiousness instead of allocating energy on the people, families, communities, environmental injustice, social injustice, and the environment.
*As an alternative explanation, the concept of justice existed in ancient times and has not adapted to the times. We may be at a stage in human history where we can adapt beyond reactionary justice to holistic justice and holistic environmental and social justice.