Money is not defined in a rational way in our society thus it is what it becomes. What it should be is another story in my opinion. I believe that because we do not have an understanding or a systematic definition for money we are constantly dealing with out of context problems created by its allocation because it was not defined in the first place. In a nature context, money to me could be like a nutrient or like energy from the sun. However, our solely anthropocentric perspective seems to create whatever it can from what we traditionally know as money without consideration of growing things like nature does. In nature, everything works together with everything else and tends to minimize energy expenditures while growing something. We have a choice. We can grow beneficial things or we can grow things that kill, hurt, destroy people, societies, life support systems, our natural environment or Earth itself. Wouldn’t it be great if we begun to prioritize functioning that produces as much ecological value, energy, and benefits as possible in a cumulative sense when it comes to choosing allocation towards growing something. If we grow too many predatory individuals and organizations that function in ways that detrimentally impact relatively significant keystone species or any other part of our dynamically functioning ecosystems or world in a significantly impacting way, we contribute toward destroying natures balance and increasing the risk that doomsday will arrive on this planet earlier than it would have if we been more harmonious, loving and caring toward everything and everyone. I believe it is time to define money in a more rational science oriented way that takes into consideration ecological benefits, energy and value produced as well as ecological relative equilibrium compensatory mechanisms for the detrimental impacts that are sometimes inevitable as we continue to adapt and incorporate human wants and needs. Therefore, I believe we should propose and define something that functions like what we used to know as money but in a more mature rational way. Let us call it something like the sun, soil, nutrients, or energy. Should it be called something like “Sunergy” units or something like that. Whatever we want to call it, it should be something that signifies growth of beneficial things for purposes of growing more of the same. It should be called the same thing all around the planet.