Legal and law are reactionary or anthropocentric and are extreme functioning ways to see our world. Instead, we should focus on more holistic striving priorities that we must first pay attention to. It would be better if legal transitions into more holistic prescriptive advice functioning. It starts with everyone being considered an indicator approach to solving all the major problems on Earth. It is better to have each person contribute by self-analyzing themselves in context with their life’s proximity, control, and cumulative totality. It is similar to a paper about police and law functioning. Legal and law functions at the wrong pace, scale, and temporal resolution, which are out of context with cumulative totality reality. All people have amazing contribution potential if they focus on solving real problems instead of those manufactured by the planet Earth’s monoculture or pray to the man god-king functioning. I am optimistic and hopeful for the day when we can all live, learn, and explore harmoniously on planet Earth instead of building castles, borders, boundaries, and walls with legality. I have concluded that there are word castles, element castles, and definition castles, which seem to be an endless source of reductionism and absolutist extremism. I believe Isaiah Thomas was trying to get us to understand that concept in the early 1800s. It may have been an early indicator that legal functioning was used as a reductionism warfighting tool for planet Earth’s monoculture. Are some types of legal functioning really another type of multi-level manufactured employment violence or war-fighting tool? What was Litchfield Law School really about?
