Manufacturing conditions to put people in prison is one of the strangest concepts on Earth, especially for something that is supposed to be the most naturally healthy, miraculous, and beautiful experience on Earth. Prison is praying to the man god-king approach to living on Earth and should be eliminated. There should be nature immersion experiences until people are healthy enough to live on their own, or they should live together with people who can help them transition to a life without violence. It is especially the strangest concept on Earth to put a woman in prison as their natural condition is about love and nurturing. I think women are detrimentally impacted and anthropogenically controlled somehow when this happens. They may be suffering from addiction cycles such that they are not living in a natural, healthy condition life. It is more likely some controlling domination and anthropocentric extremism impacted them. It seems like they should only strive for natural, healthy relationships. However, sex was used in the past as a tool to start trouble with people on purpose so they could be controlled. It was used in the pollution exclusion, liberty, and extremism cycles. Violence against women or men should never happen in the first place because love and sex are some of the most beautiful and miraculous natural healthy living experiences in life. What other species on Earth has a concept of rape? Do we need to read a treatise on sex and rape from a law book before we relate to the opposite sex? Do we need to follow every step in the books? Is rape an anthropocentrically manufactured word or definition castle? Is the word rape a way to get the law, religion, management, control, process, and procedure into your bedroom, etc? Because the word exists, do we find ways to manufacture perceptions of rape for itinerant reasons? Is the word rape used to give relevancy and validity to management people or controlling domination so they can control us? Is the word rape a way to get intrusive, manufactured, reactionary investigations into our lives and our environments? Is the word rape an investment strategy for transference? Rape may be a word that suggests people cannot handle their relationships; thus, they must be managed and controlled. This condition may create a positive feedback loop, creating legal complexity, domination, and control conditions for everyone. Does his feedback loop contribute to manufacturing a reactionary adaptive planning feedback loop as well? Does this allow people to solve their problems? Is rape an investment strategy for law, legal, employment violence, liberty cycle extremism, and pollution exclusion of people? Is it meant to pray to the man god-kings? It seems like those that like the word rape are those that think about a different anthropocentric extreme cultural context altogether. Love and sex should be a natural and healthy relationship condition, not about following steps and methods in the legal process and procedure manuals. The way I understand rape is that it involves violence, like putting a knife to the throat of a person and forcing another to have sex. Violence happens to women and men because of response mechanisms or inflection points from the cumulative totality of unnatural and unhealthy manufactured conditions in society. Instead of spending trillions of dollars on the Military and bank bailouts, we should prioritize natural, healthy living. Natural, healthy living should not involve punishing people and putting people in prison for what is supposed to be one of the most naturally healthy, miraculous, and beautiful experiences on Earth. This functioning may contribute to the extreme amount of mental illness and preventable suffering on Earth as it is so ridiculously irrational and out of context with nature. Creating controversy about something that is supposed to be one of the most natural, spiritual, naturally healthy, and miraculous experiences on Earth is a really strange condition because the unhealthiness and unnatural conditions were created by too much focus on anthropocentric extremes, materialism extremes, making money extremes, reactionary reductionism, making money from money extremes, complexity, business process/procedure extremes, globalization expansionism, monoculture extremes, diversity only extremes, militarization, litigiousness, fighting, war, employment violence, environmental injustice, lack of focusing on priorities, and social injustice in the first place. Is all of this about the 200 and/or 1500-year obscure war? If we had a foundation of loving, caring, sharing, giving, forgiving, and genuine kindness striving in context with Nature striving, natural healthy living, and natural spirituality, we would eliminate killings, assassinations, pollution exclusion, war, violence, terrorism, and every other praying to the man god-king condition.
